SAOIRSE32

11/10/2008

Deadlock ‘encourages dissidents’

BBC
11 Oct 2008

The deadlock at Stormont is encouraging the rise of dissident republicans and anti-agreement unionists, the Progressive Unionist leader has said.

Dawn Purvis told her party conference that some in the DUP were blocking the devolution of policing just to “get one over on Sinn Fein.”

She also said some in Sinn Fein “did not want a Brit about the place”.

She said the squabbling was not helping ordinary people who are struggling to pay their bills.

The former assistant chief constable Peter Sheridan addressed the conference on peace building.

He said the future prosperity of areas such as the Shankill depended on nationalists feeling safe to shop there.

Robinson’s attack on ‘sad’ Adams

Belfast Telegraph
Saturday, 11 October 2008

The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) launched a personal attack on Sinn Fein President Gerry Adams last night in a sign of growing political tension.

DUP leader Peter Robinson hit back at claims that elements of his party were opposed to sharing power with Catholics by branding Mr Adams a “sad spectacle”.

Mr Robinson rejected the republican claims of bigotry in his party and said the Sinn Fein leader’s comments should be treated with “pity rather than scorn”.

“What a sad spectacle Gerry Adams has become,” he said.

“The DUP is committed to working the Assembly for the maximum benefit of all of the people of Northern Ireland.”

Last night Mr Adams launched a strongly-worded attack on his political opponents, blaming the DUP for jeopardising the power-sharing institutions.

“There are clearly elements of the DUP who really don’t want to have a Catholic about the place. They are opposed to power-sharing in any form.”

Last night a Sinn Fein source hit back at Mr Robinson’s comments: “What Peter Robinson needs to do is focus on delivering on the obligations his party entered into in the St Andrews Agreement.”

Irish ’should be made official’

BBC

A rally in Belfast city centre has called for official status to be given to the Irish language.

About 400 to 500 people gathered for the demonstration, organised by the group Pobal.

Its chief executive Janet Muller said they wanted “a wide range of public services through the medium of Irish.”

“For example, in the courts, within public institutions, education, broadcasting, and social and economic life as well,” she said.

Irish language groups said a commitment was given in the St Andrews’ Agreement to introduce legislation.

Réamonn Ó Ciaráin, of Irish language organisation Gael Linn, said: “An Irish Language Act based on the rights of the people who speak it is needed in the north, exactly as it was promised two years ago at St Andrews.

“This kind of legislation already exists in Scotland, Wales and the south of Ireland, and the Irish speaking community here should have the same rights.”

Omagh lawyer calls for GCHQ secrets

Intercepts of the calls between bomb plotters are ‘absolutely central’ to civil case against Real IRA

Henry McDonald
Guardian
Sunday October 12 2008

A lawyer running the Omagh civil case against several suspected Real IRA leaders has challenged the Northern Ireland Assembly to press Gordon Brown to give his legal team secret GCHQ surveillance transcripts of the bombers.

Jason McCue, whose firm H20 is behind the civil action, said the best thing the assembly could achieve for Omagh victims and their families would be to issue a united call for the Prime Minister to release the intercepts of conversations between the Real IRA plotters obtained in the Irish Republic.

The assembly will debate a motion on Tuesday calling for a cross-border investigation into the Omagh bombing. Alliance party leader David Ford said that ‘given the cross-border aspects of the crime, many will not gain closure without a full cross-border investigation’.

He said any inquiry had to be legally binding to ensure no details or evidence would be withheld. The debate will start on Tuesday afternoon and relatives of some of the 29 people killed in the 1998 massacre will be in the chamber.

Speaking to The Observer last night, McCue said obtaining the evidence gathered by GCHQ, which was only revealed to the Omagh families via a Panorama investigation last month, was more important than any cross-border inquiry. ‘The best thing the assembly can do is to ask for that evidence, the intercepts of the calls being made by the bombers on the day of the massacre, the ones tracked and recorded by GCHQ,’ he said.

‘The focus of the debate should be on that evidence being handed over to the civil trial. The assembly should unite to press Gordon Brown on that.’

McCue insisted that the GCHQ material could be used in a civil action even though under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) it would be illegal to use such material in a criminal case. However, he said that, once such intercepts were heard as evidence in the civil trial, there was an argument that their airing in open court could make them admissible in any criminal case.

‘Obtaining this evidence for our civil action, therefore, is absolutely central and this is something the assembly can call for in Tuesday’s debate,’ McCue added. The laywer will argue that because most of the intercepted calls were bugged in a different country - the Irish Republic - the Ripa act would not cover them. Relatives of those killed and injured in the 1998 atrocity have also demanded full disclosure of the new evidence from GCHQ, Britain’s secretive listening station at Cheltenham.

Ford is seeking cross-party support for a cross-border inquiry: ‘This bombing resulted in the biggest loss of life throughout the whole of the Troubles, and any right-thinking person should support this call for total disclosure of all information about the incident,’ he said.

‘Clarity and a full account of events are the least that those affected by the bomb deserve. People’s lives were ripped apart and victims continue to suffer because of all the unanswered questions.’

Omagh: cross-border powers sought

By Deborah McAleese
Belfast Telegraph
Friday, 10 October 2008

Northern Ireland’s Assembly is to be asked to consider support for the establishment of cross-border legal powers to obtain security force intelligence evidence into the Omagh bomb, the Belfast Telegraph can reveal today.

A motion will be placed before the Assembly next week by the Alliance party calling for the creation of a “formal, cross-border, legally binding process” which is designed to secure “full disclosure from the intelligence services and security forces in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland,” in a bid to establish what relevant information they had before and immediately after the 1998 attack.

Twenty-nine people and unborn twins were killed in the attack, which was the worst single atrocity of the Troubles.

Alliance leader David Ford said that the people of Omagh have a right to know the full facts “about the tragic events of Saturday 15 August 1998”.

“This bombing resulted in the biggest loss of life throughout the whole of the Troubles and any right-thinking person should support this call for total disclosure of all information about the incident,” he said.

“Clarity and a full account of events are the least that those affected by the bomb deserve. People’s lives were ripped apart by this bombing and victims continue to suffer because of all the unanswered questions. Given the cross-border aspects of the crime, many will not gain closure without a full cross-border investigation process.”

Michael Gallagher, chairman of the Omagh support and self-help group, said: “The inquiry into Omagh is not just important to the Omagh families, but to everyone in this island and beyond.

“We should learn what was done well and what was not done well, and those lessons should be passed on to others so that we are better prepared for any future terrorist attack or disaster. The inquiry should never take away from those who were responsible for planning and preparing this evil act.”

No one has ever been prosecuted for the Omagh atrocity and it has been a long battle for justice for the families.

Last December, south Armagh electrician Sean Hoey (38) was cleared of involvement following a lengthy trial.

A civil case brought by the bereaved families against five men they believe were involved in the 1998 bombing is currently being held.

The Omagh families have always raised questions over the investigation into the bomb and the controversy over the investigation reignited last month after it emerged that the UK’s eavesdropping centre GCHQ had been monitoring the Real IRA bombers on the day of the massacre.

Remembering the Past: ‘Unofficial’ executions of the Civil War

By Mícheál Mac Donncha
An Phoblacht
9 Oct 2008


Civil war monument commemorating Capt Noel Lemass (Photo)

DURING the Civil War period June 1922 to May 1923, the Free State Government executed 77 republican prisoners of war. But in addition to these it is estimated that well over 100 republicans were ‘unofficially’ executed by the Free State Army and by the notorious Criminal Investigation Department (CID) based at Oriel House in Dublin.

The first such killing was that of Harry Boland TD. He was a close friend of Michael Collins and, like him, a senior figure in the Irish Republican Brotherhood. But when Collins used the IRB to help push through the 1921 Treaty, Boland broke with him.


Eamon de Valera (right) with Michael Collins (centre) and Harry Boland (left) pictured together before the treaty of 1921 (Photo)

In contrast to the fictionalised portrayal in Neil Jordan’s Collins filmography, Boland was shot in a hotel in Skerries by Free State troops and died on 1 August 1922.


Thirty republicans were killed in similar fashion during the months of August and September 1922.

These included Fianna Éireann members Seán Cole and Alf Colley and IRA Volunteer Bernard Daly, who were killed by ‘persons unknown’ on 26 August.

Image: SEÁN COLE AND ALF COLLEY: Shot dead by the CID’s ‘Oriel House Gang’ in Dublin

The executioners were members of the CID, which soon became known as ‘The Oriel House Gang’. The executions followed a similar pattern, especially in Dublin, where the victims were arrested in the city and taken to quiet country roads where they were shot and their bodies left for discovery.

BALLYSEEDY

Six Volunteers were executed after capture on Ben Bulben in County Sligo on 20 September. One of them was a son of Free State Cabinet Minister Eoin MacNeill. The executions continued through 1922 and well into 1923.
The most notorious of all were those which took place in County Kerry during February and March 1923, including the Volunteers tied to a mine at Ballyseedy and blown to pieces. The full extent of repression throughout that County is described in Dorothy Macardle’s classic account, Tragedies of Kerry.
The funerals of executed republicans were refused entry to many Catholic churches. This was the fate of UCD student and IRA officer Robert Bondfield, who was actually arrested in Dublin while visiting church on Holy Thursday 1923. He was taken to Clondalkin and shot dead by the Oriel House Gang on 29 March. Priests refused to allow his body into the Church of the Holy Name, Ranelagh.
One of the last ‘unofficial’ executions was that of Noel Lemass (a brother of Seán, who was later Taoiseach). Arrested in July 1923, his body was not found until October. The autopsy showed he had been shot three times in the head and had a broken jaw and a broken arm. The Sinn Féin Ard Fheis on 16 October adjourned for his funeral.
The body of Noel Lemass was discovered on Cruach (‘The Featherbed’) Mountain, County Dublin on 12 October 1923, 85 years ago this week.

DERRY 1968 : A turning point for Civil Rights and the North

An Phoblacht
9 Oct 2008

DERRY’S Guildhall was the setting last weekend for events marking the 40th anniversary of the famous 5 October 1968 civil rights march in Derry, which was a turning point in modern Irish history.
The event was addressed by a number of speakers, including the North’s joint First Minister, Martin McGuinness, and President Mary McAleese.

Below we reprint the full text of Martin McGuinness’s address at the Guildhall.

Still fighting for equality

TO TRACE the roots of the march we are commemorating here this afternoon, I think we have to return to the disastrous decision taken in Downing Street and forced upon Irish people at the point of a gun to partition this island.

Photo: 40 YEARS ON: ‘What happened in Derry 1968 is directly relevant to where we are today’

What followed was 50 years of unionist misrule. 50 years of domination, discrimination and inequality. Things came to a head on these streets 40 years ago.
Derry today is a different place from what it was in 1968.
There are, of course, still challenges to face – the need for equality in employment and investment, a resistance to change, and a desire by some elements to still play the orange card and seek domination over their neighbours.
Forty years ago, on the streets of this city, men and women from different backgrounds, from different generations, from different political roots came together as equals and we demanded our rights.
Some unionist voices courageously spoke out.
They knew what was happening was wrong and that the writing was on the wall for unionist misrule.
But political unionism wasn’t listening. They weren’t interested in change.

• Unionism controlled the parliament;
• Unionism controlled the cabinet;
• Unionism controlled the police force;
• Unionism controlled the justice system;
• Unionism dominated business and controlled local government;
• Unionism dictated housing policy and allocation.

And unionism would try and cling to all of this and use violence and intimidation in defence of its interests.
I say all of this not to revisit the past and apportion blame but because it is directly relevant to where we are at this time. Regrettably, there are still those within political unionism who refuse to acknowledge these past abuses or its role and contribution in all that occurred.
They hark back to the 1960s and before, and imagine it as some sort of golden age in which none of these things was going on. And despite the substantial and much-welcome progress that has been made in recent years, that mindset – of no surrender and not an inch – still exists in some elements of political unionism today, and especially within the DUP.
The fact is that there are still those within the DUP who do not agree with power sharing as a concept or as a matter of political practice.
They do not accept that the days of unionist majority rule are gone, and gone forever.
They believe that by stalling and delaying they can hollow out the Good Friday and St Andrew’s agreements. And that is what is at the heart of the current crisis in the political institutions.
It isn’t just about whether there is or is not an Executive meeting. It is about partnership government and power sharing in the new political dispensation. It is about the acceptance of the rights and entitlements of nationalists and republicans won over many years of tough negotiations.
If one party does not believe in partnership government and power sharing on the basis of equality then it is they who are placing the political institutions at risk.
The unionist political system needs to understand and come to terms with the reality that life has changed for everybody.

The only way any unionist politician will ever hold any semblance of real political power now or in the future is in partnership with nationalists and republicans.
Sinn Féin will defend the Good Friday Agreement institutions. We will defend the rights and entitlements of everyone, especially those who elected us. We stand up for and defend the rights of every citizen but especially those whose rights were denied for so long.
The nationalist and republican community has charged Sinn Féin with the responsibility to lead them through this phase of the process. They have repeatedly put their confidence in us.
And Sinn Féin wants to make the political institutions work.
Last week, in spite of the difficulties around the Executive, and as evidence of our goodwill, Sinn Féin participated in the British-Irish Conference meeting.
The decision by the DUP to block the planned meeting of the North-South Ministerial Council yesterday adds weight to the view that the DUP is not committed to partnership and equality.
The reality is that, since early June, when Peter Robinson emerged as DUP leader, Sinn Féin has been attempting to get the DUP to engage – as agreed in Downing Street – in a real and meaningful negotiation. The DUP have avoided any real engagement. They are also arguing that the St Andrew’s Agreement, which they claimed as a great victory for the DUP, no longer applies to them.
That position is simply not tenable and presents a significant challenge for both governments.
If partnership government is beyond the DUP then it will fall to the two governments to take the necessary decisions and implement the necessary policy changes to ensure political progress in the all-Ireland context envisaged in the Good Friday and St Andrew’s agreements.
The British Government knows where the problem lies. Gordon Brown came to Stormont two weeks ago and laid it out for all to see. Former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, who represented the Irish Government at St Andrew’s, did likewise recently. The resolution is DUP agreement to work the partnership arrangements and to agree a timeframe for the transfer of power on policing and justice.
Hardly a week goes past without an elderly person being assaulted and robbed in their home, or a young person stabbed or beaten, or a violent robbery.
People want the police service and the judicial system equipped with the laws to tackle criminals and thugs.
People want local politicians passing laws to tackle these issues as well as the issues of repeat offenders and bail, anti-social behaviour, street drinking and much more.
But the DUP says NO!
This is unacceptable. If the DUP leadership wants these institutions to work, then it has to stop looking over its shoulder at others. It has to confront those opposed to change within and without its own ranks.
The claims of a lack of confidence within the unionist community are bogus. Public confidence exists now for transfer to take place.
For generations the RUC, and therefore policing, was the preserve of unionism. No longer! Forty years ago in this city we witnessed at first-hand the brutality and viciousness of bad policing. We will never again put up with this.
Nationalists and republicans, despite our reservations, have embraced policing and we are determined to shape it to meet the needs of the 21st century and of our communities.
I believe that we have reached a defining moment in the process to build a new dispensation. I believe that a resolution to the current difficulties can be found. I believe that an agreement forged between myself and Peter Robinson would send out a powerful and hopeful message for the future.
But if we are to move forward it will take political courage and political leadership.
It will need real and meaningful partnership government and power sharing.
Forty years ago, we marched along Duke Street and along many other roads and country lanes across the Northern state as we demanded change and demanded civil rights. That march for civil rights and national rights continues.

It isn’t over and there is no turning back.
There can be no return to the bad old days.
We must also be the guarantors of that.

SF, Blaney, clash on Eddie Fullerton campaign

Derry Journal
**Via Newshound
09 October 2008

Donegal Dail Deputy Niall Blaney has launched a stinging attack on Sinn Fein Councillor Padraig MacLochlainn, suggesting the Buncrana politician has done little more than add lip service to the campaign for an enquiry into the death of former Sinn Fein councillor Eddie Fullerton.

Deputy Blaney said the Fullerton campaign has died since the tragic death of Eddie’s son Albert Fullerton. And even though Cllr. MacLochlainn had taken over Eddie Fullerton’s council seat from Cllr. Jim Ferry, he has done nothing more than give the campaign ‘the odd mention here and there.’

The North East Deputy also said Eddie Fullerton’s picture still hangs in many Fianna Fail houses across Donegal and said that was something Cllr. MacLochlainn would never aspire to.

The Fianna Fail TD also accused Cllr. MacLochlainn of political opportunism in the fall-out over comments the Fianna Fail TD made at a recent meeting of the Joint Committee on the Implementation of the Good Friday Agreement.

Cllr. MacLochlainn said he was alarmed that Deputy Blaney had suggested too much time had been spent examining what has happened in the past during the Northern Troubles, where very few answers are to be obtained. He said Blaney had ‘missed the point’ and pointed to the campaigns of local families, including the Fullertons, who were still looking for answers.

However, Deputy Blaney has hit back with a scathing response, accusing Cllr. MacLochlainn of political opportunism.

“Padraig MacLochlainn hasn’t done much more than add lip service to the Fullerton campaign. If he knew that much about the relationship between the Blaney family and Eddie Fullerton, he wouldn’t be making those comments,” he said.

“Since Eddie’s son Albert died, the campaign has died. If he was so worried about Eddie Fullerton, he would do much more about the campaign than give it an odd mention here and there. I don’t see him doing anything actively to progress that call for an inquiry since Eddie’s son Albert died.

“I would love to see an enquiry into the death of Eddie Fullerton and I have advocated that in Dail Eireann. But in the overall context of things, there is a much wider picture than just a couple of families. There are hundreds of cases and hundreds of families.”

Deputy Blaney said his father (former Deputy Harry Blaney) and Eddie Fullerton often travelled the country together to conferences and enjoyed each other’s company. “They were very much personal friends,” he said. “Eddie Fullerton’s picture would still be hanging in a lot of Fianna Fail households. I don’t think that’s something that Padraig MacLochlainn will ever aspire to. It shows the high regard Eddie Fullerton is held in.”

Deputy Blaney said he stood by his views expressed at the Joint Committee meeting. “There is a train of thought that a lot of this soul searching has come up with very little for a lot of individuals, not all individuals.

“I made the comment that rather than dwelling on the past forever, we shouldn’t dwell there too long. Whatever they come forward with in this report, deal with it fairly quickly and let’s start putting our emphasis into our present day youth in Northern Ireland who still have sectarian trends and habits. Sectarianism is still very ripe in Northern Ireland.

“The last thing you want to do is create a belief there among a lot of people that there could be answers when maybe there are none to be got. A lot of politicians can dwell on the past but the problem is a lot of them can’t look to the future at all.”

RIR parade to pass Markets

Irish News
09/10/08

The Parades Commission is to consider proposals by Belfast City Council which would see a welcome-home parade for members of the British army pass close to a nationalist residential area, writes Allison Morris.

Proposals submitted to the commission ahead of the November 2 parade mostly confine members of the British armed forces and their supporters to

non-residential areas in the city’s commercial centre.

However, one section of the proposed route will see returning Royal Irish Regiment members march close to the nationalist Markets area of south Belfast.

Belfast City Council has submitted an application to the Parades Commission seeking approval for the march through Belfast ahead of a civic reception organised for the returning British troops.

The application is for around 240 serving soldiers, one band and 300 supporters to be held on

the first Sunday in November.

Although listed by the commission as a “sensitive” march, no objections have as yet been lodged.

Unionists ‘don’t want a Catholic about the place’ - Adams

News Letter
10 October 2008

ACCUSATIONS by Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams that elements of unionism remain opposed to power sharing have been rejected by the DUP.

Mr Adams made the remarks during a speech to party activists in Belfast on Thursday evening.

His controversial statement comes against the backdrop of an ongoing impasse at Stormont between his party and the DUP over the devolution of policing and justice powers.

The Executive has now not met formally since mid-June.

The West Belfast MP’s comments follow on from a similar speech in America in recent weeks.

“It is obvious that there are elements with the DUP who do not agree with power sharing and partnership as a political model or a practical politics,” said Mr Adams.

“In addition, there are clearly elements of the DUP who really don’t want to have a Catholic about the place. They are opposed to power sharing in any form.

“And some of them clearly believe that by stalling and delaying they can hollow out the Good Friday and St Andrews Agreements.

“As a result of this opposition the DUP has been retreating from its obligations under the St Andrews Agreement.”

The strongly-worded tirade by the Sinn Fein president also accused members of the DUP of using “abusive” language in opposition to nationalist demands for promotion of the Irish language.

“They (the DUP) have failed to embrace partnership government, they have run away from policing and justice obligations, they seek the retention of an outdated class based education system, and have sought to undermine the rights and entitlements of Irish speakers.

“And all of this is wrapped in the most abusive and offensive language,” he added.

A spokesman for the DUP hit back, describing Mr Adams’ observations as baseless and advised the Sinn Fein leader to focus on the actions of his own party.

Prosecution service defends Northern Bank action

Irish Times
10 Oct 2008

The head of Northern Ireland’s prosecution service tonight defended his decision to put Chris Ward in the dock over the £26.5 million Northern Bank robbery.

Alasdair Frazer’s office came under heavy criticism yesterday when the case against Mr Ward dramatically collapsed.

The Public Prosecution Service (PPS) was already under pressure after trials failed to secure convictions for the 1998 Omagh bombing atrocity and the infamous 2005 republican murder of Robert McCartney.

Mr Ward’s solicitor yesterday said the decision to prosecute his client had been made without evidence and declared the 26-year-old’s life had been ruined by the decision.

But in a rare public comment on its work, the PPS tonight issued a statement which claimed it was right to take the Omagh and McCartney cases to court.

It claimed the cases had met the requisite tests and had run their course, despite the failure to secure convictions.

On the Northern Bank trial, the PPS said: “The Test for Prosecution was applied with equal rigour and impartiality in the case of Christopher Ward.

“Following receipt of a complex police investigation file and having taken the advice of independent senior counsel and considered the available evidence, it was concluded that the Test for Prosecution was met.

“There is a continuing duty upon the Director in the interests of justice to keep the Test for Prosecution under review as the evidence is presented in court.”

A crucial element of the case against Mr Ward was the claim that he had been instrumental in changing the staff rota at the Northern Bank to suit the robbers’ plans.

But the central plank of the prosecution case was swept away when it was confirmed other members of staff played a central role in rota changes.

The trial judge Justice Richard McLaughlin described the rota changes as “a result of coincidence and chance”.

The PPS tonight said: “This part of the circumstantial case was of fundamental importance. Evidence in relation to the rota was given.

“There were differences between the evidence referred to by senior counsel in his opening and the evidence which in fact was given by the witnesses during the course of the trial.”

The prosecution service said the Director then decided that the case could not proceed.

In a summary of the task facing the prosecution service, the PPS underlined the need to weigh-up each case.

“It is impossible to know with certainty whether or not a conviction will be obtained in any particular case. What is required is that there is a reasonable prospect of a conviction on the evidence which is available,” it said.

Martin O’Hagan suspect ‘was piper at loyalist funeral’

By PA Mediapoint
Press Gazette
10 October 2008

A man accused of murdering a Northern Ireland journalist was sacked from the police’s pipe band after playing at the funeral of former loyalist leader Billy Wright, a court heard today.


Martin O’Hagan

Drew Robert King, 40, denies driving the car from which Sunday World reporter Martin O’Hagan was gunned down near his home in County Armagh in September 2001.

He was shunned from the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) and Prison Service pipe bands after he wore part of a prison officer’s uniform during his appearance at Wright’s 1997 funeral, said prosecution QC David Russell.

The killing of O’Hagan, a 51-year-old Catholic, was branded sectarian and linked to his pursuit of loyalist paramilitaries during the defendant’s refused bail application at Craigavon Magistrates’ Court.

Russell said: “This applicant played as a piper at the funeral of Billy Wright, which was a paramilitary-style funeral.

“He was asked as a result of that to leave (the RUC and Prison Service pipe bands).”

Loyalist Volunteer Force (LVF) leader Wright was shot dead by republicans at the Maze high-security prison near Belfast.

O’Hagan was murdered near his home in Lurgan, County Armagh, as he walked back from a pub with his wife. He wrote a string of articles criticising loyalists in the Sunday World newspaper.

Russell added: “He (King) is a principal partner in the murder. He is intimately involved, not only in the murder but in the destruction of the evidence after the event, and the murder itself has huge sectarian overtones.

“It is clearly connected to Mr O’Hagan’s employment and his reportage in the newspaper of local paramilitaries and their activities and his criticism of them.”

King, a former car dealer from Moss Road, Waringstown, Co Down, was arrested last month after an individual known as Witness A came forward to police.

Witness A had just returned from holiday in Tenerife when he claims he was telephoned by King immediately after the 2001 murder and asked to meet him the following morning in Lurgan.

He said the next day he was taken by King in his car to Lurgan cemetery where he claimed he had suffered an accident and wanted Witness A to pick up the debris.

Russell added that the pair later drove near the scene of the killing.

“Drew said he was driving the Subaru car when the shooting took place and that after the shooting had taken place… he had driven away and lost control of the car.

“The evidence against King is his own admission to Witness A that he was a principal party in the murder of Martin O’Hagan.”

Defence barrister Andrew Moriarty insisted that his client had been cleared for security checks by the RUC and Prison Service pipe bands and had only one relevant conviction dating back over 20 years, an indication of his trustworthiness for bail.

However, Russell explained his sacking from the bands.

“He was asked to leave as he was wearing part of a prison officer’s uniform at the time of the appearance (at Wright’s funeral).”

The murder car has never been recovered and Detective Sergeant Michael Hamilton told Magistrate Peter Murphy a substantial part of the case relied upon Witness A.

“I am 100% certain, or as close as I can be, if Mr King is given bail he will try to intimidate witnesses involved in the case and he will more than likely abscond.”

Mr Moriarty said a cash surety and the deeds of their home had been promised by King’s parents should he be released and then fail to return.

He referred to Witness A’s history of dishonest behaviour including theft.

“There are certain cases whenever the prosecution case is so demonstrably weak that it requires the defence to expose those weaknesses.”

He added: “In all of the circumstances Mr King can be admitted to bail as all of the concerns are, in my respectful submission, lacking in substance for the reasons I have outlined.”

After he was refused he said he would take an application to the High Court.

The defendant was remanded in custody to reappear at a later date.

‘There’s a bomb - get out now!’

By Clare Campbell
Daily Mail
11 October 2008

The gripping stories of life in the shadow of Ulster’s terrorists

Eamonn Holmes, 49

Eamonn Holmes: ‘I was in the yard when soldiers carrying rifles jumped over the hedge’

I was eight when the Troubles began, sparked by a civil rights march through Derry in 1968. The demonstrators, all Catholic like my family, felt discriminated against when they applied for jobs. It was a peaceful march, but the response from the Protestant-dominated police quickly turned mistrust into hatred between the two communities.

My first realisation that this conflict was more than just name-calling or stone-throwing was about three years later. My brother and I were on our way home one evening when I heard a sound I didn’t recognise. It was the noise of roof tiles cracking as they fell from burning houses. Protestants and Catholics had become so afraid of living in the area, they were setting fire to their homes as they abandoned them.

I also remember playing football with my brother on the streets on Bloody Friday, 21 July 1972, when the IRA detonated bombs across Belfast. We lived on a street high above the city, and as we looked down, we could see plumes of smoke and knew something was going on, but we had no idea of the scale of the attack. By the end of the day, 20 bombs had exploded. In just 75 minutes of violence, nine people were dead and some 130 were mutilated or mentally scarred by what they had witnessed.

Yet we just carried on playing, only stopping at the noise of a particularly loud explosion to shout, ‘What’s that?’ to one another before continuing with our game. We were oblivious to the death and mayhem that was taking place all around us, until, one by one, some of the other children with us were collected by their parents, each with news of someone, a friend or a relative, who’d been killed or injured in the attack.
British troops quickly gained a reputation for being heavy-handed with Catholics.

One evening, I was playing in the backyard with my brother, when four or five soldiers armed with self-loading rifles jumped over the hedge. We stood there with our mouths hanging open, and feeling as if we were suddenly in a movie. They took us off for questioning and to check our identities. Once the soldiers had satisfied themselves that we weren’t doing any harm, they marched back to their Saracen armoured car without saying another word. My parents didn’t believe us when we told them what happened that evening. But I’ll never, ever forget it.

As a family, we tried to carry on as normal, but even getting to school safely was a challenge. I don’t think we ever had a week that wasn’t disrupted by the school bus being hijacked, a riot, or a barricade, a powercut or a strike. The area around my school, a Catholic grammar called St Malachy’s, was caught up in some of the worst of the Troubles. This part of town - New Lodge, Lower Shankhill, the Crumlin Road and Ardoyne - was known as the Murder Triangle. But for us children, once we had entered the school building, all talk of politics stopped. It was a place of learning and a place of peace - an oasis, it seemed to me at the time, in a sea of turmoil.

Forty years on, the new Northern Ireland, so different in so many ways, remains much the same underneath. People say, ‘Why talk about the Troubles? Why bring back those memories?’ But I think we have to remember so we never go back there again.

Andrea Catherwood, 40

‘The adults acted like it was a scene from Carry On Up The Khyber’ says Andrea Catherwood

One of my very earliest memories is of my mother’s reaction when she saw me playing barricades on the stairs with my baby brother. She was horrified that we were being ‘affected by the Troubles’. Today, it’s impossible to see how my generation couldn’t have been affected - even defined - by the violence.

Back then, however, there was a belief that it might all be ended by the next political initiative or, failing that, Christmas. Of course, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, no one could have conceived that the Troubles would last as long as they did. I was brought up believing, or at any rate repeating, the mantra that we were not ‘affected by the Troubles’.

We lived in probably the most affluent area in Northern Ireland, a district called Cultra on the North Down coast. We had what was, by any standards, a beautiful family home surrounded by rolling grounds. Our neighbours, both Protestant and Catholic, were mainly barristers, judges and business owners. Yet we were there, as were many of them, because we had left other districts that had become too dangerous.

We’d moved to Cultra after the head office of my father’s business was blown up twice and my uncle’s house burned down. My father had bulletproof glass in the windscreen and driver’s window of his Jaguar, and we were all shown how to check under the car for car bombs, which we did every morning before slinging our hockey bags in the boot and heading off to school.’

‘If you didn’t carry on as normal you were “giving in to terrorism”’says Andrea Catherwood

Much later, when, as a foreign correspondent, I was shown the same checks on a hostile environment course, I was shocked that I’d taken it all so casually as a child. My parents, I now realise, worked hard to protect us from the Troubles. ‘Business as usual’ was a much repeated phrase, as was the idea that if you didn’t carry on as normal you were ‘giving in to terrorism’.

Sometimes, I think the adults around me acted rather like that scene from Carry On Up The Khyber, where everyone is sitting around a dining table passing the port as the cannonballs come crashing down through the ceiling.

All of us who grew up during that time were marked by the Troubles to some degree.

Hatred has a corrosive effect on everyone, not just those most closely touched by it. But we’ve seen acts of bravery and forgiveness too.

I am immensely optimistic about Northern Ireland’s future, more so than many people who live there. I know there are still many hurdles to face and we can’t begin to wipe out the pain of the past, but I have an overriding belief that those who grew up in the Troubles must work towards making sure this hard-won and at times uncomfortable peace doesn’t slip away again.

James Nesbitt, 43

James Nesbitt had a near escape when a bomb destroyed his family’s car

My father was a primary school headmaster from a big working-class Protestant family in Ballymena. When I think of my childhood in Ulster, I remember the happiness of marching through the streets of Belfast on 12 July (the anniversary of the defeat of the Catholic King James in 1690), and the fascination of seeing the British troops’ tanks.

Being a Protestant, I subconsciously knew they were on my side. But now I can see how terrifying it must have been for Catholics. Later, as I grew up, I had friends on both sides, who had lost spouses, children, brothers and sisters, and I felt guilty for not realising all this before.

In 1973, when I was about eight, my father went to pay his car tax at the town hall, leaving my sister and me in the car. We both fell asleep, waking suddenly to the sound of an alarm bell, and a warden shouting at us, ‘There’s a bomb! Quick get out!’ My sister and I immediately went with him, only to turn and see my father fighting his way through the crowd to reach us. I will never forget the look of fear in his eyes.

Then there was a sound like a dull thud.

A bomb had gone off in the car parked next to us. I tried to take in what was happening, but was too young to fully understand. All I noticed was that the eggs my grandmother had given us earlier were still intact in the boot, even though our car had been almost totally destroyed.

Later, when I came to Britain to go to the Central School of Speech and Drama, I hated finding myself described as a ‘Paddy’. It didn’t seem to matter whether I was Protestant or Catholic. We were all just lumped into one category, and an unpopular one at that. That was an eye-opener for me, the idea that British people seemed to understand so little about us.

I salute those men on both sides of the divide who put down their guns and decided to put on suits and go into government. It was a courageous decision, and I think they’d find it hard now to go back to the balaclavas. I may be being naive, but I hope that at last they’ve realised the utter, cruel stupidity of fighting, and killing, over cultural identity.’

Gloria Hunniford, 68

Gloria Hunniford covered the bombings as a young reporter

My family lived in a place called Hillsborough, about 14 or 15 miles outside Belfast.

One evening, in 1969, we were watching the television when we saw the news coverage of British troops arriving in the city after the riots following the marching season. It was hard to take in the enormity of what was happening. Even though the intention of the British government was primarily peaceful, it still felt as if we were being invaded.

As a young reporter, I covered the story of the bombing of the Abercorn restaurant in central Belfast in March 1972. It was full of women and children: two were killed and 139 injured or maimed. It was the first time I’d experienced the aftermath of a bomb at close quarters, and I was absolutely horrified.

The emergency services had just removed the dead and injured when I got there, but all around me were their possessions, leather handbags with their contents spilling out over the road; teddy bears with charred faces - people’s everyday lives broken and tossed aside by the force of the blast. I really felt the futility of the conflict that day - women and children who had become victims, simply because they happened to be out shopping on a Saturday afternoon.

By the time my children, Caron, Paul, and Michael were teenagers, I’d come to believe that there could never be a Peace Agreement because I’d seen it broken too many times.

For the sake of our children, we tried to live as normal a life as possible. But I had to make my children aware that they weren’t allowed to go up certain roads at night and I had to know exactly where they were at all times.

I can’t see Northern Ireland ever going back to a time of violence again. We’ve travelled too far along the road to peace. But no one who went through it will ever totally forget the horror that was on our doorsteps, the tragedy of what happened to our country.

Patrick Kielty, 36

Patrick Kielty was just 16 when his father was shot by loyalist paramilitaries

I was 16 when my father, a prominent Catholic businessman, was killed by Loyalist paramilitaries who burst into his office and shot him.

My memory of the moment I was first told of his death is like trying to remember a car crash. I was putting up posters around the school for Comic Relief when I got a message that the headmaster wanted to see me urgently. I thought I was going to be told off for not asking permission first. But when I got to the school office, one of my father’s business partners was there too. I knew immediately something must be very wrong.

I can’t remember what words they used to tell me my father was dead. All I know is that I didn’t really believe it until I got home to my mother and brothers - I’m the middle child - in Dundrum, Co Down. Then it hit me properly, becoming horribly, terrifyingly real. It was probably the moment I knew I had to grow up, to look after my mother, and to be strong for the rest of the family. In a sense I felt I had to take my father’s place.

I knew he hadn’t done anything wrong. Dad was a businessman in a small village. He employed both sides of the community and was friends with Catholics and Protestants. Even the police issued a statement on the day of his funeral to say he was a totally innocent victim. There were rumours going round at the time that he might have been killed because he’d refused to pay protection money to the paramilitaries.

I still miss my dad today. He was much like me in character - full of life and fun and laughter. He wouldn’t have wanted my life to be blighted by his death. But I do wish that he’d lived to see my successes, my house and my lovely family. His loss is not one that can ever be replaced.


‘I still miss my dad today. He was much like me in character’: Patrick Kielty (centre) at his father’s funeral

Four years after my father died I was working as a stand-up telling jokes about the conflict. In a sense that was my way of fighting back. I didn’t start doing comedy because of my father’s death, but it did give me a licence to make jokes against that backdrop of continuing violence. No one could tell me I didn’t know what I was talking about after my father was killed. But mine was not the only family in Northern Ireland to lose a husband or a father.

At the time of the Good Friday Agreement in 1998, I got a call from Britain’s Northern Ireland Secretary Mo Mowlam to say, ‘The men who murdered your dad are going to be allowed to walk free.’ By then I’d met Mo and become friends with her. But I knew it wasn’t a courtesy call. She wasn’t asking, but telling me kindly that this was going to happen whether I liked it or not.

I realised I had to look at the bigger picture then, convince myself that if this was for the good of my country, I had to forget my personal grief and take a leap of faith that Mo was doing the right thing in releasing these men. She was. There are children growing up here now who don’t remember British troops on the streets, and who are more used to Starbucks and sushi bars than sectarian violence. It will take a generation, but I do believe the peace will last. Those who did grow up with the violence have a more jaundiced view because they still look at the city and remember places where bombs went off, and relatives were killed.

Barry McGuigan, 47

Barry McGuigan found that Catholics and Protestants became united as sports fans, offering hope for Ireland’s future

My family came from Clones, Co Monaghan, a small town just over the border into the Republic. But it was in the North, ironically, that I made my name as a boxer.

One of my first big fights was in a Loyalist working men’s club in the Shankhill Road, at that time known as a killing zone for Catholics. But extraordinarily, the Loyalist Ulster Defence Force not only guaranteed my safety but even provided me with a personal escort.

After that first fight, the Loyalists formed a Barry McGuigan Supporters Club, making me welcome in Belfast, from the age of 15, in areas where Catholics would normally have been too terrified to set foot. That had a profound effect on me, giving me a feeling in the ring that I could be a representative of the possibility of a united Ireland.

In London, in 1985, I became World Featherweight Champion, but of far more importance to me personally was the fact that my homecoming to Belfast was welcomed by Protestant and Catholic fans alike. I remember thinking that if they could come together through sport, then there was hope for the future and the prospect of a peaceful Ireland.

My insistence on remaining non-sectarian also enabled me to marry my wife, Sandra, a Protestant, the same year, whereas another Catholic might have received abuse.

But the bitterness was set to get worse before it got better. I’ll never forget going into a restaurant five years later, in a mainly Loyalist area of Belfast, with my wife and eldest son, Blain, who was then about two. There was a family sitting next to us with a boy of a similar age. The two boys started sparring about who had the best car. Then, suddenly, I heard the other boy say triumphantly, ‘Well, my daddy’s a Protestant.’ My son turned to me and asked plaintively, ‘What’s a Protestant, Daddy?’

I didn’t say anything to the other family, but I was deeply shocked that a child so young could have already inherited such prejudice. Since then, I’ve continued to believe that the key to lasting peace is through integrated education. Only by growing up together will young Catholics and Protestants ever learn to accept one another, free of the mistrust and suspicion we’ve lived with for so long.

The Troubles I’ve Seen, ITV1, 27 October.

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Jay of onefinejay.com