Senior QC set to investigate allegations of cover-up over victims post
By Chris Thornton
05 December 2006
A senior legal figure who knows his way around Whitehall was appointed last night to investigate whether Peter Hain and senior civil servants committed crimes by deliberately misleading the High Court.
Peter Scott QC will conduct an inquiry into Mr Justice Girvan’s complaints about the Northern Ireland Office’s apparent attempts to cover up the role of the DUP in the appointment of Victims’ Commissioner Bertha McDougall.
The NIO initially denied that the DUP played any role in the appointment, when Mrs McDougall had been nominated by DUP leader Ian Paisley and was the only candidate interviewed for the post.
Last month the judge referred the case to the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, posing 67 questions about the behaviour of the Secretary of State, Civil Service head Nigel Hamilton and NIO Permanent Secretary Jonathan Phillips in the case.
Mr Justice Girvan declared that Mr Hain had failed in his “duty of candour” to the court and said affidavits by both civil servants had been misleading. If their actions were deliberate, he said that would amount to an attempt to pervert the course of justice, which is a criminal offence.
Shadow Secretary of State David Lidington said an effective inquiry is “vital”.
“Let’s hope we now get the truth about what went on in the Secretary of State’s Office,” he said. “It’s vital for public confidence in the integrity of government and the legal process that the whole truth is made plain.
“I hope this inquiry will be thorough, speedy, and the report will be published without delay.”
Lord Goldsmith announced details of the inquiry as Mr Hain stepped up his bid to become deputy leader of the Labour Party.
Mr Scott has been asked to report “as soon as is possible consistent with the need to conduct a thorough review”.
Mr Scott is a member of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, the watchdog that investigates MI5 and MI6. A deputy High Court judge and former chairman of the Bar in England and Wales, the Prime Minister re-appointed him as a trustee of the National Gallery in 2004.
He is also chairman of the panel on Takeovers and Mergers and a judicial chairman of the City Disputes Panel.
He is a former standing counsel to the Department of Employment, the registrar of Restrictive Trade Practices and director general of Fair Trading.
Last night Peter Hain pledged to co-operate fully with the inquiry.
——————————-
Secretary of State takes flak from all sides in Assembly
Assembly Speaker Eileen Bell was “forced into making an utterly false statement” by Secretary of State Peter Hain, her party leader said yesterday.
Alliance chief David Ford made the remark about a statement Mrs Bell delivered to the Assembly that said Mr Paisley had satisfied the criteria for a nomination for First Minister on the NIO’s deadline day, November 24.
She delivered the statement even though Mr Paisley had said the “circumstances were not reached for a nomination or designation to be made”.
As DUP members repeatedly told the Assembly yesterday that Mr Paisley had not made a nomination, MLAs queued up to attack Mr Hain’s role in the November 24 meeting and the wider political process.
Ulster Unionist leader Sir Reg Empey accused Mr Hain of overriding the Assembley’s business committee last week to allow Martin McGuinness to make a speech.
“The evidence is that the Secretary of State is still interfering,” he said.
Sir Reg said Mr Hain rewrote the Assembly’s Order Paper at the behest of Sinn Fein, something Gerry Adams did not deny during his speech.
Mr Hain got Ian Paisley and Gerry Adams to agree during the debate - with both leaders attacking him.
Mr Paisley also made a plea to the Sinn Fein president to accept policing, as both men lectured each other about the role of Presbyterians in the 1798 rebellion.
During the debate Mr Paisley made his “plea to the leader of the party opposite”.
“We want to hear him say he is going to support the police and abide by the conditions set out in the Agreement,” he said.
Mr Adams did not reply directly to the plea and there were more familiar disagreements between the DUP and Sinn Fein during the debate, with Sinn Fein objecting to Mr Paisley’s repeated references to “Sinn Fein-IRA”.
“Perhaps it’s a good omen that they’re ashamed of being called the IRA,” he said.
———————
Hain red-faced as two MPs deny they back him for deputy leader
By Mark Hookham
Deputy Labour leadership hopeful Peter Hain was left red-faced yesterday after two MPs who he claimed were backing his campaign insisted they had not made up their minds.
Backbencher Roger Berry said he was “surprised” to be included on a list of 26 MPs “available for quotes” to publicly support the Ulster Secretary’s campaign.
And fellow Labour MP Peter Soulsby said his support for Mr Hain will depend on his stance on renewing the Trident nuclear missile system.
Their comments are an embarrassing blow to Mr Hain as he attempts to attract support for his bid to replace John Prescott when he stands down next year.
The Secretary of State yesterday unveiled his campaign team and a list of MPs who journalists were encouraged to phone for supportive quotes.
But when the Belfast Telegraph called Kingswood MP Roger Berry, we were told he was likely to support Mr Hain, but had not yet given his permission to be listed as a backer.
He said: “I certainly did not give authorisation. I am discussing the situation with my constituency party. It’s either Peter or Hilary Benn (the international development secretary).”
Likewise, Peter Soulsby, MP for Leicester South, insisted he was keeping his options open.
The MP, who is “totally and utterly” opposed to renewing Trident, said: “I’ll be listening very carefully to what he [Hain] and others say before deciding”.
Hain4Labour campaign organiser Joe Carberry yesterday admitted there had been a “misunderstanding”.





