SAOIRSE32

5/3/2006

Dorrians in plea to murderers’ loved ones

Belfast Telegraph

Stephen Breen
05 March 2006

Lisa Dorrian’s family last night made an appeal for the partners, sisters and mothers of her killers to come forward.

A week after the first anniversary of Lisa’s disappearance, her sister Joanne pleaded for those close to the three prime suspects in the 25-year-old’s murder to search their consciences.

Joanne said: “We are specifically appealing to the women in the lives of the three people we believe were responsible for murdering my sister.

“I am begging these women to help end our nightmare. We have a right to have Lisa’s body back and a right to justice.”

Added Joanne: “The girlfriends of these people owe them absolutely no loyalty at all, and I know they could actually do better than the evil people they are with.

“We know things about these suspects, and, if their girlfriends knew, then I would hope that they would come forward and help us.

“I would ask them to think of how they would feel if their sister had been murdered and had been dumped at sea.”

The family is set to undertake a leaflet drop of homes throughout the Ards peninsula.

The leaflets will ask the fishing communities if they can recall seeing the boat that police believe was used to dump Lisa’s body.

Said Joanne: “We are focusing on the boat because it may trigger something in their minds.”

Ahern and Blair forced to delay NI initiative

Irish Times

Sat, Mar 04, 06

Vehement Sinn Féin opposition to the proposal to re-establish the Northern Ireland Assembly in “shadow” form has delayed plans for a major announcement next Wednesday by British prime minister Tony Blair and Bertie Ahern intended to force the pace in the stalled talks., writes Mark Brennock and Frank Millar

The Government has signalled that next Wednesday’s meeting at Downing Street between the Taoiseach and the prime minister is now likely to be a stocktaking exercise in relation to Northern talks, rather than the occasion for a significant initiative as had initially been hoped.

The change in mood follows strong Sinn Féin and SDLP opposition to the initiative, which is believed to include the re-establishment of the Northern Ireland Assembly in “shadow” form, a move sought by the DUP.

A Government spokeswoman said yesterday that Wednesday’s meeting between Mr Blair and Mr Ahern would be dedicated to “reviewing the process” and assessing the contacts which had been made recently with all parties, including Sinn Féin and the SDLP.

A statement is expected afterwards, but it is not now expected to announce any significant new initiative.

Government sources say that the two governments are continuing to work towards achieving early progress, but they have signalled that Wednesday’s meeting is now unlikely to see a major new step forward.

Despite last night’s announcement in Dublin, Downing Street insisted Mr Blair’s strategy remained on course and that the moment of “tough decision” about the future of the Northern Ireland Assembly could not be long delayed.

The prime minister’s official spokesman said: “The prime minister has an increasingly clear view about what needs to be done, as I’ve said before, but we are not yet at the point of decisions being taken.”

He characterised the “no announcement/no press conference” nature of next Wednesday’s private meeting as a natural opportunity for the prime minister and Taoiseach to take stock of the situation ahead of the usual break in proceedings generated by the annual St Patrick’s Day celebrations at home and abroad.

Political sources in Dublin and Belfast earlier this week talked up the prospect of Mr Blair and Mr Ahern announcing plans next Wednesday to take the initiative in relation to restoring the suspended political institutions.

This was expected to include the restoration of the Northern Assembly in “shadow” form.

This Assembly would continue for a limited period, with full restoration of the elected Assembly conditional on agreement to re-establish the power-sharing executive.

The strength of Sinn Féin and SDLP opposition is believed to have led to a view among government officials that more time is needed to decide how to proceed.

Senior British and Irish officials met in London yesterday to consider how to go forward.

It was accepted in Whitehall that last night’s announcement would excite talk of fresh crisis in the political process.

However, while the precise timeframe for the proposed British initiative remains to be decided, the preference now appears to be for a period of six months rather than a year, pointing to a decision to reconvene the Assembly by the beginning of May.

The impression from usually well-informed sources was that Mr Blair remained keen to have the proposed “shadow” Assembly make a decision - to restore power-sharing or collapse the institutions - in October or November this year following further reports from the Independent Monitoring Commission (IMC).

Mr Blair is resisting Sinn Féin and SDLP demands that he “set a date for restoration” and the immediate triggering of the mechanism to form an executive, in the certain belief that DUP leader the Rev Ian Paisley is under no pressure from the unionist community to deal following the most recent IMC report implicating the IRA in continued criminality and intelligence-gathering.

DUP MP stands up for loyalist paramilitaries

Belfast Telegraph

Alan Murray
05 March 2006

North Belfast MP Nigel Dodds is to write to Chief Constable Hugh Orde about police tactics during the raid on the Alexandra Bar last week.

Mr Dodds said yesterday that, while he doesn’t condone attempts by paramilitaries to mount illegal displays, he is concerned at the “aggressive” tactics used during the operation.

And he claims the Chief Constable’s resolve to ‘face down’ loyalist paramilitaries contrasts with the ’softly, softly’ approach to the IRA.

Said Mr Dodds: “I am constrained at the moment because of the continuing police investigation into what was happening in the Alexandra Bar on Thursday evening and the possibility of criminal proceedings.

“But I have to say that I have a number of questions about aspects of the police raid that concern me.

“Many constituents have asked me was the high-profile raid justified and whether the police use of CS gas in such volumes was justified.”

He added: “Without prejudicing any possible legal proceedings, I have to raise with the Chief Constable why his officers made no arrests last year, and again just a couple of weeks ago, when blatant IRA parades were staged in Strabane.

“Unionists have been told that displays of UVF and UDA emblems cause offence in public, yet the Chief Constable appears not to wish to annoy Sinn Fein/IRA over their illegal displays.

“He needs to give us clear answers about whether it is PSNI policy to apply the law as it concerns paramilitaries differently in unionist areas to the way his officers exercise ‘discretion’ in republican areas.”

Police yesterday arrested a woman in connection with the raid. She is the 18th person taken into custody since Thursday’s operation.

Omagh informer removed from witness protection

Belfast Telegraph

Alan Murray
05 March 2006

A Dublin car-thief, who allegedly warned gardai that the Real IRA was planning a ’spectacular’ just days before the Omagh bombing, has been removed from a witness protection scheme.

Paddy Dixon, who fled to England after his role as a Garda informer was exposed four years ago, is understood to have lost the protection he was given by his former handlers.

The revelation has prompted fears among Omagh victims’ relatives that Dixon’s life could be in danger from dissident republicans.

Suspended Garda detective sergeant John White - Dixon’s handler - has said that Dixon told him that the Real IRA asked him to steal a Vauxhall car for use in a bombing in Northern Ireland in August 1998, but then told him not to bother because one had been obtained.

White has claimed that he processed the information through the Garda intelligence system just days before the attack, but no alert was passed to the RUC, because his bosses feared they would blow Dixon’s cover.

Relatives of the 29 people murdered in Omagh were told 10 days ago that the warning was passed onto the Garda but - incredibly - not to the RUC.

Michael Gallagher, whose son Aidan was murdered in the explosion, said he was concerned that Dixon was now at greater risk from attack by the Real IRA and could be silenced, so he can never make a full statement about his knowledge of the attack.

Said Mr Gallagher: “We understand that Paddy Dixon has been removed from the Garda witness protection programme and may have returned to Ireland to live.

“Obviously, we are anxious that what he knows of the Real IRA’s plan for the bombing is documented to the police and to our own lawyers as soon as possible.

“We are now very concerned about Dixon’s safety. We don’t want to read in the papers that he has been found in a ditch at the side of a road in the Republic with a bullet in his head.”

Tewkesbury MP Laurence Robertson, who has taken a particular interest in the Omagh case, said: “I have been told by reliable sources in Dublin that Paddy Dixon is no longer protected under this scheme and that concerns me.

“I am also alarmed at the nature of the information given to the Omagh relatives about MI5’s knowledge of the Real IRA’s intentions prior to the attack.

“We need to know why MI5 informed the Garda of a potential attack within the United Kingdom, but did not tell the RUC.”

11 face membership charges after Belfast raid

RTÉ

05 March 2006 08:03

11 men have been charged in connection with membership of an illegal organisation after police raided a bar in Belfast on Thursday.

The men are expected to appear at Belfast Magistrates Court tomorrow morning.

Seven of them were also charged with wearing clothing linking them to a banned organisation.

Six other men and a woman were arrested but were later released.

Photo of meeting: Martin Ingram, Kevin Fulton, David Shayler and Annie Machon

cryptome

5 March 2006

A writes:

This photo was taken at a secret meeting on Wednesday [March 1] of this week. It is of former MI5 officers David Shayler and Annie Machon, with Martin Ingram and Kevin Fulton. I can confirm that the two former MI5 officers and former FRU handler Martin Ingram, along with Fulton [former British secret agent in Northern Ireland], have agreed to give evidence at the public enquiry into collusion between the IRA, members of the Garda ( Irish Police ) and security forces into the murders of RUC officers Breen and Buchanan.

Judge Smithwick will be notified next week of this development.

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Click photo for full view

[Machon and Shayler (back to camera) at left, Fulton and Ingram at right. Black strips in original photo.]

Gun is held to taxi driver’s head

BBC


A gun was held to the back of the driver’s head

A taxi driver has been threatened at gunpoint in north Belfast.

It is believed the weapon jammed when one of four men who were passengers in the taxi placed a gun to the back of the driver’s head.

He had picked them up a short time earlier, at about 2230 GMT on Saturday, in the Beldoc area of the Crumlin Road and had driven them to Ligoniel.

A struggle then broke out and the driver managed to run from the car. The men then fled from the scene.

It is thought they ran down an alleyway at the side of the nearby McKenna’s pub.

Police have appealed for anyone with information concerning the incident to contact them.

Bobby Sands’ diary - day 5

Larkspirit

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Thursday 5th

The Welfare sent for me today to inform me of my father being taken ill to hospital. Tried to get me to crawl for a special visit with my family. I was distressed about my father’s illness but relieved that he has been released from hospital. No matter what, I must continue.

I had a threatening toothache today which worried me, but it is gone now.

I’ve read Atkins’ statement in the Commons, Mar dheá! (Atkins pledged that the British government would not budge an inch on its intransigent position.) It does not annoy me because my mind was prepared for such things and I know I can expect more of such, right to the bitter end.

I came across some verse in Kipling’s short stories; the extracts of verses before the stories are quite good. The one that I thought very good went like this:

The earth gave up her dead that tide,
Into our camp he came,
And said his say, and went his way,
And left our hearts aflame.

Keep tally on the gun butt score,
The vengeance we must take,
When God shall bring full reckoning,
For our dead comrade’s sake.

‘I hope not,’ said I to myself. But that hope was not even a hope, but a mere figure of speech. I have hope, indeed. All men must have hope and never lose heart. But my hope lies in the ultimate victory for my poor people. Is there any hope greater than that?

I’m saying prayers — crawler! (and a last minute one, some would say). But I believe in God, and I’ll be presumptuous and say he and I are getting on well this weather.

I can ignore the presence of food staring me straight in the face all the time. But I have this desire for brown wholemeal bread, butter, Dutch cheese and honey. Ha!! It is not damaging me, because, I think, ‘Well, human food can never keep a man alive forever,’ and I console myself with the fact that I’ll get a great feed up above (if I’m worthy).

But then I’m struck by this awful thought that they don’t eat food up there. But if there’s something better than brown wholemeal bread, cheese and honey, etcetera, then it can’t be bad.

The March winds are getting angry tonight, which reminds me that I’m twenty-seven on Monday. I must go, the road is just beginning, and tomorrow is another day. I am now 62 kgs and, in general, mentally and physically, I feel very good.

Mural detail from >>CAIN

Bobby Sands and Britain’s Own Gitmo, 25 Years On

ZNET

by Denis O’Hearn
March 01, 2006

Why should we be surprised at this violation of the Magna Carta when the nation that wrote the document threw it out a quarter century ago?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us The name Bobby Sands is emblazoned on the Irish psyche, 25 years after he began his hunger strike on March 1, 1981. He died 66 days later, on May 5. Nine of his comrades followed him to their graves. It is an irony of history that as we arrive at this anniversary, men have been on hunger strike in Guantanamo, being cruelly force-fed and artificially kept alive. No one wants another Bobby Sands.

Some memories fade, others remain. It was not that long ago that I arrived in Kingston, Jamaica. The first person I met was a combi-taxi driver.

‘Where you comin’ from, brother?’

‘Ireland.’

‘Ah, Ireland, Bobby Sands, the IRA is fighting for their freedom!’

I’ve heard many similar stories over these 25 years. Most have one thing in common: they come from people who have themselves been in struggle in places like South Africa, Palestine, Turkey and Latin America. The example of Bobby Sands still means a lot to such people. When Turkish political prisoners went on hunger strike five years ago, their secret codeword for their plans was ‘Bobby Sands’.

But few people know who Bobby Sands really was, and how he and nine others could endure such a slow and painful death. Until recently, with the unfolding of the Irish peace process, his comrades were either in jail or unwilling to talk.

Some things about Bobby Sands will be familiar to veterans of political struggle. He grew up in Belfast under extreme violent threat, first from racist (Protestant) gangs, then from representatives of the state: the police and the British army. He reacted to those threats by joining the IRA, believing that to be the only way to fight the violence that was aimed at his community.

At seventeen, Sands was jailed for his IRA activities. He spent all but six months of the rest of his life in prison. There, he became politically conscious. He learned about other struggles and revolutionaries: Che Guevara in Cuba, Camilo Torres in Colombia, George Jackson in Soledad.

But the greatest lessons he learned were practical. He learned the importance of education and, particularly, of learning the Irish language. By using Irish to discuss strategy with his fellow prisoners under the noses of the prison guards, he made it a living language. Likewise, he brought history and politics to life for his fellow prisoners.

This political awareness is why, when Britain stripped IRA prisoners of political prisoner status in 1975, they refused to be branded as criminals. When they rejected prison uniforms, their jailers threw them naked into their cells, draped only in a blanket. They were under 24-hour lockup, seven days a week, without reading materials.

While not quite in total incommunicado like the prisoners at Guantanamo, these ‘blanketmen’ might have stayed there for years, quietly suffering in what Sands called ‘these concrete tombs’, the H-Blocks of Long Kesh prison near Belfast.

But then Bobby Sands arrived. He convinced his fellow prisoners to reclaim their prison spaces, to take visits with friends and relatives, even if they had to wear prison uniforms on visits. Once they left their cells, the prison corridors became a battlefield. Prisoners used visits to smuggle in writing materials and tobacco, and to smuggle out accounts of the inhuman conditions of their imprisonment.

Bobby led by example. His smuggled accounts of life in the H-Blocks, written out on toilet paper in tiny script, showed the world what was going on.

Sands wrote about the daily events like mirror searches, where the prison guards forced the men to squat over mirrors while they searched up their anuses for illicit ballpoint refills. He wrote about how the men retained their dignity: the stories they told at night, the singsongs and talent contests, the political debates.

Most of all, he wrote of the inhumanity of the process that he called the ‘conveyor belt’. This was the process whereby hundreds of young Catholics were lifted from the streets and held incommunicado in interrogation centers. In a practice that foreshadowed Guantanamo, the government told detectives that interrogations differed from interviews, and mistreatment was justified if it led to confessions. From there, the suspects were convicted in juryless courts. And then they were thrown into the H-Blocks.

This should look familiar. Michael Ratner from the Center for Constitutional Rights argues that Guantanamo Bay has taken U.S. citizens back nearly a thousand years, before the Magna Carta, in terms of the rights that were established by that noble document in 1215, written into the US Constitution, and lost in the post-9/11 moral panic. Had he been looking at Ireland 25 years ago, perhaps he would not have been so surprised. After all, the Magna Carta was an English document, and it was England that ignored it in its fight against the IRA, Maggie Thatcher’s ‘terrorist threat’.

Article 39 of the Magna Carta reads, “No free person shall be jailed without a jury of his peers.”

Bobby Sands was jailed by a judge sitting alone, a judge who even admitted that the police had produced no evidence to tie him to the bombs that he was accused of planting. The ‘pig-in-a-wig’ is how Sands described him in his ‘Castlereagh Trilogy’, a savage poetic variation of Oscar Wilde’s ‘Ballad of Reading Gaol’ that satirically charts the process from arrest and interrogation, to juryless conviction and, finally, to naked imprisonment.

In the H-Blocks, Bobby Sands was stripped of nearly everything he had. They even took away the furniture, leaving the men to sleep on foam mattresses that were soaking from the urine that lay in pools on the floor.

Yet a funny thing happened to the prisoners. The more they lost the stronger they became. Stripped of reading materials and the most rudimentary implements in life including even their beds, they created a political letter-writing factory and a site of cultural production, with Bobby Sands at its center.

It was in these unspeakable conditions of twenty-four hour lockup that he wrote songs such as ‘The Voyage’ and ‘McIlhattan’, which are now standards in the Irish folk repertoire. His ‘One Day in My Life’ stands alongside Solzhenitsyn as a classic of prison literature and an account of the grim realities of Gitmo-like prison life.

Despite interventions on behalf of the prisoners by churchmen and politicians, Margaret Thatcher refused to compromise. ‘A crime is a crime is a crime’, she said. ‘It is not political, it is a crime.’

So Bobby Sands and his fellow prisoners decided that they had no recourse left but hunger strike. They went into their protest knowing that they would die. But Bobby Sands hoped that their sacrifice would heighten public awareness of their plight and that the people would force Thatcher to move.

The people responded. They elected Sands to the British parliament. When he died, hundreds of thousands attended his funeral. Parliaments closed down in mourning. Nelson Mandela led a group of young prisoners in a protest on Robben Island and Mayan militants went on the first hunger strike at Cerro Hueco prison in Chiapas.

Twenty-five years ago, Bobby Sands and his fellow prisoners took a stand and the world listened. Even the New York Times editorialized that Sands ‘bested an implacable British prime minister’. The Irish prisoners eventually won their rights. Irish Republicanism was immensely strengthened as it gained a true icon.

No wonder the US government, with the complicity of the British and MI5, will go to any lengths to ensure that no prisoner dies on hunger strike in Guantanamo.

Denis O’Hearn is author of ‘Nothing but an Unfinished Song: Bobby Sands, the Irish Hunger Striker Who Ignited a Generation’, Nation Books, 2006. He is Professor of Sociology at Queens University Belfast and Binghamton University.

Resurgent nationalism poses real threat to DUP

Sunday Business Post

By Tom McGurk
05 March 2006

This week the British and Irish governments will accept the inevitable: any prospect of a devolved administration in the North in the short term has disappeared. Last week, the various parties trooped in and out of 10 Downing Street - mostly to restate already well-known positions. The DUP’s suggestion of an assembly without executive powers looks like a non-runner already.

The nationalists would not have it and one would have to be unduly charitable not to see it as anything other than the DUP’s idea of a talking shop to fill the political vacuum.

Ever since the old Stormont parliament was prorogued some 34 years ago, London and Dublin have presumed that power-sharing - as opposed to majoritarianism - was the way forward. What reasonable political party, they argued, could be opposed to that?

They have now discovered that the DUP - which originally opposed power-sharing with the then major nationalist party, the SDLP - has now returned to its former position.

Now, according to the DUP, Sinn Fein is unfit for government. It’s hard to see this as anything other than a reiteration of the same old position dressed up in new language.

It goes without saying that unionism, which after 50 years of one-party government reduced the North to a political slum, might not be fit for government either, although this is rarely mentioned in exchanges.

But all of this argument tends to mask a political reality - that for unionism, politics in the North has always been, above all else, principally about maintaining the union with Britain.

The political and economic power that came with government was fine but, at the end of the day, all unionist politics and voting was about maintaining the union.

Accordingly, unionism now believes that devolved government threatens the union, in that it provides a political machine for Irish unification, which unionists believe is the principal objective of nationalism and Dublin.

The DUP is particularly suspicious and nervous of Sinn Fein’s political machinery and its determined grasp of local politics.

Quite simply, it believes that, with an executive up and running and three or four Sinn Fein ministers heading a growing electoral machine of local councillors and assembly members, nationalist political and economic power would eventually overwhelm it.

What adds to this sense of threat is the growing belief that a nationalist resurgence is taking place in the North. Post-ceasefire nationalism has a new spirit of self-confidence and self-esteem.

Nationalists’ educational performance has outstripped the unionists’.

The demographics point to a growing nationalist constituency and the emergence of a new nationalist professional and middle-class, which has radically altered the social balance.

The emergence of the Celtic Tiger in the Republic has furthered nationalist ambitions, in tandem with the emergence of an increasingly-successful nationalist entrepreneurial and business class.

Among traditional unionists there is a sense that political devolution, headed by a growing Sinn Fe¤ in political machine and with close Dublin government involvement, can only lead in one direction.

Insecure and stripped of their traditional economic and political power base, and given that their ultimate political goal is to maintain the union, unionists now fear devolution.

Remarkably, given that the 1998 Belfast Agreement was supposed to put the constitutional position on the political backburner for a generation or two, they have now taken fright. By flocking to Ian Paisley, they have displayed both their deep anxiety and their deeply rooted suspicion of politics.

Since day one of this process, London and Dublin have argued that devolution is the only way - there is no plan B. That position may no longer be possible and there is now a pressing requirement to generate the political and economic sense of the Belfast Agreement outside of the devolutionary structure.

The SDLP recently published an all-Ireland economic plan that would, for example, extend incentives such as the Republic’s low capital gains and corporate tax rates to the North.

It’s an idea whose time may well have come, given that the North’s economy is not much more than a public service basket case.

What prime minister-in-waiting Gordon Brown would make of such a plan remains to be seen, but isn’t it a remarkable historical development that the North’s union with Britain is now clearly to its economic disadvantage?

In the economic landscape where the EU and this island now sit, and in the context of any political devolutionary failure, partition looks even more like the dinosaur of another age. Equally, the unionist notion that the appropriate response to nationalist demands for the new post-Good Friday politics is no politics at all, cannot be responsibly accepted by London and Dublin.

After all, the 1998 agreement was democratically mandated by all the people of Ireland.

Fergal O Hanlon Memorial Lecture

Indymedia.ie

Sunday, 5 March 2006
The Lecture Will Begin At 3pm

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
*1916 *1981*Our people have Rights

This Theme for this year is the Hunger Strikes of 1981 and will be Delivered By Former Hunger Striker Raymond Mc Cartney and will take place In The 4 Seasons Hotel Armagh Rd Monaghan

Focus: Hoops of hate

Sunday Times

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usHow did the Celtic jersey become such a potent symbol of Irish nationalism, asks John Burns

It wasn’t the first time Celtic fans had come face-to-face with a police riot squad. After the Uefa Cup final in 2003, which the Glasgow team lost 3-2 to Porto, the Spanish police were waiting for them outside the Olympic stadium in Seville.

“They put down their shields and applauded us,” Albert McCready, a Celtic fan from Dublin, recalls. “They couldn’t believe we’d just spent two hours singing, even after we lost.”

The encounter last Saturday in Dublin’s O’Connell Street between gardai and dozens of youths wearing Celtic jerseys was of a decidely darker nature. Fans tumbled out of nearby Celtic drinking haunts to chant “go home, you huns” at the Love Ulster parade, and to throw missiles at gardai.

“It was embarrassing to look at them; it was cringeworthy,” said McCready. “There are people now using the Celtic jersey to show where they come from, and I don’t know how you go about changing that psyche. It is slightly unfortunate, because the Celtic top is prominent-looking at the best of times.”

The green-and-white hoops seem to be turning up in more and more unfavourable situations. In Derry, for example, youths wearing Celtic jerseys and carrying tricolours have taken to congregating at places such as the Diamond to barrack loyalist marchers every summer. “They are only there to provoke a reaction and to cause trouble,” William Hay, a local DUP MP, has complained.

Of course all this jersey-wearing is good for Celtic’s bottom line. Half-yearly figures released two weeks ago showed that while turnover was down, due to the club’s losses in Europe, merchandising was up by 48% to £9.6m (€14m). That’s the equivalent of 280,000 replica tops sold in six months.

But even accepting that it is easier to wear than a tricolour, how did it happen that the jersey of a Scottish soccer team is now the way to identify yourself as an Irish nationalist? And given that Celtic fans are famed throughout Europe for singalong good cheer, how come the green-and-white hoops are popping up at nasty sectarian bunfights?

FOR decades, Irish people have been making the pilgrimage to Paradise, the nickname of Celtic’s ground, Parkhead. But 20 years ago, the fans travelling from the republic to Scotland each weekend could fit into a bus. Now there are upwards of 5,000.

McCready, 40, a Dublin office worker, is chairman of the Naomh Padraig branch of the Celtic supporters’ club in Ireland, one of 20 such associations in Dublin alone. When he started making the weekend trips to Scotland in the early 1980s, all the Celtic fans knew each other.

“It was very much a hard core,” he said. “There’s been an explosion of interest in the last decade. The club’s popularity had grown mainly because of media exposure. A key factor was when satellite TV started showing Celtic matches about 10 years ago.”

Then Martin O’Neill from Derry became manager, Neil Lennon from Lurgan the star midfielder, Dermot Desmond from Dublin a director, and the club became successful after years of playing second fiddle to Rangers.

“The Irish fan base has always been important, but it revived significantly,” said Brian Wilson, author of Celtic: A Century With Honour and now a director of the club. “Celtic were in the doldrums for a while. Ten years ago the average Celtic gate was 25,000-30,000. Now you get 60,000 at every home game. The interest from Ireland has gone up too.”

From the dispersion of Celtic jerseys around Ireland, you’d guess this is a youthful and working-class fan base. But organisers say the support is mostly middle-aged and middle-class, even well-to-do.

“The sort of person you saw in O’Connell Street last weekend is not the sort going on our bus to Glasgow,” said Adrian Hillman, another fan-club organiser. “The jerseys are being bought by people who don’t go to Celtic matches. There’s nothing you can do about it.”

Celtic opened a store in Dublin in the late-1990s, and it is now the third-busiest of its 14 outlets. Shops in Belfast and Derry followed. “Roy Keane has generated some amount of interest,” a manager in the Dublin shop said last week.

The availability of the jersey did solve a social problem in Northern Ireland. There had been no easy way for nationalist and loyalist youths to tell each other apart, now Celtic and Rangers tops do the trick.

For more than 100 years Scottish football had been used as a proxy battleground between the two communities in the province, and that has become more pointed. In 2002, Lennon received loyalist death threats before he was due to captain Northern Ireland in a match against Cyprus. He never played for the team again.

Meanwhile Sinn Fein seems to grab whatever chance it can to attach itself to the Celtic fan base. The party sets up a stall at one pub in O’Connell Street whenever an Old Firm derby is being screened.

Celtic does attract people with ultra-nationalist feelings, McCready admits. “The ingredients are there — just as such people are also attracted to Irish dance and music, and to the GAA. If there’s a gathering with nationalist connotations in Ireland, you do get a fair sprinkling of Celtic shirts, just as at a unionist gathering you’ll see Rangers, Linfield and so on.

“But thousands of people in Ireland support Celtic, not just ultra-nationalists. The number of people wearing Celtic tops during last weekend’s riots probably came to five or six. There were as many Republic of Ireland tops, and there was even some Aston Villa.”

NATURALLY, Celtic has done everything it can to disassociate itself from sectarianism, including banning IRA songs at its grounds. But the club couldn’t escape its Catholic-Irish ethos even if it wanted to, and the tricolour still flies at Celtic Park.

Willie Frazer, organiser of last week’s Love Ulster parade, said: “One side is as bad as the other when it comes to football. It’s being done on the Rangers side too. People have been brushing over these issues and pretending it’s okay.

“But Celtic have a lot to answer for by having the tricolour flying on their ground in Glasgow. If Rangers ran up the Ulster flag, all hell would break loose and they’d be the biggest bigots on the planet.”

Celtic fielded dozens of calls of complaint last week about the prominence of the club’s jerseys in the riots. “These events have nothing to do with the club and those involved don’t represent it in any way,” said Iain Jamieson, a spokesman. “Clearly Celtic would condemn any behaviour of this kind.”

Statements of this kind have to be issued fairly regularly these days. In January, a video was released on the internet of two Celtic players singing The Fields of Athenry at a function in a Letterkenny hotel. The singing was punctuated by chants of “IRA” and “Sinn Fein” from the audience. Celtic issued a statement saying the players, including John Hartson, did not join in any sectarian chanting “and indeed utterly condemn sectarianism in any form, a view shared and fully endorsed by the club as a whole”.

Dr Joseph Bradley, a lecturer in sports studies at Stirling University, feels it’s unfair that the club has to continually combat such connotations. “Those perceptions can be used as a stick against the club by people who want to change things about Celtic and their fans that they don’t like,” he argues.

Bradley points to the bizarre controversy that surrounded the visit of the Tyrone GAA team and the Sam Maguire cup to Parkhead in January. One British newspaper tried to make trouble for Celtic by pointing out that Maguire was an intelligence officer with the Irish Republican Brotherhood in the 1910s.

Maguire simply can’t be a controversial figure for Celtic, which was founded by a Catholic priest in 1888. The original members were in support of Home Rule, against landlordism in Ireland, and sung rebel songs including God Save Ireland and A Nation Once Again at their first meeting, according to Bradley.

“The idea that Celtic is a Scottish football club is not entirely true; it is hybrid in nature. It is an Irish football club and a Scottish institution,” he said. “It is the only club in Britain that has such a strong Irishness at its core. Indeed, there is no parallel in terms of the amount of supporters’ clubs it has overseas.

“Because of the proliferation of Celtic tops, it has become quite easy for commentators to draw incorrect conclusions. Sportswear is now predominant in the western world. In any march, you will find any football top you like. You will also find Nike and Adidas; but you don’t customarily associate the Nike label with hooligans. People are making a bit of a jump with the Celtic tops.”

Wilson insists sectarianism is being stamped out by Celtic. “There’s a lot less problem with it than there used to be,” he said. “Celtic have always, from the earliest days, been a non-sectarian organisation. Anyone who tries to attach or graft anything on that has sectarian connotations is acting very much against the spirit of the club.”

Additional reporting: Carissa Casey

Laird and Rooker in 50:50 PSNI row

Belfast Telegraph

By Brian Walker
04 March 2006

The usual Friday afternoon calm of the House of Lords was shattered by an emotional argument between the outspoken Lord Laird and the equally blunt Minister of State Lord Rooker.

The war of words was over the 50:50 quota system for recruitment in the PSNI. Unionist peer Lord Laird said recruitment quotas for equal numbers of Catholics and non-Catholics should be scrapped on the grounds of religious discrimination.

Lord Rooker declared that Lord Laird and his supporters were being negative and exaggerating the impact of 50:50. In eight recruitment competitions since 2001, and a total of 50,000 applicants to the PSNI - 28,000 of them non-Catholic - only 541 (just 2%) were rejected due to the quota system, Lord Rooker said.

In one competition, there were 13,00 applicants for 440 posts. “Rejection was due to the massive number of applications - nothing to do with 50:50″. He also noted Catholic recruitment to the force had increased from 8.3% to 19.14% and was due to rise to 30% by 2010/11.

He added that the cost of running the quota system was about £13m or £10,000 per recruit, not the unionist claim of £80m which he didn’t recognise.

Sounding increasingly passionate, Lord Rooker went on: “To say that hundreds and thousands are suffering due to 50:50 is not true. I challenge journalists to challenge politicians on the basis of their figures”. He added that the 50:50 system would expire next March unless renewed and would not stay in place “a moment longer than was necessary”.

“If we scrapped it now, we would not achieve the target of 30% Catholics by 2010/11 but would be likely to see only 22% if we abandoned it now.”

‘Legal move’ over integrated refusal

Belfast Telegraph

Parents may opt for court challenge

By Kathryn Torney
04 March 2006

Parents are considering taking a judicial review against the Education Minister’s refusal to provide funding for four integrated schools in Northern Ireland, it emerged today.

Angela Smith announced yesterday that the Government would not provide funding for new schools in Clogher Valley, Moira/Hillsborough and Saintfield/Carryduff and also an existing independent primary school in Ballycastle because of the number of surplus places already in other schools.

Michael Wardlow, chief executive of the Northern Ireland Council for Integrated Education (NICIE), said he was “utterly stunned and bitterly disappointed” by the decision. Earlier this week the Belfast Telegraph revealed that 4,000 pupils were turned away from integrated schools in the last five years because of a shortage of places. Mr Wardlow said he has asked for an urgent meeting with Angela Smith to ask her if the Government had changed its policy on integrated schools.

“The fact that this decision was delayed until March means that parents are now under severe pressure to find school places for their children. “We have never had a proposal as strong as the one for Rowallane in Saintfield. “However, we are not ruling anything out and a judicial review of the minister’s decision is one possibility being considered by the parents.

We are currently getting legal advice on this. “The Integrated Education Fund may try to find money to fund the schools while we wait for approval but we would need to speak to the minister first to see what the prospects are for funding in the future.”

Michelle Brady is treasurer of the Clogher Valley parents’ group and had hoped that her three-year-old daughter would attend the new integrated school. She said she felt “very disappointed and let down” by the minister’s decision. “Where do we send out children now?” she asked. “We want an integrated education for our children and the minister says she is committed to that but she is not committed to our schools. “I was dumbstruck by her announcement. I never expected her to say no.”

June Wilkinson, member of the Rowallane parents’ group, criticised the minister’s late decision and said she had to decide yesterday what other school should become her P7 daugher’s first choice option to attend from this September. “Our plans to bring integrated education to a secondary level in this area are being set aside because of the Government’s lack of planning over surplus places,” she said. “I am very disappointed.”

Lollipop campaign pays off

Belfast Telegraph

By Kathryn Torney
04 March 2006

Parents in Belfast have won a long battle to have a permanent school crossing patrol for their children, it can be revealed today.

Almost five months after the South Eastern Education and Library Board axed the patrol at Brooklands Primary in Dundonald, a decision has been taken to reinstate the service.

Parents have been staging weekly protests at the school since last October and claimed that childen’s lives were at risk as a result of the board’s decision not to replace their lollipop man when he retired.

The SEELB had claimed that the school did not meet criteria relating to the number of unaccompanied children crossing the road and the volume of traffic.

A similar row erupted at nearby Braniel Primary when the board said that their patrolman would not be replaced.

It was eventually decided that both schools would get temporary patrols while a review was under taken.

A parent, who acted as lollipop woman at the school for a time while attempts were made to resolve the row, said she was delighted by the decision.

“We are so relieved that we are going to have a permanent patrol person,” she said.

“It is a busy road so it is great that there will be a safe crossing point for our children.

“It has been a long fight.”

The DUP’s Jimmy Spratt, who is a member of the board, also battled for the school patrols to be reinstated.

He said: “I am delighted by the news and think that the parents put up a very valiant fight.”

Braniel Primary is still waiting for a decision on the future of its crossing patrol.






















Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here