Irish Republican Information Service (no. 121)
RSF news - Republican Sinn Fein - http://rsf.ie
Teach Dáithí Ó Conaill, 223 Parnell Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
Phone: +353-1-872 9747; FAX: +353-1-872 9757; e-mail: saoirse@iol.ie
Date: 10 Iúil / July 2009
Internet resources maintained by SAOIRSE-Irish Freedom
In this issue:
1. Raids on homes in Belfast
2. Republicans claim ‘hourly’ harassment
3. RUC/PSNI accused of “naked sectarian policing”
4. Loyalist attacks increase
5. Hoax bomb warnings lead to road traffic chaos.
6. Plea for support for striking electricians.
7. So who did kill Rosemary Nelson?
8. Drumcree Orange parade again banned from Garvaghy Road
9. Press Statement from the Peace & Neutrality Alliance (PANA)
10. Statement from the National Platform EU Research and Information Centre
11. Break-in at Castlereagh RUC/PSNI barracks
12. Criminal Justice (Amendment) Bill 2009 passed in Leinster House
13. Press release from Free Gaza Movement [edited]
14. Between the lines
1. Raids on homes in Belfast
IN a statement on June 8 Republican Sinn Féin Belfast condemned the raids in homes of Republicans
“RSF Belfast would like to condemn without reservation the raids by the
RUC/PSNI on nationals homes in the greater Belfast area today [June 8}.
“Doors of homes were kicked in and children terrorised by the heavy handed attitude of the British occupation forces.
“Computers, mobile phones, personal effects and articles of clothing were also taken in some of the houses pictures were removed from the walls”.
2. Republicans claim ‘hourly’ harassment
A DERRY solicitor, Paddy MacDermott, claimed that the RUC/PSNI are stopping and searching people based solely on their political views after several people complained to him that they were getting stopped and searched by the police on “an hourly basis” under the British Terrorism Act.
“It would appear that this is part of a concerted campaign targeted at people for their political views,” he said.
Several members of the 32 County Sovereignty Movement (32CSM) also contacted the Derry Journal to say that they had been stopped and searched under the Terrorism Act.
One member, Paddy McDaid, said he was searched by the RUC/PSNI while holding his three year-old child in his arms.
Gary Donnelly also said he and his 16 year-old daughter (who has been stopped and searched herself on another occasion) were searched while the teenager was pushing a child in a pram along the quay. He also said he had been stopped “on several occasions” while his children were present.
Michael Gallagher said he has been stopped several times in recent days, said the incidents are part of a “renewed effort to harass Republicans”.
3. RUC/PSNI accused of “naked sectarian policing”
THE RUC/PSNI was accused of “naked sectarian policing” after members in Coleraine allegedly facilitated the erection of loyalist flags close to the scene of the sectarian murder of nationalist Kevin McDaid during a Belfast High Court bail application on June 3 for Peter Neill.
Barrister Kieran Mallon told the court that facilitating the erection of the flags so close to the murder scene in the Heights area of the town “did not do the credit of the PSNI any good.”
He said: “The RUC/PSNI were in riot gear to facilitate the erection of these emblems. Members of the nationalist community in the area found the emblems offensive and all the more because of recent events”.
It was alleged in the High Court that three of the men questioned in connection with the murder and attempted murder were helping to erect the Orange flags and that some of the loyalists began to chant “Kevin McDaid Fenian b*****d”.
Peter Neill, a relative of Kevin McDaid, was arrested by the RUC/PSNI for allegedly shouting “Orange b*****ds, you’re not wanted here, we don’t want your f***ing flags” at the loyalists. He was remanded in custody and charged with incitement to hatred and behaviour likely to stir up hatred.
Kieran Mallon told the court that before his arrest Peter Neill had asked the British Colonial police if it would be illegal to take down the flags. He was allegedly told it would not be, but that it would breach the peace. Kieran Mallon said his client questioned was it not also a breach of the peace to enter a nationalist area to put up flags.
“Mr Neill says this is political policing at its worst. He said it is naked sectarian policing,” said Kieran Mallon.
He added: “The police facilitated a large group of loyalists to enter a known nationalist area with a cherry picker to erect these flags, some metres away from a sectarian murder.
Mr Justice Treacy granted bail on certain conditions, including that Peter Neill “is not allowed to reside in Coleraine and must adhere to a strict curfew”.
4. Loyalist attacks increase
FEARS that loyalists were intent on whipping up tensions in the lead up to the marching season were heightened during the last week of June after Catholic homes were targeted in sectarian attacks, paramilitary flags were erected near mixed areas and sinister graffiti appeared warning Catholics to stay out of council run parks.
Homes and cars were damaged when a gang of around 15 youths from the loyalist Tigers Bay area of Belfast went on the rampage in Atlantic Avenue and Newington Avenue on Saturday morning. The front window of a house was smashed and car wing mirrors and windscreens were shattered by the mob.
Anti-Catholic graffiti had to be removed from a wall of Grove Playing Fields clubhouse and in Alexandra Park Avenue by Belfast City Council. The graffiti warned Catholics to “use their own park” and said ‘All Taigs Are Targets’.
UVF flags were erected at the bottom of Fortwilliam Park close to the loyalist Mount Vernon estate. A Union Jack and an Ulster flag were also flying on the entrance gate to the mixed avenue and in the centre of Glengormley the Orange Arch is festooned with Union Jacks.
At the beginning of July the North Belfast News revealed that up to 300 loyalist band supporters converged in Glengormley for the opening of the Orange arch and hurled sectarian abuse at children and young people playing football on a green in the mainly nationalist Church Road area.
On the night of July 9 GAA club houses and Catholic Churches and headstones were damaged in sectarian attacks. In Ahogill, Co Antrim a car was burned out in the carpark of the St Mary’s GAA club after the gates were rammed open. Many Catholic families have fled the village of Aoghill over the years due to intimidation ans sectarian attacks. In 2005 the RUC issued Catholic residents with fire blankets and smoke alarms such was the level loyalist intimidation.
Churches in Ballymena (2), Ahogill, Cullebackey and Portglenone were damaged with paint bombs and a GAA mural in Dunloy was also damaged with paint.
In Belfast Orange Halls on the Whitewell Road and Upper Dunmurry Lane were targeted with paint bombs.
Huge bonfires are built all across the Six Counties with sectarian slogans hanging from many of them.
5. Hoax bomb warnings lead to road traffic chaos.
A series of hoax bomb warnings in Belfast and Derry led to chaos and widespread disruption on July 10.
Traffic was diverted from Albert bridge, Donegall Road and York Street in Belfast and a suspect car was examined at the Cityside retail park off York Street. Another car was examined in south Belfast but nothing was found.
In Derry Craigavon Bridge was closed while a van was examined on the lower deck. A suspicious object was also found in the grounds of Strabane RUC station.
6. Plea for support for striking electricians.
OPEN letter to Mr Des Derwin, President Dublin Council of Trade Unions on July 7, 2009 from Paddy Healy, Dublin Colleges Branch TUI
“I know that you will understand that the strike action mounted by TEEU is of the greatest importance to all Irish workers.
“TEEU is the first union to stand up to the attempt by the employers to use the recession to drive down pay and conditions across the economy by mounting an indefinite strike. If the electricians are defeated, employers and government will go on to devastate pay and conditions in both public and private sectors.
“As a first step in support of our colleagues, I believe that all Trades Councils should hold public rallies in support of the strikers in their local areas. Support committees should be set up. Please call a special meeting of Dublin Trades Council to support the strike”.
On July 10 it was agreed that both side in the dispute would go to arbitration.
7. So who did kill Rosemary Nelson?
The Guardian July 4, 2009.
The public inquiry into the 1999 murder of a Belfast human rights lawyer is now preparing its report. It’s findings could be explosive.
The public inquiry into the assassination a decade ago of the human rights lawyer Rosemary Nelson was about to open its doors in a blank Belfast office block to witnesses last year when a new story began to circulate. It abandoned the theory accepted by virtually everyone close to the case - that [Rosemary] Nelson’s killers were probably a Belfast bomb-maker and veteran mid-Ulster loyalists, including people who had been British agents and a serving member of the British army.
Instead, the inquiry, chaired by Sir Michael Morland, was encouraged to believe that one of Nelson’s own clients, a former IRA prisoner called Colin Duffy, had in fact been responsible.
People who had campaigned for the inquiry began to wonder whether they’d made a mistake - was Nelson herself going to be impugned for the company she kept, the clients she represented in several high-profile cases that allegedly attracted RUC death threats? Was she going to be blamed for her own death?
This new theory - promoted by a high-level RUC source - offered an attractive alternative to collusion. The inquiry seemed obsessed by Rosemary Nelson’s motives and morals. But by the time the inquiry closed in June - it is now preparing its report - the focus had shifted on to an RUC culture which could have made her murderers feel safe to kill.
Everybody knew Rosemary Nelson’s life was at risk long before a bomb exploded under her car in 1998. She had had many death threats, but had been refused RUC protection. She was murdered a week before the publication of a report into allegations that members of the RUC had told her clients she’d soon be dead.
What no one had known, however, was that while the RUC itself was under scrutiny, special branch, MI5 and the British intelligence services had been spying on her. Between 1994-1998 security reports on Rosemary Nelson’s private and public life accelerated until, in the summer of 1998, an application for a warrant to put a bugging device in her property went to Mo Mowlam, then British Northern Ireland (sic) secretary. It troubled Mowlam, but she sanctioned it.
Rosemary Nelson, it appeared, was perceived as an enemy of the British state rather than a citizen entitled to its protection. The evidence has stunned the three previous inquiries - costing millions of pounds - into alleged collusion in Rosemary Nelson’s killing. They had all been told lies,that no intelligence file or files exist on Rosemary Nelson.
“That was an untruth,” says a furious source close to the murder investigation headed by Colin Port, now chief constable of Avon and Somerset police.
During her inquiry into complaints that the British state had failed to act on death threats, Nuala O’Loan, the first Six-County British police ombudsman, asked for intelligence files on Rosemary Nelson. She had “absolutely no doubt” that they never saw those files.
In 2003, in his report into emblematic cases, Peter Cory, a retired Canadian supreme court judge, concluded that there was prima facie evidence of collusion. He asked, but was given no “documents pertaining to the request for a warrant or the intelligence file on Rosemary Nelson”.
Rosemary Nelson was one of scores of lawyers in the Six Counties who endured RUC harassment but, according to Rory Phillips, counsel to the current inquiry, none had transformed that occupational hazard into a protest. Rosemary Nelson, “unusually if not uniquely” lodged formal complaints, taking her case to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), the UN and the US, and encouraging her clients to do the same.
By the summer of 1998 Rosemary Nelson was already a hate figure as a result of her involvement in three cases: Duffy’s; that of Robert Hamill, a nationalist kicked to death by loyalists while members of the RUC watched; and her work as legal adviser to the Garvaghy Road Residents’ Association which opposed the Orangemen’s annual Drumcree march.
Then the Brtitish state forces went on the offensive. On 10 July 1998, the IPCC had warned Mo Mowlam that the RUC’s own inquiry into its members alleged death threats against her was unsatisfactory. This was unprecedented - Chief Constable Ronnie Flanagan was incandescent.
RUC Special branch drafted the warrant to install a bugging device. In a bullish testimony, the assistant chief constable, Chris Albiston claimed that Rosemary Nelson fabricated IRA alibis, worked to a “paramilitary agenda”, and used her position to gather evidence about members of the RUC. However, Phillips noted that the RUC had provided no evidence to all this.
By the end of July British forces were warned of dire risks attached to the warrant: there would have been a backlash if it ever got out that RUC special branch was spying on Rosemary Nelson while it was accused of threatening her. And Mowlam’s approval of this breach of lawyer-client confidentiality could damage her position in the so-called peace process.
What was Chief Constable Flanagan’s role? During the Drumcree crisis, he described Rosemary Nelson as an “immoral woman”, David Watkins, the Six-County director of policing and security told the inquiry. Flanagan denied this. Indeed he denied knowing - or believing - that [ Rosemary Nelson was anything other than a lawyer doing her job, until he was confronted by the warrant. His denials have confounded many observers, “either he didn’t know what special branch was doing, or he is lying,” commented Martin O’Brien, former director of CAJ, the Six-County’s leading human rights organisation, “and neither of those options is palatable”. Why, he wondered, was all this coming out now?
A clue comes from Phillips’ closing speech to the tribunal. In summer 1998 “arguably the most important moments in the chronology” converged, Phillips said. The RUC claimed their real target was her republican clients, yet the “focus is entirely on Rosemary Nelson”.
Philips ventured that the intelligence revealed an RUC “attitude that was all of a piece”: Rosemary Nelson was “someone over whom it would not be worth taking any great trouble”. Despite years of surveillance there was no intelligence on the threats against her. Working with the RUC felt like “wading through treacle while treading on eggshells” Port told the inquiry.
Though much evidence about the suspects was in camera, Phillips drew attention to the security Operation Fagotto around Rosemary Nelson’s home the weekend before her death. It transmitted messages that her car was parked outside. Why? Loyalists were sighted before and after her death - but not followed up. Why?
There has always been an eerie code of silence about Rosemary Nelson’s death. Despite Port’s “outstanding” stings, said Phillips, the suspects had not spoken. But they had consistently uttered one mantra: “It was the government that did it.”
8. Drumcree Orange parade again banned from Garvaghy Road
THE Annual Drumcree parade was once again refused permission by the Parades Commission to parade down the nationalist Garvaghy Road area of Portadown, Co Armagh on July 5. They have been refused permission since 1998 but thousands of Orangemen have attempted to force their way down the road every year since. Many nationalists have been injured in serious clashes with the RUC (in riot gear flanked by dozens of land rovers) who defend the Orangemen.
Gerry Adams met with representatives of Portadown Orangemen to discuss the parade it was reported on June 25, a day before the Parades Commission banned the march from returning to Portadown town centre along the Garvaghy Road.
9. Press Statement from the Peace & Neutrality Alliance (PANA)
The Peace and Neutrality Alliance condemns the decision of the government (26-County Administration) to spend a massive amount of money sending postcards to all households on the so called legal guarantees the government intends to add as a Protocol to some treaty sometime in the future.
Roger Cole, Chair of PANA said on July 6:
“In a debate in the Dáil, Minister Martin said PANA had been looking for a Protocol and then when we achieved it, still opposed the treaty. Quite simply either Minister Martin is stupid or is very badly informed, and in PANA’s view he is not stupid, therefore he can only be very badly informed.
“PANA, since our formation in 1996 has sought a Protocol similar to that achieved by the Danish people that excludes them from paying for or involvement with the process of the militarisation of the EU. Recent public opinion polls in Denmark showed that the Danish people wished to retain their Protocol.
“The Minister however is now about to spend a massive amount of money sending postcards to all households telling them about Protocols that do not exclude Ireland from paying for or involvement with the militarisation of the EU. In any democratic society the media would at least inform people of the truth about PANA’s clearly defined position on the kind of Protocol they sought, especially as the two TSN/MRBI polls held in May and June 2008 showed that concerns over Irish Neutrality was one of the major reasons why the people voted NO to the Lisbon Treaty. The government destroyed the National Forum on Europe to prevent democratic debate and the bulk of the corporate media by refusing to report the truth are colluding with this attack on democracy.”
10. Statement from the National Platform EU Research and Information Centre
Thursday 2 July 2009
The Dáil and Seanad should insist on parliamentary control over the Taoiseach and
Government Ministers in exercising the self-amending powers of the Lisbon Treaty, just as the German Constitutional Court requires the German Parliament to do.
Ireland should not be content with a lesser standard of parliamentary control of Government Ministers than Germany if the Lisbon Treaty should be ratified.
The Government should make provision for Oireachtas control of Lisbon’s self-amending powers in legislation accompanying the Lisbon Treaty Referendum Bill.
Otherwise not only the people, but the Dail and Seanad, would be agreeing to give extraordinary powers to Ministers if the Lisbon Treaty should come into force.
The Simplified Treaty Revision Procedure proposed by Lisbon (Art.48.7, amended Treaty on European Union) would permit the Prime Ministers and
Presidents on the European Council to shift European Union decision-taking from unanimity to qualified majority voting in most of the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union (TFEU), as long as they agreed this unanimously amongst themselves.
This could apply, for example, to the Treaty article dealing with harmonising indirect taxes (Art.113 TFEU), where unanimity is currently required
Lisbon also has several “bridge articles” or “ratchet-clauses”, which would allow the European Council to switch from unanimity to majority voting in certain specified areas, such as judicial cooperation in civil matters (Art.81.3 TFEU), in criminal matters (Art.83.1 TFEU), in relation to the EU Public Prosecutor (Art.86.4 TFEU) and the Multiannual financial framework (Art.312.2 TFEU).
While the Lisbon Treaty provides that National Parliaments have to be notified of shifts from unanimity to qualified majority voting in some, though not all, of these cases, National Parliaments are not required to give their formal agreement.
The Taoiseach and Government Ministers would be able therefore to exercise these powers without proper parliamentary control.
Of concern also is the enlarged scope of the “Flexibility Clause” (Art.352 TFEU), whereby if the Treaty does not provide the necessary powers to enable the Union attain its very wide objectives, the Council of Ministers may take appropriate measures by unanimity.
The Lisbon Treaty would extend this provision from the area of operation of theCommon Market, where it operates at present, to all of the new
Union’s policies directed at attaining its much wider post-Lisbon objectives. The Flexibility Clause has been widely used to extend EU law-making over the years. The consent of National Parliaments is not required for Government Ministers to use it.
As the judgement of the German Constitutional Court states (par. 414): “To the extent that the general bridging procedure pursuant to Article 48.7(3)TEU Lisbon and the special bridging clause pursuant to Article 81.3(3) TFEU grant the national parliaments a right to make known their opposition, this is not a sufficient equivalent to the requirement of ratification. It is therefore necessary that the representative of the German Government in the European Council or in the Council may only approve the draft Resolution if empowered to do so by the German Bundestag and Bundesrat within a period yet to be determined …”
And again: ” …the silence of the Bundestag and the Bundesrat may not be construed as approval.” (par. 416)
As things stand, Ireland’s Dail and Seanad will be expected to remain silent while Irish Government Ministers exercise these extraordinary new powers at EU level in a post-Lisbon EU - unless legislation comparable to what Germany’s Constitutional Court proposes makes their actions subject to parliamentary approval in advance, and subject indirectly to the approval of Ireland’s citizens.
On Tuesday the German Constitutional Court ruled that ratification of the Lisbon Treaty would only be constitutional for Germany if parliamentary control - and indirectly citizens’ control - over German Government Ministers operating at EU level were instituted in these “self-amending: Treaty areas as well as in certain other areas mentioned.
This should also be done in Ireland.
Web-site: nationalplatform.org
11. Break-in at Castlereagh RUC/PSNI barracks
ACCORDING to a report on June 3, the case against a former chef sought in connection with a 2002 break-in at Castlereagh has collapsed suddenly. The Six-County Prosecution Service announced that Larry Zaitschek can no longer be prosecuted because of the emergence of new evidence concerning the break-in at Castlereagh RUC/PSNI barracks where Larry Zaitschek worked in the canteen when three intruders breached security on St Patrick’s Day 2002.
A US citizen, Larry Zaitschek who returned to America in the aftermath, was sought in connection with the break-in, although he denied involvement and resisted attempts to extradite him.
It later emerged that Larry Zaitschek had known Denis Donaldson. The senior Provo figure was later exposed as an informer and was shot at an isolated cottage in Co Donegal, where he had been living.
The Six-County Public Prosecution Service (PPS) said the test for prosecution in his case was no longer met and released a statement which stated among other points:
“After the original decision for prosecution had been taken, new information came to the attention of the PPS through the chief constable.
“The chief constable has now confirmed that he is not in a position to make this information available for the purposes of disclosure.
“In those circumstances, the PPS has concluded that the test for prosecution is no longer met…”
The RUC also issued a statement: “Despite the efforts of the PSNI, we are not in a position to make available all the relevant material to PPS for the purposes of disclosure..” [edited]
Brian Rowan (Brian Rowan is a former Security Editor for BBC Northern Ireland and a regular contributor to the Belfast Telegraph ) wrote on Saturday, July 4 said that a source in the RUC told him: “PIRA did it. We know who did Castlereagh - how they did it”.
“They also know how the [Provisional] IRA covered its tracks - destroying a number of mobile phones used on the night of the robbery by chopping them into pieces and dumping them down a drain in west Belfast.
“Information taken from room 220 in the police complex was moved across the border. It contained many secrets, including the codenames of Special Branch agents. This was the most embarrassing security breach in the history of the conflict - the [Provisional] IRA had been able to walk the corridors of Castlereagh and get inside the door of the “source handling unit”.
A detective, explaining the significance of the office, told him the day after the story of Castlereagh broke: “If you are an SB tout you ring into 220.”
The Provisionals now had “a list of Special Branch officers and their telephone numbers and had also taken the log of “addresses of interest” - addresses of interest to the Special Branch right across Belfast”.
An RUC member on duty in the room where sensitive information was kept was overpowered and the intruders escaped with dozens of files. Millions of pounds were spent re-housing RUC personnel and others whose security was compromised.
12. Criminal Justice (Amendment) Bill 2009 passed in Leinster House
LEGISLATION expanding the role of the Special non-jury court in Dublin to deal with ‘gangland crime’ was passed by a substantial majority in Leinster House on July 10. The Criminal Justice (Amendment) Bill 2009 was carried by 118 votes to 23.
During the debate on the Bill Minister for Justice Dermot Ahern maintained that the objections of 133 criminal lawyers to the Bill (Irish Times July
“would ultimately prove to be unfounded”.
The lawyers said that “While there are many aspects of the Bill that cause real and serious concern the most pressing are as follows: The abolition of jury trial for a range of new offences; the use of opinion evidence from any garda as to the existence of a criminal organisation; the failure to require that the garda opinion evidence be corroborated; the provision for secret hearings to extend detentions without the presence of the suspect or their lawyer..
“The United Nations Human Rights Committee has already condemned the inequality of similar provisions as it applies to existing offences but now it is proposed that we widen the net of those accused who are to be denied the right to a jury trial”.
Human Rights agencies also expressed serious concerns at the scope of the legislation and the lack of debate prior to rushing it through before the summer recess. The Irish Human Rights Commission, itself a state body, described several provisions as ‘disproportionate and unnecessary’ on the day they launched its 2008 Annual Report on July 9.
The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) slammed the controversial ‘gangland bill’ as “bogus” because it completely neglects the rights of witnesses and victims of violent crime.
Speaking in Limerick, Mr Mark Kelly, Director of the ICCL, said:
“This is a bogus bill, which does nothing to tackle the serious problem of the intimidation of witnesses or to improve the lives of victims of violent crime.
“Secret detention hearings, special courts and unlawful detentions on the word of a low-ranking guard will not help crime victims or the families of people slain by violent thugs.
“Dermot Ahern’s proposals most probably breach the Constitution, but they certainly violate the trust of victims of crime and their families, to whom he has promised effective action”. (See also Irish Times OPINION, July 10).
13. Press release from Free Gaza Movement [edited]
(Israel attacks justice boat; kidnaps human rights workers; confiscates medicine, toys and olive trees 23 miles off the coast of Gaza).
TODAY [June 30] Israeli Occupation Forces attacked and boarded the Free Gaza Movement boat, The Spirit of Humanity, abducting 21 human rights workers from 11 countries [including Ireland].
“This is an outrageous violation of international law against us. Our boat was not in Israeli waters, and we were on a human rights mission to the Gaza Strip”, said Cynthia McKinney, a former US Congresswoman.
“According to an International Committee of the Red Cross report released on June 29, the Palestinians living in Gaza are trapped in despair. Thousands of Palestinians whose homes were destroyed earlier during Israel’s December/January massacre are still without shelter despite pledges of almost $4.5 billion in aid, because Israel refuses to allow cement and other building material into the Gaza Strip. The report also notes that hospitals are struggling to meet the needs of their patients due to Israel’s disruption of medical supplies.
“The aid we were carrying is a symbol of hope for the people of Gaza, hope that the sea route would open for them, and they would be able to transport their own materials to begin to reconstruct the schools, hospitals and thousands of homes destroyed during the onslaught of “Cast Lead”.
Just before being kidnapped by Israel, Huwaida Arraf, Free Gaza Movement chairperson and delegation co-coordinator on this voyage, stated that:
“No one could possibly believe that our small boat constitutes any sort of threat to Israel. “We carry medical and reconstruction supplies, and children’s toys. Our boat was searched and received a security clearance by Cypriot Port Authorities before we departed, and at no time did we ever approach Israeli waters.
On July 1, the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC), organized a picket at the GPO in Dublin in support of those kidnapped and arrested who were on board the boat ‘Spirit of Humanity’ on June 30. Two are Irish citizens, Mairead Corrigan Maguire and skipper of the Free Gaza boat Derek Graham.
IPSC spokesperson Freda Hughes, addressing the crowd, said: “.we must remember that despite this particular outrage, this is part of an ongoing brutal siege on Gaza, which in turn is merely one facet of Israel’s slow and deliberate ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.”
“In order for the Irish public to effect positive change in regard to the unjust occupation of Palestine, our most effective course of action is to adopt a policy of complete economic, cultural, sporting and academic boycott of Israel. The Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign has been to the forefront of the campaign for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions,” Ms Hughes concluded.
Related Link: http://www.ipsc.ie
On July 7 both Mairead Corrigan Maguire and Derek Graham were deported from Israel back to Ireland.
14. Between the lines
Vincent Browne, July 5, 2009, Sunday Business Post.
We have a seriously dysfunctional society.
We became a hugely rich country over the last 15 years, yet nearly one million people live on incomes that most of us readers of The Sunday Business Post would consider penury.
We have institutionalised queue-jumping. Sick people in urgent need of medical care who have been in the queue for months are leapfrogged by others, not because the others are in more urgent need, but because they have money.
We have de-socialised hundreds of thousands of young people because they live in impoverished, vandalised and criminalised communities without hope. We have de-socialised hundreds of thousands of rich kids who believe they are superior beings because they happen to come from rich homes. And we have consolidated that de-socialisation via an apartheid system in health, education and social class.
Our political culture and political system is also dysfunctional.
We have had a government in office for the last 12 years that has wantonly destroyed an economy that had recovered at last from the legacy of colonialism through the dynamism of our people and through good fortune.
Now, that boom has collapsed, inequality is embedded in society, and we are in the midst of a crisis that may destroy for generations the basis of a reasonably prosperous and cohesive society.
It is made worse by an initiative which could be fatal: the blanket guarantee to the banks, which may cost in excess of 20 billion. That 20 billion is a penalty for the dysfunctional society that permitted a few financial institutions to assume such commanding unaccountable power that, when their recklessness imperilled their solvency, the rest of society was required to rescue them at enormous cost.
Shortly, more than half a million people will be out of jobs and perhaps a million and a half adults and children will suffer poverty and despair as a consequence. This arises largely from the recklessness of government policy, apart from the global crisis.
What is even more dispiriting is that not one of the main political parties here - Fianna Fail, Fine Gael, the Green Party and Labour - raised a cheep of protest against the policies that drove us into this crisis (or even proposed policies that would have made it even worse).None of them objected to the pro-cyclical fiscal policy, and several of them wanted ever more stimulus for the housing bubble. None of them is proposing any measures that would alter the relationship of wealth, power and influence. They simply want to revert to the dysfunctional society we had pre-crisis.
You would have thought that this would be an opportunity for the left-wing to campaign for a fairer and more equal society, on the basis of specific and plausible policies that would win popular support. But, for the most part, the left has responded with blather, cliche and waffle.
An attempt towards a left agenda - Ireland’s Economic Crash: A Radical Agenda for Change - has been published recently by UCD sociologist Kieran Allen. Its tone, in part, is shrill, and there is the depressingly predictable quotient of jargon and cliche, but there are also some good analysis and specifics.
Allen’s proposals on how we might shape a better society include:
(i) abandon last September’s guarantee to the banks;
(ii) start a major public works programme to create jobs;
(iii) appropriate Ireland’s natural resources;
(iv) redistribute wealth through taxation and/or confiscation.
Abandonment of the banks’ guarantee is just posturing. In my view, the guarantee should not have been given but, now that it has, the consequences of reneging on it would be disastrous. We need to borrow around 50 billion from the world’s financial markets in the next few years just to keep the country ticking over.
If we were to abandon the guarantee to the banks, we would find it almost impossible to raise this money. Alternatively, the interest payments on borrowings would be penal. The major public works programme is an idea though.
Much of our environment is derelict and needs renovation. We need new schools and community centres, and we need to build facilities for old and young people. Investment in these, particularly in community initiatives, would help to revive communities and the community solidarity which the Celtic tiger debilitated so spectacularly.
The stuff about natural resources - Allen says they are worth ?400 billion - is pie in the sky, a fantasy. Allen refers to a report by the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, which, he said, noted a potential 10 billion barrels of oil offshore, valued at around 450 billion. I asked the department about this report and they responded that the 10 billion figure related to ‘potential’ reserves which might or might not exist.
They said hundreds of exploration wells could be required to find the oil. Bearing in mind that only two or three exploration wells are typically drilled offshore Ireland each year (only one this year), the discovery of such quantities of oil (where extraction was feasible) would require a very dramatic increase in exploration activity.
By the way, the document in question is not available to the public, only to the industry and at a cost of 25,000 per copy. So wealth redistribution is where it is at. People earning over 80,000 a year pay only 27 per cent of their income in tax, according to information in a written answer by Brian Lenihan, the Minister for
Finance, to a Parliamentary Question by Joan Burton on November 4 last.
There are 258,000 people in that bracket; they earn in total 29 billion, and they pay just 7.8 billion in tax. If they (ie us) were to pay 42 per cent of our income in tax, the tax would be 12 billion. That is more than 4 billion extra, almost enough to meet the targets the government has set on correcting the fiscal deficit next year. No need for social welfare cuts or cuts in education or health. It would also be the beginnings of the creation of a fairer society.
The left should get its act together. Now is the time to create a different and better society.
ENDS


Up to a dozen families have fled the north Antrim village in recent years because of loyalist intimidation, community workers said yesterday.
Two Belfast thugs with loyalist paramilitary connections have been warned to expect lengthy jail sentences after being convicted of plotting a terrifying armed robbery in England during which a blind man was attacked.
The police relied on detailed analysis of the men’s phones and CCTV images from Deacons and the Academy to put Grogan and Calderwood in the frame over the raid at 3.20am on October 22 last year.

'So venceremos, beidh bua againn eigin lá eigin. Sealadaigh abú.'
--Bobby Sands