SAOIRSE32

16/6/2006

Asbestos victims group hails compensation ruling reversal

Belfast Telegraph

Widows will get full payment despite Law Lords

By Michael McHugh
16 June 2006

Ulster’s asbestos victims today welcomed news that the Government is to overturn a controversial court ruling stopping widows from receiving full compensation for their husbands’ deaths.

The Justice for Asbestos Victims (JAV) support group believes the announcement by the Prime Minister paves the way for fairer treatment of sufferers and their families after last month’s House of Lords ruling made it more difficult for thousands of victims of mesothelioma to claim compensation.

Speaking at a GMB union conference in Blackpool on Wednesday, Tony Blair said he hoped to change the ruling by legislating on the matter.

JAV spokeswoman Fiona Sterritt said the announcement was a boost for victims and their families.

“Clearly any change would be welcome. Any support that the Government can give to the widows of these victims would be welcome,” she said.

“This move is long overdue but Tony Blair seems to be intending to put this right.”

Union leaders have also welcomed the Prime Minister’s intervention.

Mr Blair said: “I regret the judgment. I’m looking to see the best opportunity for us to change the asbestos ruling.

“I hope we will be able to announce something on this in the next couple of weeks.”

Northern Ireland victims had reacted with fury to the judgement in the case of Sylvia Barker and Mary Murray, whose husbands died of mesothelioma.

The hearing surrounded the difficulties of tracing the source of the disease to a specific employers.

Many victims worked for several employers where they may have come into contact with asbestos and the Law Lords upheld an argument by insurers that one company should not have to shoulder the entire compensation burden in such cases.

Victims’ groups point out that many businesses where victims worked have since been dissolved, ending any hopes of claiming compensation.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: “If left to stand, this judgment would have meant that many victims of this dreadful disease would have either had to wait much longer for compensation, or have been denied their full entitlement.

“The Government is to be congratulated for doing the right thing and we hope that legislation will be introduced soon to end the wait and anxiety of those who have mesothelioma and their dependants.”

Remembering 1981: Two H-Block prisoner TDs elected

An Phoblacht

BY Aran Foley

The Hunger Strike election

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usThe 26 County general election of June 1981 provided the protesting prisoners in the H-Blocks of Long Kesh with an opportunity to demonstrate the wide level of public support for the Hunger Strikers and the 5 Demands.

Accordingly nine republican prisoners were put foward as election candidates and in a stunning victory for the anti-H Block/Armagh campaign two of them were elected to the Dáil while others attracted very significant support at the polls.

Combined with the election of Bobby Sands in Fermanagh/South Tyrone during the Westminster election, the result demonstrated that the British strategy of criminalisation was in tatters and had been rejected by nationalist Ireland.

In Cavan/Monaghan Hunger Striker Kieran Doherty with 9,121 first preference votes was elected with just 303 votes short of government mnister and sitting Fianna Fáil TD John Wilson. The result flew in the face of media predictions that Doherty would secure a maximum of 5,000 first preferences.

The count had gone into a second day before Kieran Doherty was declared elected. Speaking on his behalf, his election agent and Cavan town Sinn Féin councillor, Charlie Boylan told supporters that the victory was “a clear indication of the concern of a great many Irish people at the sad situation which exists in the Northern part of our country and more especially in the H-Blocks of Long Kesh itself.”

In Louth, another H-Block prisoner, Blanket Man Paddy Agnew was elected with a first preference vote of 8,368 votes. Fianna Fáil had complacently dismissed Agnew and the party was genuinely shocked by the outcome. Agnew had been arrested by British forces on the southern side of Carlingford Lough by a British military patrol boat. The refusal of the Irish Government to protest this breach of sovereignty had aroused much local anger.

There had been widespread support for the Hunger Strikers in the Louth constituency with Dundalk totally shut down by anti-H-Block industrial action on several occasions. This had prompted local Fine Gael councillor and general election candidate Brendan McGahon to blame the success of such actions on intimidation but Agnew’s victory exposed this for the lie that it was. McGahon was eliminated on the fourth count after receiving virtually no transfers. His defeat was largely attributed to his open hostility to the republican prisoners.

Local election workers estimated that the vast majority of the constituency’s 3,000 first time voters had voted for Paddy Agnew indicating the widespread support amongst the youth, not just in Louth, but across the country.

As in the Cavan/Monaghan victory it was Fianna Fáil that paid the price by losing a seat. The H-Block election victories and the huge support given to other H-Block candidates denied Charles Haughey’s Fianna Fáil an overall majority in Leinster House and was a political price for the government’s spineless attitude throughout the Hunger Srike.

In Sligo/Leitrim, the third border constituency, Hunger Striker Joe McDonnell received a very impressive 5,634 first preference votes but failed to take a seat. When his votes were redistributed 2,000 went to Fianna Fáil and nearly 3,000 went to Fine Gael demonstrating the broad base from which prisoners were receiving support. The desperate economic plight of Leitrim at the time and a determination to be locally represented - there had been no one from Leitrim elected in the previous election - saw two candidates returned from Leitrim, one for Fianna Fáil and one for Fine Gael. Campaigners believed that this was a significant factor in the failure to have Joe McDonnell elected. The result was nevertheless very significant and again indicative of the widespread support that the Hunger Strike had aroused.

Another Hunger Striker, Martin Hurson stood in Longford/Westmeath where he demonstrated that, as in Sligo/Leitrim, the Hunger Strikers drew support from a wide base. The largest proportion of his transfers actually went to Fine Gael. He had attracted 4,573 first preference votes which represented 10%of the first preference votes and was a very strong showing. Hurson remained in the race until the sixth count when he was eliminated and his transfers shared out.

In Kerry North former Hunger Striker, Sean McKenna received 3,860 first preferences showing that support for the Hunger Strikers was not just confined to the border area. Again his transfers went across party lines. Signicantly Des Foley was returned for Fianna Fáil over the outgoing Fianna Fáil TD. Foley had been a prominent member of the local anti-H-Block/Armagh Committee. Foley’s record of support for the Hunger Srikers played a significant role in his election.

In Waterford, Hunger Striker Kevin Lynch got 3,337 first preferences. The vast majority of his transfers went to the Workers’ Party, indicating how that party’s supporters were rejecting its negative stance on the Hunger Strike.

Transfers from Fine Gael’s Austin Deasy pushed Lynch above the Fianna Fáil contender and he remained in the running for two more counts after the Fianna Fáil man had been eliminated.

The constituency of Dublin West provided a surprising 3,034 first preference votes for Blanket Man, Tony O’Hara, brother of the late Hunger Striker Patsy. This placed him at a respectable seventh of 15 candidates. Support was particularly high in working class areas such as Ballyfermot. Workers’ Party leader Tomás Mac Giolla was defeated with the largest amount of his transfers going to Tony O’Hara.

O’Hara reached half the quota before being eliminated leaving his supporters to wonder what could have been achieved if the local campaign had not been adversely affected by internal divsion.

Former Armagh Prison Hunger Striker and the only woman prisoner to stand as a candidate, Mairéad Farrell secured 2,751 first preference votes in the constituency of Cork North Central ahead of one Fine Gael candidate, one Workers’ Party candidate and one Independent.

This was a significant achievement in an area far from the North and with only single channel TV news provided by RTE’s enthusuiastic implemntation of Section 31political cesnoship legislation that prevented republicans being interviewed in the broadcast media.

The humiliation of Fianna Fáil in Jack Lynch’s former constituency was emphisised in that only their four candidates remained unelected when Farrell was eliminated with two of them being elected on her transfers.

There was dissension within anti-H-Block/Armagh camp in Clare which hampered the election campaign. Neverthless Blanket Man Tom McAllister had a creditable result with 2,120 first preferences.

His transfers went mainly to Fianna Fáil whose candidate, Bill Loughnane scraped in on the eleventh count.

In addition to the nine prisoner candidates four other candidates stood on the anti-H-Block issue. In Dublin North Central Vincent Doherty of Peoples Democracy received 1,481 first preferences. Joe Harrington, also of People’s Democracy stood in Limerick East gaining 844 first preferences. Paddy Healy of The League for a Workers’ Republic ran in Dublin North East and got 1,063 first preferences and in Cork South West, the local H-Block Action Committee were early in the field with Sean Kelleher who took 1,097 first preferences.

The anti-H-Block campaign had transformed the 26 county General Election resulting in the defeat of the Fianna Fáil government. Facing defeat Haughey had made his strongest statement yet on the Hunger Strikes placing the responsibility to find a solution firmly on the shoulders of the British. However, this was widely seen as cynical politicking, offering an excuse to three independents, Neil Blaney, John O’Connell and John Loftus to support him. As it turned out only Blaney offered his support.

When the shape of the new government finally emerged it was to be a Fine Gael/Labour coalition, supported by one Independent- the anti-republican Limerick TD Jim Kemmy. Labour had suffered serious setbacks during the election and many put this down to the party leadership being out of touch with its base on the issue of the Hunger Strikes- mass defections in Louth had been echoed to a lesser extent around the country.

Although Fine Gael leader Garret Fitzgerald immediately began making noises about the need to find a solution to the Hunger Strike, even going as far as to say it was his most urgent priority, many commentators felt that this was just recognising the reality that the election had exposed. It was also felt that he saw an opportunity to eat into the base of the so called green wing of Charlie Haughey’s Fianna Fáil who had clearly been drifting because of the Hunger Strike.

His appointment to the post of Minister for posts and Telegraphs, may have more accurately reflected what was in his heart however. Paddy Cooney, a vitriolic anti-republican from the infamous 1970’s Fine Gael/Labour coalition, which witnessed the use of beating of republicans in custody by the ‘Heavy Gang’. That Cooney was to be given responsibility for broadcasting and the implementation of Section 31 censorship at such a sensitive time did not augur well for the future. It was perhaps indicative of the corrosion that Section 31 had engendered within RTE that anchor man of the Today Tonight current afairs programme, Brian Farrell, felt compelled to launch into a sycophantic defence of Cooney in response to criticisms in Magill magazine.

The election results had rattled the establishment who had failed to realise the levels of support for the prisoners. It had also severely embarrassed the British Government internationally by further giving the lie to their criminalisation policy.

The vice chair of the SDLP, Seamus Mallon, had been forced to declare that it was highly unlikely it would contest the Fermanagh/South Tyrone seat left vacant by the death of Bobby Sands and the Catholic bishops were openly expressing their worries about the rise in support for republicanism. They had issued a blatantly one sided statement calling on the Hunger Strikers “and those who direct them” to reflect deeply on the “evil of their actions”. This gave comfort to the British Government who described it as helpful while once again re-iterating that there would be no compromise with the prisoners. The irony was that the statement had been issued to exhort the prisoners to support proposals by the Irish Commission for Justice and Peace (ICJP) to end the Hunger Strike. It was in stark contrast to a statement by Fr Pierre of the French Commission for Justice and Peace who had said that “The courage of the Hunger Strikers illustrates the nobility of their cause.”

The proposals were at best woolly and in any case the British ignored them prompting Cardinal Ó Fiaich to point out that once again the British had chosen to pick out only what suited them.

Reacting to the Bishop’s statement the then Sinn Féin Vice-President Gerry Adams said the bishops “failed to mention the presence of the British government and its military forces, as being in any way instrumental or responsible for the situation. That the Irish bishops making comment about political instability in Ireland have omitted to do this or to examine the effects of the British-imposed partition of our country, cannot be but regretted by many Irish people.”

In the immediate aftermath of the elections the British Government felt compelled to send two senior Stormont civil servants to the United States in a vain attempt to offset the negative impact the Hunger Strike was having on its image. A visit to the US by Britain’s Prince Charles had been a shambles, even according to the rabidly pro-Tory Sunday Express. Also at this time a US visit by British Princess Margeret was called off, an open admission of the damage that had been inflicted.

All this coincided with a hugely successful tour of the States by John Sands, Elizabeth O’Hara and Malachy McCreesh, all relatives of three of the deceased Hunger Strikers. The election results had clearly invigorated support for the prisoners in America. In Canada, also, ex-Blanket Man Fra McCann was finding increasing support as he toured the country and the prisoners’ election victories were a big factor.

In Britain the effect the prison protest was having on the Labour Party was best evidenced by the raft of constituency party organisations which had adopted a position of calling for British troops to be withdrawn from Ireland. On 25 June the ‘Don’t let the Irish prisoners die Committee’ announced that a wide range of trade union, journalistic, labour and theatrical people had signed its petition on the issue. Meawhile pickets on the offices of MPs were mounted. Also 25 June Prince Charles was reminded of his recent trip to New York when 40 Hunger Strike protestors greeted him on a visit to Central Middlesex Hospital.

Republican morale was boosted at this time also by an increasingly effective and intense IRA campaign. Crown forces were being hit all across the Six Counties with gun, bomb and mortar attacks.

On 10 June republicans throughout Ireland were ecstatic when four IRA volunteers shot their way to freedom from Crumlin Road Prison in Belfast. The morale boost was amplified when one of them, Dingus Magee turned up giving a defiant victory salute from the podium at Bodenstown on 21 June.

All these events occurred against the backdrop of a situation where the condition of Humger Striker Joe McDonnell was deteriorating rapidly. Unable now to leave his bed unaided, he could only be moved about the prison hospital in a wheelchair. He had gone from 15 stone to eight stone and was unable to open his eyes without feeling nauseated. Doctors had made it clear to his family that time was running out.

Loughinisland - evidence of collusion mounts

An Phoblacht

It has been 12 years since the UVF carried out the massacre in The Heights bar in Loughinisland. It occurred as crowds had gathered to watch Ireland play Italy in the World Cup. As another World Cup began last week, painful memories have flooded back for the relatives of those killed. These memories are all the more painful because the families now believe that the RUC and later the PSNI were involved in covering up the mass murder.

The sectarian slaugher on 18 June 1994 took the lives of Adrian Rogan 34, Daniel McCreanor 59, Patrick O’Hare 35, Malcom Jenkinson 53, Eamon Byrne 39 and the oldest person to be killed in the conflict, Barney Green 87. Six weeks later workers from the Department of the Environment reported a suspicious holdall to the RUC. It was found to contain three pistols, three balaclavas, three sets of gloves, three boiler suits and a magazine for a rifle. Nearby an assault rifle was found.

RUC destroyed attack car

Recent disclosures have revealed that the car used in the attack was supplied by an RUC Special Branch agent, codenamed ‘Mechanic’. The agent was a member of the Mount Vernon UVF and an explosives expert who participated in the 1997 bomb attack on the Sinn Féin offices in Monaghan. He was also a close associate of Mark Haddock, another British agent working in the UVF.

Relatives have been incensed to discover that the car, a red Triumph Acclaim, was destroyed by the RUC in 1996. Effectively the car was supplied by an RUC agent and then destroyed by the RUC. These facts flatly contradict a PSNI statement of 11 October 2005 that all aspects of the trail pertaining to the car were followed up. They now suspect collusion between the killers and Special Branch pointing to the persistent refusal of the PSNI to deny that any of the suspects were intelligence sources citing the official secrets act.

Another aspect pointing to collusion arises from an 11 October 2005 meeting the families and their legal representatives held with the PSNI. During a bizarre encounter, a DSI Williamson stated he wanted to answer the families questions but then went on to refuse to answer them citing legal reasons. However he inadvertently revealed that the weapon used was one of a batch smuggled into Ireland in the late 1980s by British agent Brian Nelson.

On the advice of the RUC and later the PSNI the families remained silent so as not to alert the killers. The revelation about the car was the final straw and they now feel that their dignified stance has been abused by the PSNI.

Ombudsman complaint

0n 21 March the families instructed their legal team, Kevin Winters & Co. to lodge a complaint with the Six County Police Ombudsman. The matters they are raising include the fact that despite developments in the field of DNA, particularly since 1997, none of the 177 exhibits in the case were re-examined until April 2005. This may never have happened at all were it not for pressure exerted by the families. The results have not been released. They were promised arrests after the forensic review of the case. Eight months elapsed before two people were arrested and released without charge 6 June 2006 in what the families regard as a PR exercise in response to mounting pressure

Other matters raised are: the continued denial to the families of ballistic information on the weapons used despite precedents for this; the consistent failure to deny that any of the suspects were intelligence sources; the consistent mismanagement of exhibits in the case to the extent that the car used in the attack was destroyed thus destroying potentially valuable forensic evidence; that transcripts of helicopter logs and troop patrols have yet to be analysed; and the fact that the families believe that vehicle check points were strategically placed on the night to allow the killers to escape.

Sinn Féin MLA for South Down Caitriona Ruane pointed to the similarity between Loughinisland attack and the UDA massacre at Greysteel on 31 October 1993 during which seven people were killed. It was subsequently revealed that one of the participants Torrens Knight was also a Special Branch agent. This, says the MLA, is indicative of how agents were being used.

Ruane pledged to do all she can to support the families and said “no stone must be left unturned in the ombudsman’s inquiry. The families need answers about the destruction of the car and the other concerns they have raised. There is a strong suspicion of state collusion in this case which must be answered”.

UDA bosses set to expel Shoukri brothers

Belfast Telegraph

By Brian Rowan
15 June 2006

A statement from the UDA leadership confirming the expulsions of the Shoukri brothers and their closest associate is now imminent, according to reliable sources.

The group’s Inner Council met earlier this week and a statement was expected to be released soon - possibly within hours.

It will confirm that a majority of the UDA organisation no longer supports the Shoukri brothers - Andre and Ihab - and their associate Alan McClean.

At least four of the organisation’s so-called brigadiers support that decision, but the position of the UDA in south-east Antrim is still not clear. Earlier this week, its leader was still siding with Ihab Shoukri. There are unconfirmed reports that the UDA in south-east Antrim was meeting last night.

The Inner Council decision to expel the Shoukris and McClean followed a so-called paramilitary investigation into their alleged criminal activities.

Three weeks ago, as exclusively revealed in this newspaper, the UDA in the north of the city was told to remove them from their leadership positions.

Up to now, this has not happened, and the Inner Council leadership has now decided to make its position public.

The decision comes at a dangerous time, with the controversial Tour of the North, Whiterock and Ardoyne marches all scheduled for coming days and weeks.

As those parades approach, the UDA in north Belfast is detached from the rest of the paramilitary organisation.

The Inner Council is still trying to avoid a major split in its organisation. That is why it has delayed its statement until now.

The door has been closed to the Shoukris and McClean, but according to one source remains open to everyone else.

Contentious Orange march expected to pass off peacefully

BN.ie

16/06/2006 - 08:20:49

The first contentious Orange Order march of the year is due to take place in north Belfast later today.

The parade is opposed by nationalist residents in Ardoyne, but there are hopes that it will pass of peacefully following an agreement reached between the residents and loyalist representatives.

The loyalists have agreed to limit the number of people involved in the march, while the nationalists have agreed to restrict the size of a planned protest against the parade.

Speaking last night, Sinn Féin’s Martin McGuinness praised the initiative, saying he hoped it could lead to a new atmosphere of cooperation during the marching season.

“The summers over the last number of years have been difficult,” he said. “I don’t want to see a recurrence of that. I want to see total and absolute peace on our streets because our people deserve it.”

Mr McGuinness also said he hoped politicians could learn from the Ardoyne agreement and set a better example.

“People deserve that their elected representatives will actually work together by showing good example, by encouraging people to recognise the importance of a peaceful summer,” he said.

Expert ‘to track heart defects’

BBC

Heart defects in babies can now be detected much earlier
The Royal Victoria Hospital has appointed a specialist to detect heart defects in babies still in the womb.

The position is a joint venture between the Belfast hospital and local charity Heartbeat.

Angela McBrien, the new research fellow for antenatal screening for congenital heart disease, will be working with expectant mothers across NI.

She will track and increase early detection of any heart abnormalities in unborn children.

“Evidence shows that for some heart conditions, the earlier they are identified, the better the outcome for the child,” said Angela.

“We are set up so that we can even treat certain conditions while the child is in the womb - so the earlier that we can detect conditions the better for the mum and baby.”

Irwyn McKibben from Heartbeat said it was an exciting development for parents across Northern Ireland.

“They can now benefit from a joined up coordinated screening service and the reassurance that children get the earliest possible chance when it comes to heart problems,” he said.

One expectant mother with a history of congenital heart disease in her family, Sharon Gibson, has been told her baby has a normal heart.

“Parents are given the help and advice that they need to deal with the situation and the support we received really reassured us,” she said.

Police use CS Spray 550 times in year

Belfast Telegraph

By Jonanthan McCambridge
15 June 2006

The PSNI deployed CS Spray on more than 550 occasions in the year to April, the Policing Board has been told.

A report considered by the Board heard officers then used the irritant on 412 occasions in every District Command Unit.

Board vice-chairman Barry Gilligan said the report included occasions when police officers were threatened. He added: “In monitoring the figures, Board members have raised questions on deployment of CS Spray.”

CS Spray was used most during July (43 occasions), August (42) and September (40)

Suspension ‘over BBC interview’

BBC

A senior Orangeman has said he has been suspended from the Grand Lodge over an interview he gave to the BBC.

However, Colin Shilliday, who said he was hurt by the move, revealed he had already taken the decision to resign.

In his interview, he criticised the reaction of senior orange leaders to the violence following last year’s controversial Whiterock parade.

Mr Shilliday has been a member of the Orange Order for more than 40 years and is a former Grand Lodge treasurer.

However, said he had been growing increasingly disenchanted and in April gave an interview to the BBC in which he said he believed Grand Master Robert Saulters was “completely out of his depth”.

A few days later, Mr Shilliday wrote to his local lodge in County Down informing them he was resigning from the order.

He received no reply, but now he has been told unofficially that at a meeting of the Grand Lodge in Derry on Wednesday, he was suspended.

“I was merely articulating what many other people in public life were saying and what many grassroots Orangemen were saying to me,” Mr Shilliday said on Thursday.

“Many at a senior level within the order were saying those very same things.”

He added: “I just felt that over the past 10 years or so, I really had been living in hope that things were going to get better and that there would be some sort of realignment of the order back to its core principles and the order I joined as a young boy.”

The Orange Order has refused to comment.






















Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here