Belfast Telegraph
[Published: Thursday 14, December 2006 - 17:48]
The Democratic Unionists were tonight accused of putting forward a crazy position paper on policing as efforts continued to break the deadlock over power-sharing.
After the second meeting of the Stormont Programme for Government Committee’s sub group on policing and justice, Sinn Fein sources claimed the Reverend Ian Paisley’s party proposed an unrealistic method for selecting a devolved minister in charge of policing and justice.
The DUP’s position paper, which it said was rejected by Sinn Fein, the nationalist SDLP and Ulster Unionists, proposed that the minister would not be appointed under the d’Hondt in the Assembly used for other ministers.
Instead it would require a 70%-plus vote in favour of the candidate within the Assembly.
The DUP also suggested that the minister would have no vote within the power-sharing executive.
A Sinn Fein source said: “This was crazy stuff.
“What they were suggesting was effectively a unionist veto and in particular a DUP veto over who would be minister. Everybody bar them thought this was unacceptable.
“There was no mention in their document of a timeframe for the devolution of policing and justice powers when everybody and their granny knows that the only way this is going to be unlocked is for a date for policing and justice powers to be transferred.'’
Under British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Taoiseach Bertie Ahern’s plan for achieving power-sharing next March, it is envisaged that Sinn Fein will for the first time publicly declare support for the Police Service of Northern Ireland.
The DUP wants Sinn Fein to do that first before it will form a power-sharing government.
Gerry Adams has insisted, however, that Sinn Fein will need a timeframe for the transfer of policing and justice powers from Westminster to Stormont, agreement on the departmental model which will handle those powers and assurances that MI5 will have no role in civic policing before he can move to recommend that the party endorses the PSNI.