By William Graham Political Correspondent
Irish News
20/01/2009
THE Stormont assembly passed a DUP motion yesterday which said that the number of government departments should be reduced – in a bid to free up cash for front-line services.
An SDLP amendment, which said that a new Assembly standing committee should be set up to focus on controlling the cost of government, was defeated by 43 votes to 13.
The main DUP motion, which proposed cutting the number of departments from 11 to six or seven, was supported by the UUP and Alliance and passed on a voice vote.
The party said the move would “reduce duplication and release much-needed cash for frontline services”.
Sinn Fein abstained from both the amendment and main motion.
Introducing the debate the DUP’s Simon Hamilton said the number of departments, 11, was utterly disproportionate to the 1.7m population in Northern Ireland.
He pointed out that Scotland, with a much larger population of five million, had reduced their departments from nine to six.
Also Mr Hamilton contended that frustrated community groups are having to consult with as many as seven government departments before getting the go-ahead for projects here.
In addition he claimed that businesses and developers are also being entangled in reams of red tape due to the inflated size of government.
SDLP leader Mark Durkan said the DUP proposal was limited and claimed the issue of efficiency was not just about the number of departments.
He proposed an amendment seeking the establishment of a standing committee to examine the overall cost of government and calling on the First and Deputy First Minister to bring forward proposals to streamline the administration.
“We need to make sure that we are constantly controlling and curbing the cost of government itself to make sure the system isn’t consuming money and resources and dedicated time and talent that could be much better deployed on front line services,” he said.
The executive has already committed itself to the rationalisation of the departmental structure in the programme of government and the ongoing review of public administration.
Sinn Fein members abstained from the vote on the motion, with Caral Ni Chuilin claiming it was based on the premise that the number of departments should be reduced and therefore prejudged the outcome of a review on the government system.
Her party colleague Paul Maskey also contended that the DUP motion was like putting the cart before the horse.
Ulster Unionist deputy leader Danny Kennedy said, while his party backed efforts to cut bureaucracy, he questioned the timing of the DUP motion, coming as it did 24 hours before the Assembly is to debate DUP/Sinn Fein- backed proposals to create a 12th department for policing and justice.
“There is an apparent contradiction and it may well be an example of woolly thinking behind this motion because some may think that this motion is simply a headline grabber,” he said.
The Alliance Party backed the DUP proposal but Stephen Farry questioned how much it would actually save.
“Without doubt reducing the number of government departments will produce a degree of financial saving, I don’t think anyone will argue with that but I think the scale of the saving is overstated.’’
How the different parties voted
By Diana Rusk
MOST assembly members agree with a DUP proposal to cut the number of government departments in the Stormont Executive, according to the results of a survey.
The research by public affairs group Stratagem also shows elected representatives are prepared to dramatically reduce their own number in the Assembly.
Northern Ireland is currently being run by 11 government departments with 108 assembly members.
Of 41 members surveyed, over half (56 per cent) said they wanted the departments cut from 11 to six or seven – the number being mooted by the DUP.
Just under a quarter (23 per cent) agreed they should be cut but less dramatically to eight or nine departments.
The remainder of the respondents, 13 per cent, thought the present number was ideal.
Assembly members also appear keen to reduce their own number in Stormont meaning assembly elections would become more competitive.
Of those surveyed, 43 per cent said they wanted the number of members reduced to between 61 and 80 members. Around 39 per cent wanted the number cut to 81-100 members while just 16 per cent thought there should be over 100 elected representatives.
Mark Shepherd, of Stratagem, said the survey showed politicians had come to realise that Assembly was being hindered by unnecessary “bureaucracy” and was “over politicised”.
“It is appropriate to realise we are moving to a situation where there is less need for political representation from every group.”