SAOIRSE32

17/11/2005

The day Belfast mourned

Irelandclick.com

Roisin McManus speaks to Robert McClenaghan about his quest for justice for his murdered grandfather


BBC photo

The grandson of an elderly man killed in the attack on McGurk’s Bar in North Queen Street on 4 December 1971 says that he won’t rest until the truth is known about the bombing.

Robert McClenaghan from West Belfast is a spokesman for campaign group An Fhirinne. His grandfather Philip Garry (75) was killed in McGurk’s Bar. The campaign group will travel to Brussels on 6 December to lobby politicians at the European Parliament in a bid to shine an international spotlight on the issue of collusion between the British state forces and loyalist paramilitaries.

The loyalist bomb at McGurk’s Bar killed 15 people including children and pensioners. After the bombing official sources claimed that the bombing was an IRA “own goal”. However seven years later a UVF man was convicted of the bombing and received 15 life sentences.

Robert was a 13-year-old schoolboy when his grandfather was murdered. He clearly remembers the events unfolding.

“Philip Garry was my grandmother’s second husband. My biological grandfather had died when my father was very young,” says Robert.

“Philip had been a merchant seaman and had fought during the Second World War. I think he came home basically to enjoy his retirement and the rest of his days in Belfast.

“He was one of those people who was always very bubbly,” he added.
Robert says he remembers hearing the explosion from his family home on the Springfield Road.

“It wasn’t until the next afternoon, when all our family were sitting watching the highlights of the football, the next thing it came on to say they were interrupting the programme because of the bombing and they started to name the names of those who had been killed the night before in McGurk’s,” said Robert.

“The names came up on the TV screen and my mother started to squeal and my father jumped up to grab his coat. It was a massive shock,” he added.
Three days of funerals followed and Robert vividly remembers his grandfather’s funeral.

“He was buried from St Patrick’s chapel in Donegall Street and I remember that as the funeral came to the bottom of the Shankill there were loyalist mobs waving Union Jacks and they were singing a song ‘Bits and Pieces’.

“Even as a child I said to myself, there is something wrong with this.”
Political reaction to the bombing and media coverage angered the family who were overcome with grief.

“What outraged the family was the lies,” said Robert. “Unionist politicians at the time, the RUC, the British army and almost the entire media – and all of a sudden from being a 75-year-old innocent civilian my grandfather suddenly became a bomber and that’s what hurt and deeply affected the family.

“For years to come there was the stigma that my grandfather along with 14 other men, women and children were somehow responsible for the explosion at McGurk’s Bar on that Saturday night.”

Robert says that as he grew older he started to ask questions about why the truth was concealed about the bombing.

“Who were they trying to protect and why were they trying to protect them with such outlandish lies?” he said.

Robert says that the lies surrounding the bombing ate away at his grandmother Lily who died a few years ago.

“I remember sitting one night and we were having a cup of tea. I was involved with the An Fhirinne campaign and I asked her, ‘What would you consider justice?’ and she said if only they would say he was innocent, if only they would say he wasn’t a bomber. Basically that was it, she didn’t want a long drawn out thing, she just wanted the truth. If one thinks about collusion, collusion started for our family that night on 4 December 1971,” he added.
Robert says that his own family want to find out from the British government what information they have on the McGurk’s Bar explosion.

“Realistically up to now we have had nothing but intransigence and a brick wall as far as the British government openly admitting they colluded with loyalist death squads, and we are taking it to an international level.

“I firmly believe that the only way the truth about collusion will ever come out is if we have some sort of international, independent, judicial public inquiry which would compel senior members of the RUC, Special Branch, senior members of British military intelligence and members of the Northern Ireland Office, senior members of the British government, to compel them to give evidence under threat of prosecution.

“I believe that those are the only circumstances under which the truth of collusion will be revealed,” he added.

‘No threat to Catholic education’

BBC


Mrs Smith is seeking to “reduce the administrative burden”

The government is “not on a collision course” with the Catholic Church over the proposed downgrading of its education body, the NIO has said.

Education Minister Angela Smith told the BBC there was “no threat to the Catholic ethos in schools”.

The Council for Catholic Maintained Schools could be broken up as part of a sweeping review of NI administration.

The CCMS, which runs Catholic schools, is the employer of 8,500 teachers and looks after 500 schools.

The Review of Public Administration (RPA) has proposed that the body should be downgraded to an advisory role.

Mrs Smith said she was seeking to “reduce the administrative burden”.

“The RPA will do that across the public sector. The announcement will be made shortly of how we don’t spend too much money on administration and how that money gets to frontline services.

“That is the intention of the RPA and that is what we intend it to do.”

She added: “I do not believe we are on a collision course (with the Catholic Church).

“I met the bishops last night and we discussed this last night, along with a number of issues.

“I can give them absolute reassurance, in terms of what they are concerned about, of maintaining the ethos and the character of their schools, they will not notice any difference.”

‘Learning experiences’

CCMS chief executive Donal Flanagan said to remove their input would diminish educational standards.

“What we are saying is that our ethos adds value to children’s standards,” he said.

“Teachers and ethos are inextricably linked and we want the right to be able to appoint teachers who are committed to the aims of a Catholic education.

“The government recognises, and nowadays almost everyone recognises, Catholic education adds value to the learning experiences of young children and improves their standards overall.”

Widely anticipated changes to the way Northern Ireland is administered are set to be unveiled next Tuesday.

The review is the largest examination in more than 30 years of the organisation and delivery of public services in the province.

It was initiated by the devolved executive before the assembly was suspended in October 2002.

Many Catholic schools’ representatives have written to the government in protest at the proposed downgrading of the CCMS.

The schools say they are concerned that it is a threat to the ethos of Catholic education.

Source claims Andre Shoukri’s latest stint in prison marks the end of his paramilitary career

Daily Ireland

UDA leader ‘to be out within week’

Ciarán Barnes

Ulster Defence Association (UDA) chief Andre Shoukri will be officially stood down by the paramilitary group within the next week, loyalist sources said yesterday.
The move to oust the 27-year-old comes at a time when almost the entire leadership of the north Belfast UDA is behind bars.
It is understood the UDA’s ruling Inner Council will use this as an opportunity to remove Shoukri and his gang in the coming days.
Last Friday Shoukri and his second in command William ‘Bonzo’ Boreland were remanded in custody on charges of blackmail, intimidation and money-laundering.
On November 1 leading north Belfast loyalist and Shoukri associate, Garry ‘Jock’ McKenzie, was remanded in custody on allegations of riotous assembly.
The arrests came six months after the paramilitary described as Shoukri’s ‘enforcer’ - convicted UDA killer Robert Molyneaux - was remanded in custody on blackmail charges.
Shoukri, Boreland and McKenzie also have convictions for blackmail. Along with Shoukri’s brother, Ihab Shoukri, they each were sentenced to two years in prison in 1997 for extorting money from a Catholic businessman.
Ihab Shoukri is currently on bail awaiting trial for UDA membership.
Last weekend supporters of the Shoukri gang attempted to install convicted loyalist blackmailer Tommy Potts as the organisation’s new north Belfast boss.
However, the appointment was rejected by the UDA Inner Council which is grooming a well-spoken loyalist who is heavily involved in interface work for the role.
Potts, who is loyal to Shoukri, was recently released from prison after serving two and a half years for extortion.
Shortly after being freed Potts, under orders from Shoukri, started a poison pen campaign against South Belfast UDA leader and convicted extortionist Jackie McDonald.
McDonald is the paramilitary boss leading the charge to have Shoukri thrown out of the UDA. He represents the UDA old guard and wants to politicise the organisation.
A north Belfast UDA source predicted that Shoukri’s latest stint in prison will finish his paramilitary career.
“Everything is in place to bring him down and something definite should happen within the next week.
“Shoukri and his gang are finished as a force in north Belfast.”

Church erects CCTV in bid to halt loyalist attacks

Daily Ireland

Connla Young

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Security cameras have been erected around a Catholic Church in County Derry in a bid to ward off loyalist attack.
Magherafelt parish priest Peter Murphy says the decision to install the cameras was unfortunate but necessary. The security move came just weeks after Saint John’s Church, which is located between Castledawson and Magherafelt, was targeted in a loyalist graffiti attack. During the September incident a number of graves were desecrated after loyalist vandals attacked headstones with paint and scrawled obscene sectarian graffiti on the church walls.
St John’s was reopened just over 12 months ago with a complete internal refit after it was gutted in a loyalist firebomb attack in 2003.
Fr Peter Murphy said the security cameras are needed.
“This church has a special place in the affections of parishioners who found these acts very distressing indeed. We have to try and prevent the chapel and adjoining graveyard from being attacked in such a way again and hopefully the cameras will achieve that aim. There is now 24-hour surveillance at Saint John’s which will hopefully deter those who carry out such disgusting acts.”
Magherafelt Sinn Féin councillor Sean McPeake said it was a matter of regret that the cameras were erected.
“It’s regrettable that in this day and age that we have to resort to placing cameras around a church. It’s indicative of the sectarianism that has been festering around the Magherafelt area this summer.”
Magherafelt SDLP councillor Jim Campbell is saddened by the erection of the cameras. “It’s a sad reflection on society we live in that not even the dead are safe. The people while in that churchyard did nobody any harm when they were alive they are hardly going to do any harm now.”
In recent months an outbreak of tit-for-tat sectarian incidents in the Magherafelt area has resulted in churches and Orange halls being targeted in vandal attacks. In August the PSNI issued a warning to GAA clubs in south Derry after they claimed to have uncovered a loyalist plot to spread broken glass on gaelic fields. Days later an explosive device was discovered at the gates of Magherafelt O’Donovan Rossa GAA club, which sits just yards from St John’s Church. A recent anti-GAA poster campaign in Counties Derry and Antrim originated in the Magherafelt area in September.
Last month Sinn Féin councillors in Bellaghy condemned nationalist vandals after the town’s Orange hall was singled out by spray painters.

SF says ‘400 on loyalist hit list’

Daily Ireland

Sinn Féin leader among 50 targeted

Martin McGuinness is demanding a public inquiry after more than 50 people and Sinn Féin President Gerry Adams were notified yesterday that their personal details are on a ‘military intelligence targeting list’ in the hands of loyalists - A full public inquiry has been demanded into how the details of scores of Republicans and residents of the Short Strand were taken from British Army offices in Castlereagh last year

Jarlath Kearney

Sinn Féin yesterday demanded a full public inquiry into the circumstances in which over 50 residents from Short Strand in Belfast were notified their personal details were in the possession of loyalists.
PSNI members visited dozens of addresses on Tuesday night to advise residents that a top-secret military intelligence document had been discovered in the possession of paramilitaries.
Sinn Féin also confirmed party president and West Belfast MP Gerry Adams was notified yesterday that his details were found on the military intelligence targeting list which unidentified loyalists possessed.
A PSNI spokesperson said on Tuesday night that, “police have recovered what is believed to be a document linked to a breach of internal security in British Army offices at the Castlereagh complex in July 2004.
“As a result, police are contacting a number of people about their personal security,” the PSNI spokesperson added.
The intelligence document is believed to contain the personal details of 400 republicans targeted by the British government’s intelligence-gathering services over recent years.
In the days after the document’s disappearance in July 2004, British government officials began directly contacting newsrooms and members of the media in Belfast to advise them that the security breach was “a non-story”.
Then, on July 21, 2004, after a meeting at Stormont specifically about the developing scandal, Sinn Féin policing spokesperson Gerry Kelly declared that British minister Ian Pearson told him, “this will be a very short meeting on Castlereagh because there’s no story here”.
Mr Pearson was accompanied by three senior civil servants and a note-taker, but refused to confirm or deny any details about the affair when pressed by Mr Kelly.
Later that day Mr Pearson issued a written statement denying that there was any prospect of collusion:
“I have confirmed with senior officers that there are no indications that material has fallen into the hands of paramilitaries.”
SDLP Policing Board member, Alex Attwood, also commented on the affair, explaining that a senior PSNI member blamed the document’s disappearance on over-zealous “research” by British soldiers.
“One senior officer advised me that one line of inquiry was that the document was taken for ‘research’ purposes,” Mr Attwood said.
With the British government actively lobbying to prevent the full ramifications of the incident becoming public, the malign hand of Special Branch and British Intelligence was apparent - particularly in the context of a previous alleged burglary at Castlereagh barracks on March 17, 2002.
On that occasion, the emerging picture after St Patrick’s Day quickly suggested the incident was “an inside job”.
A senior official source later revealed to this reporter that “for the first nine to ten days after the alleged break-in (in 2002) a substantial part of the investigation was directed at disgruntled police or army involvement”.
In those initial stages, 14 PSNI detectives were assigned to investigate the ‘inside job’ theory.
However that all changed on Thursday, March 28, 2002, when the PSNI major investigation team, commanded by Detective Chief Superintendent Phil Wright, made a decision to target republican activists over the alleged burglary.
Within forty-eight hours, the number of detectives on the case had been increased to 24.
On the morning of Easter Saturday, March 30, 2002, a massive PSNI/British Army operation codenamed Hezz resulted in six arrests and 28 raids against prominent republicans across the North.
Three other arrests and at least a dozen extra raids took place in the following two weeks.
Not a single item of evidence was recovered in relation to the alleged Castlereagh burglary and none of those arrested faced charges over the incident.
One former republican prisoner, John O’Hagan, was held for prolonged questioning.
He was subsequently charged, inter alia, with possessing documents likely to be of use to terrorists, including the biographies of former British prime minister John Major and former Chancellor Norman Lamont.
He was also charged with possessing an article from New Statesman magazine published in 1988. Mr O’Hagan was convicted at Belfast Crown Court in July 2004.
However, in a significant development, two reliable sources subsequently disclosed that on March 31, 2002 - the day after the Easter Saturday arrests - a senior detective formally confirmed that at least three-quarters of the PSNI investigation was still focused on “disgruntled police or army involvement”.
Sinn Féin yesterday said that the facts about the 2002 affair - taken together with the subsequent disappearance of the intelligence document from Castlereagh barracks in July 2004 - raise serious questions about the veracity of claims alleging republican involvement in the first apparent burglary.
Such questions are heightened by this week’s PSNI admission that loyalists have in fact obtained official British government intelligence documents detailing hundreds of nationalists.
Moreover, it’s worth recalling that news about the July 2004 incident only leaked out during the middle of the North’s official summer holiday fortnight.
On the evening of July 11, 2004, the PSNI issued a brief statement that the force “had been called to investigate” an alleged internal breach of security at Castlereagh barracks.
It was then reported that a member of the British Army had been arrested and was being questioned about the incident at the Military Intelligence site on the base - known as the ‘Green Huts’.
Although that suspect was released the following day, within the following 48 hours a number of broadcast newsrooms received telephone calls from a man claiming to be a British soldier.
The caller alleged that the person arrested was a member of the Royal Irish Regiment, formerly known as the Ulster Defence Regiment. This fact was subsequently confirmed by the British government.
Thereafter, 28 members of the RIR - ranging in rank from private to major - were removed from sensitive intelligence duties, including the staffing of spy installations.
At that time, the RIR was responsible for intelligence-gathering at the Divis Tower installation in west Belfast.
The involvement of the RIR in the affair raised alarm bells throughout the nationalist community, given the regiment’s sectarian reputation.
Significantly, however, there were no high-profile PSNI/British Army raid and arrest operations designed to lay the blame with any individual or group.
Nor was there any British government inquiry, akin to the “audit of security” conducted by former senior NIO civil servant John Chilcott to “make recommendations over the handling of sensitive material” which was instigated after the apparent burglary in March 2002.
Four months ago, in July 2005, Daily Ireland exclusively revealed that – barring three initial searches and one arrest – the PSNI failed to order any follow-up searches or arrests of any kind regarding the July 2004 incident. Nor has anyone ever being charged with responsibility for the document’s disappearance from Castlereagh.
A British Army spokesperson declined to elaborate on the current assignments of the 28 RIR soldiers who were temporarily removed from intelligence duties over the affair.
“We just gave them other jobs. I don’t know what they’re doing now.
“It would be unfair of me to speculate on what they’re doing now,” the British Army spokesperson said.
Speaking yesterday, Sinn Féin chief negotiator Martin McGuinness demanded a full independent public inquiry into the entire affair.
Mr McGuinness also highlighted wide-ranging concerns about the activities at Castlereagh barracks and he urged the Irish government to intervene.
“There should actually be a public independent inquiry into what took place because it’s quite clear to everyone that both the PSNI, the British security services, the NIO and British government are all complicit in this cover-up and that effectively equates to their active participation in collusion,” Mr McGuinness said.
“That’s how serious a matter we’re actually talking about. We have serious question marks about what was precisely going on in this complex at Castlereagh, given that the people who had the run of the place were effectively all attached to the British intelligence services, to the RIR, to the PSNI and formerly to the RUC.
“Balance this affair against the way in which republicans have been targeted over the course - not just of recent weeks and recent months - but recent years, with huge wholesale arrests taking place and many people dragged to interrogation centres and the vast majority of them effectively released without charge,” Mr McGuinness said.

O’Hare transferred to Portlaoise prison

RTE

17 November 2005 19:41

Dessie O’Hare has been transferred back to the maximum-security prison at Portlaoise following what the Prison Service has described as a breach of trust.

The so-called ‘Border Fox’ is serving a 40-year sentence for the kidnapping of Dublin dentist Mr John O’Grady in 1988.

He was caught with a mobile phone and a bag of pills hidden in his clothing.
Advertisement

He had just returned to the open prison section at Castlerea from Temporary release and the items were discovered when he was searched.

O’Hare was being released for short periods in preparation for his eventual release under the terms of the Good Friday agreement.

His release on licence has now been jeopardised.

A spokesman for the Prison Service confirmed this evening that O’Hare’s security profile had been changed and that he had been moved out of the Grove Section of Castlerea - where prisoners live in houses rather than cells - to Portlaoise.

Millions of cigarettes recovered

BBC

Three men have been arrested and millions of cigarettes recovered during a police operation in Armagh.

The searches are part of an investigation into serious and organised crime linked to dissident republicans, police said.

The searches are continuing, with police and customs officers involved.

Meanwhile, in a seperate operation, police are questioning three men in north Antrim about paramilitary activity.

They were arrested in the Bushmills area on Thursday morning. A number of searches were carried out in connection with the arrests.

Irish forgery suspect flees to avoid U.S. extradition

World Peace Herald

By Bill Gertz
The Washington Times
Published November 17, 2005

WASHINGTON — An Irish communist leader wanted in the United States on counterfeiting charges has fled Northern Ireland to avoid extradition.

Sean Garland, head of the Workers Party of Ireland, an arm of the Official Irish Republican Army, said in a statement posted on his Internet site yesterday that he decided to remain in the Republic of Ireland, where British authorities allowed him to travel two weeks ago for medical treatment.

A spokesman for the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia said yesterday that the U.S. government will continue efforts to have Mr. Garland extradited, if he cannot be returned to Northern Ireland, which is under the legal jurisdiction of the British government.

“We will be seeking extradition of Mr. Garland from the Republic of Ireland,” said the spokesman, Channing Phillips.

Mr. Garland was indicted by a federal grand jury in May on charges of using his party contacts in North Korea to coordinate the purchase of fake $100 bills produced there.

Mr. Garland said he initially agreed to return to Belfast for an extradition hearing related to the U.S. charges but then feared the proceedings would be unfair.

“I have decided therefore not to return to British jurisdiction” because of the unjust nature of the U.S.-British extradition treaty, he said.

Mr. Garland was arrested in Belfast on Oct. 7 as the result of a 16-year investigation involving the U.S. Secret Service and other American agencies. Six men were accused of conspiring with Mr. Garland from 1997 to 2000 to buy more than $1 million in “supernotes” — high-quality counterfeit bills that are difficult to detect — from the North Koreans during travels in Ireland, Britain, Russia, Belarus, Poland, Denmark, the Czech Republic, Germany and elsewhere.

The Washington Times first reported in May 2001 that a top-secret U.S. intelligence report linked Mr. Garland to the supernotes. The report said Mr. Garland was involved in supernote trafficking and had met in 1997 with Chinese Communist Party official Cao Xiaobing to discuss “unidentified business opportunities.”

Mr. Garland has denied the charges. He was released on bail after a hearing in Belfast.

The indictment was the first official U.S. government accusation linking the government of North Korea to the production of supernotes.

Urgent meetings sought as more Republicans informed of death threats

Sinn Féin

Published: 17 November, 2005

Sinn Féin Assembly member Gerry Kelly today confirmed that more republicans, this time living in the Lower Ormeau and North Belfast areas, were informed overnight that their details were contained in the Castlereagh collusion dossier.

Mr Kelly said:

” Overnight a number of republicans in the Lower Ormeau area and in North Belfast were visited and informed that their lives were in danger from loyalist paramilitaries who had obtained their personal details. We assume that this information comes from the Castlereagh collusion file passed to unionist paramilitaries by the RIR and covered up by British Ministers, the PSNI and British Army over the past 16 months.

” I have requested urgent meetings with both the British and Irish governments to discuss this matter. I met both governments in July 2004 when this scandal first broke. It was in the course of these meetings that the British government Security Minster of the time Ian Pearson stated clearly that the missing file was not in the hands of loyalists.

” This has proven not to be the case and the effect of these denials and the subsequent cover up has been 400 people and their families have been living under threat without being informed and therefore unable to take measures to protect themselves. This situation is a scandal and as the British government through the NIO are complicit in the cover up a separate inquiry is required to get to the truth.” ENDS

New look for black taxis

Irelandclick.com

By Roisin McManus

West Belfast Taxi Association are ringing in the changes this week with new signage for their seven seater cabs.

This is just one of the big changes for the local taxi firm who also have new vehicles and additional services available to their customers.

West Belfast Taxis have recently received DOE approval for the new signs for their seven seaters of which there are currently eight in silver, red, blue and black.

Manager of West Belfast Taxis, Stephen Long, said that the new signs are a welcome development.

“The signage is on the seven seaters only and from a business point of view it is to make customers more aware that the seven seaters are available. This has been a personal investment from the drivers.

“We are also working on a prototype for the other taxis and once this is approved we will hopefully bring it on board.

“We are also offering additional services, we occasionally do private hire, and are doing a lot of work with the Belfast Education and Library Board and residential homes. We make no difference between disabled and able-bodied passengers in terms of price.

“We are constantly looking to improve our service and our customer awareness,” he added.

A member of staff at Dympna Mews on the Glen Road, which avails of the taxi service, said: “We use the wheelchair friendly taxis, the service is dependable and reliable even at short notice and I think that a great service is being provided.”

Journalist:: Roisin McManus

CCTV row rages

Irelandclick.com

Sinn Féin hit out at DUP in call for West Belfast cameras

By Roisin McManus

Sinn Féin in West Belfast have hit out at remarks made by the DUP’s Peter Robinson on CCTV in the area.

The Deputy Leader of the DUP has called on Chief Constable Hugh Orde to explain why there is no CCTV in West Belfast.

He said that the PSNI were guilty of partisan policing for failing to introduce the cameras in the West of the city.

The East Belfast MP said that CCTV is an invaluable tool in combating crime.

“Given that CCTV has proven to be so successful in the rest of Belfast, why shouldn’t West Belfast be placed under the scrutiny of these systems whenever CCTV has been in place in other parts of Belfast since as long ago as 2000?” said Mr Robinson.

“Is the absence of any CCTV cameras at all in the West Belfast District Command Unit because Sinn Féin/IRA have made it clear that they are opposed to them?

“Responsible public representatives should be demanding that their areas and the people they represent are protected by CCTV,” added Mr Robinson.

The DUP man said that he sees no reason why West Belfast shouldn’t have CCTV.

“It isn’t as if West Belfast is crime free. Far from it,” said Mr Robinson.

“The police’s own statistics show that between April and September this year offences against the person are up 37 per cent, domestic burglaries are up 43 per cent, robberies are up 49 per cent and criminal damage is up 30 per cent on the same period last year,” he added.

Responding to the remarks, Upper Falls Sinn Féin Councillor Michael Browne said: “Peter Robinson seemingly forgets that West Belfast has been under considerably greater levels of surveillance than other parts of the city. Not so long ago state of the art surveillance apparatus could have been found at Divis Tower, at two Springfield Road barrack locations, Andersonstown barracks, and Woodbourne barracks.

“The experience of course of people living in West Belfast has been that this apparatus did nothing to assist residents in the battle against criminal activity,” he said.

The local councillor said that this evidence makes a nonsense of any suggestion that CCTV would impact on crime related statistics.

“Anyone genuinely interested in combating crime in West Belfast would begin by recognising the need for policing arrangements that would enjoy the confidence of local people and that would actually set about addressing criminal activity.

“Today’s policing deficit not only allows the perpetrators of crime to act with impunity but in many cases it has been proven that rather than challenge the relatively small criminal element in the constituency, those charged with policing responsibilities actually work with the criminally minded to advance their own sinister agenda,” he added.

Journalist:: Roisin McManus

West Belfast man was questioned by RUC in Dundalk

Newshound

(by Suzanne Breen, Sunday Tribune)

A West Belfast man has said gardai allowed armed members of RUC Special Branch to question him in Dundalk garda station. Legal sources believe it is the only such case in existence.

Patrick Livingstone said the RUC’s later claim that he had made a confession during the “interview” resulted in his conviction for murder.

“I made no confession. I served nearly 18 years in the H-Blocks for a crime I didn’t commit. I was framed by RUC Special Branch with garda complicity. I’m not prepared to let this rest. I want the guards’ actions investigated.”

Livingstone contacted the Sunday Tribune after the Barron report last week speculated that gardai hadn’t travelled North to question loyalists suspected of the 1976 murder of Dundalk man, Seamus Ludlow, because they didn’t want the same rights reciprocated to the RUC.

“That doesn’t stand up because the RUC came South to question me five months before Seamus Ludlow was murdered,” Livingstone said.

Livingstone is from a well-known republican family in Andersonstown. His sister Julie (14) was shot dead by the security forces when returning from the shop with a bottle of milk.

In December 1975, Livingstone, who was living in Dundalk, was being detained in the local garda station when he was told he had “visitors” from the North.

“I thought it was my parents. I was shocked to find three RUC Special Branch men. The guard locked the door from the outside. One of the Branchmen opened his jacket to let me see his gun.

“They showed me a photograph of Samuel Llewellyn, who had been shot dead in Belfast and asked if I’d killed him. They later said I replied, ‘Aye, I done it.’ I didn’t say that. I never considered the RUC worthy of a proper response so I said ‘you’re detectives, you work it out’.”

Livingstone claimed when he complained to gardai that he had received no prior notice of the RUC’s visit and wasn’t offered legal representation or read his rights, the desk sergeant just laughed.

Nine months later, Livingstone was arrested after an arms find in Newry. “I was taken to Bessbrook barracks. They kicked and punched me until I fell to the ground. Then, they held me down and took turns to jump on me from a table.

“I was left pure black from the chest to the knees. My testicles were badly swollen. I was taken to hospital. One of the detectives who had visited me in Dundalk walked in and charged me with Samuel Llewellyn’s murder.”

Llewellyn, a Protestant civilian, had been shot dead by the IRA in 1975 while helping repair houses on the Falls. His brutal killing, which became known as the ‘Good Samaritan murder’, caused widespread revulsion.

Livingstone said: “I never thought I’d be convicted. The case was based on the Dundalk statement I didn’t make. But it was a Diplock court. My trial started at 11am and I was convicted and sentenced by 2.50 pm. I was the first person in the North given ‘natural life’ imprisonment.”

Livingstone lost his appeal: “I left it at that. The 1970s were crazy. Every day, people were convicted in Diplock courts on little or no evidence. You just knuckled down and accepted it.”

November 16, 2005
________________

This article appears in the November 13, 2005 edition of the Sunday Tribune.

Orde: IRA has stopped punishment attacks

Belfast Telegraph

By Michael McHugh
17 November 2005

The IRA’s punishment attacks have stopped ahead of next year’s crucial Independent Monitoring Commission report, the Chief Constable has confirmed.

Sir Hugh Orde told a meeting of Westminster MPs that IRA punishment beatings and shootings had stopped.

He said this may be because it wants a clean bill of health ahead of January’s IMC dossier, seen as crucial to bring about power-sharing.

Sir Hugh said the “encouraging” cessation of low-level violence was an indication of the power of the IRA high command over its members.

But he warned the select committee to be “realistic” about the likelihood of IRA criminality.

The IRA’s decommissioning of arms last summer has been welcomed in many quarters but some unionists have expressed scepticism and demanded an end to all criminality before going back into government with Sinn Fein.

Sir Hugh added: “I think the word encouraging is probably right at the moment. One needs to be realistic about this. It is an illegal organisation.

“There are limits on how it can lawfully fund-raise, obviously, and we are keeping a very close eye on criminal activity and we will report fully and frankly to the IMC on everything we find in relation to all paramilitary groups in our next report.”

The LVF’s ceasefire, declared earlier this month, is being monitored by police and the Chief Constable said it was too early to assess the group’s integrity.

“In terms of the LVF, it is too early to say, quite frankly.

“I said at the time we would wait and see, and I am still waiting to see what happens next.

“We have got no indications that disarmament of loyalist groups is imminent, so we have to wait and see.”

Sir Hugh said dissident republicans were continuing to target economic targets and added that he expected more activity in the run up to Christmas.

He revealed that he was at Down Royal when the racing event had to be cancelled because of bomb hoaxes.

Sir Hugh said police officers north and south of the border were continuing to disrupt dissidents’ operations.

40,000 risk losing their right to vote

Belfast Telegraph

By Chris Thornton
17 November 2005

At least 40,000 people appear to be in danger of falling off Northern Ireland’s electoral register when it closes tomorrow.

People who have not filled out forms for two successive voter trawls will be left off the register, prompting Sinn Fein to accuse the Government of applying “different standards” to the electoral process in Northern Ireland.

A new list of voters is due to be published on December 1.

Earlier this year, the Government pushed through emergency legislation to allow about 70,000 voters who hadn’t re-registered to stay on the list for May’s general and local government elections.

The move was taken amid long-standing concerns about reductions in the size of Northern Ireland’s voter pool.

The introduction of anti-fraud measures three years ago - including a requirement that every voter has to register him or herself - saw the electoral register fall.

This year ministers opted to temporarily return to a measure known as the “carry forward”, which kept voters on the register even if they had failed to fill out a form.

The change allowed about 70,000 people to stay on the register in time for the election.

Electoral officials estimate around 25,000 to 30,000 of those voters have signed up during the current trawl.

That leaves about 40,000 to 45,000 who have not filled in registration forms twice in a row.

Sinn Fein vice president Pat Doherty has accused the Government of deliberately trying to remove voters from the register.

“In the last few years there has been a huge decline in numbers of people registered to vote,” he said. “This has arisen as a result of the introduction of new and restrictive procedures for registration.

“Just eight months ago, in response to this decline in the electoral register, the British Government announced that to maximise the numbers entitled to vote in the May elections 70,000 people who were earlier removed from the register would be placed back on it.

“It is therefore incomprehensible that the British Government are again intent on removing these same people from the election register, and effectively denying them their right to vote in the next election.”

Mr Doherty said he has asked for an urgent meeting with Political Development Minister David Hanson.

Five now held over Conlon murder

BBC

Five people have now been arrested in connection with the murder of Martin Conlon in County Armagh.

Two men, aged 30 and 36, were arrested in the Armagh area on Thursday whilst a 35-year-old man was detained in Dungannon.

A 30-year-old woman and a teenage boy who were detained in the Armagh area on Wednesday are also being questioned.

Mr Conlon, 35, from Railway Street in the city, was found shot at Farnaloy Road outside Keady on 7 November.

Police said a homophobic motive was one line of inquiry. They are also looking at whether he was killed by dissident republicans, with whom he was linked.

Mr Conlon was released recently from prison in the Republic of Ireland where he had served a four year sentence after being arrested at a Real IRA training camp.

Detectives returned to the scene of the shooting on Monday to stage a partial reconstruction in a bid to piece together the circumstances surrounding the murder and identify new witnesses.

£20m paid to Omagh bomb victims

BBC


Twenty-nine people died in the Omagh bombing in August 1998

Victims of the Omagh bomb atrocity have received more than £20m in compensation, it has been revealed.

Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain said the Compensation Agency has fully resolved 826 of 852 criminal injury claims.

The figures were contained in a written reply to a question from the East Belfast MP, Peter Robinson.

Twenty-nine people including a woman pregnant with unborn twins died in the 1998 Real IRA car bomb attack.

Of the 220 criminal damage claims, 214 have been resolved with approximately £7.5m paid in compensation, Mr Hain added.

Earlier this year, County Armagh man Sean Hoey was the first person charged with murder in relation to the bombing.

Finucanes call for lawsuit

Daily Ireland

Jarlath Kearney

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Relatives of the murdered Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane yesterday (15 November) urged the Irish government to consider mounting an international legal challenge against the British government for failing to establish a “Cory-compliant” inquiry into the 1989 killing.
In their first meeting with Irish foreign affairs minister Dermot Ahern, Mr Finucane’s widow Geraldine and other family members highlighted a range of serious concerns about the British government’s approach to the case.
Pat Finucane was a prominent and highly respected defence solicitor. He was shot dead in his north Belfast home in front of his family by an Ulster Defence Association death squad.
It has since emerged that five men directly associated with the murder were all working as agents for various branches of the British security services, including RUC Special Branch and military intelligence.
Following the Weston Park multiparty talks in 2001, the British and Irish governments agreed to implement any recommendations made by the Canadian judge Peter Cory after he had reviewed the Finucane case, along with five other controversial incidents involving alleged state collusion.
Judge Cory recommended a full, independent public inquiry into Pat Finucane’s murder on the basis of prima facie collusion between state forces and the UDA.
However, rather than establish such an inquiry, the British government announced its intention to examine Mr Finucane’s murder within the strictures of the controversial new Inquiries Act of 2005.
Speaking after yesterday’s meeting, Mr Finucane’s former business partner and family solicitor Peter Madden told Daily Ireland that the Irish government had been urged to consider taking legal action against the British government.
Mr Madden said there appeared to be two options available to the British government. The first was to establish an inquiry under the Inquiries Act. The second was to announce that a proper inquiry could not now take place without the involvement of the Finucane family.
“We made it very clear to the minister that the family are not going to take part in any inquiry established under the new act,” said Mr Madden.
“The new act removes control away from a panel of judges and places it into the hands of a minister in the government which stands accused in this case.
“The family have asked the Irish government to continue supporting them in whatever stand they take in the time ahead.
“The minister made it clear that the British had violated the Weston Park agreement in relation to Pat’s case and in relation to not following Judge Cory’s recommendations.
“He pledged the Irish government’s continued support for the family.”
Mr Madden said the Irish government had not ruled out mounting an international legal challenge against its British counterpart.
Voicing support for the Finucane family, north Belfast assembly member and Sinn Féin policing spokesman Gerry Kelly attacked the British government for reneging on its commitment to establish a full independent public inquiry.
“Despite a public commitment after Weston Park to establish an inquiry into this killing, the British government have subsequently brought forward legislation which, in the view of the Finucane family, would ensure that any inquiry held within these parameters would not deliver the truth,” Mr Kelly said.
“The British state has, from the outset, sought to frustrate the Finucane family in their pursuit of justice and truth.
“They have sought to cover up the role of their own agents in this and other killings. It seems that this policy is continuing.
“Sinn Féin will continue to support the Finucane family in their campaign for the truth.
“It is also important that the Irish government do likewise,” he said.
Mr Kelly recalled the British government’s failure to assist Irish government inquiries into the 1974 Dublin-Monaghan bombings or the Co Louth killing of Séamus Ludlow.
The Sinn Féin representative criticised “the concealment and evasion which has been the mark of the British government approach to all these cases up until now”.

Increase in poltical attacks on Sinn Féin since arms move shows fear of republicanism’s rise

Daily Ireland

Durkan’s outburst has to be seen in context and that context is the relentless campaign by the SDLP and political parties in the South to demonise Sinn Féin and undermine its electoral prospects

Danny Morrison

Back in 1998 the SDLP supported the early release of political prisoners. At that time the SDLP also knew that there was an anomaly in the early release scheme in relation to other people who were on the run. It knew that Sinn Féin would argue and lobby for the right of republicans to return to their homes. Four years ago – but more specifically in 2003 – the British government agreed to resolve that anomaly in the context of ‘acts of completion’ by the IRA.
It was no secret.
Last week, however, whilst addressing the issue of OTRs (on the runs) the British government took advantage of the situation to announce that its forces could, when it becomes law, also avail of the ‘Northern Ireland (Offences) Bill’ for offences which predate the signing of the Belfast Agreement in 1998.
This means that RUC men, British soldiers, undercover soldiers, agents and informers against whom evidence might emerge from ongoing inquiries (or from their own mouths in the unlikely event of them confessing) will be granted immunity, will never go to jail and probably will never face prosecution either, given that such a decision will lie with the Public Prosecution Service.
Even with this ‘sweetener’ Conservative and unionist opponents of the measure are still outraged at the equivalence between state violence and subversion – given that state violence is invariably ‘good violence’ and all other is ‘bad violence’! Tory spokesperson on Ireland, David Lidington, said: “Members of our armed forces and police officers are to be placed on a par with terrorists. That is morally repugnant.”
Even the BBC had a problem accusing state forces of spilling blood. Its political correspondent Gareth Gordon referred to the bill as also covering “misdemeanours by security force personnel”. Shooting down marchers, killing kids with plastic bullets and colluding in hundreds of assassinations are ‘misdemeanours’?
Relatives of loved ones killed by the British Army and the RUC, or as a result of collusion, were understandably livid at the possibility that the culprits who murdered their kith and kin will escape accountability. They have campaigned for years, not for vengeance, which is what drives the self-righteous opponents of the bill, but for the truth about who was ultimately responsible for the killings. Many believe that the chain of command reached into 10 Downing Street.
Whilst the British have used the occasion to extend the list of those who qualify, the Irish government has taken the opportunity to formalise the discriminate exclusion of others. Thus, whilst those who organised or carried out the Dublin and Monaghan bombings and other killings would effectively be amnestied, those republicans implicated in the death of Garda Jerry McCabe would remain fugitives.
SDLP leader Mark Durkan jibed Sinn Féin and accused it of negotiating an amnesty for rogue members of the RUC and British Army. For sheer opportunism it was hard to match and his remarks were clearly aimed at turning the families of victims of state violence against Sinn Féin, families whom the SDLP had ignored when they lobbied the party at Stormont and Westminster.
(The remarks were also a bit rich coming only days after Durkan and his MPs – claiming to act against the evil of 90-day detention orders - voted in favour of 28-day detention orders, which, if passed gives the PSNI and the Special Branch, amongst others, extraordinary powers to abuse prisoners. We already know what happened to suspects under 7-day detention orders.)
The inclusion of state forces in the Northern Ireland (Offences) Bill was done unilaterally by the British government, as Mark Durkan knows only too well. However, Durkan’s outburst has to be seen in context and that context is the relentless campaign by the SDLP and political parties in the South to demonise Sinn Féin and undermine its electoral prospects. For them, republicans are the eternal enemy, not Britain nor those sectarians opposed to equality and justice.
Remember the Dublin government lecturing republicans that there was a political alternative to armed struggle which they could use to compete on an equal basis with all the other parties? Last weekend Taoiseach Bertie Ahern said that under no circumstances would Fianna Fail go into coalition with Sinn Féin, nor was it prepared to act as a minority government dependent on the support of Sinn Féin. In order to undermine the party his message to the electorate is that a vote for Sinn Féin is a wasted vote because Sinn Féin, regardless of how well it does in the next election, is not going into government, will not help form the government and will have no influence on government.
Ahern’s position is contradictory and hypocritical. He says that stability and prosperity in the North requires Sinn Féin to be in coalition government but stability and prosperity in the South requires Sinn Féin not to be in coalition government! His approach is no different from how the DUP on councils such as Lisburn or Ballymena treats the elected representatives of the nationalist community – banished to opposition forever. Already the DUP are using Ahern’s argument as a pretext for refusing to share power with Sinn Féin.
In recent times we have seen the SDLP describe itself as a united Ireland party, Fianna Fail announce that Easter 1916 is to be commemorated again, and Fine Gael announce that it is the true inheritor of Sinn Féin and that Michael Collins was a great shot.
That the attacks on Sinn Féin have intensified since the IRA put all of its weapons beyond use and declared the armed struggle over shows how much the parties fear the rise of republicanism across Ireland.
Danny Morrison is a regular media commentator on Irish politics. He is the author of three novels and three works of non-fiction. His play about the IRA, ‘The Wrong Man’, begins a three-week run in the Pleasance Theatre, London, from March 12.

4th Anniversary of the death of Vol Kevin Murray

:: IRBB ::

This is the oration delivered by 32CSM’s Francis Mackey.

GRAVESIDE ORATION AT 4th ANNIVERSARY OF VOLUNTEER KEVIN “KIDDO” MURRAY
13TH November 2005

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Kevin Murray

Friends and Comrades

May I begin by extending our sympathy and support to Phyllis and her daughters on this the 4th anniversary of the death of a husband and father Vol Kevin Murray, known to his friends and this community as Kiddo and I extend that sympathy to his family circle.

4 years ago when news spread that Vol Kevin Murray was terminally ill people felt helpless as they realised a friend and honourable republican was about to depart this life.

When Kiddo passed away there was expectedly sadness and sorrow and a great sense of loss not alone for his wife and family but across the entire republican family.

They knew he was a principled and honourable volunteer.

Today as we reflect on the life of this true republican we see a committed Irishman who joined the republican movement as a teenager and soon earned the respect of those around him.

I am told that he never shirked his responsibility as a republican and carried out his active service for his country with pride and honour.

He was a genuine republican and when the leadership of the Provisional Movement entered a process that would not lead to the freedom and unity of Ireland, Volunteer Kevin Murray wasn’t found wanting.

He had clearly seen that the 1998 agreement was leading republicans away from their principled position of defending the Irish Nation and upholding Irish National Sovereignty.

He had also clearly seen that under such an agreement and despite the rhetoric from political leaders, British Rule in Ireland could be permanent.

He immediately maintained the republican values and remained with the republican principles of Padraig Pearse and the men and women of 1916. This was at a time when many of his former comrades were moving to the British agenda of 1998.

At this time he was immediately called a dissident by the Brits, the Dublin administration and sadly by former comrades in the provisional movement.

I challenge those who call Vol Kevin Kiddo Murray the derogatory term dissident to explain to the Irish people what republican principle did he dissent from. The answer is very clear, he did not dissent from any; rather he proudly upheld the sovereignty of his country at a time when others sold out. Indeed it is those who entered into negotiations with a foreign government and failed to protect the sovereignty of their nation who are the dissidents. It is they who have abandoned the principles of Pearse in favour of administering British rule in Ireland.

During Kiddo’s incarceration in Portlaoise Gaol it became obvious he was becoming unwell and the state forces are to be found guilty of neglect in that they did not act sooner. It may not have made any significant difference to the outcome but those months of his life could have been made more comfortable. The late medical intervention, the lack of an early diagnosis and the lack of an early investigative response was a result of the Dublin Government treating Irish republicans as second class citizens.

It was obviously too late when Kevin was granted medical release.

In preparing for today, I learned that Kiddo was a skilled master butcher, he was a fanatical fisherman and an expert fly-maker.

He was a member of the local fishing clubs and was a regular figure on the banks of the Toberona and Castletown rivers. I believe also in his younger days he was a keen footballer.

He also enjoyed music, particularly Irish traditional and folk music and learned to play the banjo while in gaol. This shows him to be a man who was not going to be locked up without something positive being made of his incarceration. He was a lively character and enjoyed the craic; Kiddo was a family man who enjoyed his life.

The question then arises why would a man with so much going for him, with his skills, join the IRA.

The answer is to be found in the man himself. He saw a foreign government with their army of occupation, assisted by a corrupt police force and allies in loyalist murder gangs oppress the people in the occupied 6 Counties.

He saw that British rule in Ireland was wrong and he saw that the Irish people needed leadership when the traitors in Dublin abandoned the right of their people to National freedom.

He saw in 1998 that others were to join the route of Fianna Fail to abandon again, the Nationalist people in favour of entering salaried positions for personal gain.

He saw career politicians riding on the back of the republican struggle having given up their right to the name republican.

Vol Kiddo Murray was prepared to defend his nation and I have no doubt that if he was here today he would echo the sentiment of Democratic Freedom and Unity with justice for the Irish people.

As republicans we must never allow the name of Vol Kevin Kiddo Murray to be besmirched.

We have a duty to honour him with the same pride as those who have gone before and we must never forget the sacrifices he made for his country; and as we leave here today let us pledge that his part in the fight for Irish freedom was not in vain and that again the Irish people will deliver the best tribute possible to him by bringing to an end the British Governments illegal sovereign claim in Ireland.

Let us all do our part by joining the republican struggle; no part is too great or small - there is work to be done. We in the 32 CSM need your help to not only uphold the principles for which Volunteers have given their lives but to move to the next phase in preparing the challenge to the British government and to those who have bent the knee. In our document Irish Democracy a Framework for Irish Unity we have given leadership, and in our submission to the UN we are the only organisation in Ireland with a legitimate challenge. We need people like you here today to advance that challenge. I ask you to join with us in making real the dreams of Vol Kiddo Murray.

My he rest in peace.

Go Raibh Maith Agat.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Irish Freedom Committee

WHY WAS KEVIN MURRAY ALLOWED TO DIE?

Irish Republican POW Kevin Murray (48) had been serving a 12 year sentence at Portlaoise Prison, Ireland, when early in 2001 he began to complain of severe headaches and dizziness. Repeated visits to the prison doctor did not alleviate his increasingly severe headaches, or lead to proper medical attention to his very rapidly deteriorating physical health.

In mid-September of 2001, after a great deal of protest by fellow POWs and family and friends outside of the prison, Kevin was finally moved to an outside hospital to receive desperately needed medical attention for what was found at that late stage to be a massive brain tumor. By this time, however, his condition had become inoperable; and he was transferred almost immediately from Beaumont Hospital to a hospice care facility near his family in Dundalk. Kevin was administered last rights in early October after suffering a stroke which left him blind. Several weeks later, on Tuesday, November 13th, Kevin lost his long struggle for life.

Kevin Murray died a few short weeks after finally being released from Portlaoise prison for the emergency hospital care which had been requested by himself, his family, and his fellow prisoners for several months prior to his death.

The Irish Freedom Committee will continue to demand a full inquiry into why this criminal and inhuman neglect was encouraged and permitted by an institution of the Irish Free State, resulting in an easily preventable loss of life.

‘He saw them all as his mother’s murderers’

Guardian

When Craig McCausland was gunned down by loyalist paramilitaries this summer, he was more than just another innocent victim of the Troubles. His mother was also killed by them 18 years ago. So has anything changed in Northern Ireland? Angelique Chrisafis reports

Tuesday November 15, 2005
The Guardian

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Craig McCausland - photo from Justice for Craig, where you can read more about the murders of Craig and his mother Lorraine

All his life Craig McCausland hated paramilitaries. He loathed their gold jewellery, their Mercedes cars that smugly cruised the working-class Protestant streets of north Belfast. He hated their “junior wings” in the primary school playgrounds. He lobbed stones at the windows of their flashly decorated homes.

When he was two, his mother Lorraine was battered to death with a breeze block by a loyalist paramilitary gang at an after-hours drinking club. She was a 23-year-old single mother who ran a mobile shop. As a child, his family recalls, it never made sense to him how the “defenders of the faith” could kill an innocent Protestant woman and get away with it. She was in the wrong place at the wrong time, detectives told her family; the men that killed her were “psychopaths”, they said. It was 1987, the height of the Troubles, after all, and she was not the only woman whose battered corpse was mysteriously found dumped after a drink at a loyalist club. Following a familiar pattern, everyone knew who killed Lorraine, but no one was ever charged.

So during this year’s Protestant marching season, masked loyalist paramilitaries burst into 20-year-old Craig’s house and shot him dead in front of his girlfriend and her two children, it seemed history was playing a sick joke. The Ulster Volunteer Force, Northern Ireland’s oldest loyalist paramilitary group, was deep in a murderous feud with breakaway loyalist drug dealers, the Loyalist Volunteer Force. Craig’s killers were UVF gunmen and his murder was put down to the feud - another LVF scumbag cleared off the street. The only problem was that Craig, according to police, his family and the LVF, wasn’t a member. He was just an unemployed labourer on jobseekers’ allowance. Wrong place, wrong time again, just like his mother. And, in the cruellest twist, Craig also left a two-year-old son.

That was only one part of the horror his murder has left. It was his girlfriend’s children, aged six and nine, who were splattered with blood when the gunmen came back to finish Craig off as he lay dying on the stairs. Those awful minutes when they tried to stem his wounds with towels from the laundry basket have left their scars.

Craig’s murder is more than another grim statistic of the Troubles; it is a telling example of how, in many ways, Northern Ireland has not moved on - and how trauma is being passed on now to a third generation. Even as delegations from Iraq, Bosnia and Macedonia are trailed around Belfast to learn from this model peace process, the real curse of the Troubles - the way paramilitaries have been allowed to utterly rule communities - continues, 10 years after the first ceasefires.

All his life, Craig’s family did everything to stop him becoming a victim like his mother. His grandparents moved him and his five-year-old brother out of their working-class north Belfast estate because they didn’t want them pointed out as orphans of a gruesome crime. The boys were sent to one of the city’s few integrated schools, where Protestant and Catholic children were taught together.

Their grandfather was a part-time member of the Ulster Defence Regiment, the locally recruited branch of the army. “He had no time for paramilitaries. He was an independent man who believed in law and order,” says Craig’s aunt, Cathy McIlvenny, who runs a hairdressing salon on the Shankill Road. “When Lorraine was murdered, it left the whole family numb. No one talked about it, there were no photographs of her up because every time my father saw them, he broke down. All my parents focused on was bringing up these boys never to get involved with, or associate with, so-called paramilitaries.”

Craig continually asked questions about his mother, and whether he had seen her in her coffin. But her body was so battered she was unrecognisable and the coffin had to be closed. “Many of his questions were never answered because we didn’t know the answers,” Cathy says. All they knew was that on a Saturday night in March 1987 Lorraine had gone for a drink at the local community centre, which was run by the Ulster Defence Association, Northern Ireland’s biggest loyalist paramilitary group. Her half-naked body was found face down in a nearby stream the next morning. “Her injuries were horrific. Her liver was split in half, her skull fractured several times and her lung had exploded. She was beaten with a breeze block and a gas canister by a gang of more than three people,” Cathy says.

There was a trail of blood from the community centre to her body. The UDA never claimed the murder as a sanctioned killing, but everyone believed their members were to blame. The 20 people allegedly in the club at the time said they saw nothing. Her father placed an advert in the Belfast Telegraph offering a £1,000 reward for information. “Strictly confidential. Genuine. Someone knows - please help.” No one came forward.

Like every working-class teenager in Northern Ireland, everywhere Craig looked while growing up he saw paramilitaries. “He hated every one of them, he had no respect for them,” says Nichola McIlvenny, Craig’s cousin, who remembers how their group of friends would be constantly harassed by paramilitaries. “There is nowhere to go when you’re 14 or 15, so you stand in an entry, talking, drinking something, and the UVF or UDA threaten to shoot you for standing there. They sell dope to the kids on tick on a Friday or Saturday saying they don’t have to pay until next week. They give them more and more and when they owe £250 or £300, and they can’t pay it back, the paramilitaries tell them the choice is to get shot, beaten or join their organisation. In playground scraps, if one kid says they are from the junior wing of a paramilitary group, the other kid feels he has to club together with another group for protection. You either have to idolise them or keep away.”

Craig resented the local hardmen telling him what to do. He would smash their car windows and throw stones at their houses. “It became a game of point-scoring,” Nichola says. “He saw them all as his mother’s murderers.” Never good at school and angry at the world, Craig dabbled in anti-social behaviour and petty crime. At 15, the local UVF told him he had a choice: either they gave him a beating or he joined their organisation. If he had politely turned them down, he would simply have been battered in an alleyway at an arranged time. Instead, says Nichola, he answered back “in a right cheeky way,” and was shot in the leg and forced to leave north Belfast.

For five years, he lived in the east of the city where he had his son Dean with a girlfriend. He did a short spell in a young offenders’ institution for a minor offence, but after his son was born vowed to sort himself out. Then, early this year, his grandfather had a stroke. Craig needed to help the family care for him, but it meant returning to north Belfast.

“He kept a very low profile,” Nichola says. “He tried to stay in his house or got lifts everywhere. He never used any of the local taxi firms. He never went out to the shops, he never had a drink at any of the bars, which were all owned by the UVF or UDA. He didn’t want to be seen.”

Craig moved in with his new girlfriend, Kathy Gibson, an English care assistant, and her two children.

On July 10, at the height of the Protestant marching season, as red, white and blue bunting criss-crossed the streets, and children put the finishing touches to the 60ft bonfires that celebrate Protesant King Billy’s victory at the Battle of the Boyne, Craig went for a drink with relatives at a neighbour’s house. He went home before midnight, slightly drunk, and sank into a deep sleep. Kathy woke first when the fierce hammering on the front door began. He leaped up, dragged his jeans on and went to answer the door. By then, the children had come on to the landing in their pyjamas. When Craig was halfway down the stairs, two men burst in and fired a volley of shots. They ran back out but their getaway driver asked if they had “done him right”. All three then came back in and opened fire again for good measure.

Craig had been shot five times. He had been hit in the neck but was trying to speak. Kathy grabbed a towel from the laundry basket to stem the blood from his wounds and the children tried to help. They were sent to their father’s house nearby, covered from head to toe in blood, talking about what happened as if they had been watching a Hollywood film. The night-time panics and bed-wetting began later.

At the time of Craig’s death, Belfast’s latest loyalist feud was in full swing and the UVF and LVF wanted dead bodies to keep up their scores. Hours after Craig was killed, another man in his neighbourhood had to jump out of a first-floor window as masked men tried to smash down his door.

The next night, the UVF staged a show of strength at a council-sponsored bonfire in Belfast. Five masked men in combat fatigues got up on to the DJ’s stage and fired a volley of shots into the air.

“Here, when you see there has been a shooting on TV, you think, ‘Live by the gun, die by the gun’. We would have been guilty of thinking like that too,” Cathy McIlvenny says. “But we knew he wasn’t a paramilitary because of the way his mum was killed.”

Hours before Craig was killed, a local man, David Hanley, was shot several times by the LVF as he walked his dogs past a bonfire in north Belfast. Like Craig, he was not a paramilitary. It seemed to have been a case of mistaken identity. Left blind and unable to walk by the attack, he has contemplated suicide.

The McCauslands don’t know why Craig was killed. They wonder whether a UVF commander bore a grudge over Craig’s rude refusal of his order to join the organisation, and used the cover of the feud to have him murdered.

Four months on, several people have been questioned but no one has been charged. As often in Northern Ireland, everyone on the street says it’s obvious who did it but no one has been caught. The family say witnesses are too frightened to come forward.

After the feud’s death toll reached four and many families were forced from their homes, the LVF last month announced its members had been “stood down”. But the LVF is a small, peripheral group and bigger loyalist organisations remain. “When people keep getting away with murder, how can anything else in Northern Ireland move on?” says Cathy. “My mother always had a fear that what happened to Lorraine would happen again.”

It was not until two years ago, when her mother was dying of cancer and said she would be seeing Lorraine again soon, that the McCauslands sat down and talked about her murder. Lorraine’s father went to the police ombudsman, Nuala O’Loan, and asked her to investigate the police handling of the case.

When Craig was killed and the family were again faced with bringing up another two-year-old boy who could never understand the murder of his parent, they refused to stay quiet. They wrote to every party on Belfast council for help. The only person who didn’t reply or come to meet them was David Ervine, the leader of the Progressive Unionists, the political arm of the UVF, who had killed Craig. Ervine, who once served five years in the Maze on explosives charges, is credited with trying to steer the UVF away from violence. If he doesn’t have the courage to help them, the family says, then there is no hope.

Ervine told the Guardian: “What can I possibly do for them? They want justice for the murder of their loved one and I understand that. But what elements of justice can I deliver for them? Justice is a matter for the police and the courts. Should I storm into the middle of the UVF and demand the killers be handed over? It would be easy but it’s highly unlikely to succeed.”

Craig was one of four people killed by the UVF in its six-week summer murder spree. The government’s ceasefire watchdog, the Independent Monitoring Commission, blamed the UVF for the murders in a special report in September. But the Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain did not move to declare the group’s ceasefire had broken down until later that month, after UVF men had opened fire on police and army with automatic weapons and crossbows during the worst rioting in a decade.

The McCauslands want to meet Hain but he has so far declined to see them. He wrote to the leader of the Alliance Party, David Ford, saying “a meeting at such an early stage in the police investigation would offer [the family] little benefit.”

Ford says: “This is typical of the way the government currently operates in Northern Ireland. They are utterly lacking in any moral fibre.”

At Craig’s funeral, where his favourite Dido and Coldplay songs were played, his friend Johnny Sloan said they had both discussed leaving Northern Ireland to get away from paramilitaries. “Craig had friends everywhere who loved him. We had talked of getting away from it all. Now I wish we had”.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Jay of onefinejay.com