SAOIRSE32

6/3/2005

Andrew Anthony - ‘The Price of Peace’

Guardian

The price of peace

When £26.5m was stolen from the Northern Bank in Belfast just before Christmas, it proved to be no ordinary heist. The IRA were immediate suspects, and the political repercussions of the fallout have had an explosive impact on the Irish peace talks. Andrew Anthony reports on the shock waves from the most audacious bank raid in British history

Sunday March 6, 2005
The Observer

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Donegal Square (main street)

Around 8pm on 20 December last year, a young couple walking through Belfast’s Donegal Square noticed a white van parked in Wellington Street, a narrow alleyway running off the west side of the city’s central landmark. Something about the scene aroused their suspicions. Blocking the road, the van was obviously engaged in a delivery or collection. But it was the Monday before Christmas, and there wasn’t a lot of business going on at that time of the evening. The van was a distinctive box shape, unlike the standard white van renowned for its aggressive drivers. And then there were its occupants: they were wearing boiler suits, baseball caps and wigs.

The couple went in search of a police officer. Though this part of downtown Belfast is well-patrolled by the PSNI, the Northern Ireland police service, they could only find a traffic warden, who noted details and later contacted the police. A few minutes after that, a patrol car pulled up in Wellington Street, but the van was gone and all was quiet.

Donegal Square stands at the very heart of Belfast, and at the very heart of Donegal Square stands Belfast’s City Hall. A dramatic pastiche of St Paul’s Cathedral, it is an Edwardian monument to civic order, provincial pride and imperial reach, a steadfast reminder of a version of history the city’s residents have laboured both to escape and embrace.

The same neoclassical ambition is also evident in the facade of the buildings that make up the rest of the square, with the exception, that is, of a squat concrete block that fits in like a dressed-down outsider at a society wedding. Situated on the corner of Donegal Square West and Wellington Street, this is the headquarters of the Northern Bank, Northern Ireland’s foremost commercial bank.

Built in the late Seventies, when the Troubles were at their most incendiary, it casts more than a nod to the brutalist school of architecture. With its narrow windows, reminiscent of a castle keep’s, and thick, forbidding walls, the Northern Bank head office was designed to withstand the wear and tear of modern urban life. It was designed, that is, to be bomb proof.

Although the building contains no bank - at least none that the public can enter - it does hold plenty of money. Hidden away in its basement is a bunker housing the cash centre that supplies Northern Bank’s 95 branches. It’s a well-chosen site. The area in and around Donegal Square is covered by a network of closed-circuit cameras. Police stand guard at City Hall, and maintain a regular presence in the nearby streets. The Northern Bank itself boasts security cameras on every wall; teams of security guards are stationed inside and out. Within the building, an elaborate system of reinforced air locks, gates and internal cameras leads to an underground corridor, either side of which are two rooms protected by steel bars, like a sheriff’s jail in a Western. This is the cash centre.

It would be hard to envisage a more impenetrable or secure setting. And with good reason. At various times, as much as £100m is stored beneath the Northern Bank’s Donegal Square offices. There may have been around that amount assembled on that Monday in December. No one seems to be sure. Whatever the sum total, there was £26.5m less at the end of that night. By then, the Northern Bank had suffered one of the biggest and most audacious robberies in living memory.

It began the previous night in a house in Poleglass, west Belfast. Chris Ward and his father were watching a Spanish football game when there was a knock at the door. Ward, a supervisor with Northern Bank, is a keen football fan and assistant treasurer of Celtic supporters’ club in Belfast, known as Erin Go Bragh (Ireland Forever). The stranger at the door told him he had come to talk about Celtic. According to Ward, there was nothing out of the ordinary about this, so he let the man in. It was when another man followed in after that Ward realised there was something wrong.

Though the two men did not produce any weapons, they quickly took charge. They explained to Ward they wanted to talk to him about his job, and that they were going to take him away for 24 hours. ‘You have a very simple choice,’ one of them said. ‘If you co-operate with us, your family will be fine. If you don’t, they’ll be dead.’ The arrangement was also reciprocal with regard to the family’s cooperation and Ward’s life. The family were held hostage by the two men for the next 24 hours.

Another gang-member escorted Ward to a car, where the driver turned and pointed a gun at his head and told him to say nothing and not to move. He was then driven to another car, in which two further men were waiting, and out of Belfast to a village called Loughinisland, where Kevin McMullan and his wife Karen live.

McMullan was the deputy manager of the Northern Bank’s cash centre. The Northern Bank’s security system required two keys to gain access to the cash centre’s vault. And the keys were held separately by two senior staff on a rota system. McMullan had one of the keys for the following day’s work, and Ward had the other. They had only been paired together that day by a late change in the rota. Wittingly or not, someone from the bank had passed vital inside information to the gang.

At McMullan’s isolated bungalow, Ward was tied up with his arms behind his back and told to stand in the corner of a darkened room. One of the standard methods of interrogation is to extend what security experts call the ’shock of capture’. The idea is to maintain the prisoner in a state of anxiety and disorientation, so that he might be more effectively controlled. After an hour and a half of staring at a wall, Ward was taken in tears into the same room as McMullan, where he learned that Karen had been removed as a hostage under the same conditions as his family. Two men had gained access to the house by posing as policemen. They told Karen that a relation had died in a car crash.

Ward and McMullan were then questioned about details of the bank’s security by two men in balaclavas, before being led to separate rooms. Ward said he’d never seen a man in a balaclava before. Neither man was able to sleep that night.

The following day Ward and McMullan were issued with mobile phones by the gang and instructed to drive to work and behave in a normal manner. At 4.45, following instructions, McMullan sent the staff home early as a pre-Christmas treat. He and Ward then filled Ward’s Celtic sports holdall with around £1m in cash. One of the mysteries of the robbery and Northern Bank’s security system is how this action was not picked up by the internal CCTV. But cameras did capture Ward leaving the building with the bag, a mundane image that is transformed into something tautly surreal by the knowledge that he is carrying a lifetime’s earnings. He delivered the bag to a bus stop round the corner from the bank, where a man in a trilby and scarf arrived and walked away with £1m.

Experts believe this was a dummy run, to check that the two men were capable of following their instructions, and to detect any unforeseen systems in Northern Bank’s security. It turned out that leaving the building with a seven-figure sum couldn’t have been easier. Now the robbery could go ahead in earnest. Back in the cash centre, Ward and McMullan loaded trays of money on to a trolley used to collect rubbish. They also put in old chairs and other detritus to make it appear more authentic.

At around 7pm, the van arrived to pick up the ‘rubbish’. The van was driven earlier that day from across the border in Louth. Its exact origins remain unclear, though police say its licence plate belongs to another vehicle. Neither is it by any means certain if this refuse collection was a regular event, or whether it required the rubbish men to present some form of ID. What is known is that the ease with which the robbers escaped with a vanful of cash encouraged them to return for another load.

An hour later, security informed McMullan and Ward that the rubbish men had returned. As instructed by phone, they had already stacked another trolley, and taken it upstairs. It is said that during this second pick-up, a security man left the building on a cigarette break, and chatted to Ward as he loaded the van with his employer’s money. The Northern Bank’s security procedures are currently undergoing a comprehensive review. As one insider said to me, ‘Operation Stable Door is a familiar phrase in Northern Ireland.’ Shortly afterwards, the young couple passed by, which led to the traffic warden’s phone call, and the arrival of a patrol car. By then the van had disappeared, and with it £26.5m in cash.

Later that night Karen McMullan, who had been kept bound and blindfold, was released in a wood outside Belfast, in such distress that she was nearly hit by a passing car. Her own car was found burnt out. She is still said to be severely traumatised by her treatment. The only hostage to have spoken about his ordeal is Chris Ward, in an interview with Kevin Magee on BBC Northern Ireland’s Spotlight. Because he is a Catholic from Poleglass, a republican stronghold, Ward has been the subject of malicious innuendo. In the minds of more sectarian observers, these unfounded rumours gained substance when Ward opted to wear a Celtic football shirt in the TV interview. The tribal folklore of Northern Ireland and Scotland sees the Glasgow football club as representatives of Catholic republicanism in opposition to Glasgow Rangers’ Protestant loyalism.

Yet the PSNI has emphasised that Ward is a victim of the crime, not a suspect, and nothing in his performance on Spotlight suggested otherwise. A short, boyish 23-year-old, with a shaved haircut and a gold earring, he looked dwarfed by his experience, as if it were too large and too lethal to squeeze into a life shaped by a steady job and a sporting obsession. He just seemed like the wrong man in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Everybody likes a good heist story, as is demonstrated by the popularity of films like Ocean’s Twelve, which opened in Belfast shortly after the Northern Bank robbery. And the Irish are no different. Within hours the joke went about that Donegall Celtic, a tiny football team in republican west Belfast, had put in a £26m bid to buy David Beckham. Mocked-up Northern Bank notes were circulated on the net with the faces of Sinn Fein’s president Gerry Adams and chief negotiator Martin McGuinness superimposed on the money. Ocean’s Twelve posters were also adapted to feature Adams and McGuinness alongside Brad Pitt and George Clooney. And in west Belfast, young lads waved their cash at police patrols. All this guerrilla artwork reflected the widespread belief that it was the IRA that had pulled off the heist. As one former IRA volunteer told me: ‘It’s the loyalists that take £26 from post offices. Somebody else does £26m.’

On the early February afternoon I visited Hugh Orde, the chief constable of the PSNI, at police headquarters in a leafy suburb of east Belfast, he was keen to dismiss the idea that what took place at the Northern Bank was in any sense a rollicking caper. He was fed up with the international fascination with the crime. ‘I went to speak in Dubai on leadership,’ he complained, ‘and all they wanted to know about was this wretched robbery.’ For the sake of accuracy, and perhaps his own professional pride, he also let me know that, when inflation was taken into account, the Northern Bank was a smaller haul than the Great Train Robbery.

With his slicked-back hair, quick wit and informal manner, Orde is a long way from the dour caricature of a Northern Ireland policeman. For a start, he’s English. Though an outsider, he’s earned a measure of respect across both nationalist and unionist communities. A veteran of the Met’s Operation Trident, he is a man who is at ease with the modern language of diversity and inclusiveness. In accordance with the Patten recommendations on policing, he’s successfully instituted a policy of 50/50 recruitment among Catholics and Protestants. And his time spent working for Sir John Stevens on the inquiry into the murder of the lawyer Pat Finucane (which highlighted collusion between the intelligence services and loyalist paramilitaries) means that he cannot be dismissed out of hand by republicans.

I asked him what kind of specialist skills were needed to execute the Northern Bank job, and he shot back: ‘The ability to terrify people. You don’t need people to break safes. They’d never have got into that bank vault without the keys in a million years. It would have blown the middle of Belfast apart. It’s the skills people have learned over the 30 years of terrorism. People forgot that there were a number of victims in this crime. It was seen as a Robin Hood crime. That needed to be dealt with.’

Orde’s answer, three weeks after the crime, was to name the Provisional IRA as the prime and only suspects in the investigation. He says this was a purely policing decision, without external or internal political influence. But it was an unprecedented step, and considering the consequences, it’s hard to think that he was not given some kind of green light by the Northern Ireland office, or even Downing Street. In any event, it would not be an overstatement to say that Orde’s announcement shifted the political landscape of Northern Ireland.

Having previously turned a blind eye to a series of IRA robberies and punishment shootings, both Tony Blair and the Taoiseach, Bertie Ahern, made known their frustrations with the republican movement. In response, the IRA withdrew its offer to decommission its weapons and issued a terse warning to the two governments of Britain and Ireland: ‘Do not underestimate the seriousness of the situation.’

It seemed incredible that just two months earlier the IRA was reported to be on the point of disbanding, a deal on decommissioning was all but concluded, and Sinn Fein was ready to share devolved power with its old enemy, Ian Paisley’s Democratic Unionist Party. One IRA source was quoted in Ireland’s Sunday Business Post: ‘I was visited [by a figure within the IRA leadership] and told that the whole movement was going to be dismantled - the structures, the lot. I was asked if there was anything I wanted, anything they could do for me. There would be just a small team left to protect the core leadership from assassination.’

Suddenly, in the wake of the robbery, the peace process was in a greater crisis than at any time since the signing of the Good Friday Agreement in 1998. If the raid on the Northern Bank was a financial success for the IRA, it had turned into a political disaster for Sinn Fein. And it would get worse. Last month, Robert McCartney, a well-known Catholic from east Belfast, was killed in a bar-room brawl. Word soon got out that IRA volunteers were involved, and that CCTV evidence had been destroyed and witnesses intimidated. After republicans took to the streets to protest against the IRA, Sinn Fein was forced to issue carefully worded statements in support of the McCartney family. With the Northern Bank, though, it continued to attack those who named the IRA without producing any evidence. But Orde was adamant he had identified the guilty party in the Northern Bank job. He told me his team of senior detectives had put together what he described as a ‘world-class’ briefing, based on intelligence and inquiries, that convinced him of the IRA’s culpability. The Independent Monitoring Commission, the peace process watchdog, agreed.

The police believed the money was driven to the Grosvenor Road neighbourhood of west Belfast, where it was transferred to another vehicle, which headed south for the border. Raids followed on addresses in north and west Belfast, including the homes of John Trainor, a former republican prisoner said to be an IRA intelligence officer, and Eddie Copeland, once described in court as a senior IRA figure, but who has no criminal convictions. Police opened wrapped Christmas presents at Copeland’s house, and took away clothing, a mobile and 16 pairs of shoes, earning Copeland the local nickname of ‘Imelda’.

But no arrests were made, and at that stage the case against the IRA, as far as it had been revealed, seemed not only speculative but purely negative. The IRA was responsible, the reasoning went, because no one else was capable. Who else, everyone asked, could drive into a republican area of Belfast and take a household hostage for 24 hours? Similarly, the fact that the thieves were meticulous in erasing forensic evidence was also seen as a hallmark of IRA robberies. The absence of fingerprints has effectively become an IRA fingerprint. And indeed the denials issued by the IRA and Adams and McGuinness were also seen by many as confirmation of IRA guilt.

To this end, Michael McDowell, the Irish minister for justice and a tenacious critic of Sinn Fein and the IRA, brought attention to a statement made by Adams after the murder of a policeman, Jerry McCabe, during a robbery in the Republic in 1996. ‘The IRA has denied any involvement and I accept that,’ said Adams at the time. ‘Crimes like this can play no part in the republican struggle, and those who are seeking to blame Sinn Fein know this.’ It was not until some time later that the IRA admitted responsibility. Sinn Fein continues to campaign for the release of McCabe’s killers.

This is the paradox which all parties linked to paramilitaries in Northern Ireland have difficulties reconciling. On the one hand they are bound to condemn crime, but on the other, they are seen to benefit from it. Since the Good Friday Agreement, there have been more than 400 armed attacks on cash-delivery vehicles alone, and most of them are thought to be the work of paramilitaries. Sinn Fein is said to be not only the wealthiest party in Ireland, but one of the best-funded in Europe. Adams insists that the money comes from America and legitimate membership activities, but, leaving the Northern Bank aside, the IRA is suspected of a spate of multimillion-pound robberies in the past year. If the money is not being spent on weapons, where is it going?

One reading of the Good Friday Agreement is that it does not cover criminal activity, like bank robberies. McDowell insists ‘the fundamental position of the Provisionals - including, of course, Sinn Fein - still remains that the lawful and legitimate power of government of the Irish people is vested in the IRA and not elsewhere’. Therefore raids on banks and superstores are not crimes because they are not carried out in legal statehoods.

North of the border, at least, it’s obvious that Sinn Fein does not fully recognise the authority of the criminal justice system. For example, it refuses to take up its two seats on the police board to which Orde must report. Its argument is that the Patten reforms have not yet been properly implemented. Alex Atwood of the SDLP, the moderate nationalist party, told me that in his opinion not only had Patten’s recommendations been put into practice, but that, ‘The republican movement had done virtually nothing to prepare its community for lawful authority.’ Yet it is Sinn Fein that has superseded the SDLP at the polls.

Orde sees it as crucial that Sinn Fein plays its part in overseeing policing. ‘I’ve always said since the day I came here, they should join the board. That’s what the law says, that’s what the structure says, that’s what the constitution says.’

I wondered if he would have minded if Sinn Fein had joined the board the day after he declared the IRA responsible for the Northern Bank robbery.

‘It’s not a matter if I care or not,’ he replied. ‘They’ve got a right to be on it. Now what would happen to the board is a matter you could speculate on; I couldn’t possibly comment. It would be interesting.’

Orde was not without sympathy for Sinn Fein’s predicament: ‘They’re in a difficult position. We didn’t need the bank robbery and I’m sure someone could argue they didn’t, if one assumes they are committed to a peaceful political solution.’

Which begs the question that has divided republican watchers. Is it possible the Sinn Fein leadership could have been left in the dark over such a politically damaging operation? British and Irish security services have long maintained that Adams and McGuinness sit on the Provisionals’ army council. Sinn Fein insists this is untrue, and Adams even goes so far as to deny that he was ever in the IRA, though there is no shortage of persuasive counter-evidence.

Orde skirted the question when I put it to him, and it’s notable Blair has avoided linking Sinn Fein to the raid. By contrast, Ahern has shown no such reticence. Much to the anger of Sinn Fein, he made public his opinion that Adams was fully aware of what was going to take place even as he sat across the table from the Irish PM during the negotiations on decommissioning. Another who puts Adams in the frame is the republican dissident Anthony McIntyre, a former member of the IRA who served 18 years in prison for killing a loyalist and is now one of Sinn Fein’s most vocal tormentors.

‘The Sinn Fein leadership effectively runs the IRA,’ he told me, ‘and given the control freakery that besets the Adams leadership and in particular Adams, there is in my view no doubt that he knew. Would the British army go to war in Iraq without Tony Blair knowing? Do the IRA do one of the biggest bank robberies in the world without the leadership of Sinn Fein knowing?’

The counter-hypothesis is that there exists a genuine tension between the Sinn Fein leadership and IRA hardliners. One republican suggested to me that unionist intransigence in the peace process had led Brian Keenan, a legendary hardman and said to be a leading member of the IRA’s ruling army council, to gain the upper hand over Adams and McGuinness. In his auto-biography, the IRA informer Sean O’Callaghan recalls hearing Keenan refer to Adams and McGuinness as ‘two fine fucking Catholic boys’, something of a put-down from a staunch Marxist like Keenan. O’Callaghan argues that while Keenan was imprisoned in the Eighties and early Nineties, his uncompromising anti-state approach had lost ground to the Catholic pair’s pragmatic nationalism. Was the Northern Bank a case of the Keenan faction reasserting itself?

Even if this were so, it’s doubtful the raid could have gone ahead without some form of sanction by, or at least the knowledge of, the Sinn Fein leadership. Another republican observer painted a scenario in which Adams reluctantly gave a go-ahead to a ‘bloodless spectacular’ as a means of avoiding a split within the IRA, or worse still, a return to war. If nothing else, that would make the robbery a unique kind of peace mission.

I took a circuitous route to Sinn Fein’s headquarters in the Falls Road in west Belfast. First I dropped into the offices of the Progressive Unionist Party in east Belfast to talk to David Ervine, the chief spokesman for the PUP, which in the way of politics in the province is linked to the UVF paramilitaries. One of Northern Ireland’s more colourful politicians, and known as ‘Shakespeare’ for his rich oratory, he served six years in prison in the Seventies on charges of possessing explosives. He professed himself mystified by the Northern Bank raid. ‘You can’t imagine that Adams would have remotely considered the consequences and thought where we are now is a good option.’

Ervine was damning of the ‘grand militarists of the republican movement’ but, in direct contrast to mainstream unionists, he argues that the IRA’s weapons are less important than their words.

‘I think unionism and the British government have always been asking the wrong questions, and when you ask the wrong questions it should be no surprise that you get the wrong answers. The question always should have been “Is the war over?” and the weapons follow logically, I believe.’

That is not Ian Paisley’s outlook. The collapse of the decommissioning deal that preceded the Northern Bank robbery occurred when Paisley demanded filmed evidence of the IRA’s weapons. In a now infamous speech in Ballymena, he called for the IRA to be ‘humiliated’. ‘They need to wear their sackcloth and ashes,’ he said, ‘not in a back room, but openly.’

Part 2

Sunday March 6, 2005
The Guardian

It has been suggested by many observers that the Northern Bank raid may have been the IRA’s response to this speech. Certainly, of the many human qualities the IRA could be accused of lacking, pride is not an obvious one. Paisley’s words hurt, as they were intended to. ‘I’ve discussed it with some republicans,’ said Ervine, ‘and they said, “It wasn’t just that I was upset about what he said in Ballymena, my mother went bonkers, too, because it wasn’t that long ago that he accused her of being a Catholic incubator for Rome.”‘ Nonetheless, Ervine was dismayed at how easily the republicans had allowed themselves to be outmanoeuvred by their old foe, so that they were now out in the cold, with a badly damaged reputation abroad, and Paisley, of all people, was in danger of assuming the mantle of a wise old man.

As I left to get a minicab from the firm up the road to Sinn Fein’s place across town, Ervine offered me a word of advice. ‘Don’t tell them you’re going there, they won’t want to take you.’ So I kept quiet and listened to my driver talk about ‘lying republican scum’. A former soldier in the UDR, in one respect at least he did not conform to the loyalist cliche: he was a Celtic supporter. He took me to the centre of town, from where I caught another taxi. The two-cab ride was a journey through Belfast’s past, present and future. In the dilapidated sectarian strongholds in the east and west, you can still see the giant murals celebrating various three-lettered paramilitaries, but they look increasingly like period pieces, not devoid of menace perhaps, yet almost stripped of relevance. In the centre, once made a ghost town by terrorism, the busy shops, bars and cafes pay testament to the city’s current confidence in itself and booming economy. And everywhere on the horizon, giant cranes map the promise of a new dynamic city.

Sinn Fein’s HQ seems to look backwards and forwards at the same time. A whole exterior wall is taken up with a mural in memory of Bobby Sands, the IRA hunger striker and Sinn Fein MP. And in the reception the anti-imperialist solidarity posters and legal-advice leaflets might put you in mind of an old-fashioned human-rights organisation if you could circumvent the IRA’s summary knee-cappings and murders - what Mo Mowlam, the former secretary of state, once referred to as ‘housekeeping’. But upstairs, the youthful party workers stationed at their computers give the impression of an operation as up to the moment and on message as that of the Millbank modernisers.

Upstairs is where I met Gerry Kelly, the Sinn Fein representative for north Belfast in the suspended assembly at Stormont. A former IRA volunteer, Kelly was part of the notorious Maze prison break-out in 1983. He shot a prison guard in the head, though it was not fatal, and escaped to live in Holland. He was later captured with an arms cache and extradited back to Britain. A tall, lean man with chiselled good looks, he conveys that air of almost austere authority that republicans seem to have made their own. Orde told me that he thought Kelly came across as cold and implacable on TV, and he was surprised to find him charming and approachable in person.

It used to be said in the Maze that Kelly was so quiet because he said what he thought, but there is no doubting his intelligence, and if anything the problem was getting him to limit his answers. He spoke in dense polemical paragraphs, full of history, nuance, get-out clauses and negation, finally arriving at the Northern Bank robbery. ‘The accusation that the IRA did this is one thing,’ he said in a voice of stifled outrage, ‘and the IRA has spoken on that. But the accusation that leading members of Sinn Fein knew about this - I mean, let’s be frank: that’s a criminal charge.’

His argument was that Orde, Blair and Ahern had all based their accusations on ‘a single funnel of information that comes from the PSNI and the intelligence agencies’. He then outlined the dubious history of Special Branch, MI5, MI6 and the disbanded RUC, many of whose officers continue to work in its replacement, the PSNI. Of course, there is compelling evidence that the British intelligence services have in the past played a sinister role in Northern Ireland, conspiring with loyalist paramilitaries. But if, for argument’s sake, the Northern Bank was British black propaganda, that doesn’t explain why the Taoiseach is convinced of the IRA’s and Sinn Fein’s guilt.

‘Bertie Ahern has created a civil war within the nationalist community,’ he said, ‘which can do absolutely nothing for the peace process.’ He rationalised Ahern’s comments as a crude attempt to combat Sinn Fein’s growing electoral presence in the Republic. ‘This is the first time in republican history we’ve had a project throughout all of Ireland,’ said Kelly. Sinn Fein has increased its share of the vote in the previous 12 elections on both sides of the border.

But even if Ahern was simply running scared, and the Irish secret services had no intelligence of their own on the Northern Bank, that still wouldn’t explain why Tony Blair, who has visited Northern Ireland 34 times in an effort to secure peace, would want his spooks to undermine the process.

‘You will notice,’ Kelly countered, ‘I haven’t accused Tony Blair of being one of the ones to put pressure on [Orde].’ So Tony Blair, universally seen to have the intelligence services in his pocket over Iraq, is powerless when it comes to Northern Ireland? He can’t even protect Orde from the so-called securicrats?

‘In fairness,’ replied Kelly, with an expression that did not quite qualify as a smile, ‘I don’t have an answer to all the questions that you’re asking.’ Anthony McIntyre almost laughed when I mentioned Kelly’s analysis. ‘The minute Sinn Fein say it’s securicrats,’ he said, ‘it’s a guilty plea.’

McIntyre fell out with Sinn Fein after leaving prison, becoming disenchanted with the lack of internal debate and what he saw as mindless deference to the leadership. He was particularly scathing about the level of honesty at the top of the republican movement.

‘People say that Adams wears a beard to stop himself from being accused of being a bare-faced liar,’ he said. He once questioned Adams at a party meeting and says he was met by an angry Orwellian chorus of ‘Gerry’s lies are true’. ‘Not literally, but their attitude was: the leadership have sat up all night thinking of lies - how dare a selfish bastard like you not believe them?’

A large mound of a man with a goatee beard and glasses, McIntyre seemed to confirm the old saw that loyalists leave prison with a tattoo, while republicans walk out with a degree. He has not only a degree in politics but also a PhD - he wrote his doctorate on the Provisional IRA. The unification of Ireland, he had concluded, ‘was not worth a single death’. Of the likelihood of unification, he said: ‘There’s as much chance as us, Northern Ireland, uniting with France. As much chance as Bradford uniting with Pakistan.’

He thought the IRA should have made a conditional surrender rather than become entangled in an endless peace process. Adams warned the two governments last month that if the IRA was targeted, the peace process could turn out to be as ‘transient’ as Blair’s premiership. ‘That was an implicit threat,’ said McIntyre. ‘But also it was a giveaway, because it showed you that from Adams’s point of view the peace process should be endless. For the rest of us it should be transient.’

‘At times,’ he continued, ‘Adams is the most popular politician in the south. Why? It’s not due to his policies, they are no different to anyone else’s down there. It’s the result of the tremendous international public profile that the leader gets. If the peace process ends, the wind in the sails goes down rapidly. So the object of unionism is to bring the process to a conclusion, and the object of republicanism is to postpone the conclusion.’

McIntyre also has an answer to the other big question about the Northern Bank robbery: what was the £26m for? Early reports claimed that the cash was earmarked for pension money for IRA volunteers, one last big job to reward the troops. Orde refused to speculate, other than to say that criminal organisations need money to run themselves. McIntyre has finessed that argument. He thinks that the money was meant for Sinn Fein’s electoral coffers, possibly for a presidential campaign in the Republic in 2007.

For all his antagonism towards Adams, McIntyre did not underestimate his ability. The Sinn Fein leader was a brilliant strategist, he said, and he was sure he would reclaim his status as international statesman. And that is what worried him. ‘My opposition to Sinn Fein is that they are totalitarian, that they would be a terrible, terrible danger if they got power. If they got power, the police would rob the banks.’

‘The largest theft of waste paper in history’ is what Hugh Orde called the Northern Bank robbery. He was referring to the historic decision of the Northern Bank to withdraw its entire currency and replace it with a new set of notes by the middle of March. In Northern Ireland there are three banks, including Northern Bank, which are licensed by the Bank of England to print money. Thus each of the major banks has its own bank notes, technically known as ‘promissory notes’ rather than legal tender. Around £4.5m of the cash stolen from Donegal Square was made up of untraceable ‘exchange notes’, money from other banks which would be simple to launder. A further £5.5m was made up of untraceable old and high-denomination Northern Bank notes, also relatively easy to disperse, though the clock was ticking on them. The other £16.5m were new notes that would be very difficult to move, especially in the limited time available.

Early on there were stories of people using £50 and £100 Northern Bank notes to pay for small car-park charges, but they were just that: stories. As the weeks went by, not a note with a serial number from the robbery cash was reported anywhere. Orde believed the withdrawal of Northern Bank notes had taken the IRA by surprise. ‘In terms of the endgame,’ he told me, ‘I think that’s one thing the gang never thought of. I didn’t think of it, one of my detectives did. It had never been tried before.’

Orde believed that the robbers would write-off the £16.5m, but that still left £10m, which is expected to be laundered abroad and in the bars, clubs, minicab offices and various other cash-intensive businesses that the IRA owns. Not a bad return, especially as according to some sources the robbers never intended to steal so much. Apparently it was sheer bad luck that the IRA found themselves with an unanticipated excess of loot, thus forcing the PSNI to voice its suspicions. The major flaw in this argument is that police estimate the crime took upwards of a year to plan, and the same republican sources claim the IRA looked at doing the job as far back as 1997. It defies belief that they failed to realise how much money was in the cash centre, let alone how much they stole.

Orde told me that he was prepared for a long investigation. There were few leads, and the police’s best hope seemed to be DNA from the septic tank at the McMullans’ home, where the kidnappers are thought to have left their human waste. But, in the middle of February, two significant developments took place. Talking on radio in Spain, Adams acknowledged that he could be wrong about the IRA, that it was possible they were responsible. He later backtracked, but he is too seasoned in the business of dissemination to make statements that could be ‘taken out of context’. Then the following day in a fishing village outside Cork, a charred bank note blew into the back garden of a sedate bungalow. The suspicious owner took it along to a nearby garda station, and shortly afterwards armed police raided a neighbour’s house, where, in keeping with the cinematic dimensions of the story, they found a middle-aged man feeding a bonfire with Northern Bank notes.

More arrests followed in Dublin and Cork, including that of former Sinn Fein councillor Tom Hanlon, who has shared public platforms with Adams and McGuinness (he was released without charge). A chef was arrested in a car with £54,000 hidden in a box of washing powder. And more than £2.5m was seized in an operation targeting the Provisional IRA’s money-laundering network, which Irish police believe extends to Bulgaria and Libya. No one would confirm in public that any of this money came from the Northern Bank robbery, but off the record some garda officers said they were confident the link could be established.

While plainly rocked by the turn of affairs, Sinn Fein kept up a disciplined front, with the leadership reminding an increasingly cynical audience that there was still no proof implicating the IRA, much less Sinn Fein. Adams spoke of a trial by media, and tore into his gloating opponents. There was no shortage of candidates to fit this bill, but he may have been thinking specifically of justice minister McDowell, who said: ‘The Provisional movement is a colossal criminal machine laundering huge sums of money. Their mask has now slipped. Their balaclavas have come off.’ Adams also began to protect himself from the smoke billowing from the raid in Cork. ‘I don’t want to be tainted with criminality,’ he told reporters. ‘I don’t want anybody near me who is involved in criminality. I will face up to these issues if and when they emerge.’

McIntyre thought the only restraining influence on the IRA was the Southern electorate. Disillusioned with the institutional corruption in the Republic, voters had been turning to Sinn Fein. Now they had glimpsed sight of the criminal network that supports the republican movement. By coincidence, last month five men were convicted in the Republic of IRA membership, after they had been found with a stun-gun, pick-axe handles, a sledgehammer, CS gas and Sinn Fein posters in a van used for Sinn Fein canvassing.

Perhaps the strangest twist in the tale was the discovery of a stash of shrink-wrapped Northern Bank notes, the only confirmed robbery money, in the Newforge Country Club in south Belfast, a leisure centre used by the PSNI. The police said it was a diversionary tactic to reroute the investigation and public attention. I’d visited Newforge a couple of weeks earlier, to attend a function hosted by Orde. Just about every senior police officer in Northern Ireland was there, and I was struck by how easy it was to slip into the event with only the most cursory flash of a press card, and how no one checked my bag. At the time, I thought this a sign of the peace process’s progress. A fortnight later, the PSNI placed all police stations on high alert after intelligence warned of a possible bomb attack.

However, not a single person I spoke to in Belfast expected hostilities to resume. Nor did anyone doubt that when the break in negotiations was over, Sinn Fein would have to be involved in any deal worth making. If the situation looks precarious at the moment, it’s worth remembering that the people here have endured far gloomier periods, as indeed has Sinn Fein.

The party’s extraordinary ability to bounce back from the ropes was illustrated by a minor footnote in this drama. The Northern Bank is owned by the National Australia Bank, or rather it was. In an unfortunate piece of timing, a longstanding deal to sell the bank to Danske Bank was finally completed just after the robbery, leaving the NAB saddled with the £26.5m loss. When the Australian TV station Channel 9 sent a film crew to Belfast, Sinn Fein decided to put up Alex Maskey, a celebrated republican, to make the necessary denials of IRA participation and Sinn Fein knowledge. Maskey, a former amateur boxer who won 75 of his 79 fights, was twice interned in the early Seventies and later survived a number of loyalist assassination attempts, including one in 1987 in which he was shot in the stomach. At the end of the report, the Australian interviewer reminded Maskey that in 1971 he was convicted of stealing money from the Waring Street branch of the Northern Bank.

A surprised Maskey said it was the mistake of a young man, which he regretted. If Sinn Fein is to prosper, and genuinely represent the aspirations of the Irish on both sides of the border, it also needs to turn its back on crime. It worked for Maskey. Three years ago he was elected Belfast’s Lord Mayor, and took charge of City Hall, the grand municipal palace opposite the bank in Donegal Square.

Jerry McCabe’s murder

Irish Independent

**archived article from 07 February 1999

The twists and turns from capital murder to manslaughter


Det Garda Jerry McCabe

The trial of four men accused of the murder of Det Garda Jerry McCabe was dominated by controversy, writes Sinead Grennan

FOUR men appeared before the Central Criminal Court on January 12 charged with the capital murder of Detective Garda Jerry McCabe. Their apparent disdain for the proceedings was to be remarked on throughout the trial. It grated against the anger emanating from the ranks of gardai and the silent grief of Det McCabe’s widow.

On day one of a trial that was expected to run for months, Edward Comyn SC, prosecuting counsel, laid the State’s case before the court. Det Garda Jerry McCabe and Det Garda Ben O’Sullivan were escorting a postal van on a round of deliveries in County Limerick on June 7, 1996. The van contained £81,000 in cash when it stopped outside the Adare Post Office at 6.50am. As part of a well-planned robbery, a Pajero jeep rammed the garda car from behind. Two men in balaclavas approached the driver’s window and fired shots into the car, killing Det McCabe and critically wounding Det O’Sullivan.

Pearse McCauley (34), Michael O’Neill (46), Kevin Walsh (42) and Jeremiah Sheehy (36) were charged with capital murder, attempted murder and other charges relating to robbery and possession of firearms. They pleaded not guilty on all counts. A fifth man, John Quinn (30), was charged with conspiring to commit a robbery. He also pleaded not guilty.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
‘Castlerea 5′ - click for larger view

On day two of the trial, Det O’Sullivan recounted to the court the events of that dreadful day when his partner and friend was shot dead without warning. He described the silence between the rounds of automatic fire, the impact of the shots, his awareness that Jerry was “in great difficulty'’ and the chaos that ensued. “When the shooting ceased, I heard shouting,'’ he said. “But I had no idea what was being said. I called Jerry three or four times. I said `Jerry, Jerry, Jerry’. There was no response. I then put my small finger on my left hand onto his wrist. There was no pulse.'’

Det Garda Ben O’Sullivan’s testimony won’t easily be forgotten. Even those who heard it secondhand felt its raw emotion. The images he created were too stark, too real.

More evidence was presented over the following days. A pathologist explained that Det Garda McCabe would have died quickly, killed by a fatal bullet in the back which collapsed both his lungs and severed his spinal column. A ballistics expert described the types of bullets and guns used and a detective produced a Kalashnikov in court for further explanation. The court heard how garda fingerprint specialists were unable to identify the defendants’ fingerprints on the two cars used in the raid, despite an exhaustive examination.

The second week of the trial was dominated by controversy over garda statements and uncooperative witnesses. Patrick and Sally Walsh, the father and sister of one of the accused, were declared hostile witnesses after repeatedly telling the court they couldn’t remember the events of June 6, the night before the attempted robbery. They said they couldn’t recall making statements to the gardai and Sally Walsh claimed she had been threatened by gardai.

Patrick Harty (52), an unmarried County Tipperary farmer, was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment for contempt of court when he refused to give evidence. He couldn’t give any reason for his actions.

Then there was the `trial within a trial’ to decide on the admissibility of a garda compilation video of Republican commemorations which had been shown to two witnesses. The witnesses identified two of the accused in the video. The court ruled the video evidence admissible, but one of the witnesses went on to say he had been threatened before the trial. He refused to name the source of the threat.

The State’s case was weakened further by legal arguments over the admissibility of verbal admissions made to gardai by one of the accused, John Quinn. During the seven weeks spent in custody, John Quinn was brought to the casualty unit of Limerick Hospital three times. Hospital doctors were called before the court and said there was no evidence of injuries. A garda inspector told how the prisoner pretended to faint in order to frustrate interrogating officers. Gardai denied that Mr Quinn had been mistreated while in custody.

The most surprising twist came last week when the State changed its charge to manslaughter. Prosecuting Counsel Edward Comyn explained to the court that the State couldn’t establish intent to cause murder. Then events moved very quickly. The defendants pleaded guilty to the new charge and the three judges passed sentence on Friday morning.

Click for Coiste’s web page on the Castlerea prisoners.

McCabe killers

BreakingNews.ie

SF Ard Fheis demands release of McCabe killers

06/03/2005 - 16:46:23

The Sinn Féin Ard Fheis in Dublin has passed a resolution demanding the immediate release of the killers of Garda Jerry McCabe.

The party maintains that they are qualifying prisoners under the Good Friday Agreement and that this had been upheld by the High Court.

The conference finished with a call to delegates to work for an increased electoral mandate to answer the party’s many critics.

Belfast security gates

Sunday Life

Locks of ages!

By Sunday Life Reporter
06 March 2005

Belfast’s longest-standing security gates could soon be consigned to history.

For campaigners believe it is only a matter of time before Belfast’s Lower Chichester Street - adjacent to the Royal Courts of Justice - is re-opened to traffic.


Royal Courts of Justice postcard

Their optimism follows a series of high-level meetings, involving city councillors, police and the Lord Chief Justice, Sir Brian Kerr.

The security gates - and the more recently added cast-iron sentry posts - have been in place in one form or another for more than 25 years.

But, the build-up of traffic in surrounding areas, has led to huge snarl-ups at peak periods.

And, with millions of pounds being poured into city-centre development, campaigners - including the Waterfront Hall board and Laganside Corporation - believe it is time the issue was resolved.

Sunday Life can reveal that broad agreement has been reached on a proposal to open the street to buses and the emergency services, for limited hours, on a six-month trial basis.

After that, the position will be reviewed - taking into account any security implications.

One Belfast councillor said yesterday: “It is a major step forward - and one that should be welcomed by everyone. I hope we can see this introduced fairly quickly.”

The Royal Courts of Justice have long been a target for terrorists.

In 1989, the High Court was devastated by a 1,000lb IRA proxy bomb, which caused damage costing more £1m.

Terrorists have launched rocket attacks on the building, and gunmen and blast-bombers have targeted members of the security forces manning the barriers.

Security forces have also intercepted a number of bombs, as they were being driven to locations, near the courts complex.

Another councillor added: “We hope to see the trial period introduced later this year, and then move forward to a position, where the street is permanently open to all vehicles.

“Everyone accepts there could be security concerns, but - in a modern city - barriers have to come down at some stage if we are to progress.

“It’s been a long-running problem that should be resolved, as the security situation continues to improve.”

Belfast mum’s grief

Sunday Life

Mum’s grief

06 March 2005

The only request an Ulster foster mum had was for a few private moments, mourning the death of the cherished young child who died in her arms.

Instead, she claims she had to endure more than 12 hours of added grief, because of Social Services which, she claims, threatened her with the police.

The Belfast woman - who can’t be named for legal reasons - is utterly distraught at the way the death of her much-loved little foster son was handled.

And she desperately wants the authorities to re-evaluate how they deal with similar cases, in the future.

At 12.30am on January 12, John (not his real name) lost his brave, four-year battle to survive against all the odds.

He was severely disabled and suffered from seizures, was brain-damaged and unable to see or hear.

The youngster was completely immobile and dependent on his foster family for 24-hour care, seven days a week.

They knew the little lad - who first came into their home on December 12, 2000, aged just eight weeks - had a life-limiting condition.

And they were also well-aware that when he died, he would be handed over to his birth parents; they never had a problem with that.

But they were not prepared for what eventually happened.

Anne (not her real name) said that while she tried to give her foster son a life of dignity, in death it was a different story.

“There was complete confusion within Social Services from the moment he died,” she claimed, choking back tears.

“Firstly, we were told we could make funeral arrangements, which we began to do.

“Then we were told he would have to be handed over immediately to his birth parents and if we didn’t do so, the police would be called.

“The funeral director arrived to lay him out, but was told he couldn’t, for legal reasons. So, for over 12 hours, my house was in total chaos and nobody knew what to do next.

“And I cradled him in my arms for all that time, until I had to give him up.

“I even had to clean his wee body at one stage and block his wee nose, as fluid was beginning to seep out.”

Added Anne: “Despite his terrible illnesses, John gave my family a love that they never before experienced.

“And we feel so awful that, in death, it was all so undignified.”

Anne claims that at least eight social workers were involved in the whole unpleasant episode.

She believes it could all have been handled so much easier, if someone had taken the initiative and explained exactly what was going on.

“We kept being told different things and eventually, at around 3.15pm, more than 12 hours after the wee man died - we were allowed to put his body in a casket.

“It was in the back of a funeral car, and there wasn’t even a flower or anything, and he hadn’t been properly laid out.

“It was all so cold and heartless, and we’re inconsolable that we couldn’t say goodbye properly.

“That wee man never knew anything in his life but love and devotion and thank God he never knew what went on that weekend he died. Even if someone had said to us that we had to have him ready by a certain time, it would have made such a difference.”

The story of Anne’s plight was highlighted last week on BBC Radio Ulster’s Stephen Nolan show.

prison dogs

Sunday Life

Prisons bring in dogs

06 March 2005


Maghaberry

Sniffer dogs are now being turned on the inmates at Ulster’s jails to fight behind-bars drug-taking.

And the latest move to crack down on smuggling substances into Maghaberry and Magilligan prisons, will hit the jailhouse ‘bullies’ who have been accused of forcing other inmates to smuggle drugs.

Previously, the sniffer dogs have been used simply to trap visitors smuggling cannabis, cocaine and steroids into the jails.

Said a Prison Service spokesman: “While intelligence indicates that visits is the main route through which drugs are smuggled into prisons, home leave presents a secondary route.

“Some people may be bullied into bringing drugs in for others, and have fears for their safety if unsuccessful.

“By extending the use of passive drug dogs, we hope to protect prisoners from bullying and further restrict drugs coming into establishments.”

The move could see prisoners returning from home leave held in solitary confinement, if they have been in contact with anyone using drugs, while on home leave.

The sniffer dogs have caused outrage among some prison visitors by identifying innocent people, whose clothing has been contaminated by smoke.

Among those singled out was a Free Presbyterian minister, who was denied an open visit when sniffed out by the dogs.

The new tests for prisoners returning from home leave comes following the overdose death of a drug-dealer, behind bars, last month.

Kevin Slevin was found dead in his cell in Bann House, in Maghaberry, on February 14.

A 24-hour drug amnesty in the Co Antrim jail, in the wake of Slevin’s death, resulted in NO drugs being handed over to prison authorities.

According to the Prison Service’s most-recent figures, there were 74 drugs seizures in just three months, between September and November last year.

Among the drugs seized were cannabis, Diazepam tablets and a small amount of heroin.

Jim Spence ‘outed’

Sunday Life

Spence ‘the untouchable’

06 March 2005


Johnny Adair posing in front of Jim Spence’s house last month

A notorious UDA crime boss has been paid by British spy bosses to plan gun attacks on republicans and cause havoc among fellow loyalists, an ex-Intelligence Service handler has claimed.

Woodvale gangster Jim Spence has been outed by a former handler inside the Army’s Force Research Unit - the outfit that ran loyalist double-agent Brian Nelson and the IRA’s Freddie ‘Stakeknife’ Scappaticci.

Speaking to Sunday Life, he claimed Spence is an “untouchable”, who has been in the pay of British Intelligence for 20 years - a claim furiously denied by the top loyalist.

But a second former FRU officer last week backed up the claims made by the ex-handler, who now lives in the English Midlands.

The ex-handler, who first worked for FRU, and later the re-named Joint Services Group, told how Spence:

• Was used by British Intelligence to plan attacks on republicans.

• Received documents on Pat Finucane from FRU agent Brian Nelson, and passed them to Shankill UDA man Mo Courtney, before the murder of the Catholic solicitor.

• Was paid to stir up divisions inside the UDA.

• Has been allowed to run criminal rackets with impunity.

Rumours that Spence has been working for British Intelligence have circulated for some time, stirred by Spence’s bitter rival, Johnny Adair.

Previously, Spence has angrily denied claims that he is the loyalist ‘Stakeknife’.

But, last week, he refused to meet Sunday Life reporters to answer questions about the former Intelligence officer’s claims.

The source told Sunday Life that British spy masters had used Spence to organise UDA attacks on at least five republicans.

He linked Spence to the 1989 murder of solicitor Pat Finucane, that also involved security service agents Brian Nelson, William Stobie and Ken Barrett.

Barrett, who is currently in jail for the solicitor’s murder, was filmed by BBC’s Panorama naming Spence in the planning of the brutal killing.

But Spence later refuted the claims, and accused his former friend of being a “Walter Mitty” character and a “liar”.

However, the source claimed Spence’s primary role as a paid agent was to spread dissent within the UDA’s Belfast command.

“He was the perfect conduit to spread misinformation right to the very heart of the UDA.

“Spence was used to foment dissent and division within the UDA . . . to keep its leaders at each others throats - and that’s what he did, ” said the source.

“He was good at driving a wedge between them.”

The source added that the intelligence services allowed Spence to operate his lucrative extortion, blackmail, sex trade and drugs rackets with impunity.

“That was part of his reward,” said the former handler.

“As well as his payments, he was allowed to operate with impunity, as long as he did what they wanted him to do.

“He was using hookers from England in his Belfast brothels, dealing in drugs and contraband tobacco . . . but he was never going to get pulled. He was untouchable.”

The source said Spence met his handlers at a number of different hotels in Belfast, London and Glasgow.

He described how, on one occasion, a local taxi driver and fellow UDA man Barrett “compromised” a meeting between Spence and his intelligence handlers, at Belfast Castle.

Later that night, the taxi driver had a number of “visitors” to his Belfast home, who “persuaded” him to leave Northern Ireland immediately.

The source claimed that during the recent UDA feud, Spence had been used by his handlers to encourage Johnny Adair to confront the rest of the UDA leadership.

“Spence and John White encouraged Adair to take them on,” said the source.

“They (the security services) wanted Adair out of the picture, and used Spence to achieve that aim. After Adair was jailed, he continued to foment division by opposing the UDA leadership.

“After John ‘Grug’ Gregg was killed in February 2003, Spence aligned himself with the UDA leadership to oppose Adair. Again, this would have been on the direction of his handlers.”

Guess what he calls you behind YOUR backs

Jim Spence has a talent for making up derisive nicknames for fellow UDA bosses, according to the ex-Intelligence Service handler.

The source claimed Spence labelled South Belfast UDA boss, Jackie McDonald, the ‘Irish Ambassador’, because of his supposed willingness to acknowledge the involvement of the Dublin government in Northern Ireland affairs.

He had also dubbed south east Antrim boss John Gregg ‘Grug the Thug’ before his murder.

And he branded east Belfast ‘commander’ Jim Gray and his associates the ‘Spice Boys’, because of their bleached hair, loud clothes and trendy lifestyle.

A former close associate of Johnny Adair, Spence was the UDA’s ‘B’ company boss in west Belfast for several years.

Ironically, he and Adair came to the fore in the UDA following the murder of Pat Finucane, the flaunting of security force documents by the UDA, and the subsequent Stevens Inquiry, which rounded up many senior UDA figures. He remains an influential presence within the loyalist terror group today.

Security forces believe he is the brains behind the majority of the UDA’s money-spinning criminal operations in west Belfast, including racketeering and prostitution.

Scappaticci

Sunday Life

Scap file bombshell revealed

06 March 2005

Freddie Scappaticci

Senior cops knew of a plot by a notorious Army spy to kill one of their own agents - NINE months before the murder.

The shock revelation is contained in secret security files, which also show that two Special Branch officers weren’t told of an IRA plot to kill them.

The leaked documents - described as “devastating” by a senior security source - also indicate that an IRA informer was sacrificed to protect a more highly regarded informer.

The allegations relate to three key spies inside the IRA:

–Freddie ‘Stakeknife’ Scappaticci, who ran the IRA’s notorious ‘nutting squad’ while working for the Force Research Unit.

–Joseph Fenton, a Lenadoon man codenamed ‘The Driver’, who was shot dead by Scappaticci’s squad in February 1989.

–Charles McIlmurray from Andersonstown, Special Branch agent ‘Sealink’, who was abducted and killed by Stakeknife’s gang in April 1987.

One RUC source report reveals the IRA suspected they’d been “given” Mcllmurray to protect Fenton, and, ironically, got Scappaticci to investigate.

The document, authenticated by a senior security source, was dated June 6, 1988 - nine months before Fenton was killed and 14 months after Mr McIlmurray was shot dead.

It reads: “Source states that Fred Scappaticci has been asked to carry out an indepth inquiry into Joe Fenton in an effort to establish whether he is a tout or not.

“Source states that they are going to go back over every job Fenton has been involved in over the years…

“Source states that another thing being looked at is the reasons why or how Fenton gave them (the IRA) intelligence relating to Charlie McIlmurray being a Special Branch tout, which ended in McIlmurray being executed (by the IRA).”

Another section of the report will send shockwaves through Special Branch.

It reveals how an IRA team set out to shoot McIlmurray and his two handlers in Belfast, but aborted when they spotted a police traffic car.

One of the two Branch officers used his own car for meetings with informers.

But, like his colleague, he was never told of the IRA operation, and continued using the same car.

A senior security source said: “Questions need to be asked and answered on several fronts. Most worryingly . . . are the circumstances surrounding the two officers and their meeting with McIlmurray, which was watched by armed PIRA members.

“If, as this source states, McIlmurray was given to the IRA, why were his handlers never told? Two police officers could have lost their lives, as well as Mr McIlmurray, in an IRA ambush.

“The fact these officers were not even told of the attempt on their lives after the event, is reckless.”

Some relatives of both Fenton and McIlmurray are considering taking legal action, seeking compensation for their loss.

Last night we handed over a copy of the documents to a solicitor representing relatives of both men.

Greg Harkin is co-author of Stakeknife: Britain’s Secret Agents in Ireland, and is the Editorial Director at Local Press Limited in Northern Ireland.

Belfast car crime

Sunday Life

Pal of mown down have-a-go hero talks of hit and run horror

06 March 2005

This is the have-a-go hero, whose pal is fighting for his life after he was mown down by a drug-crazed death-driver.

Gerard Braiden (51) from Dunmurry, had a miraculous escape after a ruthless car-thief ploughed into his friend, Norman Lowry, at Academy Street in Belfast city-centre, on Tuesday.

Said Gerry: “There was no expression on this thug’s face - Norman didn’t exist as far as he was concerned.

“The only thing that mattered was the car.”

Mr Lowry (52) a part-time artist, suffered serious head injuries.

He remains in a critical condition at the Royal Victoria Hospital.

Mr Lowry was due to attend his first-ever art exhibition in east Belfast, when he was mown down.

The two friends, who work in the Cathedral Quarter area, were chatting near the Belfast Education and Library Board car-park, when they noticed the glue-sniffing thug attacking a woman.

As the pair ran to her aid, the car-thief managed to get inside a silver Ford Fiesta and race off - with the terrified female car-owner still INSIDE!

Mr Lowry was first to arrive at the entrance of the car-park, where he managed to close one of its gates in a bid to keep the hood trapped inside.

But, as he was turning away, the joyrider rammed the gate - ploughing straight into him.

Gerry watched in horror as his pal was hurled through the air, and the woman was thrown from the stolen car.

Cops are probing the theory that the car-thief may be responsible for a series of similar hijackings in the area.

It is also believed cops passed the stolen car, minutes before they arrived on the scene.

The Fiesta - registration TCZ 1127 - was later found burned out at Upper Springfield Road, in west Belfast.

Added Gerry: “I could see it in his eyes - this scumbag didn’t care who was in his way, when he rammed the car into the gate.

“I was just a foot away from the gate and, the next thing I remember, Norman is flying through the air with blood streaming down his face.

“I honestly thought he was dead, when I saw him lying there. The only thing he was trying to do was help someone.

“I can’t believe this has happened to Norman. I just hope he makes a speedy recovery.

“He should have been at his exhibition, rather than ending up in hospital.

“I tried to tell him to get away from the gate, because I had a feeling this hood was going to ram it.

“I can’t believe this has happened.”

Anne Cadwallader - Short Strand

Sunday Business Post

Short shrift for the Strand

06 March 2005
By Anne Cadwallader

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Gerard ‘Jock’ Davison

People are undoubtedly angry about the IRA in the Short Strand area of Belfast - but it’s not anger at the intimidation of witnesses who might finger those who killed Robert McCartney at a city centre bar on January 30. Far from it.

The anger is directed at the IRA for what many see as its expulsion of a senior member after he was, in their view, wrongly accused of being involved. Resignations from Sinn Féin and the IRA are expected as a result.

Gerard ‘Jock’ Davison is believed to be one of three IRA members expelled by the organisation or “hung out to dry’‘, as locals in the tightly-knit Short Strand were putting it last week.

As one eyewitness in Magennis’s Bar, where the brawl took place, said: “If Jock hadn’t had to go to hospital, McCartney would still be alive today. He was actually calming things down.”

That eyewitness, along with many others, said he was prepared to give evidence to the police, but - on the advice of his solicitor - is waiting until they come looking for him.

Like many others in the Short Strand, he is wondering why no police officer has approached him yet, as he is a well-known regular at Magennis’s.

Gerry Adams took an unprecedented step last Thursday when he suspended seven party members, who may have evidence on the killing, and passed their names via a solicitor to the Police Ombudsman, Nuala O’Loan.

The McCartney family gave this a half-hearted welcome, adding that this was no more than would be expected from any democratic party and was an “inadequate’‘ method of gathering information.

Local Sinn Féin sources in the Short Strand said there was “no turmoil or outcry’‘ in the ranks as the seven people suspended had already come forward voluntarily and given statements to the police on what they know.

From what can be gathered locally, said one republican, at least 30 people from the Short Strand, the nearby Markets area and others from north Belfast have voluntarily come forward, on top of the ten arrested by police.

The whereabouts of the two main suspects, however, is still unknown.

“They are coming under huge pressure from the republican movement as well as the local community and the police,” said one local resident.

Had it not been for the IRA ceasefire - and the McCartney family’s appeal for due process - the two individuals believed to have been involved in the murder would, many believe, have been discovered dead by now in a hedge in south Armagh.

As it is, they are believed to have been taken away by the IRA for five days last week for ‘debriefing’. Many in the Short Strand expect them to turn themselves in to the police before long.

Politicians lecturing the 3,000 inhabitants of the small Catholic enclave in east Belfast about their civic duty, as well as those reporting on events, are singing from a very similar hymn sheet. The tune is one that people in the Short Strand reject as both inaccurate and unfair.

They say they do not recognise the official account, that they live under the oppressive yoke of the IRA, and one ‘rogue’ unit in particular, which has imposed a rule of fear since the ceasefire. Accounts of ‘IRA godfathers’ and ‘gangs’ causing people to cower are treated with derision locally.

There have been several remarkably detailed newspaper accounts of an event that could only have been witnessed by those directly involved - and none of these has yet spoken publicly.

The reported accounts claim that McCartney and Brendan Devine, who was injured on the night of the murder, had angered a local ‘IRA godfather’.

By this point Davison had already been shipped to hospital, bleeding badly from arm injuries. He said he played no further role in the incident, and was still in hospital when McCartney was stabbed.

Back in the city centre - the official account goes - up to 15 people were involved in the murder. Other accounts, however, say that at most two men were involved in the killing, which no one inside the bar knew was taking place about 100 yards away.

A third man, who had left the bar with McCartney and Devine, returned to tell others that the pair had run off home. Those in Magennis’s assumed the brawl had ended, as most do, in injured dignity but nothing worse.

They carried on drinking, while bar staff cleaned up the broken glass and blood from the initial bottle-throwing incident.

There can be little dispute, however, that later that night, one of the two men directly involved in the killing did return to steal the security tape from a camera.

The official account continues that when the police tried to get evidence from eye-witnesses, every single one of them was too fearful of the gang to come forward.

In fact, more than 30 people have so far voluntarily made statements to police, in addition to the other seven arrested.

The reluctance of the overwhelmingly republican community in the Short Strand to speak to police, coupled with their fear of being found guilty by association, led to a delay in witnesses coming forward.

Writers who know little about the Short Strand wrote authoritative-sounding pieces bemoaning its oppression and praising the McCartney sisters’ bravery in standing up to the IRA.

Politicians have not been slow to comment either. In the upcoming British election a major policy battle will take place between Sinn Féin and the SDLP over policing.

Constitutionally, Sinn Féin can only endorse policing arrangements with the approval of a special ard fheis.

This storm has broken over the heads of the people of the Short Strand, many of them now hurt and angry.

It didn’t start out that way.

After the McCartney murder, and the subsequent heartrending appeals from his sisters, their heads were down.

The community was confused, shamed and demoralised by details of the horrific murder, and they turned out in force for the first vigil as well as for McCartney’s funeral.

But as the weeks have dragged on, hearing themselves described as a cowed community, the mood has changed.

Residents said that many who attended last Sunday’s rally came from outside the area.

“We’re no angels here, we know that, but we have our dignity, and we’re fed up with having our noses rubbed in it,” said one resident.

In the past, the chorus has often been joined by the Catholic hierarchy.

Intriguingly, on this occasion, there has been no belt from the crozier, though Archbishop Sean Brady urged anyone with information to contact the PSNI.

“No one needs to tell us that what happened to Bert [McCartney’s name in the locality] was utterly and completely wrong,” said one Short Strand resident.

“We don’t need the British newspapers or the SDLP to tell us that Bert should not have been killed, that those who carried out behaved disgracefully and should be brought to justice.”

However, residents are upset at the public image of their community, and this may discourage them from giving information to the police about the murder.

McLaughlin’s report

Sinn Féin

McLaughlin delivers negotiations report to Ard Fheis

Published: 6 March, 2005

Sinn Féin MLA Mitchel McLaughlin this morning updated party delegates on the current state of play on the negotiations front. Referring to last Decembers negotiations Mr. McLaughlin said “our approach was premised on a strategic calculation that our overall political objectives would best be served by testing the DUP’s conversion to partnership, power-sharing and inclusivity, and by ensuring that this test, as presented by the two governments, would take place on Good Friday Agreement ground.”

Mr. McLaughlin said:

This is now the third successive Ard Fheis in which this section of our clár has opened with a report on the state of play in the negotiations front. This means that for the better part of the past three years Sinn Féin has been involved in negotiations to bring about the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement. It also means that seven years after the endorsement of that Agreement by the vast majority of the population north and south we still await its implementation.

On three separate occasions during a period of 22 months we have concluded negotiations with the two governments around a political package which, had it been adopted, would have ended the political stalemate and opened the door to a future based on partnership, inclusivity, equality and justice.

On the latest occasion, in December 2004, we reached a potentially defining moment in the peace process, a potentially watershed moment in the history of this island.

Now, just 10 weeks later, and in the midst of a maelstrom of groundless accusations against our party leadership, attempts to discredit our entire party membership, the unjustified and undemocratic penalising of those we represent, what we were on the verge of achieving in December seems light years away.

Some of you may question therefore the relevance at this point of the detail of last years negotiation. You may think there is little need for anything other than a summary of a now familiar story - been there, agreed that, unionists say no, so governments renege ú and then blame it all on republicans.

For whatever the detail of last December’s political package the reality is we are certainly some way off from a restoration of the political institutions, we are some way off from unionists embracing power-sharing, we are some way off from a society built on equality, where the rights and entitlements of everyone are given equal status. In fact, seven years after its creation, we are so far off the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement we would all be forgiven for asking is there any point in clinging to such an objective, is there any life left in that Agreement.

We were posed a similar question last year. Our answer then is our answer now. We will continue to negotiate, and campaign and argue to have the Good Friday Agreement implemented not only because that is our obligation, not only because it is the right thing, but also because it fits into a strategy of providing and maintaining a political alternative to conflict, a means of sustaining and anchoring the peace process and a transition to the free independent Ireland we have worked long to achieve. We are in this process to the end, we are in this process until we have achieved our objectives, all of our objectives.

Last year’s round of negotiations began early in the year and continued throughout the summer months and autumn and until conclusion in December.

Sinn Féin’s focus in these discussions has been to achieve a comprehensive agreement which would see all outstanding matters dealt with and the Good Friday Agreement implemented in full.

Our approach was therefore two fold - to ensure that any proposals from the governments, and any agreement emerging out of these discussions, were rooted firmly in the Good Friday Agreement and to try to get the DUP on board for working with Sinn Féin in partnership in the power sharing, all-Ireland institutions.

The objective we set ourselves with regard to the DUP has confounded many. We had been accused of being unrealistic, of being naïve, of being fooled by noises from within the DUP before and after the Assembly election in November 2003 when they publicly espoused a willingness to do a deal.

Quite the contrary however. We have experienced too much of unionism’s tactical engagement with the Good Friday Agreement to take at face value any assertion by unionist political leaders of a new found willingness to embrace change, to buy into a new dispensation based on equality.

No, far from being naïve, our approach was premised on a strategic calculation that our overall political objectives would best be served by testing the DUP’s conversion to partnership, power-sharing and inclusivity, and by ensuring that this test, as presented by the two governments, would take place on Good Friday Agreement ground. And of course we are duty bound to recognise and respect the DUP mandate whatever we think of the prospect of them joining with us in our efforts to advance the political process.

The negotiations culminated in November last with the two governments proposing to the parties a comprehensive agreement which included draft statements dealing with issues which are the responsibility of the governments, the DUP, Sinn Fein, the IICD and the IRA. The bulk of these dealt with outstanding aspects of the Good Friday Agreement as well as the DUP position on IRA arms.

Sinn Fein said yes to the political package and conveyed this clearly and in writing to the Taoiseach and the British Prime Minister.

We did so because we were satisfied that we had defended the fundamentals of the Good Friday Agreement, including its power-sharing, all-Ireland and equality provisions, that we had resolved issues of concern and succeeded in strengthening key provisions.

We had secured from the British government agreement to:

* the reinstatement of the political institutions
* the rescinding of the British Government power to suspend the political institutions
* the creation of an automatic entitlement by Ministers to attend All-Ireland Ministerial Council meetings ( removing the power of veto over attendance previously exercised by unionists)
* the creation of a requirement on Ministers to attend Executive meetings and to attend, where appropriate, All Ireland Ministerial Council meetings (which the DUP refused to do in the past)
* the creation of a requirement on Ministers to observe the joint nature of the office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister (which the DUP had sought to erode)
* the establishment of the All-Ireland Consultative Civic Forum
* the establishment of the All-Ireland Parliamentary Forum
* the transfer of powers on Justice and Policing away from London and the NIO to local democratic accountability
* the repeal of repressive legislation
* the provision of new powers for the Human Rights Commission
* the removal of the restriction which prevents Irish citizens from taking up senior civil service positions in the north
* a peace dividend
* the implementation of measures to repair the electoral register in the north
* A process of rolling and frontloaded demilitarisation

Both governments also agreed to a resolution of residual issues around prisoners and OTRs.

We also secured from the Irish Government agreement on measures to facilitate Northern representation in the Irish parliament. For our part, on the issue of policing, we committed to recommend to an Ard Comhairle meeting that we convene a special Ard Fheis to decide on our position on this issue in the context of:

* Agreement between the parties on the departmental model and the powers to be transferred; and
* The enactment by the British Government of the legislation to give full expression to this transfer of powers on policing and justice away from London and
* A DUP commitment to a short timeframe for the transfers of powers on policing and justice.

The resolution of this central matter will ultimately present an enormous challenge for republicans, not least because the primary function of both the policing and judicial systems in the north have been to repress republicans and nationalists. But this very same issue that makes it such an enormous challenge for us all is also a most compelling motivation to bring this issue to satisfactory resolution.

You will no doubt hear more of the detail of our approach to resolving the issue of policing from Gerry Kelly in the section of this Ard Fheis which deals specifically with this issue.

Throughout these negotiations we believed also that a comprehensive agreement would motivate the IRA to address satisfactorily the issues which are its responsibilities. We have many times stated our commitment to the objective of taking the guns out of Irish politics. And our commitment to this has gone far beyond words, far beyond the rhetoric of others. While it remains our position that resolving the issue of arms is a matter for the IICD and the armed groups we have not shirked from using our influence on many occasions in the past in an effective and productive way to help bring this about. Last December Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness again went to the IRA to seek to persuade that organisation to address the issue of arms in a conclusive way and in a way which took account of the genuine concerns of unionists.

The IRA subsequently set out publicly what they were prepared to do in the context of an agreement. What they offered to do was unprecedented and beyond the wildest expectation of the most optimistic observers of this process. The IRA were prepared to move into a new and peaceful mode and to put their entire arsenal beyond use within a space of weeks and do so additionally under the watchful gaze of two independent witnesses.

And so, we arrived in early December at, what I described earlier as, a potentially defining moment in the peace process, a potentially watershed moment in the history of this island. So what happened?

Well the first thing that happened was the DUP refused to sign up for the political package. They failed the test that had been set for them in the terms of equality and power sharing. This was no surprise. They had failed it many times before in the council chambers of Ballymena, Lisburn, Castlereagh and elsewhere. They had failed it in the discussions at Leeds Castle last October. But the DUP also rejected the IRA offer to put all its weapons beyond use and demanded instead at their party meeting in Ballymena the humiliation of the IRA, and for republicans to wear sackcloth and ashes.

They signalled clearly that they were not yet prepared to leave behind the sectarianism, bigotry and intolerance that marked the political life of the northern state since partition.

The second thing that happened is that, in the run up to the conclusion of these negotiations the governments, in the knowledge that the DUP would fail to come across the line, tried to shift the blame onto republicans by supporting the demand for photographs of the IRA putting their arsenal beyond use.

And of course, the governments themselves then refused also to honour their part of the political package.

In effect, they failed the very same test set for the DUP. And of course, like the DUP, this was no surprise either. On every occasion in the past when unionist leaders have walked away from or reneged on agreements to break the political stalemate the governments in turn have reneged on their end of the deal. On each occasion they have failed or refused to confront a unionist veto.

While all of this has tried our patience we must not allow it to distract us from our objectives. The outcome of past negotiations including that which ended in December has been increased validation for our political analysis.

It may be that as the governments walk away from each negotiation in the knowledge that there will be another, they do so in the hope that republicans will come back to the next round of discussions weaker and prepared to accept less. The two governments have now joined with our political opponents in a concerted effort to weaken the Sinn Féin negotiating hand.

We must now shift our focus away from negotiations to the coming elections. In the coming months we have an opportunity to once again seek an increased endorsement of our strategy, an opportunity to ensure that when we return to discussions which will shape a way forward we will do so with an increased mandate.

The process of change cannot be frozen because rejectionist unionism refuses to come to terms with the new political realities. Political unionism cannot be allowed to veto the fundamental rights of citizens or to veto other changes necessary for the development of a peaceful society.

That is our message to the governments. With increased political strength we will be better able to increase the pressure for radical social and political change across this island.

Sinn Féin’s radical, alternative voice is a challenge to the sectarianism and inequality of the 6 County state. But also it is increasingly a challenge to the corruption and elitism of the Southern political establishment. That is why they seek to halt the surge in support of our party.

Sinn Féin is in this to the end. We will secure our rights and entitlements on the same equal basis as available to others. We will persevere and we will achieve all our political objectives. So, let’s get out and build a radical alternative.

Plastic bullets

Sinn Féin

Raymond McCartney demands no ambiguity on Plastic Bullets

Published: 6 March, 2005

Sinn Féin Foyle MLA Raymond McCartney speaking to the Sinn Féin Ard Fheis said there is “no room for ambiguity on Plastic Bullets anywhere or in any situation”.

Ta me ag labhairt ar son run 311- 315 - 323

I am speaking in support of motions of 311 - 315 - 323

At various times throughout the past thirty five years the British government thought by a simple change in name that they could get people to believe that real change had come about.

Remember the early 190s the internees overnight became detainees - Long Kesh became the Maze - The B Specials became the UDR who became the RIR. Of course there are some who believe change the name - and you change the nature of the problem, Today they shelter behind the new label of PSNI to cover over the inadequacies which still remain in policing. Of course truth does not change at the stroke of a pen.

Only this week we get latest change in name - no longer will we have Plastic bullets - and in their place and wait for this Attenuating Energy Projectiles - I will say that again Attenuating Energy Projectiles.

We are told by some who are LESS THAN HONEST that AEPs are LESS THAN LETHAL. This weapon is another form of plastic bullet which has killed men women and children. This is not a time for deferral as the SDLP opted for this week - this is the time for a clear and precise message - this weapon is lethal and the Policing Board must refuse to purchase - and put them in the hands of those who have abused them before.

No room for ambiguity on this either - there is no place for this weapon anywhere or in any situation.

The Policing Board have also provided a new name for CS GAS - they call it - Anti-Person Control Spray - they make it sound like the latest deodorent for men. As I speak it has been used over 100 times in the North ˆ with most of the incidents going unreported in the media.

It has severely injured those it was intentionally directed at and it has also injure people in close proximity. A similar weapon has been withdrawn in the United States as it was responsible for death of a spectator in a sports stadium.

Yet we have a policing board which not only approved their deployment behind closed doors - but it was forced into a position to admit that they permitted its use without guidelines. It was up to the PSNI to issue its own guidelines - Responsible management at its very best.

Let there be no doubt that this is CS GAS and the motion should be supported.

These are just some of the matters which the SDLP have failed to act on - indeed it highlights the bankruptcy of their position on policing in general. They failed the people of Ardoyne last July and the people of Short Strand the year previous.

Their positions on the Policing Board, their role on the whole issue of policing is not about serving the public interest, but self interest and self preservation.

The nationalist and republican electorate have delivered their verdict on the way forward for accountable policing and they certainly did not vote for Joe Byrne and Tom Kelly.

In conclusion I urge people to support the motion for the removal of the Rosemount spy post. I commend the PFC for its attempts to have it registerd in the Guinness book of records - £250,000 for 12 visits per year - £20000 a visit and as one republican cynic was heard to say - put me down for two of them and I will do it at half the price.

Gerry Kelly’s speech

Sinn Féin

Gerry Kelly opens session on Policing at the 2005 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis

Published: 6 March, 2005

Sinn Féin spokesperson on Policing and Justice Gerry Kelly MLA speaking at the 2005 Sinn Féin Ard Fheis this morning said that republicans have put policing at the “very core of negotiations with the British”.

Full Text:

For generations now the police force in the North has been an instrument of political repression, counter-revolution and terror. It has been a partisan, political, protestant and paramilitary force, which has been used in the main against Catholics, Nationalists and republicans.

For any conflict resolution process, or peace process or political process to succeed in Ireland then all the above has to change so radically that the old regime will be unrecognisable in the new beginning to policing that republicans are striving for.

Republicans put policing at the very core of negotiations with the British for that reason.

I’m not going to go over all the history of those very protracted and ongoing negotiations except to remind people that instead of having one Justice Act and one Policing Act, Sinn Féin had to push for and achieve a further Act in each case because the first Acts simply reflected the securocrats trying to arrest change as opposed to implement it.

Let us also remind ourselves that those who scream the loudest for Sinn Fein to join the present policing arrangements are the same individuals and political parties who worked with the RUC and the judicial system at the worst periods of oppression of Nationalists during the last 35 years and longer. Indeed some of the political parties in the 26 counties introduced and enacted repressive legislation against republicans that would have made Maggie Thatcher or for that matter Attilla the Hun look like Florence Nightengale.

So where are we at, at our 2005 Ard Fheis? We have made very substantial progress. We have a Police Act, which more fully reflects the 175 Patten recommendations.

Critical to a new beginning to policing and justice is the issue of transfer of powers to Ireland through the local Assembly, the Executive and hence into an all-Ireland context through the all-Ireland institutions. But transfer of powers is also crucial because it is the only way that control of policing and justice can ultimately be wrested out of the hands of British securocrats in London and the NIO who have run policing as a paramilitary force for generations. Without transfer Policing and justice will remain unaccountable and a tool of repression.

Other outstanding issues, which remain to be resolved, include:

— A ban on the use of plastic bullets.

–In the meantime an accountability mechanism is required to deal with plastic bullets, which are fired by British Army personnel.

— We have negotiated changes to the inquest system. We await the outcome to see if the wholesale abuse of the past will cease.

— The British government has yet to repeal emergency legislation and instead, has extended powers

— The inquiry demanded by the family of Pat Finucane is again being buried through new legislation to prevent the truth coming out.

— The British Government must acknowledge state violence. And collusion and dismantle the structures which perpetrated collusion.

Within the last year, a battery of new repressive legislation has been introduced by the British government. The most recent proposal is a new Prevention of Terrorism Bill which is reminiscent of anti-democratic laws which prevailed under Apartheid in South Africa. The British government has also revealed plans to change the role of MI5 in relation to policing in the 6 counties. These proposals will pre-empt the transfer of powers. Any attempt to minimise the transfer of powers will be unacceptable to Sinn Féin and we have said that to both governments. All of this vindicates the position our party has taken in demanding to see the script for legislation on transfer of powers.

Previous speakers have already laid out the potential comprehensive agreement of last December. When the DUP bluff on power sharing was called they collapsed the negotiations. The policing section in that was essentially that in the context of: -

Agreement between the parties on the departmental model and the powers to be transferred;

The enactment by the British government of the legislation to give full expression to this transfer of powers on policing and justice away from London; and

A DUP commitment to a short timeframe for the transfer of powers on policing and justice.

Then the party president would propose to the Ard Comhairle that it calls a special Ard Fheis to decide Sinn Féins position on new policing arrangements.

In other word because of our experience thus far on the efforts of securocrats to hollow out legislation we wanted to see the parliamentary Act after it was passed to make sure the British keep their word. On that basis the Ard Comhairle and most importantly the rank and file in the party would then have the opportunity to debate the very fundamental issues involved at conference.

Let me repeat what I said at last years Ard Fheis. The job given to the negotiations team was to achieve a new beginning to policing and justice. We have made significant progress especially through new legislation. It is not an impossible task and republicans need to be acutely aware that if the Republican Leadership achieves the objectives set in this area then this in turn will raise fundamental questions and problems for all activists. There is a public commitment if we reach that point to then put a changed policy to our membership and nationalism as a whole. While we are a substantial distance from that point yet, activists need to realise that we can achieve it and with achievement there is responsibility.

Now let me quote SDLP Chief Seamus Mallon. He recently said, “The people of West Belfast, West Tyrone and South Armagh do not want policing because if you have policing, you don’t have criminality”.

Try telling the people of New York, London and Dublin that good policing means no criminality. You need policing because of criminality.

No one wants a new beginning to policing and justice more than the nationalist and republican people of West Belfast, West Tyrone and South Armagh. I commend all of those who work on the ground to create safer communities through anti-car crime schemes; youth outreach programmes, and especially, Community Restorative Justice projects. They are doing a greater serviced to working class nationalist areas than the policing and justice system has ever done.

Negotiations herald change. Change brings turmoil and soul searching. It also means breaking moulds. If we accept that the political changes over the last decade have caused massive upheaval for the Unionist and British system which has misruled the North for so many years let us also accept that Republicans have faced shibboleths and sacred cows as well.

Nobody said it would be easy. Here is the challenge facing us. As political activists we must rethink strategically, debate strategically and decide what is best for our party, for the cause we represent and most importantly for the people we represent.

Policing and justice cannot be viewed in isolation from other key issues such as the stability of the interdependent institutions, equality and human rights, demilitarisation, the ending of discrimination, collusion and so on. The militarised barracks, armoured vehicles, guns and plastic bullets do not auger well. The force within a force, the continuing political raids, the mis-policing of loyalists marches and the lack of action on sectarian attacks and drug dealing makes it extremely difficult for republicans and nationalist to envisage a radical new policing service in the future. But we will pursue proper policing and justice with all out energy.

Last December in theory at least, we were within months of having a decisive debate on this issue. Delegates need to go back to their areas and open up the debate within Sinn Fein and their community.

Our opposition to the present policing arrangements is not a matter of timing. It is not merely a question of tactics. It is a matter of integrity and our inalienable rights.

It is a Justice and Policing system for the people we will achieve, not for the privileged few or the brown envelope brigade. Hugh Orde needs to know that he is not the justice minister in the North. We as Republicans will not be part of the Police Force which is involved in collusion, we will not be part of a Police Force which protects Human Rights abusers, or Drugs barons, or Sectarian murderers simply because they are state agents. There will be no force within a force when we are finished. We will create a new policing service, which will serve the whole community throughout Ireland. We will have a service, which is representative, accountable and free from partisan political control.

I call on this Ard Fheis and activists to support us in this very fundamental struggle for an enduring and All-Ireland Justice system.

SF and police reforms

BreakingNews.ie

SF ‘faces challenge over police reforms’

06/03/2005 - 14:08:42

Sinn Féin has warned its supporters to brace themselves for a new beginning to policing in Northern Ireland, it emerged today.

Delegates at the annual conference in Dublin were told that if democratically accountable policing is achieved, the party will face fundamental challenges.

Party justice spokesman Gerry Kelly said that a special delegate conference would be called if the party reaches its objectives under the Patten Report.

He said: “It is not an impossible task and republicans need to be acutely aware that if the Republican leadership achieves the objectives set in this area then this in turn will raise fundamental questions and problems for all activists.

“There is a public commitment if we reach that point to then put a changed policy to our membership and to nationalism as a whole.

“While we are at a substantial distance from that point yet, activists need to realise that we can achieve it and with achievement there is responsibility.”

The party was today debating policing motions during which it rejected calls for a boycott of policing initiatives, but delegates passed a motion calling for the Special Branch detective unit in the Republic to be disbanded.

Speaking on republican participating in policing, Mr Kelly added: “Nobody said it would be easy.

“Here is the challenge facing us.

“As political activists we must rethink strategically, debate strategically and decide what is best for our party.

“But we will pursue proper policing and justice with all our energy.”

Garda John White

Sunday Business Post

John White’s Omagh story

06 March 2005
By Barry O’Kelly

Garda John White was facing criminal charges when he first made his claims about a security lapse leading up to the Omagh bombing. He claims that the bomb was allowed to be transported into the North to protect the man who secured the getaway car, informant Paddy Dixon.

It has also been claimed that the RUC ignored a tip-off from another informant about the bombing. Further claims involving a third informant are expected to be made during the Omagh civil action.

White’s allegations were originally viewed with suspicion because of the charges he was facing. However, he has since been tried and acquitted of six corruption charges relating to his work in the Donegal Garda division.

He is still facing a separate charge which is the subject of a legal challenge in the High Court.

Two years ago, the North’s Ombudsman Nuala O’Loan’s investigators interviewed White. They are believed to have accepted his account as accurate.

However, three retired civil servants, the so-called Nally Committee, appointed by justice minister Michael McDowell, have since concluded that they could find no basis for the claims.

They maintained that they were unable to interview the man who is living under the garda-run witness protection scheme.

McDowell has refused to publish the committee’s report because he claims it would prejudice the court case against White.

Omagh

Sunday Business Post

Garda prepared to testify in Omagh case

06 March 2005
By Barry O’Kelly


Colm Murphy

Claims that gardai ignored a warning about the Omagh bombing are expected to be raised by one of the men being sued by the victims’ relatives.

The allegations will be aired during the forthcoming lawsuit facing Colm Murphy and four others. Murphy, 51, said last week that he intended to subpoena the man who made the claims, Garda John White.

Murphy said he also intended to produce new documentary evidence to corroborate White’s story about the 1998 atrocity, which claimed 31 lives, including a woman pregnant with twins.

The Donegal-based detective is prepared to testify if asked. He said last week: “If I receive a subpoena, I will testify and tell the truth.”

White has claimed that a senior garda allowed the 1998 bomb to be transported through the Irish Republic in order to protect an informant named Paddy Dixon.

Dixon, a car thief from Dublin, was taken into the witness protection programme after his cover was blown three years ago. Days before Dixon went into the protection programme, White obtained a taped admission from him.

On the tape, Dixon said: “They [the Real IRA] had got a car and they [the gardai] knew it was moving . . .They knew it was moving within 24 hours at that stage.

“The Omagh investigation is going to blow up in their faces.”

Murphy - the only man jailed in connection with the bombing - had his conviction overturned on January 21. A retrial has been ordered.

Last week, Murphy told The Sunday Business Post: “I will definitely be calling John White as a witness. He is one of the key players who will be able to show the bigger picture.’’ Murphy, of Ravensdale, Dundalk, said he would also produce new evidence to support White’s claims.

Four other republicans - Seamus Daly in Dundalk, and Liam Campbell, Seamus McKenna and Michael McKevitt in Portlaoise Prison - are named in the €14 million lawsuit. The British government has donated stg£800,000 (€1 million) towards legal funds for the families civil suit.

Murphy and Michael McKevitt - both of whom deny involvement in the bombing - are still seeking legal aid.

SF support

Sunday Business Post

SF holds its support but public is uneasy

06 March 2005
By Pat Leahy

Support for Sinn Féin is holding firm, despite the Northern Bank robbery and the killing of Robert McCartney. However, attitudes among non-Sinn Féin voters are hardening against the party.

This is according to the findings of today’s Red C/Sunday Business Post opinion poll. Fianna Fail has staged a dramatic recovery since last June’s local and European elections. If a general election were held now, according to the results of the poll, it would be politically impossible to form a government without Fianna Fail. The national survey comes before two by-elections in Meath and Kildare North on Friday.

Fine Gael’s support has declined since June; the party has returned to the level of support it had at the time of the 2002 general election, although voters say a Fine Gael-Labour-Green Party coalition is their preferred choice for government, but there’s not enough support to bring them to power.

Sinn Féin’s support, at 9 per cent, is 1 point up on its local election result last year and 2 points up on the general election result of 2002. However, there is evidence to show that a majority of the party’s own supporters say they are concerned about reports of IRA activity, including money laundering in the Republic.

A Sinn Féin-Fianna Fail government is viewed as unacceptable by almost 70 per cent of all voters.

The poll is good news for Taoiseach Bertie Ahern.

Since last year’s catastrophic mid-term local and European elections, when Fianna Fail received less than 32 per cent of the vote, the party’s support has recovered and stands today at 37 per cent.

While this is still behind the 41.5 per cent the party won at the 2002 general election, it is a vital reversal of the downward trend and puts Ahern in the driving seat to win a third term.

Bobby Sands - diary

Larkspirit

**Bobby’s diary - 6th day

Friday 6th

There was no priest in last night or tonight. They stopped me from seeing my solicitor tonight, as another part of the isolation process, which, as time goes by, they will ruthlessly implement. I expect they may move me sooner than expected to an empty wing. I will be sorry to leave the boys, but I know the road is a hard one and everything must be conquered.

I have felt the loss of energy twice today, and I am feeling slightly weak.

They (the Screws) are unembarrassed by the enormous amount of food they are putting into the cell and I know they have every bean and chip counted or weighed. The damned fools don’t realise that the doctor does tests for traces of any food eaten. Regardless, I have no intention of sampling their tempting morsels.

I am sleeping well at night so far, as I avoid sleeping during the day. I am even having pleasant dreams and so far no headaches. Is that a tribute to my psychological frame of mind or will I pay for that tomorrow or later! I wonder how long I will be able to keep these scribbles going?

My friend Jennifer got twenty years. I am greatly distressed. (Twenty-one-year-old Jennifer McCann, from Belfast’s Twinbrook estate, was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment for shooting at an RUC man).

I have no doubts or regrets about what I am doing for I know what I have faced for eight years, and in particular for the last four and-a-half years, others will face, young lads and girls still at school, or young Gerard or Kevin (Bobby’s son and nephew, respectively) and thousands of others.

They will not criminalise us, rob us of our true identity, steal our individualism, depoliticise us, churn us out as systemised, institutionalised, decent law-abiding robots. Never will they label our liberation struggle as criminal.

I am (even after all the torture) amazed at British logic. Never in eight centuries have they succeeded in breaking the spirit of one man who refused to be broken. They have not dispirited, conquered, nor demoralised my people, nor will they ever.

I may be a sinner, but I stand — and if it so be, will die — happy knowing that I do not have to answer for what these people have done to our ancient nation.

Thomas Clarke is in my thoughts, and MacSwiney, Stagg, Gaughan, Thomas Ashe, McCaughey. Dear God, we have so many that another one to those knaves means nothing, or so they say, for some day they’ll pay.

When I am thinking of Clarke, I thought of the time I spent in ‘B’ wing in Crumlin Road jail in September and October ‘77. I realised just what was facing me then. I’ve no need to record it all, some of my comrades experienced it too, so they know I have been thinking that some people (maybe many people) blame me for this hunger-strike, but I have tried everything possible to avert it short of surrender.

I pity those who say that, because they do not know the British and I feel more the pity for them because they don’t even know their poor selves. But didn’t we have people like that who sought to accuse Tone, Emmet, Pearse, Connolly, Mellowes: that unfortunate attitude is perennial also…

I can hear the curlew passing overhead. Such a lonely cell, such a lonely struggle. But, my friend, this road is well trod and he, whoever he was, who first passed this way, deserves the salute of the nation. I am but a mere follower and I must say Oíche Mhaith.

Henry McDonald

The Observer

** Is it not a bit rich to ask murderers to ‘do the decent thing’?

Sinn Fein gives ovation to stabbed man’s sisters

Henry McDonald
Sunday March 6, 2005
The Observer

The sisters of a Belfast man they claim was murdered by members of the IRA received a standing ovation from 2,000 delegates at Sinn Fein’s annual conference in Dublin last night.

Earlier Catherine McCartney confirmed she and her four sisters had agreed to an invitation to attend the party’s centenary conference during which the Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams called for her brother’s killers to admit their guilt.

They were led into the conference hall by Adams before his televised keynote speech to his party and sat in the front row flanked by him and the Sinn Fein justice spokesman Gerry Kelly.

Prior to his speech, Adams said: ‘They [the sisters] are here on my invitation, as I wanted to demonstrate that we are all on their side.’

In his address he said the McCartney murder was a huge issue because it was alleged some republicans were involved.

He said: ‘Those responsible for the brutal killing of Robert McCartney should admit what they did in a court of law. That is the only decent thing for them to do. Others with information should come forward. I am not letting this issue go until those who have sullied the republican cause are made to account for their actions.’

Father-of-two Robert McCartney was stabbed to death outside a Belfast city centre bar on 30 January. It is alleged his killers are well known IRA figures in the city. Seven of those suspended from Sinn Fein last week are known to have been in Magennis’s bar when the murder happened.

However, reports that a senior commander in the IRA who allegedly gave the order for Robert McCartney and his friend Brendan Devine to be stabbed has been expelled from the organisation appear erroneous. The Observer has learnt the leading IRA man is still highly regarded within the movement and has not been pushed out.

The attendance of the McCartney sisters will be seen as a PR boost for Sinn Fein, given that the party has been under fire for weeks with accusations that republicans covered up the crime and intimidated witnesses.

The sisters did not applaud Adams’ speech but afterwards Catherine McCartney said: ‘We are appreciative of what Gerry Adams has done.’

She added: ‘Our bottom line is that nobody has been brought to justice. We are not going to be satisfied until we see people in court.’

Adams urged republicans to test again whether Dr Ian Paisley is actually prepared to share power with them.

He also said his party remained committed to its peace strategy.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Jay of onefinejay.com