SAOIRSE32

4/5/2006

Families go online in a quest for the truth about collusion

Irelandclick

Murdered Dundalk man’s case is boosted by evidence of local republican. Relatives slam Taoiseach’s failure to meet family.

by Roisin McManus

www.anfhirinne.org

An Fhirinne, the campaign group set up to expose collusion between the British state and loyalist death squads, this week launched their new website in West Belfast.

The website, which includes biographies of those murdered and updates on each case, is the latest step by the campaign group who have travelled to the US, Brussels and London in a bid to highlight the collusion issue.

Families of those murdered through collusion gathered at the Roddy McCorley Social Club for the launch and a moving exhibition. A particular welcome was extended to the family of Seamus Ludlow, the Dundalk man abducted and killed by loyalists in April 1976. His murder was blamed on the IRA despite the existence of hard intelligence available to both the RUC and Gardaí identifying the loyalist killers. Mr Ludlow’s 30th anniversary occurred on Tuesday.

The Ludlow family’s campaign for justice has been boosted by a local connection. Lower Falls republican Pat Livingstone has assisted the Ludlow family by providing evidence directly contradicting Garda claims that it did not act on the intelligence because of issues of protocol and precedent which they claimed prevented them travelling North to interview the killers. In fact, reciprocal arrangements did exist as Mr Livingstone was interviewed by two RUC Special Branch officers in Dundalk Garda station in 1975 and was convicted in 1976 on the basis of a disputed statement he was said to have made there. During his trial, Gardaí were in the court in Belfast, intending to give evidence if needed.

Speaking to the Andersonstown News, Jimmy Sharkey, the nephew of Seamus Ludlow, said, “We are here because 30 years ago my uncle was killed and for a large part of that 30 years, part of our family were told by the Southern authorities that the IRA had killed him that he was an informer and actually that members of our own family were implicated in his killing. That belief lingered on for almost 20 years. We have found out since that within a very short period of time the Southern authorities knew full well who killed him and that members of the British army were involved in the killing but they chose to cover that up completely,” he added.

Jimmy welcomed the setting up of the website and said he hoped that it would raise awareness.

“I feel that Seamus’ life was absolutely worthless as far as the Southern authorities were concerned and we see the website as a major step forward.
“From our own perspective we need a full public inquiry which the Southern authorities have consistently refused to give us. It is not lost on our family that Bertie Ahern has refused to meet the family and while we have received some sort of informal apologies they have never acknowledged their part in this whole collusion. They have never acknowledged that they rated Seamus Ludlow as being irrelevant. They put their own political reasons before an investigation into his death,” he added.

Speaking at Tuesday’s launch, Sinn Féin President Gerry Adams said that collusion and state killings were a matter of administrative practice in the North and were authorised at the highest political level.

Mr Adams congratulated all of those involved in the launch of the An Fhirinne website and paid tribute to the families who have lost loved ones as a result of collusion and state murder.

“While there have been many deaths arising out of the conflict An Fhirinne seeks to draw attention to those carried out by state forces as well as those involving collusion between state forces and unionist paramilitaries,” said the Sinn Féin President. “Together these claimed hundreds of lives over 30 years of conflict. For the families of state violence and collusion there has been the trauma of dealing with the loss of a loved one, but their grief has been compounded by the lies and deceit of the state in covering up the truth of these events,” he added.

Mr Adams said that many of these families are only now beginning to learn of the role collusion played in the murder of a relative.

“An Fhirinne has been campaigning for four years, demanding that the British government acknowledge the truth of the role its state agencies played in the murder of citizens and that it dismantle the apparatus and structures of collusion,” he continued.

“Its objective is to secure an international, independent, public judicial inquiry into collusion and state killings. This is an enormous challenge.”

www.anfhirinne.org

Journalist:: Roisin McManus

Files confirm suspicions

Newshound

(Steven McCaffery, Irish News)

The significance of the files made public in the last 48 hours is that they have delivered confirmation of what was once dismissed as a ‘collusion conspiracy theory’.

They represent a substantial addition to the debate on how the Troubles developed and why violence lasted so long.

For the first time they give a dramatic insight into the scale of collusion and, crucially, how much the British government knew about it.

The ‘Subversion in the UDR’ document was written in August 1973 by military intelligence and Ministry of Defence officials, with one civil servant expressing fears over the questions that “are bound to follow once it has reached No 10″.

They were obviously concerned that the then prime minister would be shaken by their report that 5 to 15% of UDR troops were linked to loyalists and that the regiment was the “best single source” of weapons for loyalist paramilitaries.

So what questions did Downing Street ask?

We know that the shocking reports of subversion reached the prime minister’s desk.

This is confirmed by a further document, stamped ‘confidential’, which records a meeting in September 1975 – two years after the subversion document was written.

The document is a summary of a meeting where the prime minister at the time, Harold Wilson, and his secretary of state for Northern Ireland Merlyn Rees, brief the leader of the opposition, Margaret Thatcher, on political and security matters.

The five-page document shows that the politicians held a meeting in the House of Commons where Mrs Thatcher was brought up to date on events in Northern Ireland.

It is clear the discussion was frank and wide-ranging. They discuss the IRA, the performance of the courts and the overcrowding of prisons.

However, a key section on the security situation confirms that Downing Street was aware of the UDR subversion and reveals additional concerns over the RUC.

“The Secretary of State said that he was more worried by the current sectarian murders than by the bombings in Belfast,” reads the document.

“Unfortunately there were certain elements in the police who were very close to the UVF and who were prepared to hand over information, for example, to Mr Paisley.

“The army’s judgement was that the UDR were heavily infiltrated by extremist Protestants and that in a crisis situation they could not be relied on to be loyal.”

The record of the discussion sheds no further light on these revelations. None of the politicians are recorded as raising concerns or expressing surprise at the comments.

Two years after the subversion document was written, therefore, the UDR remained “heavily infiltrated” and Downing Street was linking elements within the RUC to the loyalist UVF.

With this in mind an extraordinary RTE documentary filmed in 1977 gives a revealing insight into the UDR at the latter stages of the decade.

The programme interviews a number of senior officers, including an unnamed company major.

There is no suggestion that the officer was involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever but his comments echo those of his colleagues on the programme, offering a valuable insight into UDR thinking.

The TV reporter and soldier discuss the UDR’s role.

Interviewer: “Who do you see as the enemy in your area?”

Officer: “Well the Provisional IRA is the only enemy we have.”

Interviewer: “Are you suspicious of the Catholic community in your area?”

Officer: “Well a certain amount of them you have to be suspicious, because a lot of them are involved in the deaths of members of this company.”

Interviewer: “Well could you give me an idea of how many Catholics in your area that you are suspicious of?”

Officer: “Well that’s a very difficult question to say, well roughly speaking say 50%.”

A nationalist resident tells the programme: “Obviously there are very good and very decent men in the UDR but the record has been poor.

“The great difficulty I see with the UDR is it in fact brings one section of the community into the security forces and keeps the other out.”

Through the 1980s and 1990s, the Stalker and Sampson inquiries examined allegations of wrong-doing in the RUC, while three investigations by John, now Lord, Stevens probed allegations of security force collusion with loyalists.

The British government never allowed the inquiry teams to publish their findings.

Now these files unearthed from the government’s own records have confirmed that as early as 1973 it was aware of large-scale collusion.

We know that politicians who asked questions were misled.

Crucially, there is no evidence of any substantial effort by government to combat collusion.

These files amount to a few dozen pages, but they have confirmed allegations that were evaded throughout the Troubles.

They leave us with one important unanswered question: What is in the files we have yet to see?

May 4, 2006
________________

This article appeared first in the May 3, 2006 edition of the Irish News.

Stolen army gun may be linked to second killing

Newshound

(Steven McCaffery, Irish News)

Shocking documents show that as early as 1973 the British government knew security force collusion with loyalists was resulting in murder. In the second day of a series of special reports, we recount the murderous history of an army gun – as recorded by British military intelligence

The single page of typed sentences looks like a common or garden shopping list, but its contents are chilling.

“February 3rd, kidnapping….”

“February 20th, attempted murder….”

“May 9th, attempted murder….”

Number ‘6′ on the list of loyalist paramilitary attacks reads: “31/5/73 – The murder of Thomas Curry, and the attempted murder of others in Muldoon’s bar, Tomb St. Fired cases found at the scene.”

The page is entitled ‘Annex E’ and is attached to a document detailing ‘Subversion in the UDR’ – both were written in August 1973 by British military intelligence and have never before been seen in public.

The main ‘Subversion’ document, carried in yesterday’s Irish News, contained a series of shocking revelations, including that:

* five to 15 per cent of UDR members were linked to loyalist groups
* the “only significant source of modern weapons for Protestant extremist groups has been the UDR”
* the first loyalty of many soldiers was to “Ulster” rather than “Her Majesty’s Government”
* removing undesirables from the UDR could “result in a very small regiment indeed”.

The documents offer an unprecedented insight into the scale of security-force collusion and accompanying letters indicate that the information was to be passed to “No 10 Downing Street”.

In an extraordinary development, the documentation, therefore, forms a paper trail that stretches from the heart of the British government to the scene of murder and attempted murder in Belfast.

The trail begins on page seven of the main document, where intelligence officers recount how, in October 1972, UDR and territorial army troops at the King’s Park camp in Lurgan “were ‘overpowered’ by a number of armed men” – the report’s author using inverted commas to signal his scepticism.

The document asks:

* how the gang successfully avoided a series of patrols arriving and leaving the camp
* why the base’s weapons had been gathered in one central location
* why guard orders were “contravened” to ensure “there was only one man on the gate”.

“The possibility of collusion is therefore highly probable,” the report says, adding later: “It is difficult to resist the conclusion that members of the UDR were party to these incidents.”

The loyalist gang left with 85 semi-automatic rifles and 21 sub-machine guns. According to the document: “It is apparent that the raiders found rather more weapons in the armoury than they had bargained for and within hours 63 SLRs and eight SMGs had been recovered close to an abandoned Land Rover.”

A total of 22 SLRs [self-loading, or semi-automatic, rifles] and 13 SMGs [sub-machine guns] were not recovered – until July 1973.

The main document explains: “One of the Sterling SMGs stolen from the Lurgan centre was recovered in the Shankill on 21 July 1973 in the possession of three men, two of whom were known members of the Shankill UFF/UVF group: they had just robbed a bar.

“Research at the Data Reference Centre has subsequently indicated that this weapon has been used in at least 12 terrorist outrages, including the murder of a Catholic, and seven other attempted murders (details are at Annex E).”

Today The Irish News reproduces Annex E.

It bears the heading: “A list of terrorist outrages in which one of the sub-machine guns stolen in the Lurgan UDR/TAVR [territorial army] Centre arms raid on 23 October 1972, has subsequently been used.”

It states: “The examination of test [shell] cases fired from the SMG recovered from three men, two of whom were known UFF/UVF, following an armed robbery and attempted murder at 192 Shankill Rd on 21 July 1973, has revealed that the same weapon has been used in the following incidents…..”

It then lists 11 loyalist attacks, including references to a murder, a kidnapping, two unidentified shooting incidents and seven attempted murders.

All of the shootings took place in the Belfast area and in most cases the victims of the attacks are named.

Significantly, while the annex identifies seven attempted murders, three of the shootings targeted separate groups of Catholic youths and a detachment of security forces.

When the information is matched with news reports from the time, it becomes clear that the shootings could have ended in multiple deaths.

The third incident on Annex E is listed as: “20/3/73 – The attempted murder of three youths who were fired at from a passing car on Brookvale Avenue.”

The reference to the incident carries little detail, but The Irish News report from the time suggests an atrocity was narrowly avoided.

“Twelve boys in the 14-15 years old age group, playing together in Brookvale Avenue, off Antrim Road, had narrow escapes when a masked gunman stepped from a Ford Cortina which pulled in close to them and opened fire,” reads the report in The Irish News.

“The boys scattered in terror. The gunfire, from an automatic weapon, missed.”

The paper quotes an eyewitness as saying: “It was a miracle there were not half a dozen bodies left behind.”

The fact that the Brookvale murder bid was carried out using a British military weapon and that security forces believed it was stolen with the help of soldiers, was never made public.

In a further point, which may yet prove significant, it is reported that the gunmen sped off in a ‘Ford Cortina’.

The Irish News records that on the same night loyalist gunmen – also armed with a sub-machine gun and driving what was described as a ‘white Ford Cortina’ – killed one Catholic youth and injured another.

The tragedy is not mentioned in the annex but the circumstances of the death raise further questions of the security forces.

The report in The Irish News of the time reads: “A 16-year-old Catholic youth was shot dead and a schoolboy companion critically wounded from a passing car at the corner of Merrion street and Grosvenor Road, Belfast, late last night.

“The dead boy was Bernard McErlean of Durham Street. He was rushed to the Royal Victoria Hospital, only 200 yards away, but he was dead on arrival.

“The wounded boy… was hit by six bullets from a sub-machine gun in the chest, arms and buttocks.

“Soon after the shooting lower Falls residents accused the British army of ‘facilitating Protestant extremist gangs’.

“Eyewitnesses said the boys were shot from a white Ford Cortina car which passed, did a U-turn, and repassed the corner of Merrion Street when the gunmen opened fire.

“Local residents said that only minutes before the boys were shot an army saracen burst through a barricade at the corner of Merrion Street, scattering barrels and other articles ‘in all directions’, before ‘disappearing into the darkness’.”

The Irish News quotes one woman as saying: “People came running out when they heard the crash and a crowd gathered at the corner of Merrion street.

“Then the Ford Cortina came up Grosvenor Road, turned, and the gunmen opened fire.

“Young McErlean was killed instantly. It looked like a well timed operation – first the barricade was swept aside, bringing a crowd into the street, then the murder car swept by. The people around here can’t be blamed for thinking that the British army had a hand to the murder.”

The death of Bernard McErlean does not feature in the Annex and it may be unrelated to the British army sub-machine gun in question.

But the attacks happened on the same night, both involved a sub-machine gun and on each occasion the gunmen used a Ford Cortina.

If, however, the same weapon was used, then Thomas Curry was not the only person killed by the gun taken in the “self-service” raid in Lurgan.

And the significance of the attack may yet go further. The youth who was shot and injured alongside Bernard McErlean was 15-year-old Kieran Nugent.

Nugent, of Merrion Street, survived and went on to become a well-known republican and a key member of the prison ‘blanket protest’.

Imprisoned in 1976, he refused to wear inmates’ clothing: “The only way I will wear a prison uniform is if they nail it to my back.”

Although he died six years ago, his words kick-started years of republican prison protests, culminating in the hunger strikes and he is commemorated in a mural on the Falls Road.

The main ‘Subversion’ document details how large quantities of UDR semi-automatic rifles, pistols and machine guns were stolen by “well briefed gangs, without a shot being fired in anger or any significant attempt made to resist”.

The document also reveals that: “Since the beginning of the current campaign the best single source of weapons, and the only significant source of modern weapons, for Protestant extremist groups has been the UDR.”

‘Annex E’ has given us the story of just one of those weapons.

May 4, 2006
________________

This article appeared first in the May 3, 2006 edition of the Irish News.

We Say: And 25 years later

Irelandclick

Is it really 25 years since the dread news arrived that Bobby Sands had died? Is it really 25 years since that awful cycle of death and dying that ended up in the death of 10 young men inside Long Kesh and the streets outside the camp in turmoil.

It is. It is indeed. And it is a tribute to Bobbby Sands and his brave comrades that those 25 years have passed so quickly, with the republican struggle growing stronger and more confident and the impetus towards an island of equals well-night unstoppable.

Of course there have been terrible times and awful setbacks, but when the political tally is taken, when the gains are measured against the losses, it can be seen that the fresh faces of those men who gave their lives in the cause of justice and freedom loom ever larger in the political pantheon while those from right across the political spectrum who callously abused them and who cynically opposed their just demands are yesterday’s men and women.

The wide and impressive range of events that has been organised across the island of Ireland – and in Belfast in particular – to mark the anniversary is testimony to the increasing relevance of the hunger strikers and their ideals in modern nationalism and republicanism. 25 years ago to have voted for Bobby Sands, to have taken to streets in support of the blanketmen was to be marked down as an undesirable, to be sidelined and demonised at best, to be attacked and murdered at worst. Nowadays, with republicanism an ever-growing force across the island, it is those who espouse the politics of the past, those who mouth bitter and poisonous bile, and those who fear to step boldly forward who are seen both at home and abroad as the impediment to peace. Those who hold the hunger strikers up as heroes and role models are saying that this is an island that is ours to share, where the old certainties have turned to dust, where the reactionary state and religious forces that had us in vice-like grip no longer hold sway and where we’re free to make our own choices and shape our own future.

Too many of us have painful and lasting memories of those dark days of 1981 when it seemed that we would never emerge from under the shroud of death and suffering that covered us all. Today, the IRA has departed the stage as a military force and some of those very republicans who shared cells with the hunger strikers, who were privy to their most intimate and personal utterances, who watched them die and who died a little bit with them, hold elected office, waiting for the inevitable day when the essential truth of the republican ideal can power and inform their words and actions in the political chamber. Those people have seen too much to be beaten or even diverted by the cynicism and fear which motivates so many of those who oppose them and who would spurn an historic political opportunity in favour of long years of enmity and suspicion.

In truth, it is not the shadow of the gunman which prompts unionist politicians, Irish establishment opportunists and faceless British manipulators to shy away from those who today espouse the same cause that the hunger strikers died for. It is a fear of having finally to come face to face with the courage and the spirit of 1981 – not on a ground of their choosing with their opponents naked in a fly-blown prison cell or dying on a hospital bed, but in a chamber of equals where the future of this island will be ultimately decided and where right will finally win the day.

Republicans prepare to mark anniversary of Bobby Sands’ death

BN.ie

04/05/2006 - 17:08:17

Republicans were tonight preparing to mark the 25th anniversary of the death of IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands with a number of events throughout Ireland.

Seven IRA and three Irish National Liberation Army prisoners died in 1981 during the protest which they hoped would force then British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s government to recognise them as political prisoners.

Bobby Sands, who was the Officer Commanding of the IRA when he embarked on a hunger strike in 1981, was the first of the 10 to die, at the age of 27.

But he also died an MP, having sent shockwaves through British politics when he won a 1981 Westminster by-election for the Fermanagh and South Tyrone seat.

Mr Frazer said FAIR had already received requests for copies of the document in the United States, Colombia, Israel and parts of the UK.

Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams and other senior members of the party will take part tomorrow in events to remember the hunger strikers in Belfast, Dublin, Derry, Navan, Kilcoo in Co Down and Ballincollig, Co Cork.

A group of former prison comrades will hold a short ceremony in Sands’ memory at the now empty Maze Prison, outside Belfast.

Sinn Féin MPs Martin McGuinness and Michelle Gildernew will join them at the prison building in the former jail.

Black flag vigils are also being planned on the Falls, Andersonstown and Stewartstown Roads in west Belfast and senior African National Congress member Robert McBride is to deliver a lecture in Bobby Sands’ memory in the city.

Mr McGuinness will also take part in a parade and rally in Derry tomorrow, which will stop outside the former homes of two of the hunger strikers - Patsy O’Hara and Mickey Devine.

The Mid Ulster MP and his Assembly colleague Raymond McCartney, who took part in a 1980 hunger strike at the Maze, will address the crowd.

Outside Dublin’s GPO, the scene of the 1916 republican Easter Rising, Sinn Féin MEP Mary Lou McDonald will take part in a commemorative event and there will be a number of vigils throughout the city.

Gerry Adams will also visit a hunger strike memorial at Hackballscross, Co Louth, along the Irish border before addressing a commemorative event in Navan, Co Meath.

Anniversary of hunger strikes to be marked by a series of events

Irelandclick

By Francesca Ryan

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usAMONG the series of events taking place this weekend to commemorate a momentous time in Irish history – the 1981 hunger strikes – is a programme of events launched by a collaboration of the Roddy McCorley Society and the Coiste 81 Committee’s Lenadoon branch.

The four-day programme was mobilised last June when the two groups conferred about the most appropriate way to remember the sacrifice undertaken by the hunger strikers on this, the 25th anniversary.

“The reason we teamed up with the Lenadoon 81 Committee is because we cover the same catchment area,” explained John Stewart of the Roddy McCorley Society.

“We met up with the families and representatives of each of the hunger strikers and this brought us to as far away as Mayo where Frank Stagg, Michael Gaughan and Sean McNeela were from.

“The result is that we have most families coming to the weekend’s events, which is very significant.”

The programme of events gets underway tonight (Thursday, May 4) when the Roddy’s plays host to the premiere of Aisling Ghéar’s production of Dialann Ocrais/Diary of a Hunger Striker.

“We are happy to be hosting the first production of this play which will be followed by a quiz with the hunger strike as its theme,” continued John.
“This will be the first quiz of its kind here at the Roddy’s and we intend to make it an annual event.”

On Friday the club’s Tom Williams Room will hold an exhibition honouring the struggles in both the H-Blocks and Armagh prison.

The exhibition will run from 2pm to 7.30pm and will be followed by entertainment provided by Take It Easy.

“Our main focus is on the Saturday and Sunday,” said Gerry McConville, from the Lenadoon 81 Committee.

“We are going to have representatives of the hunger strikers, in most cases family members, here on Saturday for most of the day.”

At 4pm, the finals of an underage GAA blitz will be taking place at the pitches of the Rossa, Sarsfields and St Paul’s GAA clubs.

At 5.30pm on Saturday, a march and rally will take place at the monument commemorated to Julie Livingstone at the bottom of Lenadoon Avenue.
Julie was shot on May 12, 1981, by the British army as she returned from the shop, she died from her injuries the following day.

“There will be a wreath-laying ceremony at Julie’s monument where Gerry McConville will give a speech before the crowd, accompanied by two bands, marches up Lenadoon Avenue and into the grounds of the Roddy’s,” said John.

Five years ago, the Roddy’s had 12 trees planted to commemorate the hunger strikers, on Saturday families and friends of the 12 men will lay wreaths at the trees.

“Saturday’s event will be chaired by David McGivern, chairman of the Roddy McCorley Society, and Gerry Adams will be giving the main oration after the wreath-laying ceremony, before we head into the club for entertainment,” said John.

At 3pm on Sunday a discussion entitled ‘The Hunger Strike Period in Lenadoon’ will take place in the Roddy’s.

Speakers will include Padraig McCotter, Seany Simpson and Brendan Mulvenna.

There will also be an all-day exhibition at the Roddy’s of posters, cuttings and photgraphs from the period of the hunger strikes.

“The idea of this whole programme is to cover all aspects of the hunger strike, what happened in the H-Blocks, what happened with the families and what was going on in the streets,” said Gerry.

“The discussion is aimed at getting a flavour of what was happening in the streets during that period of 1981. It was an important year for the community, for the people of Lenadoon, where Joe McDonnell was from, and we are encouraging everyone to come to the discussion to relay their memories, share experiences and participate in the discussion.”

A recital of revolutionary poetry, readings and songs in conjunction with the Roddy McCorley Writers’ Group will follow the discussion before entertainment throughout the complex on Sunday evening.

“Everyone is more than welcome to all of these events and we would urge as much local participation as possible. The more people that come, the more successful the commemorations will be.”

Journalist:: Francesca Ryan

H-Block heroes remembered

Irelandclick

THIS WEEKEND: PAY A TRIBUTE

By Francesca Ryan

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us25 years ago Bobby Sands made the ultimate sacrifice. He was to be followed by nine courageous comrades, two more of them from West Belfast, Joe McDonnell and Kieran Doherty. Across the city in the coming days a
series of events will mark the stirring contribution that the ten men made to the struggle for justice. To paraphrase Bobby, you can play your part by attending an event, no matter how small.

With the 25th anniversary of the death of Bobby Sands upon us, the West Belfast MP Gerry Adams is calling on republicans across the city to attend events organised to mark Bobby’s death on hunger strike.

“The fifth of May is a very significant date in West Belfast,” said Mr Adams. “Twenty five years ago, Bobby Sands took on the British government and their attempts to criminalise him. Bobby died on hunger strike on this day and for many, this still will be a very emotional time.”

Here’s the list of events taking place in various areas of the city over the weekend.

THURSDAY MAY 4

7.30PM: Roddy McCorley’s Social Club Production of Aisling Ghéar’s Dialann Ocrais/Diary of a Hunger Striker 9PM: Roddy McCorley’s Social Club Hunger Strike themed quiz in the Wolfe Tone Room
12 MIDNIGHT: Outside Upper Springfield Development Trust 24 hour fast and vigil organised by Upper Springfield Sinn Féin

FRIDAY MAY 5

2PM-7.30PM: Roddy McCorley’s Social Club Hunger Strike Exhibition in Tom Williams Room
5PM-6PM: Black Flag Vigil on the Falls Road, Springfield Road, Andersonstown Road and Stewartstown Road. The gathering points at 5pm are as follows: Falls Road Sinn Féin Centre, Sevastopol Street; Beechmount Avenue/Falls Road junction; Whiterock Road/Falls Road junction; Top of the Monagh Road; Connolly House, Andersonstown Road; Mairead Farrell Sinn Féin Office at the Dairy Farm Centre.
8.30PM: Devenish Complex 24th Annual Bobby Sands Lecture delivered by South African Chief of Police Robert McBride, followed by music from Frances Black and The Scór.

SATURDAY MAY 6

1PM: Balmoral Hotel Talkback focusing on legacy of the hunger strikes. Panellists will include John Finucane, Chris McGimpsey, Toireasa Ní Fhearaiosa and Alan McBride who lost relatives in the Shankill bomb of 1993. 4PM: GAA pitches of St Paul’s, Sarsfields and Rossa – Finals of the underage GAA blitz.
5.30PM: Julie Livingstone Memorial, Lenadoon Avenue/Stewartstown Road junction. Wreath-laying ceremony, rally and march, via Lenadoon Avenue, to Roddy McCorley’s Social Club.
6.30PM: Roddy McCorley’s Social Club. Family and friends of the hunger strikers to lay wreaths at trees dedicated to the 12 hunger strikers in the club’s grounds, followed by an oration by Gerry Adams. Entertainment in club afterwards.
8PM: Andersonstown Social Club (PD). Republican activists from the 1980/1981 period talk about their experiences.

SUNDAY MAY 7

1PM: Dairy Farm Complex, Stewartstown Road. March from complex to Twinbrook where Robert McBride will unveil a sculpture dedicated to the hunger strikers. Unveiling of a mural to hunger strikers will also take place. 2PM: Roddy McCorley’s Social Club. Discussion entitled The Hunger Strike Period in Lenadoon followed by poetry, readings and songs by the Roddy McCorley’s Writers’ Group.
3PM: Twinbrook Pitches. Cumann na Fuiseoige take on Dungiven’s Kevin Lynch Club in an invitational hurling match.
8PM: Andersonstown Social Club (PD). Event with prominent speakers and entertainment.

Journalist:: Francesca Ryan

Govt accused of exacerbating prison overcrowding

BN.ie
04/05/2006 - 08:10:47

The Irish Prison Officers Association has expressed growing frustration with what it called the Government’s failure to address prison overcrowding.

The issue is set to be discussed at the association’s annual conference in Killarney, Co Kerry, in the coming days.

The IPOA says Irish jails are so overcrowded that a revolving-door system is beginning to emerge, with inmates released early to make way for new prisoners.

It says the situation has been exacerbated by the Government’s decision to close prisons in the Curragh, Spike Island and Shanganagh without building replacement facilities.

The association has also expressed concerns about Minister for Justice Michael McDowell’s suggestion that bail laws may be tightened due to the level of crimes being committed by people on bail.

It says there is no space in Irish jails to deal with the extra prison population that such a crackdown would create.

Inmates end rooftop protest at Magilligan Prison

BN.ie

04/05/2006 - 09:36:40

Two inmates have ended a 10-hour rooftop protest at Magilligan Prison near Derry.

The prisoners climbed onto the roof yesterday while being moved across the prison yard and demanded talks with the Free Presbyterian chaplain.

One of the men involved is serving a sentence for robbery and the other for armed robbery.

The pair started a fire and threw tiles from the roof during the protest, but they ended the action voluntarily just after midnight.

Woman sells home to pay off dead husband’s assets recovery bill

BN.ie

04/05/2006 - 10:46:23

The ex-wife of a murdered loyalist paramilitary leader has sold her home in the North in order to pay £35,000 (€51,000) to the Assets Recovery Agency, it announced today.

The money is in addition to £200,000 (€292,000) already recovered by the agency from the estate of Stephen Warnock.

Warnock, 35, a leader in the Loyalist Volunteer Force splinter group, was shot dead in September 2002 during an inter-loyalist feud.

The Agency said it had gathered evidence that the £35,000 (€51,000) was the proceeds of Warnock’s criminal activities and had indirectly enabled Mrs Warnock to buy the house she was living in.

The ARA said it identified the money from the large-scale drug trafficking Warnock had been engaged in prior to his death. They said he had become a major supplier of both cannabis and ecstasy.

Mrs Warnock settled her case with the ARA in February at the High Court in Belfast when she agreed to pay the agency the £35,000 (€51,000).

A cheque for the money had now been received from her solicitor, said the ARA, and this had concluded its case against the property of the late Mr Warnock.

Warnock was delivering his three-year-old daughter to school in Newtownards, Co Down, when he was murdered.

The little girl escaped injury when a gunman on a motorcycle pulled up alongside her father’s car and fired 15 shots into it.

Following the final settlement of the case against Mrs Warnock, ARA deputy director Alan McQuillan said: “Accepting money as a gift from those who have obtained it by criminal means is a risky business. The agency was set up to go after such money and we will do that to the best of our ability.”

One family’s Rising

Irish Echo

Ex-Taoiseach FitzGerald recounts parents’ activism in Irish cause

By Peter McDermott
pmcdermott@irishecho.com

A chance discovery in a cupboard brought Garret FitzGerald into Dublin’s General Post Office, 50 years after the Easter Rising.

He’d found his father Desmond’s first-hand, participant’s account of that watershed event in Irish history.

“My older brothers knew [he’d written the manuscript], but he never said it to me,” said the former taoiseach.

The youngest son of Ireland’s first foreign minister arranged to have it published in 1968, along with correspondence between his mother and George Bernard Shaw. Now 90 years after the event, “Desmond’s Rising” is being reissued with a considerable amount of new material.

FitzGerald, who is 80, has in recent weeks come to the defense of the insurrection in which both his parents were involved.

“Without 1916, you wouldn’t have had independence in 1922,” he said in an interview with the Echo. “We would have gotten Home Rule in some form in a partitioned Ireland, but not independence, and Home Rule would have become permanent over time.”

Already, from about 1911, the monetary transfers were greater from Britain to Ireland than the other way, “but the scale wasn’t huge, so we were able to get out from under in ‘21,” he said.

If the welfare state had been fully implemented, the transfers would have become massive and it would have been far more difficult to mobilize later for separatism. The second decade of the 20th century, it turned out, was Ireland’s last opportunity to strike for freedom.

“I have that strong view that 1916 was fundamental to the achievement of what we have achieved,” he added.

Ireland may have been poor for a long time afterwards, and may have made serious economic mistakes, but they were its own mistakes, and it learnt from them, eventually using “the powers of independence to become a viable and successful economy,” FitzGerald said.

The former taoiseach made a related argument critiquing the Provisional IRA campaign from 1970, which he said made Northern Ireland even more dependent on Britain, postponing the possibility of unification by decades.

FitzGerald said: “I wrote a book on Northern Ireland in 1970 in which I said our economy and theirs [the North’s] was growing at 4.2 percent per year, while Britain had 2.35, and at that rate, in 25 years the whole of Ireland would be at the same level as Britain. No more subsidies — so that obstacle to unification would have disappeared.

“We did it. It took 29 years, not 25,” he said. “But of course, the IRA destroyed the Northern Ireland economy.”

The other outcome of the violence, said FitzGerald, a key architect of the 1985 Anglo-Irish Agreement, was that it ultimately brought the two governments closer together than had ever been once thought possible — hardly, he added, the aim of the paramilitaries. “Three thousand people dead for that?” FitzGerald said. “It was a most extraordinarily unsuccessful campaign.

“But I recognize, of course, the skill with which [Martin] McGuinness and [Gerry] Adams have won people around to do the exact opposite: that is to make Northern Ireland work, rather than destroy it,” he added

FitzGerald, the author of the just-published “Ireland in the World: New Perspectives” was in New York last week, though, to speak at NYU on a broader theme: “European Union and its role in world peace.”

The former taoiseach said people in the U.S. know little of the EU’s enormously positive influence on world affairs and challenged, if indirectly, Donald Rumsfeld’s notion of an “old Europe.”

“Basically Europe has reversed its values in the last 50 years on every issue,” he said.

The picture has been transformed on states’ responsibility in the area of human rights, on capital punishment (abolition is a requirement of membership) and in what circumstances countries can legally go to war. Although the Balkans’ civil wars in the 1990s were disastrous, other latent ethnic disputes were prevented from surfacing, precisely because the different groups were agreed on joining the EU.

Added FitzGerald, the EU gives four times as much aid worldwide than the United States relative to its population. “And in ecology we’re leading the world,” he said.

It was the era of the old colonial Europe, that the 1916 leaders launched their rebellion

“There was a war going on, launched by emperors and kings against each other in the context of which only two countries had universal suffrage,” FitzGerald said.

The planners did, of course, have the promise of support from one of those powers.

Desmond FitzGerald agreed with the last-minute decision to call off the Rising when material aid from Germany failed to appear on Good Friday, 1916. However, when the Irish Republican Brotherhood’s secret Military Council pressed ahead with an uprising in Dublin on Easter Monday, FitzGerald felt morally obliged to join it, having trained men to fight.

The future revolutionary was born in London in 1888. The son of stonemason, he was swept up in the cultural nationalism of the time in the city, where he met and fell in love with the daughter of a Belfast Presbyterian businessman, Mabel McConnell, who had become a republican, suffragette and socialist at Queens University.

FitzGerald was primarily a poet, like three of the 1916 Proclamation’s signatories; in fact, said his son, he was not all that political.

“He did the jail bit, and she did the extreme nationalist bit,” he said, laughing.

McConnell was for a time a secretary to Shaw and her passionate letters to him in 1914, urging him to back Irish separatism, prompted “very amusing ones back from him, very entertaining, very affectionate responses,” said her son.

The couple married in 1911, moved to Brittany and then in 1913 to Irish-speaking Dingle in County Kerry, where he organized the newly-formed Irish Volunteers.

They had gone to Ireland to take part in the “national movement,” a cause distinct from that of the predominant Home Rule party. After being prohibited by the authorities from operating in Kerry, FitzGerald moved to Bray, Co. Wicklow, 20 miles from Dublin, where the family lived thereafter.

Mabel FitGerald worked in Dublin for Cumann na mBan, whose offices didn’t have a typewriter, “She would go home to do the typing at night, having spent the day meeting people,” her son said.

She was involved in the first few days of the Rising. After she’d completed a couple of important missions for him, Patrick Pearse said: “You can’t have the parents of two small children here — you go home.”

Desmond FitzGerald had been put in charge of the food supplies on the third floor of the GPO, where the restaurant was, “Everybody came up to eat there,” said his son.

The elder Fitzgerald’s account of the Rising itself has drawn attention because of revealing conversations with Pearse, who was executed 90 years ago today, and fellow signatory Joseph Plunkett

Two aspects of his father’s account of his conversations with the two men stand out for Garret FitzGerald. “One was their suppressed sense of doubt about the morality of the Rising,” he said of one exchange. “All three were producing arguments in favor of the Rising as being morally justified, trying not to think of any arguments the other way.

“The other is that Pearse was a realist,” he said. “He’s presented by the mythmakers and the revisionists as if he were a lesser man that he was. As a realist, he knew that if the Germans won the war, they would restore a monarchy in Ireland.”

The thinking was that the kaiser’s sixth son, Joachim, would be married to a Catholic and that the children of such a union would not speak English. The result, they reasoned, could be an Irish-speaking Catholic monarchy.

FitzGerald, who became one of his father’s successors as minister for foreign affairs, wondered if this idea had originated with the Germans themselves, and wrote to Joachim’s grandson in Spain some years ago. He didn’t get a reply.

Pearse’s emergence as the “president of the Republic” is still the subject of debate. For one thing, he hadn’t been universally admired by his fellow conspirators, said FitzGerald.

He recounted the story of Sean Mac Diarmada’s mission to the North in 1915 to ask Denis McCullough to become president, or head center, of the Irish Republican Brotherhood. McCullough and Bulmer Hobson, the driving forces behind the renewal of the IRB from 1907, were cautious of insurrectionary adventures. But it suited the Military Council to have the former nominally in charge, and safely out of the way, “So they could get on with their plotting,” said Garret Fitzgerald.

When McCullough suggested Pearse, Mac Diarmada said: “Pearse? That lunatic?”

It’s assumed that Pearse took the key role because of his writing and speaking skills, and that Tom Clarke, the elder statesmen of republican revolutionaries, was happy to take a back seat.

“But Kathleen Clarke was always furious about her husband being pushed to one side by Pearse,” said FitzGerald, who was taoiseach for eight months in 1981-2 and again from 1982 to 1987.

He said his father obviously respected the two best known of the 1916 leaders, referring to them in his manuscript as “Mr. Pearse”, of whom he and his wife were particularly fond, and “Mr. Connolly.”

FitzGerald, who served a jail sentence in 1915-16, was back behind bars after the Rising’s collapse. He would serve two further jail terms before the Treaty, one of which, with Eamon de Valera, is described in “Desmond’s Rising.”

In 1919, FitzGerald became minister for publicity in the new underground government and set about swaying world opinion in favor of the Irish cause. He used all of his contacts in London and Paris to bring journalists over to Ireland and made it a rule to publish, in the republicans’ Irish Bulletin, only information that had been verified by an affidavit. Said his son: “The result was that after six months, the journalists could believe what was in the Bulletin, but couldn’t believe a word the British said.”

When he was imprisoned, Erskine Childers succeeded him.

FitzGerald — a great admirer of his ministerial colleague Michael Collins — supported the terms of the Treaty. Now veterans of the Rising, like W.T. Cosgrave, Richard Mulcahy, and FitzGerald, found themselves at war with their former comrades.

Cosgrave was once close to de Valera; Mulcahy was related by marriage to two prominent anti-Treatyites, (Sean T. O’Kelly and James Ryan, both later Fianna Fail ministers); and FitzGerald’s wife Mabel took the republican side, though not actively, said her son.

The independence negotiated by Collins up to May 1922 was significant, said Garret FitzGerald, greater than the dominion status held by Australia and Canada. In contrast to the latter cases, the role of the British monarch in the workings of the new Irish democracy was “totally nominal,” he said.

“Now we had irritants left,” FitzGerald said. “Forms of terminology were objectionable.”

The first Irish government did what it could with these within the terms of the Treaty, he added, paving the way for Fianna Fail to dismantle it later.

In addressing this issue of whether the 1916 martyrs would have supported the Treaty, Desmond FitzGerald recalled a comrade saying, when passing the massive military base at the Curragh, Co. Kildare: “If we could just get rid of the British army and have our own embassies.” Six years later, Collins achieved just that. (The man quoted died in the fighting in Easter Week.)

Only “much, much later” did the future Fine Gael politician find that his mother had a different view. Even after his birth, she wrote to a friend in London saying she hoped the government would be thrown out as soon as possible, and that de Valera had made the same mistake as the others: he compromised. Mabel FitzGerald was, at the time, the wife of the minister for external affairs.

But he said that Kevin O’Higgins’s assassination in 1927 had a profound effect on her. At the time her husband was seriously ill, and she sat by his bed from early in the morning until late at night, to prevent anyone telling him the news of the murder of his colleague and friend, which she believed would kill him.

“She modified her position eventually,” he said.

He said none of the cabinet later regretted their Civil War executions policy (whose 77 victims included Childers). He said their worry was that the IRA policy of assassination of pro-Treaty TDs threatened the government’s majority; and that only by extreme measures could they show they were serious about protecting the fledgling democracy. The ministers, he said, would not allow friendships get in the way of what they regarded as their duty.

“It was a motivation of an unusual kind,” he said.

FitzGerald’s father died in 1947, when he was 21, still too young, he said, to raise such grave matters.

Generally, the Civil War’s traumas weren’t referred to.

Instead growing up in Bray, his father’s memories of the national movement were often related as funny stories, focusing on the absurd aspects of incidents.

“My father had a great sense of humor,” he said, adding that it comes across in “Desmond’s Rising.”

He referred to a cultural shift over time in the way people talked about certain issues. “Violence wasn’t seen as it would be today,” he said. “There was great enthusiasm for war [during the 1914-18 conflict].”

That’s something many of those who criticize the Rising fail to acknowledge, FitzGerald contended.

“Some revisionists are perfectly serious historians trying to establish the facts and the data available,” he said, but others are pundits who take an ahistorical approach.

“It’s retrospective history because of the IRA claiming to be inspired by 1916, which is nonsense anyway,” he said.

“They [revisionists] try to judge what happened then by today’s standards. It’s ridiculous. You can’t make judgments on people about their actions 90 years ago outside the framework of the time.

“It was a totally different world,” FitzGerald said.

This story appeared in the issue of May 3 - 9, 2006






















Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here