SAOIRSE32

18/12/2005

Adams: Dissidents undermining peace process

BreakingNews.ie

**The best defence is an offence…

18/12/2005 - 17:50:15

Dissident elements within the British security services are undermining progress made by the IRA during the peace process, Gerry Adams has warned.

As republicans reeled from revelations that one of Sinn Féin’s top aides at Stormont, Denis Donaldson, was a British spy since the mid-1980s, the party’s leader Gerry Adams arranged crisis talks tomorrow with Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain.

The move came as the British government faced mounting pressure for a House of Commons statement or public inquiry to explain the incredible series of events which led to the collapse of devolution in the North in October 2002 and the unmasking three years later of Mr Donaldson as a spy.

Mr Adams said tonight: “Following the historically significant initiatives by the IRA in recent months, a new opportunity has been opened up to make progress.

“The new year will see important efforts being made to restore the political institutions. All of this is at risk because of these dissident elements within the British system.

“The onus to stop this lies with the British government. It has to take whatever steps are necessary to rein in the wreckers who are opposing British government policy. And there has to be an end to political policing.”

In October 2002, Sinn Féin’s head of administration at Stormont, Denis Donaldson, his son in law, Ciaran Kearney and civil servant William Mackessy were arrested and accused of taking part in a republican intelligence gathering operation at Stormont.

Police Land Rovers swarmed Stormont’s Parliament Buildings as the Sinn Féin offices were raided.

The police operation resulted in unionists threatening to collapse power-sharing executive and the then Northern Ireland Secretary John Reid suspending devolution.

Power-sharing has not been restored since.

After a three-year legal battle, the Public Prosecution Service announced 10 days ago in Belfast Crown Court it was dropping the case against the three men because it was no longer in the public interest.

But in another sensational twist on Friday, Sinn Féin announced it had expelled Mr Donaldson after he confessed to senior party officials that he had been spying on his colleagues for 20 years.

The 55-year-old former prisoner and friend of IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands read from a prepared statement in which he admitted that he had been a spy since the mid-1980s after being compromised in his personal life.

Sticking to Sinn Féin’s claims that there was no republican spy ring at Stormont, he said: “The so-called Stormontgate affair was a scam and a fiction. It never existed. It was created by Special Branch.

“I deeply regret my activities with British intelligence are RUC/PSNI Special Branch. I apologise to anyone who has suffered as a result of my activities as well as to my former comrades and especially to my family who have become victims in all of this.”

Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain today disputed Mr Donaldson and Sinn Féin claims that the only spy operation at Stormont was being run by British intelligence.

Garda quits force ‘because of bullying campaign’

BreakingNews.ie

18/12/2005 - 16:09:55

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

A 43-year-old garda has quit the force because of a campaign of bullying and harassment, it emerged today.

It involved the shredding of his uniform in his locker, anonymous notes being placed on his desk and a digitally manipulated photo of him wearing a priest’s collar with the slogan: ‘Have the Gardaí gone soft?’.

The Dublin-based psychiatrist Dr Michael Corry, who details the case in his new book on depression, said there had been a flurry of activity after the garda made a complaint against a senior garda colleague.

“He started to receive untraceable phone calls in the night. When driving at night his car was followed, a garda car suddenly appearing behind his, intermittently flashing his lights and sounding the siren. He could never identify the driver.”

The garda found that he became a target of abuse after he completed a mediation course five years ago, and eventually had to go on sick leave, before retiring.

Dr Corry said the case, which is now going through the courts, was not an isolated one.

“Bullying in the Gardaí is ubiquitous at the moment. It’s a huge, huge problem. Because I do a lot of work with prison officers and guards, I would say they are the ones that get bullied the most.”

The hierarchical nature of the Gardaí means that bullies can give orders which on the surface appear normal but are designed to upset the victim. They can block the victim’s applications for transfers, promotion and specialist courses.

Under the Garda chain of command system, they can also read open letters from the chief medical officer before they are handed to the victim.

“Bullying has to be seen as an assault at work. It causes tremendous damage to people and it really crushes them,” said Dr Corry.

“There have been female members who have been sexually harassed and when they try to do something about it, they come up against a stone wall.”

In 1993, Dr Corry helped the Gardaí set up a peer support structure to deal with bullying in the force.

But he was so alarmed at the number of Gardaí who were still coming to him with complaints that he wrote a letter to the Garda Representative Association (GRA).

It was read out at their conference in Tralee last April in the presence of Justice Minister Michael McDowell, who responded by stating that the issue of bullying had to be addressed.

The Garda Commissioner Noel Conroy has since set up a working group to examine the current anti-bullying policies. They include the internal grievance procedures which many victims are afraid to use in case they become a target for even more bullying.

GRA president Dermot O’Donnell said he wanted to pay tribute to Dr Corry for having the courage to highlight the problem.

“I believe he has created an awareness at a higher level. It is still a huge problem. We all know someone who has been bullied, it’s commonplace, ” he said.

Mr O’Donnell said he had anecdotal evidence of at least one garda who had died by suicide due to bullying.

“In making garda management acknowledge the problem, we can then work in partnership to address it. It’s obviously going to take a long time and within our organisation, it will take a culture change as well. But change we must, it just cannot be tolerated any longer.

:: Depression: An Emotion not a Disease, by Dr Michael Corry and Dr Aine Tubridy, is published by Mercer Press.

Hain defends Stormont ’spy ring’ police

::: u.tv :::

Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain today defended a police operation against republicans which brought down devolution in the province three years ago and led to the exposure of a Sinn Fein official as a British spy.

SUNDAY 18/12/2005 14:28:13
By:Press Association

Following the sensational revelation last Friday that Sinn Fein`s former head of administration at Stormont, Denis Donaldson, had spied on republicans since the mid 1980s, Mr Hain stood by the police operation against an alleged republican spy ring.

The police raid on Sinn Fein`s Stormont offices in October 2002 led to the suspension of power sharing by the then Northern Ireland Secretary John Reid.

It also resulted in the arrest of three men including Mr Donaldson.

BUT 10 days ago the Public Prosecution Service withdrew charges against the 55-year-old Sinn Fein official, his son-in-law Ciaran Kearney and civil servant William Mackessy at Belfast Crown Court, claiming it was no longer in the public interest to proceed with the case.

As republicans tried to get to terms today with the dramatic expulsion of Mr Donaldson by Sinn Fein after he admitted to senior party officials that he had been a British spy, Mr Hain disputed the Sinn Fein leadership`s claim that the only spy ring that operated at Stormont was run by the British intelligence service.

He told ITV`s Jonathan Dimbleby programme: “This is a turbulent event.

“Let us remind ourselves about what happened.
“Something like a thousand documents were stolen from the Northern Ireland Office over which I now preside.

“They appeared in a West Belfast situation. They disappeared. They were stolen.

“The police went in, praised by the (Police) Ombudsman (Nuala O`Loan) by the way because this is the most regulated, supervised police force now in the world.

“It`s not what it used to be.

“The Police Ombudsman, she said they have done not only what was justified but what was absolutely necessary.

“Then events unfolded and the prosecution felt that they could not proceed in the public interest.”

The British government has faced increasing demands for a public inquiry into the Stormontgate affair since the collapse of the case against Mr Donaldson and his two co-accused.

However, those demands have grown even more intense after the unmasking of Mr Donaldson as an agent for police Special Branch and the British Army intelligence.

The Rev Ian Paisley`s Democratic Unionists, the nationalist SDLP, the Ulster Unionists and the cross community Alliance Party have demanded an explanation from the government.

Mr Hain is also expected to face questions from the Irish Foreign Minister Dermot Ahern when they meet at Hillsborough Castle in Co Down tomorrow.

Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams has also had to deal with disquiet among republicans who have been shocked by Friday`s revelations that the 55-year-old former head of the party administrative team at Stormont was an intelligence agent for the British.

Republicans were also facing mounting speculation that another high-placed mole existed in their ranks and could be exposed publicly like Mr Donaldson.

The rival nationalist SDLP`s vice-chair Eddie Espie suggested today Mr Adams should quit as Sinn Fein`s leader in the wake of the spying allegations.

“For 20 years, Denis Donaldson, one of Adams` closest allies, has been feeding information to the British intelligence services,” he argued.

“Only a few days ago, Gerry Adams was happy to appear alongside Donaldson on the steps of Stormont, presenting him as a `victim of securocrats` and trying to tell everyone to move on from the Stormontgate affair.

“Now it transpires that Adams was singing the praises of an arch-British agent.

“As party leader throughout the period of Donaldson`s double agency, Gerry Adams was party leader. The buck stops with him. The only option now open is for Gerry Adams to resign.”

In a city awash with rumours, there has been speculation that Mr Donaldson and his family have left their home in the heart of republican west Belfast.

Some reports have suggested they have gone into hiding in the Irish Republic while others have suggested they have fled to somewhere in Europe.

Mr Donaldson, a friend of IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands, confessed to his role as a British agent in his statement broadcast on Irish television on Friday night.

The former Sinn Fein official said he had been recruited as an agent after being compromised at a vulnerable time in his life and had been paid for the information he had passed to the British.

But he also stuck to Sinn Fein`s claims that there was no republican spy ring at Stormont.

“I was not involved in any republican spy ring in Stormont,” he said.

“The so-called Stormontgate affair was a scam and a fiction, it never existed. It was created by Special Branch.

“I deeply regret my activities with British intelligence and RUC/PSNI Special Branch.

“I apologise to anyone who has suffered as a result of my activities as well to my former comrades and especially to my family who have become victims in all of this.”

Birdman of Belfast gets wings clipped

Sunday Life

Defiant Gerry: ‘They can coop me up in jail… but I’ll not pay litter fine’

By Stephen Breen
18 December 2005

The angry ‘have-a-go’ hero is being fined by Belfast City Council - for feeding PIGEONS!

Outraged Gerard Braiden - whose best pal Norman Lowry was left fighting for his life after they attempted to stop a notorious car thief last March - hit out at the council for slapping him with a £50 litter fine.

Mr Braiden (51), was involved in a heated row with a litter warden last week after he fed pigeons with seed at Hector Street in the city centre.

The warden, who was accompanied by two police officers, told Mr Braiden that he was committing an offence by feeding the birds.

Ironically, the bird-lover was feeding the pigeons just a few yards from where his pal was mown down by car thief Stephen O’Hagan.

And in the week that O’Hagan was due to be jailed for a catalogue of motoring offences, Mr Braiden can’t believe that he could also end up in court.

The Belfastman has refused to pay the fine - and has vowed to go to jail if necessary.

He said: “I love all kinds of animals - including pigeons.

“I can’t believe the council wants to fine me for feeding the birds.

“But I am taking a firm stand on this. There’s no way I’m going to pay this fine.

“I will go to court and, if I have to, go to prison.”

He added: “Litter in the dictionary is defined as dropping rubbish in a public place.

“But I wasn’t dropping anything in a public place - it was on private property.

“I can’t even see how they think I’m dumping rubbish, because as soon as the seed was dropped on the ground, the pigeons had gobbled it up in a matter of minutes.

“I don’t know why they are taking this action against me - the whole thing is crazy.”

Jim Ferguson, operations manager for the council’s street cleansing department, defended the action.

He said: “The litter warden observed Mr Braiden on numerous occasions feeding pigeons with corn seed.

“He was warned, but continued to feed the pigeons - even though we told him it was an offence under the 1994 Litter Act.

“Corn seed attract rats and, if everybody in Belfast fed pigeons with corn seed, rats would be running riot everywhere.

“Mr Braiden will receive a £50 fine and, if he doesn’t pay it, he will have his day in court.”

Victom of city floods hurt in bomb horror

Sunday Life

By Ciaran McGuigan
18 December 2005

THE disabled man who met with NIO minister Shaun Woodward last week to welcome claims for compensation for victims of the Lower Ormeau flood is carrying a tragic secret.

For wheelchair-user Victor Gargan only narrowly escaped with his life when he was the innocent victim of a horrific pipe-bomb explosion.

Mr Gargan, who television viewers saw meeting the Regional Development Minister, lost two fingers and a thumb after being the innocent victim in the explosion - when he was just eight-years-old.

Victor had been playing with his younger brother and another pal outside their Hatfield Street homes when he found a pipe-bomb inside a hedge.

The device - believed to have been thrown from a passing car - exploded in Victor’s hand causing him to lose two fingers and a thumb.

His brother and pal also suffered head and facial injuries from nails and other shrapnel from the device.

Mr Gargan (40), suffers from a cerebral condition that attacks his nervous system and can lead to fits - leaving his life in danger when sewage and water flooded into his house.

A Fire and Rescue team, and local community workers, were able to help him from his home when the floods struck on December 1.

It was one of almost 50 homes that suffered damage caused by shortfalls in the drainage and sewage system. More than 20 homes were destroyed.

Mr Woodward last week announce interim compensation payments of between £1,000 and £2,000 to 43 homes in the area, with full compensation to follow later.

The flooding, which saw a number of streets under over a foot of water, and carried raw sewage from throughout Belfast through homes, was blamed on a blocked sewer and a broken pump in the drainage system

Devlin family: Our pain is very deep’

Sunday Life

By Stephen Breen
18 December 2005

THE grieving parents of murdered teenager Thomas Devlin last night issued a special Christmas plea for anyone with information on the brutal killing to come forward.

Thomas’s heartbroken mum and dad, Jim and Penny, spoke to Sunday Life about their pain and torment from their home, in Somerton Road, north Belfast.

And the Belfast Royal Academy pupil’s parents have appealed directly to the partners, friends and relatives of the evil killers to provide police with the vital clues that could put the murderers behind bars.

Said Jim: “Our pain is very real and very deep and anyone who has lost a child will tell you this.

“Thomas was a gift to us, but an evil killer has taken this away from us.

“I appreciate there may be people out there who know who was responsible for killing an innocent child, but are living of fear of such a violent man.

“But any person - no matter how close they are to these people - who stood up to be counted against a child-killer would be a hero in our eyes.”

Added Jim: “We want justice for our son, but people have to remember the person who murdered Thomas will no doubt have the capacity to rob someone else of an innocent child.

“At this time of year, I would plead with anyone who knows anything - no matter how insignificant they think it may be - to contact police immediately.”

The popular 15-year-old died in August, after he was stabbed five times in the back as he walked along Somerton Road in north Belfast with pals.

The teenager’s young friend was also seriously injured in the horrific and unprovoked attack.

Although a number of people were questioned about his murder, no one has been charged.

Thomas’s mum, Penny, spoke of her heartache at her family having to spend Christmas without him.

She said: “There’s no doubt Christmas will be very difficult for our family.

“Thomas loved Christmas - he would have had a long list of presents he wanted.

“I would just ask anyone who is sitting down with the killers at Christmas, and they know what they have done, to think of us and how we are feeling.

“I hope goodness will come to the fore at this time of year.”

She added: “People need to bear in mind just how violent the attack on Thomas and his friend was. Whoever did this crept up behind two kids with the intention of killing them.

“It is also a very difficult time for my other children, Megan and James, because they are coming home and their brother is not here.”

“Thomas was the future of this society - part of a new generation that had no interest in religion or division.

“The killer could do this to his next-door neighbour and that’s why we want to see him behind bars.

“How could anyone take a gift from, or give a gift to, someone - knowing what they have done to an innocent child?”

The detective leading the hunt for the killers, DCI Ian Gilchrist, also appealed for anyone with information to come forward.

He said: “The investigation is progressing well, and we would like nothing more than to bring the killer or killers before the courts.

“The people who did this may be violent to those around them and we would urge anyone with information to come forward immediately so we can try and bring some closure to the Devlin family.”

Remember Lisa this Xmas

Sunday Life

By Stephen Breen
18 December 2005

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

THIS time last year, the Dorrian family were busy preparing for Christmas and the New Year.

But, when Christmas Day falls next Sunday, it will just seem like any other day to the Dorrians.

For the family’s thoughts will not be on opening presents or the Christmas turkey.

Instead, they will be dominated by the disappearance and murder of their daughter, Lisa.

Lisa (25), who lived for Christmas, vanished after attending a party in Ballyhalbert in February.

Since then, the murder-victim’s heartbroken family have embarked on a campaign to have her body returned and her evil killers brought to justice.

A number of searches have been undertaken in recent weeks by cops, but they have failed to locate the missing woman.

Although they have not been thinking about Christmas, the family will do their best to make it special for Lisa’s nine-year-old sister, Ciara, and nephew, Ryan (5).

Speaking to Sunday Life at their home in Conlig, Co Down, Lisa’s dad, John, spoke of his family’s pain at spending Christmas without her.

He said: “There will be an empty space at our table and in our hearts this Christmas and we can’t believe it.

“The last 10 months have been a living hell.”

He added: “We will all wake up on Christmas morning with the same questions that we have had for the last 10 months: ‘Where is Lisa?’ and ‘What have these evil people done with her?’

“Lisa loved Christmas and we had a great time last year. Little did we know that it would be the last Christmas we would ever spend with her.

“It will be hard on Christmas Day, but we will have to put on a brave face for the kids.

“My wife, Pat, and I went out the other night for dinner, but we had to come home early because we were just thinking about our daughter.

“Her sisters, Joanne and Michelle, will also be devastated, because we did the baby-sitting on New Year’s Eve and the girls always went out.

“But, this year, that has been taken away from them. And for what? What motive lies behind this evil crime?”

The distraught father also made a heartfelt plea to the killers to tell police where Lisa’s body is.

“I want these people to think of their own family, and how they would think if they didn’t have their daughter or sister at Christmas,” he said.

“All we want is for her body to be returned, because we haven’t been able to grieve properly since this whole nightmare began.

“Our pain is getting worse the longer this goes on.

“That’s why, at this time of year, I am pleading with these people to tell us where she is. All it takes is a phonecall.

“We know the suspects have brothers and sisters, and if they could only imagine what we are going through and if it happened to their family.

“How can they live with themselves by putting us through this pain? All we want for Christmas is for Lisa’s body to be returned and, when it comes into 2006, we will step up our campaign for justice.”

sbreen@belfast telegraph.co.uk

Jail spy Scap for perjury’

Sunday Life

By Sunday Life Reporter
18 December 2005

A FORMER Army intelligence handler has called for IRA superspy Freddie Scappaticci to be jailed for PERJURY.

Force Research Unit whistleblower ‘Martin Ingram’ believes that Scappaticci, known as Stakeknife, should be hauled before the courts for lying in his attempts to gag Sunday Life.

And he has written to retired Metropolitan police chief Lord John Stevens in a bid to have Chief Constable Hugh Orde investigate his perjury claims.

In his letter to Lord Stevens, Ingram points to several leading figures in the security services who would be able to verify that Scappaticci committed perjury when he swore an affidavit claiming he was not Stakeknife.

Scappaticci, currently on police bail on murder and kidnapping charges, would be expected to benefit from the On The Runs legislation that will see terror fugitives escape jail sentences for their crimes although their cases would be heard by tribunal.

If Scappaticci was to be convicted by that tribunal, that would in effect PROVE that his affidavit in his case against this newspaper was a pack of lies.

Scappaticci went to court in February last year to try to prevent Sunday Life serialising a book written by Ingram and journalist Greg Harkin, Stakeknife: Britain’s Secret Agent in Ireland.

His lawyers asked a judge to overturn a decision by the Ministry of Defence not to extend an injunction - already in place in England and Wales - against Sunday Life and Martin Ingram, a former MoD employee. Part of his case was that he was NOT Stakeknife.

Said Ingram: “Scappaticci’s attempt to censor Sunday Life and the publication of the book was an attempt to hide the truth and we were delighted at the time when Stakeknife lost his action.

“There is now no doubt that all acts of collusion will be buried in the OTR legislation, therefore allowing the truth of many cases to be hidden forever.

“In Scappaticci’s case, if he were convicted of crimes including murder, he would be able to walk away a free man.

“I believe the only way of getting Mr Scappaticci to face any questions is by using the Sunday Life case, to which I was an interested party, by making a formal complaint of perjury against him.

“He is and was Stakeknife.”

Mr Ingram added: “I do not believe the families who have been touched by the work of agents and their handlers will ever get to the truth now and that includes the family of the late solicitor Pat Finucane.”

MI5 feared Donaldson was a double agent

Sunday Times

**Via NEWSHOUND

Liam Clarke
December 18, 2005

DENIS DONALDSON, the British mole in Sinn Fein, was cast adrift by his handlers after they suspected that he had become a double agent spying on the Stormont administration for the IRA.

Donaldson’s role was uncovered by a second low-level informer who was reporting to the PSNI Special Branch.

A security source said: “Denis was caught with his fingers in the till. He wasn’t telling his handlers everything he was up to.”

The search is now likely to start within the republican movement for
the second mole and nobody will be above suspicion. Two years ago Freddie Scappaticci, deputy head of the IRA’s internal security division, was unmasked as a British agent known as Stakeknife.

The second Stormontgate agent gave the police information that led them to a stash of documents and a computer containing IRA intelligence gathered at Stormont. It included the details of thousands of prison officers, dissident republicans, civil servants and even a well known lawyer with the words “must go” written beside her name.

The tip-off came within a few days of the IRA raid on Special Branch headquarters in Castlereagh on March 17, 2002. The code names of scores of Special Branch detectives and clues to the identities of informants were seized by the IRA.

Larry Zaitschek, a former chef at Castlereagh police station, was suspected of helping the raid. Donaldson had met Zaitschek in New York when he was the Sinn Fein representative in America, and encouraged him to come to Northern Ireland. Zaitschek returned to New York shortly before the raid and now denies all involvement in it.

The papers stolen at Castlereagh were taken first to Derry and then to the republic. Police believed that the Stormont papers were destined for the same IRA network. A surveillance operation, codenamed Torsion, was launched, involving telephone taps bugging, surveillance and the use of agents.

The IRA documents involved were recovered with the help of the informant and then copied and returned to their hiding place.

Operation Torsion culminated on 4 October 2002 in a raid on Donaldson’s home and a follow-up search at his office in Stormont, where three computer discs were seized.

Two days before the raid Donaldson had met his Special Branch handlers. He had told them nothing of the spy ring and they did not warn him that he was at the centre of an investigation.

Donaldson got no protection from Special Branch or MI5, to whom he had also reported on occasions, because he had not passed on information about the documents. Donaldson, his son-in-law Ciaran Kearney and William Mackessy, a former civil service messenger at Stormont who now works for Sinn Fein’s Gerry Kelly, were all charged.

A decision was taken to drop the case against them when the prosecution was refused Public Immunity Certificates that would have protected the agents’ identities. By that time, Sinn Fein’s suspicions had been roused that one or more informants were involved.

On Tuesday, Donaldson was met by his handlers for the first time since his arrest and told his life was in danger.

The ensuing political row is unlikely to subside, even though the British government and Sinn Fein are both eager to draw a line under the affair.

Lord Goldsmith, the British attorney general, has told the SDLP, DUP and UUP that he was satisfied that there was ample evidence on which to base a prosecution of Donaldson, Kearney and Mackessy but that it had been withdrawn in the public interest. This is normally a code for the protection of life or of an important intelligence interest.

Matters are unlikely to rest there, with the Ulster Unionists demanding a public inquiry, the DUP and SDLP seeking more information, and Bertie Ahern asking the British government for clarification.

David Trimble, the former Ulster Unionist leader whose administration was toppled by Stormontgate, said: “It’s the republican movement that’s in a crisis today. They have discovered that a person who was at a very senior level within Sinn Fein in fact was operating as an agent for over 20 years.”

The SDLP is suggesting that Adams should resign. Eddie Espie, the party’s vice-chairman, said: “Only a few days ago, Adams was happy to appear alongside Donaldson on the steps of Stormont. Now it transpires that Adams was singing the praises of an arch-British agent. The buck stops with him. The only option now open is for Adams to resign.”

Serving the agenda of two masters

Newshound

(Anthony McIntyre, Irish News)

Denis Donaldson was a stalwart defender of the peace process. Closer to the Sinn Féin leadership think tank than Freddie Scappaticci aka Stakeknife – very close in fact – Donaldson was never slow to berate those who dissented from the leadership.

While in Maghaberry on remand as a result of Stormontgate, both as a leading Sinn Féin activist and a long- term British agent (the difference is sometimes blurred) a Real IRA prisoner offered him Ed Moloney’s book A Secret History of the IRA.

Donaldson reacted as if he had been scalded, declined to take the book, muttering that it was unhelpful to the peace process and that it undermined the credibility of the Sinn Féin leadership.

A number of months ago as I walked my young daughter into her school, Donaldson looked at me with something close to hatred.

Seemingly, I too was not helpful to the peace process.

Frequently, Donaldson would seek to demonise me and vilify my writing on the grounds that it was disloyal to the leadership.

With him as part of that leadership I shall proudly wear my disloyalty like a badge of honour.

And part of that leadership he was.

Early in the peace process and shortly after he was sent out to take charge of the party’s New York operation, he began to undermine anyone thinking along traditional republican lines.

Martin Galvin became a casualty in that exercise. According to Galvin, the orders from the Sinn Féin leadership in Belfast were that all vestiges of the old order be purged and replaced with others who would be acceptable to the US political class.

Sinn Féin in New York was to be such in name only.

Operationally, under the guidance of Donaldson, it was to function much the same as Fianna Fail.

Whether in south Down or Antrim town, the role of Donaldson as leadership enforcer remained as it was in New York. Any republican who asked a question about the strategic direction of the party was removed by him and expelled from the movement. Solid republicans such as Paddy Murray and Martin Cunningham were ambushed by this agent of the British state.

While Donaldson did all of this at the behest of the Sinn Féin leadership, it is inconceivable that his ’securocrat’ handlers also did not approve of his activities.

His role was to implement the shared agenda of two masters.

The Sinn Féin leadership, shaken less by the fact that it appears agent-penetrated and more by the revelations of how closely its own agenda and that of the British state overlap, has resorted to abandoning Donaldson in a manner that Scappaticci escaped.

Gerry Adams has sought to construct the fiction that there was no Sinn Féin spy-ring at Stormont; that the only spy-ring there was, in fact, one operated by the British intelligence services.

This would be all very well were it not for the fact that the person operating the same spy-ring happens to be a senior elected Sinn Féin politician.

Scappaticci certainly provided his British handlers with an inordinate amount of information about the same person in a bid to make him more susceptible to “being turned” through blackmail.

Is Mr Adams telling us that this politician is the third ‘horseman’?

What a complex web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

It is too early to say that there are sufficient horsemen within the Sinn Féin leadership to make a cavalry regiment.

But, as Oscar Wilde might have said, one tout, Mr Adams, is misfortune, two is carelessness.

December 18, 2005
________________

This article appeared first in the December 17, 2005 edition of the Irish News.

‘Adams should quit’: SDLP vice chair

BreakingNews.ie

18/12/2005 - 10:14:44

Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams (pictured) should quit in the wake of spying allegations which have rocked his party, a leading SDLP member claimed today.

As pressure mounted on the British government to hold an inquiry into the scandal which brought down Northern Ireland’s devolved government in 2002, SDLP vice chair Eddie Espie said Mr Adams should take the heat for the revelation that one of his aides Denis Donaldson was a British spy.

Mr Espie said: “This project of super collusion happened under Gerry Adams’ watch. For 20 years, Denis Donaldson, one of Adams’s closest allies, has been feeding information to the British intelligence services.

“Only a few days ago, Gerry Adams was happy to appear alongside Donaldson on the steps of Stormont, presenting him as a ’victim of securocrats’ and trying to tell everyone to move on from the Stormontgate affair.

“Now it transpires that Adams was singing the praises of an arch-British agent.

“As party leader throughout the period of Donaldson’s double agency, Gerry Adams was party leader. The buck stops with him. The only option now open is for Gerry Adams to resign.”

Republicans have been reeling since it emerged on Friday that Mr Donaldson, Sinn Féin’s former head of administration at Stormont, was working for British Army and police intelligence since the mid-1980s.

The revelation came eight days after the Public Prosecution Service announced in Belfast Crown Court it was dropping a case against Mr Donaldson, his son-in-law Ciaran Kearney and civil servant William Mackessy based on claims that they were involved in a republican intelligence gathering operation.

The three men were arrested in October 2002 and a high profile raid by police took place on Sinn Féin’s offices at Stormont.

Allegations that republicans were running a spy ring led to the suspension of power-sharing by the then Northern Ireland Secretary John Reid.

Devolution has not been restored since.

Sinn Féin has strenuously denied there was ever any republican spy ring.

On Thursday, Mr Donaldson, a friend of IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands, confessed to party officials he had been spying on them for two decades after he was warned by police he was about to be publicly exposed as an agent.

His expulsion from Sinn Féin was revealed by Gerry Adams on Friday who also unmasked the 55-year-old as a spy.

Mr Donaldson later confirmed the claims in a statement on Friday night.

The former Sinn Féin official said he had been recruited by the security services after he was compromised at a vulnerable time in his life.

He also stuck to Sinn Féin’s claims that there was no republican spy ring at Stormont.

“I was not involved in any republican spy ring in Stormont,” he said.

“The so-called Stormontgate affair was a scam and a fiction. It never existed. It was created by Special Branch.

“I deeply regret my activities with British intelligence and RUC/PSNI Special ranch. I apologise to anyone who has suffered as a result of my activities as well as to my former comrades and especially to my family who have become victims in all of this.”

Democratic Unionist MEP Jim Allister yesterday called on British Prime Minister Tony Blair to make a statement in the House of Commons tomorrow on the Stormontgate affair.

Ulster Unionist leader Reg Empey has also demanded an explanation.

Sinn Féin’s Martin McGuinness yesterday insisted the only spy ring which operated at Stormont was run by the British intelligence services.

He stopped short of calling for a public inquiry into the affair.

The Mid Ulster MP told BBC Radio Ulster: “What would a public inquiry achieve? In the circumstances the unionists have called for an inquiry. Let’s see if they get one. Let‘s see if that happens.

“It is very, very clear from Sinn Féin’s perspective – and I think this is shared increasingly by many other people within our society – that there was a spy ring at Stormont, but it was a British spy ring controlled by securocrats, by people within the establishment who are hostile to the peace process.”

Britain’s secret torture centre: The interrogation camp that turned prisoners into living skeletons

Guardian

German spa became a forbidden village where Gestapo-like techniques were used

Ian Cobain
Saturday December 17, 2005
The Guardian

Despite the six years of bitter fighting which lay behind him, James Morgan-Jones, a major in the Royal Artillery, could not have been more specific about the spectacle in front of him. “It was,” he reported, “one of the most disgusting sights of my life.”

Curled up on a bed in a hospital in Rotenburg, near Bremen, was a cadaverous shadow of a human being. “The man literally had no flesh on him, his state of emaciation was incredible,” wrote Morgan-Jones. This man had weighed a little over six stones (38kg) on admission five weeks earlier, and “was still a figure which may well have been one of the Belsen inmates”. At the base of his spine “was a huge festering sore”, and he was clearly terrified of returning to the prison where he had been brought so close to death. “If ever a man showed fear - he did,” Morgan-Jones declared.

Adolf Galla, 36, a dental technician, was not alone. A few beds away lay Robert Buttlar, 27, a journalist, who had been admitted after swallowing a spoon handle in a suicide attempt at the same prison. He too was emaciated and four of his toes had been lost to frostbite.

The previous month, January 1947, two other inmates, Walter Bergmann, 20, and Franz Osterreicher, 38, had died of malnutrition within hours of arriving at the hospital. Over the previous 13 months, Major Morgan-Jones learned, 45 inmates of this prison, including several women, had been dumped at Rotenburg. Each was severely starved, frostbitten, and caked in dirt. Some had been beaten or whipped.

The same week that Major Morgan-Jones was submitting his report, a British doctor called Jordan was raising similar concerns at an internment camp 130 miles away. Dr Jordan complained to his superiors that eight men who had been transferred from the same prison “were all suffering gross malnutrition … one in my opinion dying”.

They included Gerhard Menzel, 23, a 6ft German former soldier who weighed seven stones, and was described as a living skeleton. Another, admitted as Morice Marcellini, a 27-year-old Frenchman, later transpired to be Alexander Kalkowski, a captain in the Soviet secret police, the NKVD. He weighed a little over eight stones, and complained that he had been severely beaten and forced to spend eight hours a day in a cold bath.

Prisoners complained thumbscrews and “shin screws” were employed at the prison and Dr Jordan’s report highlighted the small, round scars that he had seen on the legs of two men, “which were said to be the result of the use of some instrument to facilitate questioning”. One of these men was Hans Habermann, a 43-year-old disabled German Jew who had survived three years in Buchenwald concentration camp.

All of these men had been held at Bad Nenndorf, a small, once-elegant spa resort near Hanover. Here, an organisation called the Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre (CSDIC) ran a secret prison following the British occupation of north-west Germany in 1945.

CSDIC, a division of the War Office, operated interrogation centres around the world, including one known as the London Cage, located in one of London’s most exclusive neighbourhoods. Official documents discovered last month at the National Archives at Kew, south-west London, show that the London Cage was a secret torture centre where German prisoners who had been concealed from the Red Cross were beaten, deprived of sleep, and threatened with execution or with unnecessary surgery.

As horrific as conditions were at the London Cage, Bad Nenndorf was far worse. Last week, Foreign Office files which have remained closed for almost 60 years were opened after a request by the Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act. These papers, and others declassified earlier, lay bare the appalling suffering of many of the 372 men and 44 women who passed through the centre during the 22 months it operated before its closure in July 1947.

They detail the investigation carried out by a Scotland Yard detective, Inspector Tom Hayward, following the complaints of Major Morgan-Jones and Dr Jordan. Despite the precise and formal prose of the detective’s report to the military government, anger and revulsion leap from every page as he turns his spotlight on a place where prisoners were systematically beaten and exposed to extreme cold, where some were starved to death and, allegedly, tortured with instruments that his fellow countrymen had recovered from a Gestapo prison in Hamburg. Even today, the Foreign Office is refusing to release photographs taken of some of the “living skeletons” on their release.

Initially, most of the detainees were Nazi party members or former members of the SS, rounded up in an attempt to thwart any Nazi insurgency. A significant number, however, were industrialists, tobacco importers, oil company bosses or forestry owners who had flourished under Hitler.

By late 1946, the papers show, an increasing number were suspected Soviet agents. Some were NKVD officers - Russians, Czechs and Hungarians - but many were simply German leftists. Others were Germans living in the Russian zone who had crossed the line, offered to spy on the Russians, and were tortured to establish whether they were genuine defectors.

One of the men who was starved to death, Walter Bergmann, had offered to spy for the British, and fell under suspicion because he spoke Russian. Hayward reported: “There seems little doubt that Bergmann, against whom no charge of any crime has ever been made, but on the contrary, who appears to be a man who has given every assistance, and that of considerable value, has lost his life through malnutrition and lack of medical care”.

The other man who starved to death, Franz Osterreicher, had been arrested with forged papers while attempting to enter the British zone in search of his gay lover. Hayward said that “in his struggle for existence or to get extra scraps of food he stood a very poor chance” at Bad Nenndorf.

Many of Bad Nenndorf’s inmates were there for no reason at all. One, a former diplomat, remained locked up because he had “learned too much about our interrogation methods”. Another arrived after a clerical error, and was incarcerated for eight months. As Inspector Hayward reported: “There are a number against whom no offence has been alleged, and the only authority for their detention would appear to be that they are citizens of a country still nominally at war with us.”

Today, the older people of Bad Nenndorf talk about August 1 1945, the day the British arrived, with undisguised bitterness. A convoy of trucks pulled into the village, and the Tommies took over from an easygoing US infantry division. Within hours, the British had ordered everybody in the centre of the village to pack their belongings and leave. Bad Nenndorf was heaving with refugees from the bomb-ravaged ruins of Hanover, 18 miles to the east: hundreds of people were given 90 minutes to pack some food and valuables, and get out.

“We thought everyone would be allowed back in a few days,” recalls Walter Münstermann, now a retired newspaperman, but then a 14-year-old. “Then the soldiers started putting barbed wire fences around the centre of the village, and slowly we began to realise that this was going to be no ordinary camp.”

Walter and his neighbours realised that the centre of their village was being transformed into a prison camp when they heard that the British were converting a large, 40-year-old bath-house, ripping out the baths and installing heavy steel doors to turn each cubicle into a cell. They saw the first batch of prisoners arrive in the back of a truck. Later groups arrived at the village railway station in cattle trucks.

Ingrid Groth, then a seven-year-old, said locals claimed that if you crept up to the barbed wire at night, you could hear the prisoners’ screams. Mr Münstermann, who passed the main gate on his way to school each day, insists that the opposite was true: that it was a sinister place precisely because “you never, ever saw anyone, and you never heard a sound”. Among the people of Lower Saxony, Bad Nenndorf became known as das verbotene dorf - the forbidden village.

The commanding officer was Robin “Tin Eye” Stephens, 45, a monocled colonel of the Peshawar Division of the Indian Army who had been seconded to MI5 in 1939, and who had commanded Camp 020, a detention centre in Surrey where German spies had been interrogated during the war.

An authoritarian and a xenophobe with a legendary temper, Stephens boasted that interrogators who could “break” a man were born, and not made. Of the 20 interrogators ordered to break the inmates of Bad Nenndorf, 12 were British, a combination of officers from the three services and civilian linguists. The remaining eight included a Pole and a Dutchman, but were mostly German Jewish refugees who had enlisted on the outbreak of war, and who, Inspector Hayward suggested, “might not be expected to be wholly impartial”.

Most of the warders were soldiers barely out of their teens. Some had endured more than a year of combat, at the end of which they had liberated Belsen. Some represented the more unruly elements of the British Army of the Rhine, sent to Bad Nenndorf after receiving suspended sentences for assault or desertion. Often, Hayward said, they were the sort of individuals “likely to resort to violence on helpless men”.

The inmates were starved, woken during the night, and forced to walk up and down their cells from early morning until late at night. When moving about the prison they were expected to run, while soldiers kicked them. One warder, a soldier of the Welsh Regiment, told Hayward: “If a British soldier feels inclined to treat a prisoner decently he has every opportunity to do so; and he also has the opportunity to ill-treat a prisoner if he so desires”.

The Foreign Office briefed Clement Attlee, the prime minister, that “the guards had apparently been instructed to carry out physical assaults on certain prisoners with the object of reducing them to a state of physical collapse and of making them more amenable to interrogation”.

Former prisoners told Hayward that they had been whipped as well as beaten. This, the detective said, seemed unbelievable, until “our inquiries of warders and guards produced most unexpected corroboration”. Threats to execute prisoners, or to arrest, torture and murder their wives and children were considered “perfectly proper”, on the grounds that such threats were never carried out.

Moreover, any prisoner thought to be uncooperative during interrogation was taken to a punishment cell where they would be stripped and repeatedly doused in water. This punishment could continue for weeks, even in sub-zero temperatures.

Naked prisoners were handcuffed back-to-back and forced to stand before open windows in midwinter. Frostbite became common. One victim of the cold cell punishment was Buttlar, who swallowed the spoon handle to escape. An anti-Nazi, he had spent two years as a prisoner of the Gestapo. “I never in all those two years had undergone such treatments,” he said.

Kalkowski, the NKVD officer, claimed that toenails were ripped out and that he had been hung from his wrists during interrogation, with weights tied to his legs. British NCOs, he alleged, would beat him with rubber truncheons “while the interrogating officers went for lunch”. Hayward concluded, however, that “there was not a shred of evidence to support these allegations”.

Whatever was happening during the interrogations must have been widely known among many of the camp’s officers and men. In common with every CSDIC prison, each cell was bugged, so that the prisoners’ private utterances could be matched against their “confessions”.

Inspector Hayward’s investigation led to the courts martial of Stephens, Captain John Smith, Bad Nenndorf’s medical officer, and an interrogator, Lieutenant Richard Langham. The hearings were largely held behind closed doors. A number of sergeants - men who had carried out the beatings - were told they would be pardoned if they gave evidence against their officers.

Langham, who had been born in Munich and fled to England with his parents in 1934, at the age of 13, denied that he had mistreated prisoners and was acquitted. Charges of manslaughter against Smith were dropped but, after a court martial held entirely in secret, he was found guilty of the neglect of inmates and sentenced, at the age of 49, to be dismissed the service.

It is unclear whether any of Stephens’s superiors knew, or condoned, what had happened at Bad Nenndorf, although his lawyers said they were prepared to spread the blame among senior army officers and Foreign Office officials. Before his court martial began there was nervous debate among ministers and government officials about how to avoid the repercussions which would follow, should the truth become known.

Ministers were anxious that nobody should learn that CSDIC was running a number of similar prisons in Germany. There was also what the chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Frank Pakenham, later to become Lord Longford, described as “the fact that we are alleged to have treated internees in a manner reminiscent of the German concentration camps”. The army, meanwhile, said it was determined the Soviets should not discover “how we apprehended and treated their agents”, not least because some would-be defectors might have second thoughts.

Finally, there was the inevitable fall-out for Attlee’s Labour government. As Hector McNeill, foreign minister, pointed out in a memo to Ernest Bevin, the foreign secretary: “I doubt if I can put too strongly the parliamentary consequences of publicity. Whenever we have any allegations to make about the political police methods in Eastern European states it will be enough to call out in the House ‘Bad Nenndorf’, and no reply is left to us.”

Stephens was eventually court martialled behind closed doors. Amid complaints of a half-hearted prosecution, he was acquitted of two charges, two others were withdrawn, and he was free to apply to rejoin MI5.

In Bad Nenndorf, the remaining prisoners were shipped out, the wire ripped down, and the prison shut down. The baths were reinstalled in the cubicles and, gradually, the spa returned to its traditional business of catering for the health needs of elderly German tourists.

The closure of Bad Nenndorf was not the end of the story, however. The archives reveal that three months later a custom-built interrogation centre, with cells for 30 men and 10 women, was opened near to the British military base at Gütersloh. The inmates were to be suspected Soviet spies, and would be medically examined before interrogation.

When Frank Pakenham complained that most of the interrogators had been at Bad Nenndorf, and demanded that “drastic methods” should not be employed, Major-General Sir Brian Robertson, the military governor, put his foot down.

Why, he exclaimed, if the military authorities were required to justify the arrest of each inmate, and then handle them according to the standards “enforced by the prison commissioners in our own enlightened country”, there was little point in having an interrogation centre at all.

Death subterfuge

One of the most bizarre episodes at Bad Nenndorf followed the death of a former SS officer called Abeling. He had been so severely beaten during his arrest in January 1947 that he was unconscious on arrival at the prison, and died shortly afterwards.

The camp’s officers instructed a local gravedigger to prepare a grave for a British officer who had died of an infectious disease. Abeling’s corpse was sewn into a blanket, lowered in, and covered with quicklime. A firing party was on hand to ensure that the dead man was buried with full British military honours, and a white wooden cross with a false name was erected over the grave.

The reasons for such subterfuge are made clear in declassified Foreign Office papers at the National Archives. Abeling, formerly a member of an “annihilation squad” in Warsaw, had been working as an agent for the Americans at the time of his death, spying on his old Nazi comrades under the codename Slim.

The report notes that the Americans “insisted that ‘Slim’s’ death must be kept a very closely guarded secret, because of the fact that the US authorities had been employing him in the full knowledge that he was wanted by the Polish government as a major war criminal”.

Today the wooden cross over Abeling’s grave has been replaced with a gravestone. It still bears the name of the man that local people believe to be buried there: John X White, born 1.8.1911, died 17.1.1947.

The spy at the heart of the IRA

Sunday Times

Denis Donaldson climbed his way from Belfast’s streets to the top of the republican movement. Yet on Friday it was revealed that for the past 20 years he had been passing secrets to London. Liam Clarke tells the story of his double life as a British agent in a dirty war

The Sunday Times
December 18, 2005

As a young man, Denis Donaldson was good at getting out of scrapes, both as an IRA volunteer and as a legendary seducer. Last week he found himself in a dilemma that tested his plausibility to the limit.

For nearly 40 years this diminutive charmer has been at the heart of the republican movement, first as a teenage gunman and later as Gerry Adams’s most trusted fixer — the clever little man doing the hard work while the big names enjoyed the limelight.

In 2002 he was arrested and accused of being a key figure in what the police claimed was a Sinn Fein spy ring at Stormont, the seat of British government in Northern Ireland. The ensuing scandal caused the collapse of power sharing between Sinn Fein and the Ulster Unionists.

Donaldson also had a hidden life. Last Tuesday, as the winter rain swept through Belfast, his past caught up with him. He was spirited to a furtive meeting with his Special Branch handlers who warned him that his secret was out: he was about to be unmasked as a long-standing British agent.

To his credit he took charge of his own fate. Three days later he confessed at a press conference in Dublin that he had been working for British intelligence and the Northern Ireland Special Branch for at least 20 years.

Reporters were startled. To some it was like a scene from Monty Python. Here was a republican veteran, regarded as one of the Sinn Fein leadership’s most trusted apparatchiks, a man who had been accused of spying against the British, telling them incongruously: “My name is Denis Donaldson . . . I was a British agent.”

He confessed: “I was recruited in the 1980s after compromising myself during a vulnerable time in my life.”

Donaldson’s pre-emptive “outing” of himself is more than one man’s personal drama. For Northern Ireland’s politics it is a huge shock that has unleashed a wave of conspiracy theories. For republicans it is yet more proof that their leadership has been penetrated for years by British intelligence.

For Adams it is a humiliation. The Sinn Fein president said he had suspected that an informant was at work but that Donaldson had never occurred to him as a likely candidate.

People who had known Donaldson for years were stunned by the revelation. A Sinn Fein colleague told Daily Ireland, a pro-Sinn Fein newspaper: “No one, I mean no one, ever pointed the finger of suspicion at Denis Donaldson. He was a loyal party servant. No task was too small for him, no obligation too onerous. He was at the heart of every election campaign.”

Who was this helpful little man and where did his true loyalties lie?

DONALDSON was born in 1950 into a traditional republican family in the nationalist enclave of Short Strand in east Belfast. A beleaguered area surrounded by larger loyalist communities, Short Strand has produced many republican legends.

He joined the IRA in the mid-1960s while he was still in his teens, well before the start of the Troubles. When the IRA split into Marxist Official and traditionalist Provisional wings in December 1969, Donaldson went with the Provos and quickly became involved in their urban bombing campaign. (He served alongside Seanna Walsh, who was chosen by the IRA to read out its statement ending all offensive activities earlier this year.) In 1971 Donaldson was caught during an attempt to bomb a distillery and government buildings and was sentenced to four years in the Maze prison, his first and only jail term.

In 1974 a camera was smuggled into his cell and a famous picture emerged. Intended as a joke to boost the morale of relatives and supporters, it shows four prisoners standing beside a mock-up of a Belfast street, pretending to have escaped from the Maze.

Among them is Donaldson, a slight bearded figure, with his arm stretched up to encircle the broad shoulders of Bobby Sands — who would be the first of 10 republican prisoners to die on hunger strike in 1981.

Donaldson and Sands spent three years in jail together and became close friends. This link helped to establish Donaldson’s credibility within the close group of former prisoners who would reshape the IRA and Sinn Fein under Adams’s leadership during the 1980s.

After he was released from jail Donaldson became a key Adams ally against the previous generation of IRA leaders. He also built up links with foreign revolutionary groups which would supply the Provos with weapons and training.

In August 1981, three months after Sands’s death, Donaldson and William “Blue” Kelly, a leading IRA gunrunner, were arrested by French police at Orly airport in Paris. The duo, who were travelling on false passports, told the French authorities that they were returning home after spending several months in a Lebanese training camp.

Donaldson was allowed to go home despite the admission and some suspect that this may have been the moment when he was turned by intelligence agents, but by his own account it is too early.

He continued to build republican links with groups such as Eta (the Basque terrorists) and Yasser Arafat’s PLO, travelling widely in Europe and South America as Sinn Fein’s director of international affairs.

By 1983 he was back in Short Strand where he stood unsuccessfully as a council candidate and reorganised Sinn Fein and the IRA in the area. Richard O’Rawe, who was head of the Sinn Fein press office at the time, remembers him as “a nice enough wee guy to talk to.

He represented Short Strand and would come into headquarters to report what was going on. He always took an interest in what was happening, but I can’t say I was suspicious of him.”

If, as Donaldson himself suggests, he was first persuaded by the security forces to work for them “in the 1980s after compromising myself”, then the reason may lie in an embarrassing incident in his personal life.

Former IRA colleagues point to an occasion when the police raided a house in the Ligoniel area of west Belfast and found Donaldson, a married man, in bed with a local woman. Even that may be a cover story, however, because Donaldson’s wife Alice was told about what had happened by the police. Like many senior republicans in the mid-1980s, Donaldson seldom spent the night at home for fear of arrest or loyalist attack, and this provided many opportunities for extramarital liaisons.

One former IRA member said that he was a well known “chaser”, as it was known in Belfast. If so the police may have threatened to disclose other affairs; or perhaps this is yet another cover story thrown up by Donaldson to hide the deeper secrets of his double life.

Former Special Branch and military intelligence officers say that a grudge or an ideological change of heart is a more common lever for recruiting an agent than blackmail or money. One said: “If you want someone to work for you for several years you have got to look for a better motivation than catching him with his pants down. A guy who you are blackmailing can’t be trusted in the long term.”

As events were to show, Donaldson would indeed prove an unreliable agent.

IF this was the period when he was recruited, Donaldson initially brought a rich dowry to his handlers, including a full account of the Provos’ international allies and arms links.

He remained highly thought of within the republican movement and in 1987, when he was undoubtedly a police agent, he was dispatched by Sinn Fein to his old stamping ground in Lebanon to try to secure the release of Brian Keenan, the Belfast hostage.

His mission was unsuccessful but on his return he said that he had secured meetings with both Hezbollah and Nabi Beri’s Amal militia.

After that he sank into the background as part of the Sinn Fein bureaucracy, at one point claiming that MI5 had tried to recruit him as an agent during a holiday abroad.

By the early 1990s he was emerging as a key supporter of the peace process and was involved in the preparation for the IRA ceasefire, which came in 1994. This was a time when the British government was in secret contact with the IRA. Having someone like Donaldson in place would have given it an invaluable read-out on the true intentions of Sinn Fein and the IRA. Donaldson was later moved to America, after the Clinton White House overlooked his explosives convictions to give him a visa. He set up Sinn Fein’s first office there and organised the groundbreaking first trips to the United States by Adams and Martin McGuinness.

He had an invaluable listening post not only on the IRA’s US support network but also on the US administration, which was at loggerheads with the British government on many aspects of Irish policy. Donaldson met State Department officials regularly, carrying messages back and forth from the republican leadership.

He also met Larry Zaitschek, a New York chef who later travelled to Ireland and who is now wanted in connection with an IRA raid on Special Branch headquarters in Castlereagh.

Although Donaldson was an important agent to the British during these years, former intelligence officers doubt that he passed on all the information to which he had access. Otherwise he would not have survived for two decades.

As the peace process began to provide political dividends in the form of the Good Friday agreement and power sharing, Donaldson became head of the party’s administration in the parliament buildings in Stormont.

Police believe that he knew of an IRA spy ring at the heart of the British administration at Stormont but kept quiet about it for fear that his role would be exposed.

Donaldson apparently did not know that the spy ring was revealed to the RUC Special Branch by a lower-level agent whose information sparked a three-month surveillance operation known by the codename Operation Torsion.

A mass of intelligence material gathered by the IRA at Stormont was removed from a house in Belfast by the police, copied and returned in the vain hope that Bobby Storey, the IRA’s head of intelligence, would eventually take possession of it and expose himself to arrest.

This entrapment and surveillance operation took place against strong advice from MI5 who urged the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) to seize the papers and leave it at that. It reasoned that this would be enough to halt the spying operation and bring Donaldson into line.

In the end the police decided to recover the IRA intelligence cache and make what arrests they could — including Donaldson and his son-in-law Ciaran Kearney. The affair led to the collapse of power sharing and the fall of David Trimble, the Ulster Unionist leader, who was blamed by loyalist voters for being too trusting of Sinn Fein. In the continuing political fall-out, Ian Paisley’s Democratic Unionist party ousted the Ulster Unionists as the majority party at the last general election.

Sinn Fein claimed that the whole “Stormontgate” affair had been designed to collapse the power sharing executive, but this was dismissed by Nuala O’Loan, the Northern Ireland police ombudsman, who said the police operation had been fully justified.

Just over a week ago, however, charges against Donaldson, Kearney and a former civil servant called William Mackessy had to be withdrawn when the police were refused a public interest immunity certificate, which would have protected the identity of the agent who tipped them off in the first place. A court hearing was told that the director of public prosecutions felt that proceeding was “no longer in the public interest”.

Events then moved fast. Summoned by his Special Branch handlers on Tuesday, Donaldson was told that they had been tipped off by yet another source within the IRA and Sinn Fein that the net was closing in on him. They were there to offer him protection under their “duty of care” to informants.

Instead of taking up the police offer, Donaldson decided to face the music. Resettlement and a new life would have meant losing contact with his family, many of them active republicans.

Ten years earlier Donaldson would almost certainly have taken the chance to get out of Belfast. The alternative then would have been interrogation, torture and execution by the IRA’s internal security squad.

The moles who pentrated the IRA:

FREDDIE SCAPPATICCI

A west Belfast republican, he was a senior figure in the IRA’s internal security division responsible for rooting out informants. He was also an agent, codenamed Stakeknife, for a British special forces unit.

Scappaticci agreed to change sides in 1978 after becoming disillusioned with IRA violence. He was trusted by senior republicans and was a friend of Gerry Adams, so his unmasking by the press in 2003 was a huge embarrassment to the republican movement.

He is now being investigated by police who are reviewing all unsolved murders during the Troubles.

WILLIE CARLIN

Had a similar role to Denis Donaldson but at a lower level. From a nationalist area but a member of the British Army, Carlin was sent back to Derry in 1984 to spy on Sinn Fein. His handlers never asked him to join the IRA. Instead he reported to London on political thinking in Sinn Fein and was an invaluable asset in the early 1990s when he was able to confirm the bona fides of Martin McGuinness and Adams. Carlin’s cover was blown after a drunken MI5 agent described him to IRA prisoners. He has now resettled in Britain.

SEAN O’CALLAGHAN

This agent reached a more senior position within the IRA and Sinn Fein than any of the others. He was a member of the IRA’s GHQ staff, a Sinn Fein councillor and a member of Sinn Fein’s ruling council, all the time working for the gardai. It took MI5 a full year in Holland to debrief him. O’Callaghan’s biggest success was in 1984 when his information led to Martin Ferris, now a Sinn Fein TD, being arrested on board a trawler with seven tons of weapons. He now lives in London.

MARTIN MCGARTLAND

Known as Agent Carol he infiltrated the IRA in west Belfast in the early 1990s. He claims to have saved about 50 lives by tipping off the police about attacks. After his cover was blown, he escaped an IRA interrogation squad by jumping out of a third-storey window. After being resettled in Britain, he was tracked down by the IRA and shot. He survived and has moved again.

RAYMOND GILMOUR

The RUC convinced him to join the INLA; after he wrecked its operation in Derry, Gilmour was then encouraged to join the IRA and repeat the method. His supergrass evidence was the centrepiece of the largest criminal trial in British legal history, but was ultimately rejected by the court. He now lives in England and is one of several IRA agents to tell all in a book.

McDowell vendetta disguises hidden agenda

Sunday Business Post

18 December 2005
By Vincent Browne

Columnist Kevin Myers made a good point on the Frank Connolly affair in The Irish Times last Thursday.

He said that “due process’‘ had no place in journalism - that is ‘due process’ as applies in the criminal justice system.

As journalists, we do not require someone to be convicted of an offence before we fix the offence on them. For instance, Frank Connolly, in writing about the €30,000 Ray Burke received from JMSE, did not wait until a court proved that the money had been handed over.

Of course, we do - or should - apply a ‘due process’ of our own. For instance, we make every reasonable effort to establish that what we write is true and we should hear all sides of the case in almost every instance.

But the ‘due process’ mentioned in relation to the allegation concerning Connolly is nonsense journalistically.

It is also a nonsense, incidentally, to contend that, in the media arena, everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

Did Connolly regard Burke as innocent of having taken the €30,000 from JMSE because the allegation had not been proved in court?

It is entirely appropriate to apply the same standards of accountability to Connolly as he would apply to anybody he writes about.

Where people in the public arena refuse to answer questions about their public actions - or their alleged public actions - we are entitled both to report that and to draw obvious inferences.

Therefore Connolly’s refusal to say, for instance, where he was in April 2001,while on leave from The Sunday Business Post, is a relevant fact to be reported.

We are entitled to draw inferences from his refusal to answer that question, as we would have been entitled to draw inferences from Burke’s refusal to answer questions about his funding while he was a public figure.

Myers made some of these rather obvious points on the way to justifying McDowell’s conduct in this affair. In so doing, he avoided every one of the obvious issues that arise concerning that conduct.

Had McDowell confined himself to commenting, however stridently, on the known facts concerning Connolly, there would not be a problem.

However, what he did was to put into the public domain a document from a Garda file and to represent this as proof of criminal conduct by Connolly.

Also he used ‘intelligence’ from that file - and perhaps otherwise - to state that the Garda Siochána and the Colombian police force believed that Connolly had travelled to Colombia in April 2001 on a false passport and that, while there, he had assisted Farc terrorism and had boosted the coffers of the IRA for subversive purposes at home.

It is questionable whether a minister for justice should have recourse to a Garda file, given the improper use to which such material might be put. It is quite certain that a minister for justice should never disclose the contents of such a file.

We have no less an authority for that proposition than McDowell himself, who said on the Pat Kenny radio programme in September 2003: “I am not supposed to just throw out into the public domain facts which haven’t been proven in court against people.”

There is good reason for this. Much of what is on Garda files is false - and inevitably so.

Some of the material comes from informers who have an animus against the person concerned or a motivation for supplying false information.

Some of the information is speculative, a lot of it hearsay.

Some, as in this instance, is based on information received from other police forces whose reliability is very much open to question.

Some such information is fabricated by the gardai themselves, as we have come to know through the Morris Tribunal. In other words, it is thoroughly unreliable.

The only context in which such information should be disclosed is in the context of a trial where the rules of evidence can determine its admissibility and test the reliability of the information.

McDowell himself acknowledged this in 2003.

To put this information into the public domain without the safeguards attendant on a trial, as though this information could be relied upon, is despicable.

McDowell’s characterisation of the false application for a passport as ‘proof ‘ of misconduct by Connolly is a case in point. It is no such thing. All it proves is that a bogus application was made by someone, and perhaps that a photograph was used which bears some resemblance to Connolly. Were such ‘evidence’ presented in court, it would be tested. Its use in apolitical vendetta outside a court process is disgraceful.

The further use of Garda ‘intelligence’ based almost entirely on Colombian ‘intelligence’ as proof of criminality and subversion by Connolly is shameful. Do we not know by now that Garda ‘intelligence’ is unreliable and do we not know the worthlessness of Colombian ‘intelligence’?

The blackening of the reputation of a citizen, under cover of Dáil privilege, by a minister for justice, based on such ‘evidence’, which he knows - or should know, or at least suspect is entirely unreliable - is a gross abuse.

What is most disturbing however - and this was not mentioned by Myers, even though it is an entirely obvious point – is McDowell’s motivation in all this.

The minister has claimed that it is his duty to safeguard the state against subversion and, when he has evidence of subversion, it is his duty to speak out and expose it. The reality is that he has no duty to speak out in such circumstances.

He certainly has a duty to ensure the police force, along with the legal and penal systems, are adequately resourced to deal with subversion.

He may also have a duty to use his office to rally support against subversion by speaking out against subversion and alerting the public to its dangers. But a duty to disclose information from Garda files in the fight against subversion?

Nonsense, as McDowell himself implicitly conceded in 2003, and as his record, and the record of previous ministers for justice, testifies.

No other minister - in times when subversion was a real threat - ever resorted to the disclosure of Garda files.

McDowell’s motive is to bring about the closure of an independent, well-funded investigative agency, the Centre for Public Inquiry.

The PDs have had the centre in their sights since its inception, devising an array of bogus justifications for their antagonism. Amid all the posing as angels of accountability, in reality they hate the prospect of a truly independent, effective inquiry agency.

McDowell’s assault on Prime Time is a further example of that.

The PDs would prefer the fawning adulation of ‘investigative’ reporters, who never found out anything that wasn’t in their postbox, or of columnists who revile other journalists for ignoring obvious issues and then go on to do the same themselves.

sbpost@iol.ie

Minister ‘defending against IRA sleepers’

Sunday Business Post

18 December 2005
By Paul T Colgan

“IRA-Sinn Féin were well on the way to creating a state within a state. They were using well-placed sleepers and collaborators – some of them pillars of society – to achieve that end.”

The Minister for Justice, Michael McDowell, April 9, 2005.

They are already here among us. It could be anyone.

Your solicitor perhaps, your banker, your accountant or even your favourite newspaper columnist. They might be living right next door to you.

Republican “sleepers’‘, having for years successfully evaded the attentions of the gardai and the media, lie dormant within Irish society awaiting their orders to rise up and seize the apparatus of the state.

This is the scenario unveiled by Michael McDowell at the Progressive Democrats’ party conference last April. According to the Minister for Justice, Sinn Féin - aided and abetted by the muscle of the IRA - had, only months earlier, almost succeeded in creating a “state within a state’‘.

Analysis of McDowell’s speeches over the past year uncovers a clear line of thinking on republicans.

Speaking in early March, he claimed: “The truth was and is that the [IRA] Army Council were preparing to transform the movement by stealth into one in which . . . a lightly-armed IRA gendarmerie. . . would in future act as the enforcers for the criminal and control strategy underpinning Sinn Féin’s drive for political power.”

His choice of the word “sleepers’‘ to describe the alleged republican strategy is particularly savvy.

Popularised in recent years by the rise of al-Qaeda, the sleeper cell theory brings to mind the sort of cold-hearted, steely-minded political fundamentalists who crash airliners into buildings and detonate bombs on busy commuter trains.

The month before McDowell’s April speech, Phil Flynn, a government trouble-shooter and confidant of Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, was questioned about an alleged IRA money-laundering ring in Co Cork. No charges relating to money-laundering have ever been brought against him.

Flynn, a former chairman of the Irish subsidiary of the Bank of Scotland, denied any wrongdoing after a company he had invested in was alleged to have laundered the proceeds of the €38 million Northern Bank robbery.

Flynn insisted that the company was “clean’‘ and had nothing to answer for.

The audacious robbery seemed, however, to help crystallise the “sleeper’‘ theory in McDowell’s mind. Here you had an alleged IRA operation, apparently designed to swell the coffers of the republican movement, with links to hitherto unblemished “pillars of society’‘.

In recent days, McDowell has revisited this theory to explain why he brought down Frank Connolly, executive director of the Centre of Public Inquiry (CPI).

McDowell’s claims that Connolly was central to an IRA plot to secure “tens of millions of dollars’‘ from Colombian rebels in exchange for bomb-making expertise, have caused huge damage to the CPI’s executive director.

Connolly denied the allegations and accused McDowell of having usurped the function of the DPP and the Garda.

McDowell’s initial claim that Connolly had travelled to Colombia on a false passport came only hours before the CPI’s main benefactor - US billionaire Chuck Feeney’s Atlantic Philanthropies charity - withdrew funding worth €4 million.

The comments, made under Dáil privilege, followed McDowell’s decision to leak documents that allegedly referred to Connolly, to the Irish Independent.

The minister told the Dáil last week that he had spoken out against the former journalist because he believed Connolly would use the CPI to undermine the state.

It does not take a forensic analysis of McDowell’s words to see how he views Connolly’s raison d’etre at the CPI.

Connolly has described McDowell’s actions as a “witch-hunt’‘, while Mr Justice Feargus Flood of the CPI has described them as part of a “drumhead court-martial’‘.

Fine Gael justice spokesman Jim O’Keeffe said he had “grave concerns’‘ about McDowell’s behaviour, while Labour justice spokesman Joe Costello said the minister had set an “extremely dangerous precedent’‘.

McDowell had been busy behind the scenes over the past year briefing journalists and other interested parties on who he viewed as a “threat’‘ to the state. Far from seeking to disguise this fact, McDowell appeared to take great pride in his uniquely proactive approach to the justice portfolio.

Following his appearance on RTE Radio’s News at One last Monday, when he admitted leaking the forged passport application form allegedly used by Connolly, McDowell said he was “delighted’‘ to have been able to do so.

Speaking in the Dáil later in the week, he said it would be a sorry day when a justice minister chose not to act as he did when faced with similar circumstances.

McDowell is unlikely to incur political damage from this strategy. Despite speculation early last week that his overeager admissions might come back to haunt him, such pronouncements are more likely to enhance his standing among the “law and order’‘ set, while strengthening the PD brand.

Indeed, given McDowell’s unwillingness to back down over the Connolly allegations, he may even seek to “expose’‘ more “pillars of society’‘ in the coming months and years.

Individuals or organisations targeted by the minister have so far had little in the way of legal recourse. Taoiseach Bertie Ahern said last week that if Connolly wished to clear his name, he could initiate legal proceedings. While Connolly could conceivably sue the newspapers that published articles in 2002 about his alleged trip to Colombia, he may have more difficulty suing McDowell.

The Daily Ireland newspaper has discovered that it can be difficult to claim defamation against a government minister. The newspaper’s owners brought a libel case against McDowell last month after he compared the Belfast publication to a Nazi propaganda sheet.

In a 3,000-word broadside directed against various political opponents and published on the Department of Justice’s website last January, McDowell had written: “Will it [Daily Ireland] be to Irish democracy what the Volkischer Beobachter was to pre-World War II German democracy?”

He went on to repeat the claims on RTE Radio and said the paper, which had yet to publish its first edition, was driven by the IRA.

Daily Ireland publisher Mairtin Ó Muilleoir claimed the comments had put his staff at risk and said it was an attempt to “bully the readers, workers and investors of Daily Ireland’‘.

However, the minister’s lawyer pleaded “sovereign immunity’‘ and said the statements were made on behalf of the government. He also said that no statement of claim had been put before the court to corroborate claims that workers’ lives had been put at risk.

Judgment has been reserved in the case, but legal observers do not anticipate a successful outcome for the paper.

McDowell’s critics have questioned whether it was likely that a clandestine and over-arching republican plot actually existed to undermine the state. Last April, he claimed that the money accrued through IRA robberies would be used to fund Sinn Féin in its pursuit of political power in the south.

Yet in September, McDowell accepted the word of decommissioning boss General John De Chastelain that the organisation had disposed of all its weaponry.

Similarly, McDowell, along with the rest of the cabinet, accepts the assessments of the Independent Monitoring Commission that IRA activity has ceased since the summer.

If the war is in fact over, ask the opposition, why did McDowell choose to say what he did about the CPI two weeks ago?

If republicans have abandoned illicit fundraising, which supposedly fuelled the so-called “sleeper’‘ strategy, then the threat to the state he identified in April has dissipated - or at least changed.

Tommy McKearney, a former senior member of the IRA who disagrees with the current republican strategy, said he found McDowell’s claims of sleeper cells “hard to believe’‘.

“What he is proposing would simply be too hard to keep secret,” said McKearney.

“I’d be very sceptical of what he says. I can’t recall a precedent where a once-revolutionary organisation has sought to undermine a state in such a way.’’ He said, however, that attempts to gather intelligence on political opponents was not restricted to republicans and was a simple reality of parliamentary democracy.

“It’s par for the course for political parties to seek to gather information on each other. Any party that gets a juicy story on its opponents is going to use it.

“Every party to some extent uses some method or means to trip up the government. But it doesn’t go beyond that. It’s the meat and bones of parliamentary democracy.”

Anthony McIntyre, a former IRA member now opposed to the mainstream republican leadership, said he believed republicans would continue to seek intelligence on their opponents, but such activity could only be very limited.

“You have to ask how widespread such a thing can be in democratic society,” he said.

“In my view the IRA has made too many mistakes for a network to be widespread. For example, why didn’t they see the arrests in Cork coming?

“That was an indication of where they are at.”

Since doubts about the existence of a vast republican conspiracy pervade those critical of Sinn Féin, McDowell’s stated belief that the state is under “threat’‘ may be open to question.

It has been suggested that McDowell chose to move against the CPI, not because of any security concerns, but because it was planning to examine the purchase by the state of the Thornton Hall prison site in north Co Dublin.

Sources close to the CPI said it had looked at the Thornton Hall issue, but decided there was not enough information available to warrant the preparation of a full report on the subject.

McDowell presided over the decision to buy the site for €30 million earlier this year. Objectors maintain that the site was only worth €6 million and that other potential sites had been ignored.

It has also been mooted that McDowell acted on a party political basis.

He certainly would have received encouragement from his party colleagues. PD leader Mary Harney recently said: “The idea of some group of citizens setting themselves up with absolutely no justification to the wider public is absolutely sinister and inappropriate.”

The minister denied he had acted improperly and would no doubt maintain that he had access to confidential Garda information suggesting he was right to have spoken out in recent weeks.

McIntyre said: “The contention at the moment is no longer about what McDowell is saying, but about the ethics of saying it at all.

“He needs to be called to account.”