SAOIRSE32

11/6/2006

McCabe killing

Limerick Leader

**Via Newshound

09 June 2006

TEN years after the horrific killing of Garda Jerry McCabe the people of Limerick still stand fully behind Anne McCabe and her family. Time is often a great healer but in the case of Anne McCabe life has not got any easier.
Constantly in the media spotlight she openly admits that after 10 years life is still traumatic. ‘Every day is the same and everyone misses him.,’ she explains. Everyone in Limerick and throughout the country can only try to imagine, without really knowning, how life has been for the McCabe family for the past decade.
Most families after funerals can grieve in private and eventually get on with their lives. But it has been different for the McCabes who have to do so publicly as they are rarely out of the media spotlight. This was emphasised again this week with a special RTE documentary screened on Tuesday.
Ann McCabe has continued bravely to speak out and ask questions that remain unanswered about her husbands killing.
In New York Jerry Adams outlined his revulsion at the killing but felt that those serving time for the shooting should be released under the Good Friday Agreement. The vast majority of the people of Limerick would disagree. They should serve their full sentences.
Two others on the run, who were allegedly involved in the killing, should if apprehended and found guilty also serve their sentences.
This Tuesday marked the 10th anniversary of Jerry McCabe’s killing in Adare and last week in the Limerick Leader Ann McCabe revealed how she confronted Jerry Adams as he addressed supporters at that meeting in New York.
She asked the Sinn Fein leader about statements he made saying her husbands murder was not authorised by the army council, but at a lower level. But who, asked Mrs Cabe, were this lower level?. And why did they authorise it?
But Mr Adams has chosen not answer these questions or give a proper apology for the shooting dead of her husband. This did not surprise Ann McCabe or the people of Limerick. It is time that the remaining unanswered questions were addressed by Sinn Fein.

‘Save our son’

Sunday Life

By Sinead McCavana
11 June 2006

The beautiful baby boy has just WEEKS to live - unless YOU can help raise £100,000 for a life-saving operation.

Leukaemia sufferer James Hynes’ heartbroken parents last night appealed to you - our readers - to help save their 13-month-old son’s life.

Said dad James: “A hospital in Germany can do the bone-marrow operation James needs - but first we need to find £100,000.”

Mum Cathy added: “We’re already selling our home - we’ll do anything. But, with James, every day counts.

“That’s why we desperately need your readers’ help.”

Little James Hynes has just WEEKS to live - unless he receives a life-saving operation.

For the cute toddler - he only celebrated his first birthday last month - is battling leukaemia.

Now James’ distraught mum and dad, Cathy and James snr, desperately need to raise £100,000 for a life-saving bone-marrow transplant at a top German hospital.

The Co Antrim couple have already put their house on the market.

But the sale will come too late for baby James - so they’re asking for YOUR help this morning.

Said James snr: “The German doctor says there is between a 20pc and 30pc chance that the operation will be successful.

“But at least that’s some hope - we just have to try.”

Added the dad-of-two: “The doctors here have told us a transplant operation could kill James.

“But what’s the alternative? Just leave him to die and try nothing?”

Consultants treating James at the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children told the heartbroken couple last week that there was very little else they could do for James.

Said mum Cathy (31): “No hospital in the UK will consider carrying out a bone-marrow transplant, because James is not in remission.

“We were told last Tuesday to take James home and enjoy what time we had left with him.

“We think he might only have a matter of weeks to live.

“But we will not give up - we have to keep fighting for him.”

Cathy found a German surgeon on the internet who was expert in transplant operations on children with leukaemia.

She added: “Professor Rupert Handgretinger would use bone-marrow from either myself or James’ dad and transplant it into James.

“We spoke to him and he can do the operation now. But we need €150,000 euro (£103,000) - in America, it would be $$650,000 (£352,000).

“We have asked the Royal to refer us to this hospital in Germany, but our consultant says he doesn’t hold out much hope of that happening.

“We are willing to sell the house that we spent years building - we will do anything.

“But we won’t get a buyer quickly enough - with James, every day counts.

“So we’re asking the people of Northern Ireland to help us to save our little angel’s life.”

James, who has an older brother, Michael, has spent most of his short life in hospital.

For weeks, he was in excruciating pain as his bones swelled and doctors struggled to diagnose his illness.

They discovered - to his parents’ horror - that it was acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) - rare in children, but more common in adults.

Said Cathy: “James was given only a 30pc chance of survival. He has received six blocks of chemotherapy and, for a time, was in remission. But, sadly, the cancer came back again at Easter.

“James has battled for a year now - he deserves a chance to live.”

–If you wish to make a donation to The James Appeal, please contact Sunday Life’s Appeal Hotline (028) 9026 4311 or email smccavana@belfasttelegraph.co.uk

Family mark tragic Lisa’s birthday with new appeal

Sunday Life

By Stephen Breen
11 June 2006

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us The heartbroken family of murdered Bangor woman Lisa Dorrian will mark her birthday tomorrow, June 12th, by making a fresh appeal for information about her disappearance.

Lisa, who should have been celebrating turning 27, vanished after attending a party in Ballyhalbert, Co Down, last February.

Since then - and in spite of extensive land, sea and air searches - police have been unable to locate Lisa’s body or charge anyone with her murder.

Although her family marked her birthday last year by publicly releasing balloons at Bangor marina, they have decided to spend this year’s birthday at home.

But, speaking to Sunday Life last night, Lisa’s sister, Joanne, repeated her plea for anyone with information to come forward.

Said Joanne: “It is not getting any easier for my family and this is the second time we have had to spend Lisa’s birthday without her.

“Her young nephew, Ryan, and sister, Ciara, still want to know why Lisa won’t be coming home for her birthday. We don’t know what to say to them.

“We did a public thing last year for Lisa’s birthday, but we will just spend this year’s together at home and it will be a very difficult day.”

“The pain is just unbearable and if relatives of the people who did this, especially their sisters, could see the suffering we are going through, especially on a day like tomorrow, then they might help us.

“These last 16 months or so have been horrendous and it’s just hard to believe that we have been put in this situation by an act of evil.”

Joanne also said that her family is confident the people who murdered Lisa and disposed of her body will end up in court.

She said: “I have no doubt that we are going to get justice for Lisa and I’m hoping it happens this year. I can’t wait for the day when we see these people in court.

“We know the police are not giving up and are just waiting on getting that little bit of evidence.

“We intend to start another billboard campaign over the coming months and we just want these people to know we are not going to go away.

“We know it will be very hard now to get Lisa’s body back because it was dumped at sea - that’s why it’s making us even more determined to get justice.”

McCord’s cousin beaten by gang

Sunday Life

By Stephen Breen
11 June 2006

A relative of anti-UVF campaigner Raymond McCord has received a vicious beating by former pals of Special Branch spy Mark Haddock.

Sunday Life can reveal that Mr McCord’s cousin, Robert McCord, was attacked by an eight-man UVF gang from the Mount Vernon Estate last week.

The gang is believed to be under the control of convicted blackmailer Willie ‘Mr Muscles’ Young.

Robert McCord was attacked at a flat in the Rathcoole estate in Newtownabbey, where Raymond McCord, whose son, Raymond jnr, was murdered by a UVF gang in 1997, used to live.

Mr McCord, who is in his 50s, was:

–STRIPPED to the waist;

–BEATEN around the head, and;

–BURNT with cigarette lighters.

A senior loyalist source told Sunday Life that the gang, who were not masked, asked Mr McCord to tell them where his cousin was now living.

When he told the thugs he had “no idea”, he received the vicious beating.

The pair have not seen each other in almost 10 years.

Said the source: “McCord’s cousin was sitting with his pals in a flat when two carloads of men kicked the door in.

“They were from the Mount Vernon UVF and they singled out Raymond’s cousin and demanded to know if he knew where Raymond was living.

“When he replied he had no idea, they stripped him to the waist and then gave him an awful kicking and burnt him with cigarette lighters.

“The local (Rathcoole) UVF are not happy about this team coming into their area to attack a man who is known in the area as harmless and who has nothing to do with his cousin.”

Raymond McCord only learned of the attack when we contacted him last week.

He said: “I didn’t know anything about this, because I haven’t spoken to my cousin in about 10 years. My cousin has nothing to do with my campaign for justice for my son.

“I would urge him to name his attackers to the police. They should not be allowed to get away with this type of intimidation.

“If the UVF in Mount Vernon have a problem with me, then they should come to my door.”
________________

MP backs campaign for justice

Raymond McCord was last night backed in his campaign for justice by Ulster Unionist MP Lady Sylvia Hermon.

Mr McCord met the North Down MP at her home in Donaghadee yesterday.

After the two-hour meeting, Lady Sylvia offered her support for his calls for a full, independent judicial inquiry into his son’s murder.

The UUP’s decision to allow PUP chief David Ervine to join the party’s Assembly team was raised at the meeting.

Also discussed was the murder bid on Special Branch spy Mark Haddock, and his role in the Mount Vernon UVF.

Mr McCord described the meeting as “extremely positive”.

He said: “Lady Sylvia is a very honourable lady, something which is lacking in the UUP - especially from the leadership.

“I still feel (Sir) Reg Empey should resign because of his decision to welcome the leader of a party with links to a terrorist organisation into his Assembly team.

“I expect Lady Sylvia to say something positive on my son’s case next week and I plan to have more meetings with her over the coming months.

“We discussed a lot of issues.

“At the minute, I’m just pleased that a senior member of the UUP took the time to talk to me.

“I would now like a statement from the UUP and PUP that if my son’s killers are brought to justice they won’t be freed under the Good Friday Agreement because I have always been told the murder wasn’t sanctioned.”

Mr McCord also confirmed that he is to meet with other victims of violence over the coming weeks before the publication of Police Ombudsman Nuala O’Loan’s report into his son’s murder and the activities of the UVF in Mount Vernon.

Lady Sylvia was not available for comment on the meeting last night.

New witness in McCartney case

Sunday Life

By Stephen Breen
11 June 2006

The sisters of murder victim Robert McCartney last night claimed a new witness had come forward with evidence about events on the night of the dad-of-two’s killing.

Robert’s sister, Catherine, told Sunday Life her family received new information last week which contradicts the version of events given by Provo Gerard ‘Jock’ Davison, who has always denied any connection with the murder of the 33-year-old outside Magennis’ Bar, in Belfast city centre.

According to the family, the fresh details were provided by a new witness who is set to make a statement to the police.

Catherine McCartney told Sunday Life: “This witness has inside knowledge of what happened to my brother and we are very encouraged by it.

“It totally contradicts what Jock Davison said about Robert’s killing and we are hoping the police will act on this new information.

“The witness is also prepared to make a statement which contradicts the statements already made by people who were in the bar that night.

“We think the wall of silence is now beginning to crumble and we are determined to do all we can to get more people into court for my brother’s murder.”

Two months after Mr McCartney’s murder, Davison went public in a major newspaper interview giving a detailed account of events in the bar leading up to the murder. He said he had been injured in an altercation but had left the bar for treatment to the injury before Mr McCartney was attacked.

Davison’s solicitor, Philip Breen, issued a statement on his client’s behalf, saying: “If the McCartney family are so interested in going through the legal channels, why are they running to the press?

“My client and I are extremely cynical of this so-called emergence of a witness. If this witness contradicts Mr Davison’s account it also contradicts dozens of other accounts which exonerate him of any involvement in Robert’s murder.”

Catherine also told how the family had received new information about the lengths Robert’s killers went to protect themselves just a few days after his killing.

She said Robert’s killers had sent women to pose as mourners to glean information from the family for the IRA. “We thought these women were paying their respects to a neighbour and friend. How could they stoop so low?”

Drumcree row not solved

Sunday Life

By Ciaran McGuigan
11 June 2006

Portadown Orangemen are preparing for their Drumcree protest to run past the 3,000-day mark - in spite of the court ruling re-instating former District Master David Burrows to the Parades Commission.

A split ruling in the Court of Appeal on Friday went in favour of Secretary of State Peter Hain and declared that the appointment of Orangemen Burrows and Don McKay to the seven-man commission had been political but not unlawful.

But, with just four weeks until the annual Drumcree parade, the court’s ruling is likely to result in further litigation - and potentially a House of Lords hearing - leaving no immediate decision on this year’s parade possible.

Garvaghy Road residents, meanwhile, were consulting with lawyers immediately after last Friday’s hearing.

They object to the conflict of interest in having an Orangeman appointed to the body that decides on Orange marches.

Garvaghy Road Residents spokesman Brendan MacCionnaith: “The fact is that four High Court judges have now ruled on this and two have found for and two against the appointments.

“So this is far from a cut-and-dried case.”

Definitive ‘Troubles’ publication goes from strength to strength

Sunday Life

By John McGuirk
11 June 2006

An acclaimed book recounting the story of every fatal victim of the Troubles is set to be reprinted.

Lost Lives: The Stories of The Men, Women and Children Who Died Through The Northern Ireland Troubles will be republished by Mainstream later this year.

A spokeswoman told Sunday Life that the book - which meticulously catalogues more than 3,600 murders - will hit the bookshelves again by the end of the summer.

The book, compiled and written by award-winning journalists David McKittrick, Seamus Kelters, Brian Feeney and Belfast Telegraph political correspondent Chris Thornton, was a surprise publishing success on its release in October 1999.

The result of seven years’ research, it has been reprinted three times since 1999, being revised most recently in June 2004.

There have been 17 killings since the last revision - including those of Robert McCartney, ex-UDA boss Jim Gray, IRA informer Denis Donaldson and Catholic schoolboy Michael McIlveen.

However, it’s understood that the fifth and latest version of the 1,600-page book will not include these deaths.

Lost Lives has been acclaimed as “the most essential work ever produced on the Troubles” and was labelled by renowned writer and broadcaster Nell McCafferty as “the print equivalent of Picasso’s Guernica”.

Alleged abuse victim free to sue Vatican

Sunday Times

June 11, 2006

AN ALLEGED victim of an Irish paedophile priest can take the world’s first sexual abuse lawsuit against the Vatican, an American court has ruled, writes Sean O’Driscoll.

Michael Mosman, a US district judge, lifted the Vatican’s diplomatic immunity. He said the Vatican appeared to be involved in an “international conspiracy” to spirit Fr Andrew Ronan out of Ireland and between parishes in America.

The case stems from the transfer of the late Fr Ronan from Ireland to America in the early 1960s, after he allegedly sexually abused a boy in Co Tyrone.

In a hard-hitting ruling, Judge Mosman noted that “without warning parishioners of a known danger, [the Holy See] placed a priest it knew to be a child molester in a position in which, for the third time, he would have private access to minors.”

Judge Mosman also said that the Holy See did “not offer evidence to contradict this allegation of its involvement in transferring a known child-molester” and said Fr Ronan could be considered a Vatican employee under Oregon law.

The suit claims there was an international conspiracy to move Ronan from Ireland after he allegedly sexually abused a boy while working at a seminary in Benburb, Co Tyrone. After he was moved to America, Ronan admitted to church superiors that he sexually abused three boys at a Chicago school before he was transferred to Portland, Oregon. He was defrocked in 1966.

Michael Finnegan, a Minnesota-based lawyer representing one of the victims, described the decision as “absolutely huge” and said he was very confident that his firm, Anderson Advocates, would be able to prove the case in court.

But Finnegan predicted that the Vatican would keep filing motions to delay the case because it did not want its authority structure revealed to the general public. “They have many secrets and they will do anything they can to stop those secrets from coming out. It could take years to get them to court,” he said.

The ruling follows a four-year legal battle in which the Vatican insisted that the alleged victim spend at least $40,000 (£21,700) translating all legal documents into Latin, the official language of the Holy See.

The Vatican twice rejected translations by two American Latin professors, saying their translation of “court”, “conspiracy to commit fraud” and “defendant” and many other phrases were incorrect. The two professors hired by the Anderson firm also had to translate modern terms such as “fax number” (numerus isographicus) and e-mail (inscriptio electronica) as well as dense legal arguments relating to foreign immunity. The Vatican gave up its battle against the translations last December.

Jeffrey Lena, the Vatican’s California-based lawyer, said that the judge had rejected two other arguments for lifting the Vatican’s diplomatic immunity and added that the plaintiff was still a long way from proving any Vatican liability for Fr Ronan’s actions.

American firms that specialise in abuse cases are increasingly focusing on the Vatican because many dioceses close to settling hundreds of millions of dollars in claims are teetering on the verge of bankruptcy.

Blow to Unionists as rising star defects to Tory party

Sunday Times

Carissa Casey
11 June 2006

AN Ulster Unionist party officer and former Young Unionist chairman is defecting to the Conservative party of Northern Ireland. Peter Bowles took the decision in protest at the UUP’s recently announced deal with the Progressive Unionist party.

Last Friday Lady Sylvia Hermon, the UUP’s sole Westminster MP, called for the link with the PUP to be severed because of continuing activity by the UVF, the loyalist paramilitary group with which the PUP is associated.

She said the UUP, which accepted the party into the Ulster Unionist grouping in the Northern Ireland assembly, had become “a hostage to fortune”.

Bowles, a councillor in Co Down, is the first defector from a party that has become increasingly divided over the link. Bowles said the circumstances surrounding the ambush of Mark Haddock, a former UVF leader, and the recent arrests of two people in connection with the 1994 UVF massacre at Loughinisland were “the last straws”.

“The Ulster Unionists used to be the party of law and order and now it’s linked with the UVF,” said Bowles. “Those guys haven’t changed at all. They’re still refusing to decommission. A party with links to loyalist paramilitaries is not a party I want to be part of.”

Haddock, who was named in the Dail last year as the subject of a police ombudsman investigation into the 1997 murder of Raymond McCord, was shot on May 30. Darren Moore, a former associate, has been charged with attempted murder.

Last week police arrested two people in connection with the murder of six people in a pub in Loughinisland, a village in Bowles’s constituency. In the attack, a UVF gang sprayed bullets into the bar as customers watched coverage of the Republic of Ireland’s World Cup game against Italy.

According to Bowles, the UUP’s selective boycott of the Policing Board has been another irritant: “The Policing Board carries out an important function and I think it’s a foolish policy by the party. I wasn’t consulted on it and I wasn’t consulted on the PUP deal.”

Bowles said he began talks with David Liddington, the Conservative party’s spokesman on Northern Ireland, following the PUP deal and reached an agreement last week. He will formally announce his defection at a press conference tomorrow evening attended by members of the Conservative party. He will become their only elected representative in Northern Ireland.

“It’s a very difficult decision because I’ve put a lot of time and effort into the Ulster Unionists. But the party has lost its way. There is a lack of direction, a lack of vision and a lack of consultation,” he said.

“The public is to a large extent disengaging from politics here. More and more people are choosing not to vote, particularly in the middle classes. I think the Conservatives can offer an alternative.”

At 25, Bowles is the youngest of the UUP’s six party officers elected at the Ulster Unionist council. He joined the party at the age of 18 and was vice-chairman and later chairman of the Young Unionists.

According to Jeffrey Peel, vice-chairman of the Northern Ireland Conservatives, his party has gained 100 new members since the election of David Cameron as leader in December of last year, bringing its total membership to 600.

“We’re planning a major campaign to increase membership over the coming months,” Peel said.

“We’re getting the full support of the national leadership on this. They recognise that Northern Ireland has changed over the past 10 years, although the political system is still in a time warp. We believe that we can move people away from this entrenched sectarianism towards a left-right split.”

The Conservative party is the only British national party that contests elections in the north.

McCord meets Lady Hermon

:::u.tv:::

10/06/2006 18:08:26

Raymond McCord, whose son was killed by the UVF, has met with Ulster Unionist MP Lady Sylvia Hermon.

Raymond McCord Senior said the talks, which lasted nearly two hours, were very meaningful and he is hoping for new initiatives from the MP in the coming week.

Mr McCord has actively campaigned for those responsible for his son`s murder to be charged with the killing.

The Police Ombudsman Nuala O`Loan is preparing a report into the police`s handling of the murder investigation.

It is expected to be highly critical of the police`s use of loyalist informers.

Yesterday, Lady Hermon said her party`s links with the Progressive Unionist Party should be severed, following the shooting of leading loyalist Mark Haddock, which has been widely blamed on the UVF.

It’s time to come clean on hare coursing ban, urges Green party

Sunday Independent

THE Green Party has claimed it is time for Government TDs to come clean as to why they are against the imposition of a ban on hare coursing.

The party also said the fact that 37 per cent of all government funding in sport goes to the horse racing and greyhound industries is a cause of concern.

Party spokesman on Arts, Sport and Tourism Paul Gogarty described this statistic as “a scandal” and said it would be worth investigating the links between the Government and these two sports.

Here’s looking at you, for ever, in e-world

Sunday Times

Andrew Sullivan
11 June 2006

The great myth of new media is that they take us into the future. It’s a good selling point, of course. Blogs have begun to transform journalism, and newspapers will increasingly exist online in ways they never have before. Podcasting is indeed going to supplement radio. Online movies in spanking-new home entertainment systems may well kill off cinemas. Online television is already diminishing the clout of satellite and cable, just as the latter helped decimate the power of big networks.

In all of this we’re constantly seeing new products in new ways and by new methods. And the pace of it is so fast we are as aware of living on the brink of the future as we have ever been.

And yet in practice something else has happened with all this newness: something more surprising but just as significant. The technology of the future has managed to open up the past in ways few foresaw. It has made what was once history present again; it has enabled anyone to tap into bygone days with an ease once reserved for university dons in vast and meticulously organised libraries. Everything old is new again — and online.

Here’s one simple example of what I mean. A decade or so ago I remember calling up the sub-editors of this paper in the dead of night worrying about an error I thought I might have made in a column. The breezy cockney voice on the other end of the phone reassured me: “Oh, I wouldn’t worry about that. It’s fish and chips now, mate.”

And so it was. For most of western civilisation a journalist’s daily musings would very soon become transparent with the grease off a battered cod or pulped into non-existence. Today every comma is stored, cached, Googled and rendered as accessible now as it was when it was first published.

To find an old column or an article that was printed a while back you used to have to find a good university library and spend hours scanning through microfiched pages. Most sane people couldn’t be bothered. Now anyone can Google anything; and as more and more newspaper archives are slowly scanned and placed online the past opens up again as an eternal digital present.

That column from a decade ago? Two right-clicks and you have it. That essay from the 1950s? Increasingly you’ll be able to track it down in a jiffy.

Outsourced serfs will eventually be able to scan in and copy newspapers from decades or even centuries past, and they’ll be as available as today’s editions to anyone with a modem and a sense of curiosity. The New Republic, to take a single example, is now busy putting many of Walter Lippman’s old essays back online. They still own the copyright, so why not?

He’s as good as anyone writing today and, at times, curiously clarifying. Want to see the parallels between journalism in the Vietnam era and in the Iraq war? In the past you’d need a research assistant and a few weeks. Today? More and more it’s a cinch.

The process does not of course have the nostalgic feel of poring over the old magazine itself: the ancient fonts, the funny advertisements, the faded yellowing paper. But it’s a lot easier and quicker. And the prose never changes.

What’s true of journalism is now increasingly true in other media as well. I’ve largely given up going to cinemas for “grumpy old men” reasons. My other half and I subscribe to a mail-in DVD service called Netflix that, for a modest subscription rate, allows us to compile online a queue of films we want to see and posts us up to five movies at any one time.

When you’ve seen one, you put it right back in the same envelope, send it back and within a day or so the next one in your queue arrives.

But here’s the real joy of it: there are more than 60,000 titles to choose from. They go back decades: old treasures you’d find only in the most arcane video rental stores are now available at the click of a mouse and in your DVD player in a few days.

Thanks to the newest technologies, I can now see the oldest films; movies I would never have known existed, let alone watched and enjoyed. I can search through a director’s entire work and discover a gem that would previously have passed me by. That can lead me in turn to an actor I hadn’t heard of. A couple more minutes online and I can order up his other performances. The stars of the 1940s are suddenly hot again.

Now the real treasure trove: out-of-print books. Google is currently engaged in scanning vast quantities of books from the past, compiling a vast archive of historical writing available online.

For many titles the copyrights are long gone, but the books themselves lie alone and unread in dusty library stacks, waiting for some wandering student or eccentric to pick them up. If the books were lucky in the recent past, someone with an afternoon to spare might have stumbled across an old edition in a second-hand bookshop. But all that could soon change.

By scanning the contents of countless books online, and by allowing readers to search for topics or words, or print out chapters or even just paragraphs, Google will soon unleash an entire ancient dust-covered printed archive on an unblinking world. Words written decades ago will appear in the same pixels as someone’s blog-post of 10 minutes ago. “Out of print” could become a meaningless phrase.

The only thing lacking of course is the book itself: that wonderfully efficient package of paper and binding that you can pick up and take anywhere. Who wants to read an old novel on a screen? But that too may change. Print-on-demand technology increasingly allows books to be printed individually at lower and lower costs. Companies could easily find a niche turning Google discoveries into readable form and sending them to you by mail.

We could even return to those wonderful old generic Penguin paperback covers: the same design for every book. But this time searchable in advance and available for peanuts. Netboox: is it the next idea waiting to happen? These used to be daydreams. Nobody who has experienced the information revolution of the past two decades could say that now. And so old fogies and the high-tech can finally reach an accommodation. Cherish, lament and rhapsodise the good old days — but right-click to get there. You have no idea what you might find.

Anti-terror police target schools and youth groups

Sunday Herald

By Neil Mackay
11 June 2006

Politicians, human rights lawyers, Muslim organisations and teachers have expressed dismay at a Scottish Special Branch initiative that sends officers to schools to encourage teachers to inform on pupils who are suspected of flirting with Islamic extremism.

Special Branch (SB) in Tayside is also operating in youth groups at Dundee’s universities and using everything from Asian corner shops and supermarkets to mosques and restaurants to gather intelligence on potential terrorist threats.

Detective chief superintendent Colin McCashey of Tayside Police said his Special Branch Community Contact Unit was created to establish good relations between police and ethnic communities and to gather intelligence on possible terrorists within ethnic groups.

But critics fear it could damage relations with the Muslim community, which have been undermined by the bungled raid in Forest Gate in London last week during which a wrongly identified suspect was shot and 250 officers, some dressed in chemical warfare suits, surrounded homes in the east end. No chemical weapons were found and no charges were brought.

McCashey, head of crime at Tayside, insists that the SB unit does not engage in any “covert cloak and dagger activity or anything sophisticated like infiltration”. He told the Sunday Herald: “We are seeking to obtain a real understanding of what communities are thinking and to feed information from the police into those communities.”

SB officers are openly approaching prominent community leaders, organisations and professionals – such as tutors, teachers and youth leaders in ethnic communities – in order to “establish a point of contact”. From there, officers try to put the relationship on a formal footing, and the SB is now even sitting in on meetings of the Islamic Society at Dundee University.

The unit focuses only on “ethnic religious groupings” such as Muslims, Jews, Sikhs and Hindus. It does not focus on any Christian organisations, far-right groups, Irish cultural groups, republican groups or organisations espousing hardline Scottish nationalism.

When SB officers approach schools they do not speak to pupils about the risk of terrorism. Instead, says McCashey, teachers are asked to help them “identify any activities that could be considered to be extremist”.

“We ask teachers to be alert to suspicious activity in school. The school will inform us if they see any questionable behaviour,” he added.

McCashey believes the SB unit will prevent terrorism and ease feelings of police “oppression” in ethnic groups. “We want to get an understanding of what communities think of the police and of any tensions in those communities,” he said.

Tayside Police say that “although there is no specific terrorist threat to Dundee, we cannot be complacent. The public expect us to make them safe”. However, there are extremist Islamic organisations operating in the area.

Any information gathered during the SB officers’ contact with ethnic groups is shared with the rest of Special Branch and uploaded to the Scottish Intelligence Database, where it can be read by officers across the UK.

The impetus to create the SB Community Contact Unit came last year in the days following the July 7 tube and bus attacks in London by Muslim extremists. The bombers were ordinary young British-born men, and their attacks on their capital took police and intelligence services by surprise.

“The nature of terrorism has changed and we need to be seen to be moving to make sure we have an accurate intelligence picture,” said McCashey. He admitted some communities were “hard to reach” in policing terms, but believes SB officers talking openly to community leaders would improve relations.

Despite the British government’s insistence that Iraq had nothing to do with the growth of terrorism in the UK, McCashey was clear that the invasion of Iraq by coalition forces had increased tensions in the Muslim community.

In universities, SB officers are able to note which foreign national students are arriving in Dundee because they have to register with police. “We’ve also spoken to senior managers in universities,” McCashey added.

Police forces across Scotland and England are considering mimicking Tayside’s new “kinder, gentler” form of SB operation. They are impressed by the overt “soft intelligence gathering” style of the operation, coupled with its community policing approach to terror threats, and believe it will assist community relations and improve the flow of information between the police and ethnic groups.

Detective sergeant Mark Charnley, a frontline Tayside SB officer, said his team were presenting themselves to the ethnic communities as a “point of contact”. All opportunities are taken to meet with members of ethnic groups. Charnley said that if a racist incident occurred in which a Muslim shop-keeper was attacked by white youths, an SB officer would go along and establish a relationship.

Charnley says his goal is to “go deep into the community … to keep an eye on what all sides are doing”. He says he wants to “reassure the Muslim community, which feels under fire”.

In schools, Charnley says, SB officers have asked teachers to look for signs of extremism among pupils. One “sign” he mentioned would be “a kid who has gone back to their parents’ country of origin [for example, Pakistan] and returned with anti-Western feeling or stronger religious faith than they had shown before”.

Charnley added that contact with shop owners, restaurateurs and other ethnic business leaders “gave us a broader base of people to speak to”.

This low-intensity intelligence- gathering is an innovation in SB tactics. “It means that a lot of information we missed out on in the past is now becoming part of the larger intelligence picture,” Charnley added.

He dismissed any criticism of the unit as “ignorant”, saying: “We are there for the community, to build up trust.”

One female member of Dundee University’s Islamic Society, who asked to remain anonymous, said she had sat through a meeting with two SB officers in attendance. “Why were they there?” she asked. “We have nothing to hide. It is unfair of the police to home in on specific groups. If one group is going to be looked at then all should be looked at. This is ghettoising and stigmatising the Muslim faith . I feel very uncomfortable with this .”

Many members of the Islamic Society are from countries with poor human rights records. They worry that if Scottish SB reports in which they are noted to have criticised their home regimes, or attacked the UK government for its foreign policy, are shared with foreign intelligence services, they might be in danger when they return home.

Sohaib Saeed, Scottish chair of the Federation of Student Islamic Societies, said: “I worry about who defines extremism. Is it extreme to question the legitimacy of the government? Or the actions of the government? This enforces the stereotype that Muslims are more likely to be terrorists.”

Saeed said membership of the Islamic Society was in decline because of Special Branch interest.

“This type of policing exhibits a type of paranoia that stereotypes communities,” he added. “It’s politicised policing at a time when confidence in the system is already shattered. The police are pandering to the type of mentality that has led to a rise in Islamophobia.”

Patrick Harvie, Green MSP and convener of the Scottish parliament’s cross-party group on human rights, lent limited support to the Special Branch operation saying he welcomed, in principle, innovations by the police to reach out to ethnic minority communities.

However, he highlighted a worry, shared by many teachers, that a teenager doodling “al-Qaeda” on a jotter could wrongly end up under surveillance for a common act of classroom rebellion. He did not welcome teachers “policing pupils” on behalf of Special Branch, saying it would be better if SB officers spoke to pupils themselves instead of asking school staff to monitor them.

Lawyer John Scott, chair of the Scottish Human Rights Centre, said that in the wake of the Forest Gate police raid fiasco, the monitoring of schoolchildren by Special Branch was a “very dangerous path to go down”.

“We could demonise children,” Scott added. “There’s a very real danger that we could lose certain communities if it looks like they are being targeted. We could end up encouraging the behaviour we want to prevent. It is easier, if you want to recruit someone, to say ‘you are a suspect anyway, so what have you got to lose by getting involved’.”

IRA bomb victims demand payout

Guardian

Ten years on, many of those injured by the Manchester blast feel betrayed and baffled

Mark Townsend, legal affairs correspondent
Sunday June 11, 2006
The Observer

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usVictims of the Manchester bombing are still waiting for compensation, a decade after the IRA attack that devastated the city centre. With the approach of the 10th anniversary of the atrocity on Thursday, those injured by Britain’s biggest terrorist bomb have described their sense of betrayal at receiving no government recompense.

Speaking for the first time, one victim who broke both her knees and has been diagnosed with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder said that, while she had forgiven the IRA, she felt only anger towards the government. ‘All my negativity is towards those who could and should have helped me, but then chose to ignore me,’ said Lisa, who requested anonymity. By contrast, victims of last July’s London bombings began receiving government compensation within three months after intervention by Tony Blair.

The blast happened on 15 June, 1996. Police received a coded warning that the IRA was planning to attack Manchester. Just after 11am, a lorry carrying 1,500kg of explosives exploded outside Marks and Spencer in Corporation Street. Two hundred people were injured by the blast. Remarkably, there were no fatalities.

Lawyers acting for those injured said they are baffled by the response of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. David Small, of Manchester-based Mellor Small Solicitors, which is representing Lisa, said: ‘Support has been virtually non-existent. Her only access to justice is compensation from the government.’ He said the lack of a survivors’ support group made it impossible to ascertain the number of victims who had still not received their entitlement.

Lisa spent the hour before the bomb wandering around the bustling shops in the bright sunshine. Then came the moment that would change her life. ‘I swear I saw the air move. Later I learnt that a bomb sucks in air towards it. I was lifted and thrown with such force on to the pavement. Being a typical woman, I didn’t let go of my shopping and my knees took the full force,’ she said.

Numbed by shock, Lisa managed to drive away from the devastated city centre. ‘The next thing I remember, I was in my mother’s house in the middle of the country. She said I looked grey. Then she put on the television and realised what had happened.’

Like many of the injured, Lisa went back to work, as the manager of a successful Manchester business. But within weeks she had to leave, unable to cope. Manchester itself - the buzz, the nightlife, the pandemonium of city living - had become intolerable. Lisa, who is now in her mid-fifties, has not worked since.

Diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder in 1997, her claim for compensation was submitted to the compensation authority almost immediately. ‘If I had received compensation I could have received treatment and maybe could have gone back to work,’ she said.

Now she is a recluse, living alone in a remote house in the Lancashire countryside. Her lawyers believe that she should qualify, in terms of loss of earnings and medical bills, for the same amount for which victims of last year’s London suicide bombers are eligible - up to £500,000. In 2004 the authority offered her £2,000, a figure she dismissed as ‘pathetic’. Earlier this year the authority came back with an improved sum of £10,000, a figure solicitors say is far less than sums offered to victims of the London bombings with comparable injuries.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Jay of onefinejay.com