Belfast Telegraph
Loyalist’s assault of Stormont was more about the killer’s ego than protesting against power-sharing.
Brian Rowan reports
27 November 2006
You might wonder why Michael Stone didn’t attack the Stormont building and the new politics of this place long before last Friday.
That is, if you accept what he claims as his motivation for all that happened and didn’t happen at Parliament Buildings those few days ago.
I don’t.
If you were daft enough, he’d have you believe that this had something to do with power sharing and a political sell-out; something to do with Paisley and the Provos, and that he, Stone, the “soldier” from the “war” that’s over, was out to deliver a last loyalist message of “No surrender”.
What absolute nonsense.
What about Stormont and the politics of this place when David Trimble was First Minister and unionists, nationalists and republicans - including Martin McGuinness - were part of the same Executive?
Where was Michael Stone then? Where were his pipe bombs and all of the rest of his paramilitary bits and pieces?
The answer is, they were nowhere to be seen.
I think I know why.
Last Friday, and the Stone show, had nothing to do with power sharing or a sell-out - nothing whatsoever.
Michael Stone long ago accepted Sinn Fein’s mandate and its place in the political process. He told me so - told me within weeks of the Good Friday Agreement; told me and then tried not to tell me.
After a television interview, he and other loyalists asked for the tape.
I spoke to him in that gap between the Good Friday Agreement and the referendum of 1998 - interviewed him while he was out on parole and just hours after loyalists had given him a standing ovation inside the Ulster Hall.
They are not celebrating him any longer - not after his show on Friday last.
That interview back in 1998 was quite controversial - not so much because of what Stone had to say, but when he said it.
It was a timing thing.
The people had not yet endorsed the Agreement, and one of its most controversial aspects related to the early release of prisoners - something from which Stone and hundreds of loyalists and republicans would later benefit.
Last Friday at Stormont one of those early release licences was torn up in public - destroyed in that one-man show at the entrance to Parliament Buildings.
Stone must have known the consequences of his actions. Did he want to go back to jail? Is that where he believes he will be safe?
Some will tell you that the answer to both those questions is yes.
Back in May 1998, on the morning after the Ulster Hall rally, the Northern Ireland Office told the then Ulster Democratic Party to ensure that Stone did no media interviews.
This issue of prisoners and their release was damaging the wider political agreement, and the Government feared this could feed the “No” vote in the now imminent referendum.
The call to the UDP was too late. Stone had just finished an interview with me to be broadcast later that day on BBC news outlets.
In the company of Stone and the UDA brigadier Jim Gray - later murdered in 2005 - the UDP’s then prisoners spokesman John White asked me to give them the tape.
I refused. A fax signed by Stone was then sent to the BBC withdrawing permission for the interview to be used, and senior leaders in the UDP contacted BBC editors.
It was serious stuff. There was talk that the Prime Minister Tony Blair had hit the roof when he’d seen the television pictures of Stone in the Ulster Hall.
The interview was broadcast - an interview in which Stone refused to apologise for the murders he had committed.
He acknowledged “the hurt” he had caused, but “within the context of being a volunteer in a war”, he would not apologise.
In that interview, more than eight years ago, Stone said the following about Sinn Fein’s most senior leaders:
“Adams and McGuinness have brought the republican death squads on, seemingly making the transition into a democracy, and, if they believe in that democracy, then majority rules. They’ve a political mandate, I accept that, and they should have their place at the talks.”
The same Michael Stone, who in 2006 is shouting about no power-sharing with the “Shinners” and who is accusing Ian Paisley of a sell-out, spoke those words - words that take you closer to the truth of what last Friday was really about.
Forget about all of that shouting and ranting about power sharing, about Paisley and the Provos and about the new politics of this place.
What happened at Parliament Buildings last Friday - after Stone stepped out of a taxi - was a play for publicity, a desperate and dangerous performance by a man whose cause is fame and whose fear is that he might become irrelevant.
Friday was about Michael Stone’s ego.
He plays this silly game with the exiled loyalist Johnny Adair - a game of gimmicks and stunts. It is about the two of them staying in the news - about them sounding and seeming important within loyalism and within Northern Ireland.
They aren’t. Not any more. It’s all nonsense.
These days, Adair sneaks in and then runs out of Northern Ireland, because, for all his talk, to stay would mean he would end up dead.
Stone - after his performance at Parliament Buildings - is back in prison and will stay there for a considerable period of time.
His ego has been sent to jail.
Will it matter to anyone within loyalism? No it won’t.
Because for all they were to the UDA in the war of yesterday, Stone and Adair are nothing in the peace of today.